Listen to the exact words in the exact books Democrats want in our public school libraries

[SassyIrishLass]

That's just it, there is no 'logic' to it at all. It's mind blowing that we have to defend NOT having this degenerate shit in our schools:

“I put some lube on, and I got him on his knees,”

“And I began to slide into him from behind,”

“I got a new strap-on harness today, I can’t wait to put it on you,”

I pulled out of him and kissed him while he masturbated.
He asked me to turn over while he slipped a condom on himself.
This was my ass, and I was struggling to imagine someone inside me.
He got on top and slowly inserted himself into me.
It was the worst pain I think I have ever felt in my life.
Eventually, I felt a mix of pleasure with the pain.”

That's porn

 

[OldFlame]

That's porn

It absolutely is.

Being homosexual isn't supposed to be just about physical pleasure, or indulging in anything that makes you 'feel good', that's what we're told over and over again, it's all about 'love'. 'Love is love'. These 'books' illustrate exactly that it's not about love, and only about making yourself feel good, whatever it takes. Same with drag shows, gay parades, it's depravity on display, where is this so called 'love'?

 

[WTH_Progs?]

^ 60 year old conservative fearbait.

You guys desperately need new material.

Join us in the 21st century, won't you?

I think leftists say a lot of abstract shit to try and satisfy their tweaked heads. Lines burrowed from others, and realism doesn't matter. You just as well have pulled the race card.

 

[koshergrl]

So no Bible?

The Bible isn't porn. Neither is Gone With the Wind. Nor is Uncle Tom's Cabin. Porn is porn.

 

[koshergrl]

And yet the Bible is riddled with groomers, child rapists, child murderers and so forth.

They're treated as heroes.

You're okay with that?

Still isn't porn. Sorry.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Th

That's just it, there is no 'logic' to it at all. It's mind blowing that we have to defend NOT having this degenerate shit in our schools:

“I put some lube on, and I got him on his knees,”

“And I began to slide into him from behind,”

“I got a new strap-on harness today, I can’t wait to put it on you,”

I pulled out of him and kissed him while he masturbated.
He asked me to turn over while he slipped a condom on himself.
This was my ass, and I was struggling to imagine someone inside me.
He got on top and slowly inserted himself into me.
It was the worst pain I think I have ever felt in my life.
Eventually, I felt a mix of pleasure with the pain.”

There is absolutely no imaginable purpose for providing that to a kid except to hope the kid will be easier to convince to accept sex with a grown man. "Just hold still, Bobby. pant The pain will turn to pleasure, remember?"

 

[OldFlame]

The rats seem to have deserted the ship here, telling.

 

[bripat9643]

And yet the Bible is riddled with groomers, child rapists, child murderers and so forth.

They're treated as heroes.

You're okay with that?

Can you post an example from the Bible of a groomer?

 

[koshergrl]

The rats seem to have deserted the ship here, telling.

They know what and who they are, and what it is they are advocating for.

 

[surada]

No elected Democrat has spoken out about this, which can only lead to the assumption that they approve of it.

What was the name of the book?

 

[surada]

What children? He's certainly isn't a child. Who has access to that book? What libraries is it in? Who is the author? what is the title?

There's a whole lotta missing information here.

It's banned by schools in ten states..it's considered young adult fiction.

All Boys Aren't Blue - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[surada]

These are not adult books with adults in situations. These are children in adult situations. Books written for children about children.

It's category is young adult fiction.

All Boys Aren't Blue - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[Seymour Flops]

It's category is young adult fiction.

All Boys Aren't Blue - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[JoeB131]

There’s only one reason you’re so outspoken to allow the grooming of children.

Nobody is grooming children.

You really need to stop projecting your sexual insecurities onto others.

 

[JoeB131]

The Bible isn't porn. Neither is Gone With the Wind. Nor is Uncle Tom's Cabin. Porn is porn.

One person's porn is another person's literature.

For instance, when I was in a Catholic HS in the late 70's, they had us read Orwell's 1984. That book contains SEVERAL explicit sex scenes, including one where the protagonist hires a prostitute.

 

[my2¢]

I believe the matter should be left with the local community through its local school board and both the State of Illinois and the U.S. Congress should butt out. I'd be inclined to vote against anybody making it a state or federal issue.

 

[MinTrut]

The demonic left are out of the closet to groom children. If they’re not killing them in the womb, they’re either pushing to normalize pedophillia or cutting the tits off girls.

This has nothing to do with the left, and the reading was of a very brief passage from a much larger work.

The Bible on the other hand...

I've heard it unflatteringly referred to as "A Groomer's Guide to Grooming."

Do you want the Bible banned?

 

[HeyNorm]

It's category is young adult fiction.

All Boys Aren't Blue - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

The left would make Debbie Does Dallas “young adult fiction” if it had an all male cast.

 

[HeyNorm]

This has nothing to do with the left, and the reading was of a brief passage about consensual teenage sex.

The Bible on the other hand...

I've heard it unflatteringly referred to as "A Groomer's Guide to Grooming."

Do you want the Bible banned?

Ummmm, consensual teenage sex, in graphic detail is still child porn.

And you are justifying it.

Guess we can all assume why, can’t we?

 

[MinTrut]

No. It should be available along with the Koran, the Talmud, the Book of Mormon, and other major and minor religious writing in the religion section of the library.

Concur.

It is the most banned book in history. In the real meaning of "banned." People have been burned at the stake for possessing it, or possessing the "wrong" version of it.

Do you consider every single book that a librarian chooses not to stock to have been "banned?"

We're talking about banning books from school libraries.

If the America Library Association recommends against stocking a particular book, such as:

Amazon product ASIN 1684510317
Is that a "banned" book?

See above.

What about this, that you will not find on Amazon:

“That said, we reserve the right not to sell certain content. All retailers make decisions about what selection they choose to offer, as do we. As to your specific question about When Harry Became Sally, we have chosen not to sell books that frame LGBTQ+ identity as a mental illness.”

Amazon to stop selling books that frame LGBTQ+ identities as mental illness

Retail giant announces decision in letter to Republican US senators about removal of book by conservative academic

www.theguardian.com

See above.