Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Babbitt was not protesting - She was involved with hundreds of Trump Supporters commiting a physical attack against members of Congress and the second and third in line in succession to the Presidency. She was involved in an attack against the United States of America. We shoot our enemies. No need to give a warning.What kind of an asshole wants to shoot people without warning for protesting?
What member of Congress was physically attacked?Babbitt was not protesting - She was involved with hundreds of Trump Supporters commiting a physical attack against members of Congress and the second and third in line in succession to the Presidency. She was involved in an attack against the United States of America. We shoot our enemies. No need to give a warning.
All of them. Plus Pence. Plus the hundred and some police officers who were injured trying to protect all the members of Congress. Breaking and entering to a live session of Congress is a physical attack. Babbitt took a bullet and it stopped the physical attack pretty much.What member of Congress was physically attacked?
Really? So how many of them were even TOUCHED by a protester? Do you even grasp what the term "physical" means?All of them. Plus Pence. Plus the hundred and some police officers who were injured trying to protect all the members of Congress. Breaking and entering to a live session of Congress is a physical attack. Babbitt took a bullet and it stopped the physical attack pretty much.
I am participating, my discussions with you have been about the committee integrity, and the legality of the Eastman Plan. At present, I'm trying to understand how the left is so angry about something they themselves were ready to do, and 16 states joined in on, and enacted.Go find them then and take it up with them . There wouid be no election that way if that process was determined to be unconstitutional.
This thread is about a constitutional crisis unnecessarily created AFTER a REAL election and caused by the sitting President who lost. Please participate.
Ignore latest red herring attemptI am participating, my discussions with you have been about the committee integrity, and the legality of the Eastman Plan. At present, I'm trying to understand how the left is so angry about something they themselves were ready to do, and 16 states joined in on, and enacted.
You're lying again, lying con. She was warned.What kind of an asshole wants to shoot people without warning for protesting? You people on the left have lost your collective MINDS over this! We literally had months of violent protests by the left in cities all across the country and not a single unarmed protester was shot by a single police officer...we had a protest at the Capitol that lasted a few hours and an unarmed protester is shot at point blank range...yet you idiots think this guy is a "hero" for losing his cool?
They tried but law enforcement got them out to safety.What member of Congress was physically attacked?
ThisIsMe wrote: Are both plans, at their core, not the same thing? Do they both not subvert the will of the voter? 21NOV10-POST#929
NFBW wrote: One is a proposal regarding future elections likely never to see the light of day. The other is a private blue-print by a constitutional lawyer advising Trump that may have evolved from right-wing anti/governments pro-Trump militia types starting in December 2020. 21NOV10-POST#938
NFBW wrote: I say the Eastman memo may have evolved from militia types because this was posted on social media in December 22 21NOV10-POST#938
““””On Dec. 12, a poster on the website MyMilitia.com urged violence if senators made official the victory of President-elect Joe Biden. …. "If this does not change, then I advocate, Revolution and adherence to the rules of war," wrote someone identifying themselves as I3DI. "I say, take the hill or die trying “”””
That comes from the following earlier post:
“”””” NFBW wrote: DJT’-s summons to a peaceful but wild protest of the Jan6 transfer of power ceremony on Capitol ‘bunker’ Hill began mid December.
"Statistically impossible to have lost the 2020 Election. Big protest in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!" he tweeted on December 18. On Sunday, the president again promoted the protests, writing on Twitter, "I will be there. Historic day!"
Trump tweeted "Big protest in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!"
Jan 13, 2021 — The invasion of the U.S. Capitol last Wednesday was stoked in plain sight. … Some interpretations of the POTUS call for his historical wild political orgy was a call to arms Oldestyle Correll …. GIVE ME LIBERTY or GIVE ME DEATH! - - -
Even before the call to orgy tweet , On Dec. 12, a poster on the website MyMilitia.com urged violence if senators made official the victory of President-elect Joe Biden. …. "If this does not change, then I advocate, Revolution and adherence to the rules of war," wrote someone identifying themselves as I3DI. "I say, take the hill or die trying. 21NOV07-POST#864 “””””
One is a proposal regarding future elections likely never to see the light of day.
poster on the website MyMilitia.com urged violence if senators made official the victory of President-elect Joe Biden. …. "If this does not change, then I advocate, Revolution and adherence to the rules of war,"
Be there, will be wild
Correct, it is plain as day that my posts are not fantasy.Plain as day.
Why bring fish into this?Latest red herring
So what you're basically saying is that not a single Congressperson was so much as even touched by any of the protesters?They tried but law enforcement got them out to safety.
By whom? The officer who shot her? He didn't say a word. He hid out of sight. Waited until the other officers left their post in front of the crowd of protesters and then he stepped out and fired a shot at point blank range at an unarmed female protester. That's your "hero"! (Eye Roll)You're lying again, lying con. She was warned.
You know they weren't just like you know they had to be evacuated for safety from a violent mob threatening to kill some of them.So what you're basically saying is that not a single Congressperson was so much as even touched by any of the protesters?
He says he did and a guy next to Ashes Targetpractice say he heard cops warning that mob to get back.By whom? The officer who shot her? He didn't say a word. He hid out of sight. Waited until the other officers left their post in front of the crowd of protesters and then he stepped out and fired a shot at point blank range at an unarmed female protester. That's your "hero"! (Eye Roll)
So basically you're saying that an unarmed protester that hadn't harmed anyone was shot to death because someone made the call that she "might" be violent? Who was it that made that call and isn't it amazing that no other Police Officer in the Capitol building that day decided to fire their weapon EXCEPT your "hero"!You know they weren't just like you know they had to be evacuated for safety from a violent mob threatening to kill some of them.
Nope, I'm not saying that.So basically you're saying that an unarmed protester that hadn't harmed anyone was shot to death because someone made the call that she "might" be violent? Who was it that made that call and isn't it amazing that no other Police Officer in the Capitol building that day decided to fire their weapon EXCEPT your "hero"!
I listened to the audio, Faun...when was that warning issued? If you can hear it...point it out please because I heard NOTHING in the way of a warning before that shot was fired except protesters screaming that they saw a gun!He says he did and a guy next to Ashes Targetpractice say he heard cops warning that mob to get back.
So you're saying that Babbitt WAS a violent person who physically attacked someone before she was shot?Nope, I'm not saying that.
