Looks Like the Trump Admin is Bringing Dark Secrets to The Light

How insane can you fucking get to try to post what you just did after Mueller indicted 12 Russian intelligence operative for conducting this hacking???

...and how is Mueller's attempt to extradite those Russians to the US and to successfully get them convicted going, snowflake?

Bwuhahahahaha.....Indicting these 12 Russians he knew he had no shot in hell of ever getting here in the states and who would never make it in front of a courtroom was all part of the incredible BS SHOW...and you bought into it... hook, line, and sinker.

:p

What the hell does our inability to extradite these operatives have to do with the simple fact that OBVIOUSLY Mueller's investigation concluded that Russians did it and even got specific Russians indicted before Grand Jury for these crimes.

Your posting about how Mueller's investigation supposedly didn't find that Russians did the hacking is straight insane.
 
Last edited:
Yes seriously, Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying.
When several FBI Agents testify/ state they do not believe Flynn was lying, and the only one to say he did was/is the FBI's #1 Counter-Intel Expert (such a high level FBI leadership position being involved in an interview usually done by Field Agents, another 'breach of standard protocol / from the norm the IG pointed out) who has been proven to have lied numerous times, helped the NSA and CIA Directors author the ICA and ICR - which they said they knew nothing about (a LIE)and considering all of the other criminal evidence against the FBI...according to the retired FBI Investigative expert in the article posted, this was a planned illegal set-up that required the FBI to bypass protocol so as not to alert the WY or WH legal Counsel to ensure Flynn was isolated and without legal Counsel. This was a set-up. Comey even admitted it (read the article).



"Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying."

That doesn't mean he WAS lying, either...and every one of the FBI Agents involved....except co-conspiring Strzok stated they did not believe Flynn lied.

That’s right, it doesn’t.

THE FACTS OF WHAT HE SAID TO VP AND FBI BRAZENLY CONTRADICTING HIS CONVERSATIONS WITH RUSSIANS DOES.
The evidence that already exists and that continues to come out speaks for itself:

The Obama administration initiated an illegitimate investigation into Trump and his team based on no legal, proper, legitimate justification for doing so.

Moron, Trump's DOJ IG report has already concluded this statement to be full of shit.

In a highly anticipated report released Monday, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz determined that the FBI had adequate cause in July 2016 to justify opening an investigation into links between the Trump campaign and Russia and did not find hard evidence of political bias in that decision, undermining allegations by President Trump and his allies that the bureau acted improperly in launching the probe.



What is it with you and total disregard for well-known facts?
That was before all of this information / internal docs (as recent as yesterday) began being unsealed...

Nothing in these 2017 documents deals with why 2016 investigation was initiated.

As usual, you grossly misunderstand what you mouth off about.
Spin it however you like. Mounting evidence shows the case against Flynn is looking very bogus indeed.
 
Yes seriously, Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying.
When several FBI Agents testify/ state they do not believe Flynn was lying, and the only one to say he did was/is the FBI's #1 Counter-Intel Expert (such a high level FBI leadership position being involved in an interview usually done by Field Agents, another 'breach of standard protocol / from the norm the IG pointed out) who has been proven to have lied numerous times, helped the NSA and CIA Directors author the ICA and ICR - which they said they knew nothing about (a LIE)and considering all of the other criminal evidence against the FBI...according to the retired FBI Investigative expert in the article posted, this was a planned illegal set-up that required the FBI to bypass protocol so as not to alert the WY or WH legal Counsel to ensure Flynn was isolated and without legal Counsel. This was a set-up. Comey even admitted it (read the article).



"Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying."

That doesn't mean he WAS lying, either...and every one of the FBI Agents involved....except co-conspiring Strzok stated they did not believe Flynn lied.

That’s right, it doesn’t.

THE FACTS OF WHAT HE SAID TO VP AND FBI BRAZENLY CONTRADICTING HIS CONVERSATIONS WITH RUSSIANS DOES.
The evidence that already exists and that continues to come out speaks for itself:

The Obama administration initiated an illegitimate investigation into Trump and his team based on no legal, proper, legitimate justification for doing so.

Moron, Trump's DOJ IG report has already concluded this statement to be full of shit.

In a highly anticipated report released Monday, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz determined that the FBI had adequate cause in July 2016 to justify opening an investigation into links between the Trump campaign and Russia and did not find hard evidence of political bias in that decision, undermining allegations by President Trump and his allies that the bureau acted improperly in launching the probe.



