Listen to the exact words in the exact books Democrats want in our public school libraries

You almost get to a point. Romance is a purely human thing (usually cured by marriage!) Animals just have sex to get gratification, which happens to perpetuate the species.

The thing is, same-sex copulation is common in the animal kingdom.

We humans wrap a simple biological function in all this stuff about romance and morality and religion... this is kind of our hangup.
I just expalined to you it is not out of a lust for same sex aniumals you idiot it is pruely to exert dominance in the pack. Animals do not experience romatic love neither do homosexuals it is sexual deviancy
 
It would be impossible to do something that is outside your natural ability to do. That's just basic logic. If you can do it, then by practice and example, it is within your natural abilities to do.
No, it goes agains the natural order of why there is male, and female, and why it is a perversion of that
 
Not against the rules at all
The Bible is a guide for how to live your life and a historical document

(With apologies to J. Kent Ashcraft)

Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your post, and I try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind him that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate.

I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the specific laws and how to best follow them.

a) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord ( Lev 1:9 ). The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

b) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7 . In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

c) I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness ( Lev 15:19-24 ). The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

d) Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

e) I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?

f) A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an Abomination ( Lev 11:10 ), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?

g) Lev 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?

h) Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev 19:27 . How should they die?

i) I know from Lev 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

j) My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? ( Lev 24:10-16 ) Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? ( Lev. 20:14 )

I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help.

Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.
 
(With apologies to J. Kent Ashcraft)

Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your post, and I try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind him that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate.

I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the specific laws and how to best follow them.

a) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord ( Lev 1:9 ). The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

b) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7 . In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

c) I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness ( Lev 15:19-24 ). The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

d) Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

e) I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?

f) A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an Abomination ( Lev 11:10 ), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?

g) Lev 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?

h) Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev 19:27 . How should they die?

i) I know from Lev 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

j) My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? ( Lev 24:10-16 ) Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? ( Lev. 20:14 )

I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help.

Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.
Is that seriously the best you have?
 
I just expalined to you it is not out of a lust for same sex aniumals you idiot it is pruely to exert dominance in the pack. Animals do not experience romatic love neither do homosexuals it is sexual deviancy

Here's where you are confused.

Gay people experience romance just like straight people do.

One of my dear friends is a gay woman. She and her partner have been together for 20 years now. They do all the same things that committed straight people do.
 
Then how do you explain how many pedophiles come from a religious background?

Shit, I was brought up Catholic. The one thing you learned early as a Catholic is you never wanted to be alone in a room with a priest. Two priests in my parish were accused of doing nasty stuff and the church paid out money for it. We had a football coach at my High School that showed gay porn to his team members. Now, THAT'S an example of grooming. Not the "Well, we told kids that there's nothing wrong with being gay, really." shit your sort goes on about.

Just because someone is brought up as a Christian doesn’t mean they are one. They have a higher probability of being a Christian though than someone who was not. Every child exposed to homosexuality or pedophelia will not be a homosexual or a pedophile, but there is a higher probability.

As for the football coach, I agree, that is grooming for sure, which is exactly why we are against that type of behavior.
 
I thought it was pretty good. The thing about slavery and witch burning and other behaviors condoned by the bible is that God didn't change his mind.

We changed ours.

You have an unhealthy, insatiable desire to attack Christians and the Bible.
 

The encounter was yet another data point in a growing understanding: Homosexual behavior is more common among nonhuman animals than scientists once acknowledged. By several estimates, researchers have observed such activity in more than 1,500 species. “These aren’t rare anomalies,” author Eliot Schrefer writes in Queer Ducks (and Other Animals), a young-adult book that drew national attention to the issue in 2022, including an appearance by Schrefer on The Daily Show. “An explosion of research over the past 20 years has shown significant amounts of same-sex sexual behavior throughout the animal kingdom,” he writes.

Scientists have long known that heterosexual behavior varies wildly among animals. Snowshoe hares breed promiscuously. Male elephant seals preside over harems of dozens of females. Female Galápagos hawks mate with multiple males, who take turns incubating the eggs and feeding the young.

Likewise, animals exhibit diverse same-sex behavior. Before splitting a honeycomb found together, female bonobos will rub genitals, which Durham University primatologist Zanna Clay says reduces tension and helps them share. Bonin flying foxes, a type of bat, curl up in same-sex clusters to keep warm during the mating season, and oral-genital stimulation is common in the male clusters. Male zebra finches form lifelong socially monogamous relationships that include courtship dances and sex, and that don’t break up when females become available. Female Laysan albatrosses in Hawai‘i share nests, mount each other sexually and raise their young together.

I LOVE how some scientists will jump through ridiculous hoops in attempts to prove their ideology. ”Science” has become anything but…
 
Yes, a sufficient reply to such nonsense. You are easily mystified.
I'm sure a Bingo like you does find it a sufficient retort to actual scientists in the field observing homosexuality in the animal kingdom. 😄 That's kind of what makes it so funny. You're a true believer.
 
I'm sorry you're experiencing issues, and hope you get the help you need rather than seeking to control what others see/read.
Ah, I see where you went wrong. I want parents to have more influence and control over what their children are exposed to than the government does, and you think I want something completely different. It sounds like the idea of parents being more in control of their kids scares you. Like we've been saying, if someone wants their kids exposed to inappropriate material, they can do it in their own homes, leave other kids alone.
 
Likewise, give your kids what you want them to read at home. Leave other kids alone.
That's a bullshit argument. If you really believed that you'd have no problem with a gay sex educational course that included these materials but also allowed for your child to opt out. That's not the case here. Republicans don't want these subjects taught to anyone's children.
 
That's a bullshit argument. If you really believed that you'd have no problem with a gay sex educational course that included these materials but also allowed for your child to opt out. That's not the case here. Republicans don't want these subjects taught to anyone's children.
There are certain things that are inappropriate for children of certain ages to be exposed to. Do you deny that?
 
There are certain things that are inappropriate for children of certain ages to be exposed to. Do you deny that?
Yes. I agree with that very general statement. If you ask me specifically whether highschoolers and maybe even seniors in middle school can handle material on sex I'd say yes. I'd also add its a good bet some of them are already engaging in it.
 
Yes. I agree with that very general statement. If you ask me specifically whether highschoolers and maybe even seniors in middle school can handle material on sex I'd say yes. I'd also add its a good bet some of them are already engaging in it.
Then what's left is deciding where to draw that line, and that's where the numbers come into play. If enough parents don't want their kids exposed to sexually explicit material, the schools should and will let the parents be in control.

Ultimately, the big question becomes, why is it the schools' responsibility to give kids sexually explicit material?
 

Forum List

Back
Top