Listen to the exact words in the exact books Democrats want in our public school libraries

[MinTrut]

Animals don't seem to be nearly as confused as you and other liberals on this subject, then again, they are likely smarter too.

Whoopsie.

You don't know what's in the Bible OR what's happening in nature.

Color me utterly shocked.

 

[MinTrut]

Natural sex is for procreation. I don't care about gay sex, that isn't the point. But how is sex that doesn't provide the reason for sex natural? That makes no sense

^ Attempting to use his extreme ignorance to win the argument.

But maybe if you continue on this path of Idiocratic bludgeoning, you'll prevail, at least in your own mind.

 

[MinTrut]

Why don't we let the author speak:

Q: The way protesters have described the book online — they make it sound like it’s marketed to 6-year-olds.

A: It keeps being called a children’s book. Senator Kennedy implied it was a children’s book. But I think that’s coming from a misreading of the comic-book form. “Gender Queer” is a comic, and in full color, but that doesn’t mean it’s for children. I originally wrote it for my parents, and then for older teens who were already asking these questions about themselves. I don’t recommend this book for kids!

Q: Having read it, I definitely wouldn’t give it to a grade-schooler in my life. But I could see recommending it to my kid if they were 17. If they were looking into chest binding, for example — I’d rather they learn about how to do it safely, as you discuss in the book, instead of winging it.

A: Many books that are being challenged often wrestle with a difficult topic, like historical atrocities, or experiences of racism, or something dealing with sexual health. In my opinion, books are one of the safest places to encounter that information for the first time. It’s less visceral than watching a movie or documentary. And you can go at your own pace. If something feels overwhelming, you can set the book down and walk away from it. I would rather young readers encounter information in books than in random unstructured Googling.

Q: Back to Senator Kennedy and the one page he read out loud. If he’d kept reading, we would have learned that the following page shows you and your partner beginning to have sex, and then you deciding you don’t actually want to have sex.

A: Right. The whole scene is really about consent. It’s about one character saying, “Hey, what we’re doing right now isn’t going the way I thought it would. It isn’t giving me the feelings I thought it was going to give me. Can we stop what we’re doing and do something else?”

This is the page that most conservatives cite when they say my book is too explicit. But it’s a scene about showing the reader that it’s okay, even mid-sexual experience, to stop and check in with your partner and say, “This isn’t working for me, and I need to back off.” I think that’s a message that’s important to share, and it’s not one that I heard often when I was a teenager.

Stop winning the thread.

 

[BS Filter]

Whoopsie.

You don't know what's in the Bible OR what's happening in nature.

Color me utterly shocked.

Court documents have rape crimes graphically explained. Does that mean a rapists crime is being glorified? That's pretty stupid, huh.

 

[MinTrut]

No different than than someone being attracted to other types of animals, right? That would just be a natural variation wouldn't it?

^ Astonishing ignorance of history and biology.

 

[BS Filter]

^ Attempting to use his extreme ignorance to win the argument.

But maybe if you continue on this path of Idiocratic bludgeoning, you'll prevail, at least in your own mind.

Beats your false narrative.

 

[MinTrut]

And yet you keep attacking DeSantis for his no duh position you just said you agree with him on. It's not a kids book. You asses are the ones pushing it in the schools, so stop it, dumb ass

^ Conclusion based on ignorance and fallacy.

 

[BS Filter]

^ Astonishing ignorance of history and biology.

Sticking your penis up an asshole is very ignorant and unhealthy.

 

[MinTrut]

Not the kind you people want to talk to kids about, boy.

^ Extreme delusion.

 

[BS Filter]

^ Staggering ignorance.

Classic trolling. If people are born deranged, perhaps we should abort them.

 

[MinTrut]

By the way asshat, I havebnever said I can or should deny you the right to live as you see fit, it's just unnatural, go blow other guys simply do not want you around children

2/Homophobia.

 

[MinTrut]

Lol Standard deflection terms.

Projection.

Those books dont belong. Period.

The Bible is not for under 12s, agreed.

You can jump up and down and scream....

Projection.

I dont care.

Delusion.

Has no business in the schools.

The Bible is NOT for under 12s, no.

 

[MinTrut]

I'm a grandfather. These little boy arguments you bring to me I swipe away like you were just that, a child.

Not even all heterosexuals are driven by the desire to procreate. My wife and I are in our 40s and have no desire for any more kids but we still desire each other sexually. I also know a number of young couples who have no interest in having kids. Just because some people have a desire to procreate doesn't mean everyone does. In fact we witness desire for procreation ebbing and flowing in society itself. These days, wealthy first world countries are finding their citizens are lacking the desire to procreate to extent that some are worried about being able to maintain their populations.

^ Curried Goat Island of reason in an ocean of conservative insanity.

 

[MinTrut]

You actually argued that pro-creation doesn't drive sex. How could you become a grandfather? Then again you claimed you were black too

You simply cannot be this...

Were some conservatives beaten with Bibles as children?

I mean literally - on their innocent little heads?

 

[MinTrut]

Ever notice homophobes describe gay sex in lurid detail? It's like a vegetarian who can't stop talking about steak.

Their envy of the opportunities 21st century teens will have to explore same sex attraction eats them up, and goads their homophobia.

 

[MinTrut]

A different form of sexuality. Period.

Get over it.

Ah.

A fairly generic post in support of LGBTQ sexual expression actually cuts to the heart of this entire issue.

Different isn't the word.

Common and universal is.

And THAT is the problem.

The conservatives here, more than anything else, have been driven to derangement NOT by words in a book, but by the reminder of the essentially pansexual nature of human beings.

This has been brutally repressed in their lives, and to be reminded of it drives them wild.

I've talked about conservative envy and homophobia - and severe mental illness - but really, it comes down to the tragedy of their repression, once inflicted by their elders, and now self-inflicted.

That's what this is about at its core.

 

[MinTrut]

A different form of sexuality. Period.

Get over it.

We heard you the first time!

 

[MinTrut]

Nope. That's still you in dress up.

While I regard Biden as utter thuggish scum, I will say that he could not have survived as a Delaware politician unless he walked this line.

Delaware is possibly THE most racist state in the Union.

 

[MinTrut]

No every man does not do "very evil things". That's a complete fallacy.

Every man or woman, is given free will to decide what they will do.



Who decides what gay porn? Certainly not you. Only a child with concerns about his sexuality would be interested in accessing information about homosexuality. Not something a boy discusses with his Republican parents now is it?

That’s what you’re afraid of. That the brainwashing and right wing indoctrination will fail if your children see a better way than fear and hatred.

^ Another thread win.

 

[MinTrut]

Democrats pushed gay porn on six year olds in Florida until DeSantis stopped it. Neither one of us knows WTF you're talking about

^ Extreme conservative delusion based in repression and homophobia.