What is it with you and total disregard for well-known facts?
That was before all of this information / internal docs (as recent as yesterday) began being unsealed...

Nothing in these 2017 documents deals with why 2016 investigation was initiated.

As usual, you grossly misunderstand what you mouth off about.
Spin it however you like. Mounting evidence shows the case against Flynn is looking very bogus indeed.

Let's see you say that after Flynn gets convicted.
 
Yes seriously, Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying.
When several FBI Agents testify/ state they do not believe Flynn was lying, and the only one to say he did was/is the FBI's #1 Counter-Intel Expert (such a high level FBI leadership position being involved in an interview usually done by Field Agents, another 'breach of standard protocol / from the norm the IG pointed out) who has been proven to have lied numerous times, helped the NSA and CIA Directors author the ICA and ICR - which they said they knew nothing about (a LIE)and considering all of the other criminal evidence against the FBI...according to the retired FBI Investigative expert in the article posted, this was a planned illegal set-up that required the FBI to bypass protocol so as not to alert the WY or WH legal Counsel to ensure Flynn was isolated and without legal Counsel. This was a set-up. Comey even admitted it (read the article).



"Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying."

That doesn't mean he WAS lying, either...and every one of the FBI Agents involved....except co-conspiring Strzok stated they did not believe Flynn lied.

That’s right, it doesn’t.

THE FACTS OF WHAT HE SAID TO VP AND FBI BRAZENLY CONTRADICTING HIS CONVERSATIONS WITH RUSSIANS DOES.
The evidence that already exists and that continues to come out speaks for itself:

The Obama administration initiated an illegitimate investigation into Trump and his team based on no legal, proper, legitimate justification for doing so.

Moron, Trump's DOJ IG report has already concluded this statement to be full of shit.

In a highly anticipated report released Monday, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz determined that the FBI had adequate cause in July 2016 to justify opening an investigation into links between the Trump campaign and Russia and did not find hard evidence of political bias in that decision, undermining allegations by President Trump and his allies that the bureau acted improperly in launching the probe.



What is it with you and total disregard for well-known facts?
That was before all of this information / internal docs (as recent as yesterday) began being unsealed...

Nothing in these 2017 documents deals with why 2016 investigation was initiated.

As usual, you grossly misunderstand what you mouth off about.
Spin it however you like. Mounting evidence shows the case against Flynn is looking very bogus indeed.

Let's see you say that after Flynn gets convicted.








I will be waiting for you to accept you were wrong.
 
Can somebody explain what’s controversial here? Flynn got fired by Trump for lying about contacts with Russians. The FBI caught him lying to them which is a crime. Nobody forced him to lie. Flynn confessed to the crime.

Why is this an issue?
 
Yes seriously, Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying.
When several FBI Agents testify/ state they do not believe Flynn was lying, and the only one to say he did was/is the FBI's #1 Counter-Intel Expert (such a high level FBI leadership position being involved in an interview usually done by Field Agents, another 'breach of standard protocol / from the norm the IG pointed out) who has been proven to have lied numerous times, helped the NSA and CIA Directors author the ICA and ICR - which they said they knew nothing about (a LIE)and considering all of the other criminal evidence against the FBI...according to the retired FBI Investigative expert in the article posted, this was a planned illegal set-up that required the FBI to bypass protocol so as not to alert the WY or WH legal Counsel to ensure Flynn was isolated and without legal Counsel. This was a set-up. Comey even admitted it (read the article).



"Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying."

That doesn't mean he WAS lying, either...and every one of the FBI Agents involved....except co-conspiring Strzok stated they did not believe Flynn lied.

That’s right, it doesn’t.

THE FACTS OF WHAT HE SAID TO VP AND FBI BRAZENLY CONTRADICTING HIS CONVERSATIONS WITH RUSSIANS DOES.
The evidence that already exists and that continues to come out speaks for itself:

The Obama administration initiated an illegitimate investigation into Trump and his team based on no legal, proper, legitimate justification for doing so.

Moron, Trump's DOJ IG report has already concluded this statement to be full of shit.

In a highly anticipated report released Monday, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz determined that the FBI had adequate cause in July 2016 to justify opening an investigation into links between the Trump campaign and Russia and did not find hard evidence of political bias in that decision, undermining allegations by President Trump and his allies that the bureau acted improperly in launching the probe.



What is it with you and total disregard for well-known facts?
That was before all of this information / internal docs (as recent as yesterday) began being unsealed...

Nothing in these 2017 documents deals with why 2016 investigation was initiated.

