Listen to the exact words in the exact books Democrats want in our public school libraries

Normally I would but this guy is right off his med - everyone is pedophile and a groomer.
Your post was directed at me.

I have yet to call ANYBODY a pedophile or groomer. But I am 100% convinced that some literature the left is pushing on children is for that purpose and/or has that effect. And parents are quite correct and within their prerogative to object to that.
 
Some people are able to grasp the concept of a topic and discuss it intelligently. Most others post the juvenile crap you posted here.
You and most of the rest of us are ADULTS and so are horrified that this is being presented to children.

The Communist filth in this forum are still children, themselves (thus their desire for a nanny state) and so are incapable of doing that.
 
If you think what he read is appropriate for young children in public school settings, then you are likely as creepy as you appear.
How old are these 'young' children, no one has told me? Do you even know? Are they among the large number of students who have had sexual intercourse by the time they are 18? Banning them from sexual content may be closing the barn door a bit late.
 
You and most of the rest of us are ADULTS and so are horrified that this is being presented to children.

The Communist filth in this forum are still children, themselves (thus their desire for a nanny state) and so are incapable of doing that.
Yes we are adults and are horrified at much of the material the left is pushing on children including partisan/ideologically manipulated history, civics, literature etc. and sexually explicit material and adult themes totally inappropriate for especially young children.

I won't characterize anyone here in a derogatory way, but will continue to speak out in strong opposition to whatever error or 'filth' they promote or condone that is harmful to America or Americans of any age.
 
Last edited:
Nope, you're talking about restricting the access of my children. You're welcome to restrict the access of your children but leave mine to me.

Like I said, I don't care that you buy gay porn and give it to your kids, but it doesn't belong in the public school library.

Spend your own money on your porn, not my money.
 
Nope, you're talking about restricting the access of my children. You're welcome to restrict the access of your children but leave mine to me.
Why do you want your prepubescent boys learning how to give blowjobs and be fucked anally?

As somebody who has raised two sons into adulthood, that sure doesn't sound like any actual parent to me.
 
What children? He's certainly isn't a child. Who has access to that book? What libraries is it in? Who is the author? what is the title?

There's a whole lotta missing information here.


So you're just another ignorant commie that can't take a minute to watch the video, GOT IT!!!!!!!!!!!

.
 
You can buy gay porn for your kids to use at home, but it shouldn't be in the school library.

One would have to have severe doubts about any parents that would expose their own children to such shit. If this doesn't cross the line, at least it comes very close to the line, where authorities would be justified to step in and remove the child from such abusive parents.
 
The first book is for 15yrs and over... They would hear worse from their peers..

Like I said, I don't care that you buy gay porn and give it to your kids, but it doesn't belong in the public school library.

Spend your own money on your porn, not my money.
 
Your post was directed at me.

I have yet to call ANYBODY a pedophile or groomer. But I am 100% convinced that some literature the left is pushing on children is for that purpose and/or has that effect. And parents are quite correct and within their prerogative to object to that.

Some of these works explicitly and disgustingly depict minors engaging in sex acts with one another, and with grown-ups, in a manner that is clearly intended to depict this as normal and proper behavior.

What other purpose could there be to providing minors with materials such as this, except to groom them into easy prey for pedophiles. Nobody who will defend this shit has given any other plausible explanation for what the motive could be, here.

Hey, Tainted Tommy—you started a thread, earlier this year, specifically defending one of the most depraved and disgusting examples of such material.

Do you care to tell us what you think the motive and purpose is, to providing such sick, fucked-up shit to minors? How is this good for any other purpose than to convinced minors that they should let grown-ups fuck them?
 
Like I said, I don't care that you buy gay porn and give it to your kids, but it doesn't belong in the public school library.

Spend your own money on your porn, not my money.
Why do you want your prepubescent boys learning how to give blowjobs and be fucked anally?

As somebody who has raised two sons into adulthood, that sure doesn't sound like any actual parent to me.
First time I'm hearing about 'prepubescent boys' so I'm guessing you're just making stuff up and should be ignored.

If you prefer real numbers here are some:
  1. 6 in 10 sexually active high school teens reported using condoms during their most recent sexual intercourse.[9]
  2. 1 in 4 teens contract a sexually transmitted disease every year.[10]
 
How old are these 'young' children, no one has told me? Do you even know? Are they among the large number of students who have had sexual intercourse by the time they are 18? Banning them from sexual content may be closing the barn door a bit late.

Jesus, can a leftist ever answer a post without Strawmen arguments.

Yeah, I’m talking to you looney tune!
 

Forum List

Back
Top