Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 65,212
- 56,040
- 3,615
LOL
A pity you failed to prove he's a pedophile.
![itsok :itsok: :itsok:](/styles/smilies/itsok.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL
A pity you failed to prove he's a pedophile.
Yeah, it's certainly a double standard.Those shitgibbons have been using a pic of Ivanka on her dad's lap at a public event for years trying to say he molested her.![]()
Are you really that fucking stupid? You don't think she is calling the shots?For one, Pelosi isn't chairing the committee.
^^ Groomer alert!"Propably" inappropriate. That's not sexual assault, I don't care how conservative you are.
It's an investigation, not a trial. Members are allowed to be biased. Just like the Republicans on the committee would have been had McCarthy put 5 on there.
It's an investigation, not a trial
Members are allowed to be biased.
Just like the Republicans on the committee would have been had McCarthy put 5 on there.
I don't know...it's creepy, especially if the child is 14...It matters not how Democrats would have reacted had it been a Republican. It's still acceptable in our society for parents to bathe or shower with their own kids as long as it's not sexual and the kids are very young.
Are you really that fucking stupid? You don't think she is calling the shots?
Please, please tell us you aren't that fucking stupid.![]()
"probably not appropriate." Looks like you didn't read her diary.
And show your proof she was 14 at the time...
And show your proof she was 14 at the time...
^^ Groomer alert!
Keep defending your pedophile Messiah.LOL
Yet another rightard thinks "probably not appropriate" equates to sexual assault.
So if some Republican actually sexually assaulted you, you would think of that as ... probably not appropriate, huh?
![]()
One that could lead to a criminal referral to the doj, with 2 years of investigation, completed by a committee desperate to see Trump not run for president, that the doj will use as the basis of their investigation.
Thank you for admitting that finding the truth is not their objective.
And no, if you are investigating, you can't be biased, not if you are really seeking the truth. Their bias, combined with their stated desire to disqualify Trump means this "investigation" is indeed not legitimate.
Indeed, which is why this should have been a non partisan, independent investigation.
I don't know...it's creepy, especially if the child is 14...
And it does matter. Your defending of Biden here is not genuine if you would not react the same if this were a repub.
Well, she would have to have been close to her teen years, I mean, how many 3 year Olds do you know that write diaries?
Ok, you ARE that fucking stupid.
Thanks for playing.
Keep defending your pedophile Messiah.
And were back to square one. He tried, but pelosi overruled 2 of his choices.Yet more reason for McCarthy to place Republicans on that committee. What a pity he didn't.
And were back to square one. He tried, but pelosi overruled 2 of his choices.
And again, it doesn't matter what mccarthy did, this whole thing should have never been done by Congress, both sides of whom have their agendas, and are based.
LOLOLOLOL
Translation: you can't prove it.
I already knew that, Dumbfuck. Can't you post something I don't already know??
![]()