As usual, you grossly misunderstand what you mouth off about.
Spin it however you like. Mounting evidence shows the case against Flynn is looking very bogus indeed.

Let's see you say that after Flynn gets convicted.








I will be waiting for you to accept you were wrong.
We shall see. I do give the deep state credit for being able to cover their own asses when they screw up.
 
Can somebody explain what’s controversial here? Flynn got fired by Trump for lying about contacts with Russians. The FBI caught him lying to them which is a crime. Nobody forced him to lie. Flynn confessed to the crime.

Why is this an issue?
Because that isn't what happened.

The FBI was going to close the case on Flynn in January of 2017. They concluded that there was nothing wrong with what he did.

Then Comey and Struck decided to lay an entrapment sting on him. They even advised him that he needed no lawyer. They withheld exculpatory evidence from him and his lawyers.

Flynn confessed to lying in order to spare his son from the threats made to investigate him unless he did. Flynn did not confess because he was guilty of anything.

What isn't controversial about it.
 
Can somebody explain what’s controversial here? Flynn got fired by Trump for lying about contacts with Russians. The FBI caught him lying to them which is a crime. Nobody forced him to lie. Flynn confessed to the crime.

Why is this an issue?
Because that isn't what happened.

The FBI was going to close the case on Flynn in January of 2017. They concluded that there was nothing wrong with what he did.

Then Comey and Struck decided to lay an entrapment sting on him. They even advised him that he needed no lawyer. They withheld exculpatory evidence from him and his lawyers.

Flynn confessed to lying in order to spare his son from the threats made to investigate him unless he did. Flynn did not confess because he was guilty of anything.

What isn't controversial about it.
What were they going after Flynn's son for? Not sure if I ever heard what that part was about.
 
Can somebody explain what’s controversial here? Flynn got fired by Trump for lying about contacts with Russians. The FBI caught him lying to them which is a crime. Nobody forced him to lie. Flynn confessed to the crime.

Why is this an issue?
Because that isn't what happened.

The FBI was going to close the case on Flynn in January of 2017. They concluded that there was nothing wrong with what he did.

Then Comey and Struck decided to lay an entrapment sting on him. They even advised him that he needed no lawyer. They withheld exculpatory evidence from him and his lawyers.

Flynn confessed to lying in order to spare his son from the threats made to investigate him unless he did. Flynn did not confess because he was guilty of anything.

What isn't controversial about it.
What were they going after Flynn's son for? Not sure if I ever heard what that part was about.
/----/ Try listening to the news once in a while.
We're the FBI - tell us what we want to hear, confess to whatever crime we say OR we will go after your son, and destroy him like we did you.
 
Can somebody explain what’s controversial here? Flynn got fired by Trump for lying about contacts with Russians. The FBI caught him lying to them which is a crime. Nobody forced him to lie. Flynn confessed to the crime.

Why is this an issue?
Because that isn't what happened.

The FBI was going to close the case on Flynn in January of 2017. They concluded that there was nothing wrong with what he did.

Then Comey and Struck decided to lay an entrapment sting on him. They even advised him that he needed no lawyer. They withheld exculpatory evidence from him and his lawyers.

Flynn confessed to lying in order to spare his son from the threats made to investigate him unless he did. Flynn did not confess because he was guilty of anything.

What isn't controversial about it.
What were they going after Flynn's son for? Not sure if I ever heard what that part was about.
/----/ Try listening to the news once in a while.
We're the FBI - tell us what we want to hear, confess to whatever crime we say OR we will go after your son, and destroy him like we did you.
Why am I not surprised given the people involved. All I heard was the FBI would go after Flynn's son, no details as to potential charges.
 
Yes seriously, Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying.
When several FBI Agents testify/ state they do not believe Flynn was lying, and the only one to say he did was/is the FBI's #1 Counter-Intel Expert (such a high level FBI leadership position being involved in an interview usually done by Field Agents, another 'breach of standard protocol / from the norm the IG pointed out) who has been proven to have lied numerous times, helped the NSA and CIA Directors author the ICA and ICR - which they said they knew nothing about (a LIE)and considering all of the other criminal evidence against the FBI...according to the retired FBI Investigative expert in the article posted, this was a planned illegal set-up that required the FBI to bypass protocol so as not to alert the WY or WH legal Counsel to ensure Flynn was isolated and without legal Counsel. This was a set-up. Comey even admitted it (read the article).



"Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying."

