LMAO!! The globe has been "COOLING" since the 1930's!!!

Only thing that matters >>>>>


http://www.usmessageboard.com/environment/313851-more-proof-the-skeptics-are-winning.html



Not even debatable anymore!!! Thread DOMINATES the "Environment" forum!!!:eusa_dance::eusa_dance::up:


US.....globe......Mars....doesn't matter s0ns!!!:D:fu:



In 2 years, not one AGW climate change k00k has been able to deliver a single thread showing where the "consensus science" is mattering in the real world!!!


Because its not....one look at data from Obama's EIA tells a laughable story!!! >>>>









lOsInG
 
Last edited:
This is what we have to put up with constantly in the environment folder, skook's nonstop content-free idiot spamming. And he's not even the dumbest one there.
 
I'm used to it. Serious debate not allowed with regards to the climate ... because we're a bunch of silly libs.

That's pretty much it.
 
This is what we have to put up with constantly in the environment folder, skook's nonstop content-free idiot spamming. And he's not even the dumbest one there.

You should call the cops about the guy holding a gun to your head forcing you to visit the Enviro forum and read the posts you fear so much.
 
Liberals have this unreasonable fear of climate change.
Even if humans are 100% responsible for the planet warming, our species first of all, won't be around forever anyway, and future humans will adapt to their environment as they always have.
Other species will also adapt, or die out, and new species will replace those are unable to compete. This is how life on this planet has always evolved, and trying to force these natural changes from occurring is like trying to use a shovel to dismantle Mt Everest.

I think it is fear of being caught agreeing with conservative Republicans.

If liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans promoted agreement on
* eliminating environmental destruction, pollution and waste
* OWNING property in order to preserve it instead of pushing to REGULATE
companies through govt
Then they would be too busy compiling donations to buy out land and solve problems.

That would compete with dollars needed to fund campaigns for office.

So instead they choose to focus on the NEGATIVE conflicts (not the solutions to unite them)
so they can raise money to campaign AGAINST each other,
and fund careers as media politicians. And not have to focus on solutions
because they can get paid to BLAME the other party.

It's like watching divorcing couples on reality TV fight and fight,
while the lawyers and media rack up millions selling the drama to the public.

Someday we'll get either smart (or just plain tired and bored)
and start hiring and funding candidates to invest in solving problems,
and quit projecting blame on each other for political points.
 
Last edited:
Dang, these deniers are dumb.

Global Analysis - May 2014 | State of the Climate | National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)

May 2014 was the hottest May in the historical record. That's what these kooks are calling "cooling", the highest temps ever seen. Like I said, one serious bunch of morons.

And the response of the kooks? Declare all the data has to be a liberal conspiracy. After all, their liars' cult told them it was, and none of the kooks would dare think independently. That would get them instantly ejected from the cult.

You do know the earth is like 4.5 billion years old,.the thermometer was not invented till the 1400a I think and the hottest day on record only goes back to around 1910 in the united states right?
 
Dang, these deniers are dumb.

Global Analysis - May 2014 | State of the Climate | National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)

May 2014 was the hottest May in the historical record. That's what these kooks are calling "cooling", the highest temps ever seen. Like I said, one serious bunch of morons.

And the response of the kooks? Declare all the data has to be a liberal conspiracy. After all, their liars' cult told them it was, and none of the kooks would dare think independently. That would get them instantly ejected from the cult.
The hottest day ever recorded was over 100 years ago, dummy.

The Hottest Day on Earth, 100 Years Ago ? History in the Headlines
 
Dang, these deniers are dumb.

Global Analysis - May 2014 | State of the Climate | National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)

May 2014 was the hottest May in the historical record. That's what these kooks are calling "cooling", the highest temps ever seen. Like I said, one serious bunch of morons.

And the response of the kooks? Declare all the data has to be a liberal conspiracy. After all, their liars' cult told them it was, and none of the kooks would dare think independently. That would get them instantly ejected from the cult.
The hottest day ever recorded was over 100 years ago, dummy.

The Hottest Day on Earth, 100 Years Ago ? History in the Headlines

Death Valley keeps setting records. Just over a year ago – on April 22, 2012 – the hottest temperature ever during the month of April in North America was recorded in Death Valley: 113°F, which eclipsed the old record by 2 degrees.

Yet another temperature record was tied in Death Valley last summer, when the overnight low in the park dropped to only 107°F on the night of July 12, matching the world's warmest low temperature record set just weeks earlier in Oman (at Khasab Airport on June 27, 2012).
 
Dang, these deniers are dumb.

Global Analysis - May 2014 | State of the Climate | National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)

May 2014 was the hottest May in the historical record. That's what these kooks are calling "cooling", the highest temps ever seen. Like I said, one serious bunch of morons.

And the response of the kooks? Declare all the data has to be a liberal conspiracy. After all, their liars' cult told them it was, and none of the kooks would dare think independently. That would get them instantly ejected from the cult.
The hottest day ever recorded was over 100 years ago, dummy.

The Hottest Day on Earth, 100 Years Ago ? History in the Headlines

Ah. So global warming isn't really a problem till we get to 134.1 F. Got it.

Did you finish high school?
 
Dang, these deniers are dumb.

Global Analysis - May 2014 | State of the Climate | National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)

May 2014 was the hottest May in the historical record. That's what these kooks are calling "cooling", the highest temps ever seen. Like I said, one serious bunch of morons.

And the response of the kooks? Declare all the data has to be a liberal conspiracy. After all, their liars' cult told them it was, and none of the kooks would dare think independently. That would get them instantly ejected from the cult.
The hottest day ever recorded was over 100 years ago, dummy.

