🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Looks like the JV team may have taken out that airliner that killed 200+ people

So who has claimed responsibility?

Ahh no one... But don't worry the crazies have already said some generic muslim just did because he is a muslim and hates all non muslims...

So since the crazies were the ones who started the mess in ME and want to stay there. They should ignored...

Why?

Because they are the fucking idiots that started this mess... I mean they have been wrong so many times it would be a complete fucking surprise if they got something right, but hey a sun shines on a dogs arse once in his life....
ISIS claimed responsibility.

Why do you lefties have to be spoon fed current events? Get out from under your rocks
"Cowboy Ted" is neutered, he can't help it.
 
'ALMOST ALL BAD': Egypt's resort airport has history of security lapses...

Sharm el-Sheikh airport officials reveal porous security
November 08, 2015 - The airport at Egypt's resort of Sharm el-Sheikh has long seen gaps in security, including a key baggage scanning device that often is not functioning and lax searches at an entry gate for food and fuel for the planes, security officials at the airport told The Associated Press.
Security at the airport, and others around Egypt, have become a central concern as investigators probe the Oct. 31 crash of a Russian plane 23 minutes after it left Sharm el-Sheikh, killing all 224 on board. The U.S. and Britain have said the cause was likely a bomb planted on the flight, and Russia has halted flights to Egypt until security at airports is improved. Seven officials involved in security at Sharm el-Sheikh airport, several for more than a decade, told the AP of the gaps, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the press. Several said the malfunctioning scanner had been noted in security reports to their superiors, but the machine was not replaced. One of the officials, involved in security for planes, also pointed to bribe-taking by poorly paid policemen monitoring X-ray machines. "I can't tell you how many times I have caught a bag full of drugs or weapons that they have let through for 10 euros or whatever," he said.

Egypt's aviation minister and his spokesman did not respond to repeated calls and texts for comment. Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi has said British officials sent a security team to evaluate the airport 10 months ago, in cooperation with Egyptian officials, and were satisfied with the results. A spokesman for Britain's Department of Transportation would not comment on any details of what the team found. But British Transport Secretary Patrick Mcloughlin suggested on Friday that screening of checked-in bags was insufficient, telling the BBC that it had imposed its own additional checks on its flights "because we weren't wholly satisfied with the way screening had been done." All bags are put through a scanner as passengers enter Sharm airport, and carry-on bags go through a second machine at the gate before boarding.

But a scanner in the sorting area for checked-in bags often is not working, all the airport officials speaking to AP said. One of the officials said the breakdowns in the 10-year-old CTX scanner were because operators didn't use it properly — "human stupidity," he said — rather than technical faults. "I have seen people unplug it to save power," he said. Another of the officials said the staff made sure the scanner was operating well enough whenever international experts came to review measures at the airport. "We only care about appearances," he said. "Once they (higher-ups) hear something is coming, suddenly everything gets fixed. ... We wish we had visits every day."

MORE
 
All signs from our government as well as others are pointing to a bomb that got smuggled onto the plane.
Of course this is all just speculation at this point but all possibilities have to be considered.

Was pleased to see that US Marine Lt. Col. on Fox yesterday saying what I've been about no proof presented yet. It's all just 'it could have been a bomb.' and 'it could have been ISIS.' Coulda been a lot of things, if you got evidence present it.
 
So what? They were just Russian scum.

At least unlike Obama, the Russians are fighting against ISIS instead of for them

We are presenting the same strategy. No boots on the ground. Just bombing runs. They lose a jetliner with hundreds of people on it, and we haven't seen a terrorist attack in years. Hooray, Putin!!!
 
So what? They were just Russian scum.

At least unlike Obama, the Russians are fighting against ISIS instead of for them

We are presenting the same strategy. No boots on the ground. Just bombing runs. They lose a jetliner with hundreds of people on it, and we haven't seen a terrorist attack in years. Hooray, Putin!!!

If you love Putin, then good for you.

We are fighting on the side of ISIS against the Syrian government and Russia is fighting on the side of the Syrian government against ISIS, how is that "the same strategy?"
 
"Looks like the JV team may have taken out that airliner that killed 200+ people"

Typical of many in the right: to seek to exploit a tragedy for some perceived partisan gain.

You mean like when W said "mission accomplished" and the left never let it go? That was bad. Though I have a question, are you admitting that hyper-partisanship was a mistake when Democrats did it? Or are you just acting as your normal partisan self?
 
So what? They were just Russian scum.

At least unlike Obama, the Russians are fighting against ISIS instead of for them

We are presenting the same strategy. No boots on the ground. Just bombing runs. They lose a jetliner with hundreds of people on it, and we haven't seen a terrorist attack in years. Hooray, Putin!!!
Theoretically both the Russians and the US have boots on the ground. One has the legitimate governing authority in Syria on the ground, the other......... terrorists.
The United States government, led by Barack Obama, is openly supporting terrorism in foreign lands.
 
So what? They were just Russian scum.

At least unlike Obama, the Russians are fighting against ISIS instead of for them

We are presenting the same strategy. No boots on the ground. Just bombing runs. They lose a jetliner with hundreds of people on it, and we haven't seen a terrorist attack in years. Hooray, Putin!!!
Theoretically both the Russians and the US have boots on the ground. One has the legitimate governing authority in Syria on the ground, the other......... terrorists.
The United States government, led by Barack Obama, is openly supporting terrorism in foreign lands.

We've seen this meltdown before, must be contagious.
 
So what? They were just Russian scum.

At least unlike Obama, the Russians are fighting against ISIS instead of for them

We are presenting the same strategy. No boots on the ground. Just bombing runs. They lose a jetliner with hundreds of people on it, and we haven't seen a terrorist attack in years. Hooray, Putin!!!
Theoretically both the Russians and the US have boots on the ground. One has the legitimate governing authority in Syria on the ground, the other......... terrorists.
The United States government, led by Barack Obama, is openly supporting terrorism in foreign lands.

We've seen this meltdown before, must be contagious.
The moral failure of the American people to recognize the reality of the situation and to hold the government accountable for its actions begins with those who think like you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top