That doesn't mean he WAS lying, either...and every one of the FBI Agents involved....except co-conspiring Strzok stated they did not believe Flynn lied.

That’s right, it doesn’t.

THE FACTS OF WHAT HE SAID TO VP AND FBI BRAZENLY CONTRADICTING HIS CONVERSATIONS WITH RUSSIANS DOES.
The evidence that already exists and that continues to come out speaks for itself:

The Obama administration initiated an illegitimate investigation into Trump and his team based on no legal, proper, legitimate justification for doing so.

Moron, Trump's DOJ IG report has already concluded this statement to be full of shit.

In a highly anticipated report released Monday, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz determined that the FBI had adequate cause in July 2016 to justify opening an investigation into links between the Trump campaign and Russia and did not find hard evidence of political bias in that decision, undermining allegations by President Trump and his allies that the bureau acted improperly in launching the probe.



What is it with you and total disregard for well-known facts?
That was before all of this information / internal docs (as recent as yesterday) began being unsealed...

Nothing in these 2017 documents deals with why 2016 investigation was initiated.

As usual, you grossly misunderstand what you mouth off about.
Spin it however you like. Mounting evidence shows the case against Flynn is looking very bogus indeed.

Let's see you say that after Flynn gets convicted.

I will be waiting for you to accept you were wrong.

Me too, but god damn it, I keep being right.
 
Can somebody explain what’s controversial here? Flynn got fired by Trump for lying about contacts with Russians. The FBI caught him lying to them which is a crime. Nobody forced him to lie. Flynn confessed to the crime.

Why is this an issue?
Because that isn't what happened.

The FBI was going to close the case on Flynn in January of 2017. They concluded that there was nothing wrong with what he did.

Then Comey and Struck decided to lay an entrapment sting on him. They even advised him that he needed no lawyer. They withheld exculpatory evidence from him and his lawyers.

Flynn confessed to lying in order to spare his son from the threats made to investigate him unless he did. Flynn did not confess because he was guilty of anything.

What isn't controversial about it.
What were they going after Flynn's son for? Not sure if I ever heard what that part was about.
I'd have to go look, but I do recall that Flynn had been bankrupted because of the lawyers he needed after the second run at him by the FBI commenced. They were looking into his son too, but I don't recall the reasons.
 
Can somebody explain what’s controversial here? Flynn got fired by Trump for lying about contacts with Russians. The FBI caught him lying to them which is a crime. Nobody forced him to lie. Flynn confessed to the crime.

Why is this an issue?
Because that isn't what happened.

The FBI was going to close the case on Flynn in January of 2017. They concluded that there was nothing wrong with what he did.

Then Comey and Struck decided to lay an entrapment sting on him. They even advised him that he needed no lawyer. They withheld exculpatory evidence from him and his lawyers.

Flynn confessed to lying in order to spare his son from the threats made to investigate him unless he did. Flynn did not confess because he was guilty of anything.

What isn't controversial about it.
What were they going after Flynn's son for? Not sure if I ever heard what that part was about.
/----/ Try listening to the news once in a while.
We're the FBI - tell us what we want to hear, confess to whatever crime we say OR we will go after your son, and destroy him like we did you.
Thanks.
 
Logan Act is a joke and that's why they didn't nail him on it.
Yes, to a trump supporter being a human shield for a trump proxy. But the FBI still investigates these violations. As they should.


Flynn was set up by the FBI.
Yes, that's what the FBI does with criminals. He was set up to lie, because they knew he would lie. And they were right. He did. Blame the foreign agent doing illegal deals with russians for that. He lied, because he knew what he was doing was not okay.
Why didn't they prosecute him for the Logan Act? Show some honesty

Flynn is completely innocent, it was a set up....and you know it. You just can't bring yourself to admit it
 
Can somebody explain what’s controversial here? Flynn got fired by Trump for lying about contacts with Russians. The FBI caught him lying to them which is a crime. Nobody forced him to lie. Flynn confessed to the crime.

Why is this an issue?
People feel strongly that Flynn should have never been interviewed in the first place.

Keep in mind, it was a wholly voluntary interview. The FBI asked him if they could ask him questions, he said yes.
 
Can somebody explain what’s controversial here? Flynn got fired by Trump for lying about contacts with Russians. The FBI caught him lying to them which is a crime. Nobody forced him to lie. Flynn confessed to the crime.

Why is this an issue?
I think the issue is that the FBI squeezed him for dirt on Trump and Russia. And at the time the FBI did that, it had to know there was no actual evidence of a Trump-Putin conspiracy.

