Listen to the exact words in the exact books Democrats want in our public school libraries

Not only were the quotes Senator Kennedy read extremely disturbing to be included in a school library for ANY age and certainly 100% disgusting and unacceptable for prepubescent kids, before the video ended he was saying that 'random' parents should not be allowed to object to it. That is even more alarming, reprehensible and unacceptable.

What in the hell is a random parent? I guarantee you the interpretation will be that ANY parent who objects to that will be 'random' and therefore will have no voice to object.
The book isn't in libaries for prepubescent kids... It is for 15yrs+... I suppose senator Kennedy didn't say that...

Amazon product ASIN 0374312710
This is an multiple award winning book about being black and queer in America...
 
Nope, you're talking about restricting the access of my children. You're welcome to restrict the access of your children but leave mine to me.

What kind of sick, fucked-up, short-eyed pervert thinks that any children need access to this sort of fucked-up pornography?

That's not really, the right question to ask, why children need access to this shit.

The right question to ask is why some fucked-up perverts want to give children access to this shit. And when one puts it that way, I think the motive is absolutely clear.

We're not allowed to say, here, what it very clearly tells us about you, that you want children to be provided with this sort of material, but we all know, don't we?
 
The first book is for 15yrs and over... They would hear worse from their peers..
So you think their peers should be teaching in school? That is your argument. Good lord the insanity. Even with a Strawman argument you sound bizarre
 
Why do you want your prepubescent boys learning how to give blowjobs and be fucked anally?
As somebody who has raised two sons into adulthood, that sure doesn't sound like any actual parent to me.
A commie who wants his own little boy learning how to be the recipient of anal sex, no less.

It's a pretty safe bet that the foul fucked-up creature to which you are responding does not, itself, have any sons that it wants to be fucked by pedofaggots, Its interests seems to be in other people's sons; same as anyone else that would want this sort of material to be provided to underaged boys.

Or perhaps he does. I'm now thinking of a man, who, when his daughter was eight years old, decided that she should be giving him blowjobs. That went on for about two years, ending when it came out what he was doing to his daughter, at which point he died from a self-administered .357 caliber brain hemorrhage. That little girl grew up to become my wife; a wonderful person, but one who continues to suffer more than forty years later from what her father did to her.

I'm sure that there is plenty of room in my father-in-law's section of Hell for disgusting creatures such as the one to which you were responding.
 
Last edited:
Jesus, can a leftist ever answer a post without Strawmen arguments.
Yeah, I’m talking to you looney tune!

I think it is clear that they cannot give an honest answer, without admitting things about themselves that they do not want to admit.

It is not at all difficult to figure out very reliably what it is about these fucked-up freaks, that they do not want to admit.
 
What kind of sick, fucked-up, short-eyed pervert thinks that any children need access to this sort of fucked-up pornography?

That's not really, the right question to ask, why children need access to this shit.

The right question to ask is why some fucked-up perverts want to give children access to this shit. And when one puts it that way, I think the motive is absolutely clear.

We're not allowed to say, here, what it very clearly tells us about you, that you want children to be provided with this sort of material, but we all know, don't we?
So I take it you are fine with these numbers and would do nothing to change them?
  1. 6 in 10 sexually active high school teens reported using condoms during their most recent sexual intercourse.[9]
  2. 1 in 4 teens contract a sexually transmitted disease every year.[10]
You must really hate children. Very sad.
 
First time I'm hearing about 'prepubescent boys' so I'm guessing you're just making stuff up and should be ignored.

If you prefer real numbers here are some:
  1. 6 in 10 sexually active high school teens reported using condoms during their most recent sexual intercourse.[9]
  2. 1 in 4 teens contract a sexually transmitted disease every year.[10]
But if we don't talk about it or teach kids about it. It will all go away, like magic...
 

Forum List

Back
Top