The Hottest Day on Earth, 100 Years Ago ? History in the Headlines

Ah. So global warming isn't really a problem till we get to 134.1 F. Got it.

Did you finish high school?
There IS no global warming, sucker.
 
The hottest day ever recorded was over 100 years ago, dummy.

The Hottest Day on Earth, 100 Years Ago ? History in the Headlines

Ah. So global warming isn't really a problem till we get to 134.1 F. Got it.

Did you finish high school?
There IS no global warming, sucker.


SURE

indicator8_2014_tempgraph.PNG
 
Turns out
1, no fiddling the source is a liar who is too stupid to know
2, the data is for the US not the globe.

From your own link:

The US has actually been cooling since the Thirties



LOL......what a surprise.:D:D In the face of facts, the lefty calls the messenger a liar. The far left........they are consistent!!:2up:


s0n.....youve been pwned here!!!:eusa_dance::eusa_dance::fu: The data is fake!! And dang......global warming sure is taking a long, long, long time to get to the USA!!!!:gay::up:
Well, anyone who claims that the temperature of the US determines the temperature of the entire globe has to be a liar because no one, not even you, is that stupid! The US is 2% of the globe!!!!!

Even though this is data for only the US, if the data was fudged for the US, what other countries is the data being fudged?

Are you going to ASSume that all the rest of the data is correct or do you become a little more suspect. I have always followed the mony trail on both sides of this issue and if you take grant money and say there is no globle warming, then you have lost more grant money. Honesty is not the objective, and that is true for both sides.
 
Last edited:
Guys, keeping the air clean is important weather you believe that the earth getting warmer is due to man or not.


Chinese smog is so bad it's like a 'nuclear winter' that's even stopping plants' photosynthesis



Pollution in Beijing is now so dense that its effects are comparable to that of a nuclear winter, Chinese scientists have said.
It has been predicted that if enough nuclear bombs were detonated, so many particles would be thrown into the air that the sun could be blocked out enough to alter the weather and damage the food supply.
This process is now under way in China’s capital city and six northern provinces, according to He Dongxian from China Agricultural University’s College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...ering-plant-photosynthesis.html#ixzz35gkbG4LT


article-2568531-1BD79E6100000578-150_634x424.jpg


article-2568291-1BD7940500000578-43_634x419.jpg


article-2568531-1BD79B9900000578-748_634x421.jpg


article-2568531-1BD7C4FD00000578-135_634x433.jpg


article-2568531-1BD7D33B00000578-628_634x453.jpg



Seriously, this is how you want our cities to look?

We cannot just pollute the environment as much as we want with no repercussions.
 
Last edited:
Guys, keeping the air clean is important weather you believe that the earth getting warmer is due to man or not.


Chinese smog is so bad it's like a 'nuclear winter' that's even stopping plants' photosynthesis



Pollution in Beijing is now so dense that its effects are comparable to that of a nuclear winter, Chinese scientists have said.
It has been predicted that if enough nuclear bombs were detonated, so many particles would be thrown into the air that the sun could be blocked out enough to alter the weather and damage the food supply.
This process is now under way in China’s capital city and six northern provinces, according to He Dongxian from China Agricultural University’s College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering.

Read more: Beijing's toxic air pollution is so severe it resembles a nuclear winter | Mail Online


article-2568531-1BD79E6100000578-150_634x424.jpg


article-2568291-1BD7940500000578-43_634x419.jpg


article-2568531-1BD79B9900000578-748_634x421.jpg


article-2568531-1BD7C4FD00000578-135_634x433.jpg


article-2568531-1BD7D33B00000578-628_634x453.jpg



Seriously, this is how you want our cities to look?

We cannot just pollute the environment as much as we want with no repercussions.
Keeping the air clean is not a goal of the AGW cultists so what is the relevance of your post?
 
Sorry, guys - It's getting warmer. Even I can see that from the mid sixties to now, quite a bit of warming has occurred.

How would you explain rising sea levels and melting ice caps?
Reversion to the mean. Temperatures prior to the 1883 Krakatoa eruption should be available since the thermometer was invented by Fahrenheit in 1714. However they are not used, do you ever wonder why?

Great observation and interesting point!
 
Guys, keeping the air clean is important weather you believe that the earth getting warmer is due to man or not.

We cannot just pollute the environment as much as we want with no repercussions.

Do you really think right wing Americans WANT to pollute the planet?

Do you not know that America is much cleaner today than it was a few decades ago?

Stupid fools once claimed Lake Erie was dead for a thousand years...funny...just a couple decades after those fools made that claim, fisherman were catching vast amounts of fish from the lake. Claims by radicals, like the AGW cult, should never be listened to and roundly denounced.

So, the Earth is far more resilient than the radical left (warmers) want you to believe.

BTW the AGW cult claims CO2 is causing warming. CO2 is not a pollutant. So, if you believe these idiots, pollution is not the cause of warming.
 
Even though this is data for only the US, if the data was fudged for the US, what other countries is the data being fudged?

The key word in this sentence is "if". It's your side that is blindly buying into the word of an anonymous cheetos eating blogger as if he's the holy bible.

Perhaps a little skepticism instead of always believing what you want to believe.

Fox News Cites Birther To Claim NASA "Faked" Global Warming | Blog | Media Matters for America

However, the libertarian magazine Reason noted that even climate "skeptic" blogger Anthony Watts said that Goddard made "major errors in his analysis" and criticized the implication that "numbers are being plucked out of thin air in a nefarious way."
 

Forum List

Back
Top