And that IS NOT TO DAY THE FBI DIDN'T HAVE REASON TO INITIATE AN INVESTIGATION. Trump told his boychinkins to meet with a known Russian spy to get dirt of Hillary. And Trump publicly asked Putin to hack and publish Hillary's emails. No presidential candidate since Nixon has come close to that brazen misbehavior.

But I agree that in the end, all Flynn did was illegally represent foreign entities, and he did so while working for the US govt (US). He needed to give the money up, and take his legal hit.
 
Because, when person commits a crime he would have not otherwise thought to commit because of the nefarious activities of the Government---its known at "Entrapment" and it is a bar, a legal defense, to punishment for the crime.

But that is just the start of the story as to General Flynn.

I don't feel like explaining it all---it's a long story, but it involved KGB-like pressure--psychological torture---breaking him financially, and threatening to do the same to his son to get him to plead to a "process crime" which it is not clear he even committed.

People do plead to crimes they didn't commit, to avoid other hassles which are worse. The most basic example is paying a traffic ticket when you don't think you did anything wrong---to avoid the hassle and cost of fighting it.

It was of course much worse for Flynn.

Out of spite, Obama operatives investigated him for being a possible Russian Agent---a 30 year combat veteran--found nothing---and decided to close the case--until Comey and McCabe and Strzok said in effect: "no keep it open perhaps we can "entrap" him into a lie if we interview him even though we we know he has committed no crime.

So, they sprung a trap and interviewed him without him even knowing he was involved in an investigation---nefarious as it was. The people who did it did not find evidence of lying, and they didn't charge him----but later on---Mueller and his Gestapo---needing a scapegoat to keep their sham investigation in the news---did pursue him; and his son---and reduced him to plead to relieve the psychological and financial torture.

The issue is now, not whether Flynn, who was suspected of no crime, lied to the FBI when they performed a shame interview---the issue is much larger than Flynn--it is the behavior of our DOJ/FBI---which very much resembles the old Soviet KGB---at least the way it was operated under Obama and his apparachits.

Forget Flynn. What has been exposed should terrify every American---except you Bolsheviks, of course.

------
 
Last edited:
How insane can you fucking get to try to post what you just did after Mueller indicted 12 Russian intelligence operative for conducting this hacking???

...and how is Mueller's attempt to extradite those Russians to the US and to successfully get them convicted going, snowflake?

Bwuhahahahaha.....Indicting these 12 Russians he knew he had no shot in hell of ever getting here in the states and who would never make it in front of a courtroom was all part of the incredible BS SHOW...and you bought into it... hook, line, and sinker.

:p

What the hell does our inability to extradite these operatives have to do with the simple fact that OBVIOUSLY Mueller's investigation concluded that Russians did it and even got specific Russians indicted before Grand Jury for these crimes.

Your posting about how Mueller's investigation supposedly didn't find that Russians did the hacking is straight insane.
Charging Russians who you know will NEVER see the inside of a courtroom, who will never get the chance to force Mueller to show he has a case, and who will never get the chance to prove they had anything to do with the bogus 'dnc hack' is a theatrical way of trying to make it appear your false Russian narrative is valid without ever proving so.

Hillary could charge the leader of NK of helping Trump win in 2016, could declare he is going to be charged, and demand his extradition.....

....he will never come here, if still alive, and Hillary could continue to repeat the lie, claiming the fact that he was accused means he must have done it which proves her lie.

Same difference.

Same bullshit.

Accusations, claims, charges mean NOTHING. Mueller proved nothing with this theatrics.

Again, the Mueller report made it clear that the Intel Community nor the FBI were able to conclude the DNC server was ever hacked - especially by the Russians - because the Only ones who supposedly looked at the server was a private company paid by the DNC... whose co-founder was given an Obama Cabinet position after it was over....


.
 
The FBI was going to close the case on Flynn in January of 2017. They concluded that there was nothing wrong with what he did.
That's a well crafted distortion of the truth. In the part of the investigation ("Crossfire Razor") you referred to the FBI was looking in to whether Flynn had acted as a Russian agent during the campaign. They concluded he had not.
That investigation was not part of the FBI's pursuit of Flynn on charges relating to his conversations with Kislyak. The conversations he lied to the FBI about and later confessed to. A crime for which he plead guilty.

However, none of these facts matter to occupants of Trumpworld. Where half-baked conspiracy theories, outright lies, and false accusations by the Liar-in-Chief are the currency of the land.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top