Looks Like the Trump Admin is Bringing Dark Secrets to The Light

[iceberg]

Yes seriously, Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying.

When several FBI Agents testify/ state they do not believe Flynn was lying, and the only one to say he did was/is the FBI's #1 Counter-Intel Expert (such a high level FBI leadership position being involved in an interview usually done by Field Agents, another 'breach of standard protocol / from the norm the IG pointed out) who has been proven to have lied numerous times, helped the NSA and CIA Directors author the ICA and ICR - which they said they knew nothing about (a LIE)and considering all of the other criminal evidence against the FBI...according to the retired FBI Investigative expert in the article posted, this was a planned illegal set-up that required the FBI to bypass protocol so as not to alert the WY or WH legal Counsel to ensure Flynn was isolated and without legal Counsel. This was a set-up. Comey even admitted it (read the article).



"Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying."

That doesn't mean he WAS lying, either...and every one of the FBI Agents involved....except co-conspiring Strzok stated they did not believe Flynn lied.

That’s right, it doesn’t.

THE FACTS OF WHAT HE SAID TO VP AND FBI BRAZENLY CONTRADICTING HIS CONVERSATIONS WITH RUSSIANS DOES.

So why did they decide to go back for a 2nd interview when they found nothing the first time? What many on the left love to do, invent reasons

 

[easyt65]

Yes seriously, Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying.

When several FBI Agents testify/ state they do not believe Flynn was lying, and the only one to say he did was/is the FBI's #1 Counter-Intel Expert (such a high level FBI leadership position being involved in an interview usually done by Field Agents, another 'breach of standard protocol / from the norm the IG pointed out) who has been proven to have lied numerous times, helped the NSA and CIA Directors author the ICA and ICR - which they said they knew nothing about (a LIE)and considering all of the other criminal evidence against the FBI...according to the retired FBI Investigative expert in the article posted, this was a planned illegal set-up that required the FBI to bypass protocol so as not to alert the WY or WH legal Counsel to ensure Flynn was isolated and without legal Counsel. This was a set-up. Comey even admitted it (read the article).



"Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying."

That doesn't mean he WAS lying, either...and every one of the FBI Agents involved....except co-conspiring Strzok stated they did not believe Flynn lied.

That’s right, it doesn’t.

THE FACTS OF WHAT HE SAID TO VP AND FBI BRAZENLY CONTRADICTING HIS CONVERSATIONS WITH RUSSIANS DOES.

The evidence that already exists and that continues to come out speaks for itself:

The Obama administration initiated an illegitimate investigation into Trump and his team based on no legal, proper, legitimate justification for doing so.
- This was the finding of the US IG, admitted to by those who participated in it (page, Comey, FBI Lawyers,, etc...

Comey, Page, and others have stated the FBI never found any evidence to support their own internal investigations that found nothing nor any that justified an official investigation and Special Counsel being appointed. Evidence shows the justification for the investigations were Russian Intelligence Service Propaganda the FBI itself assessed was already being used by the RIS against Trump Foreign Policy elsewhere. Their investigations were based on KNOWN enemy / Russian propaganda, lies, and false narratives THEY created in order to commit FISA Court Abuses, Civil Rights violations, and crimes in an attempt to take down / remove from office a newly elected President.

THIS is not FACTUALLY disputed...and more and more evidence continues to come out almost daily exposing it further, despite Wray's damnedest effort to keep it out of the public eye.

FBI agents involved in Flynn's interview said they believed he did not lie...yet he was charged based on the word of a proven lying FBI member high among the leadership ranks...who should never have been involved in a lowly interview conducted by Field Agents. Strzok is a proven perjurer and conspirator who has been proven to have engaged in Obstruction, manipulated and manufactured 'evidence' known to be based on Russian Counter-Intel Propaganda to frame, entrap, and remove from office the National Security Advisor and President of the United States.

These criminal pieces of shit withheld exculpatory evidence that destroyed their narratives and cases - such as knowing Page was in contact with the Russians because he was a contact working with / for the State Department. They used KNOWN false information, KNOWN Russian Intel Service propaganda, hid key information, lied, committed perjury, altered official documents, altered witness testimony after the fact, knowingly intentionally committed FISA Court abuses, and blackmailed people into confessions of guilty by threatening to target / jail their CHILDREN.....


...and these are the criminal, treasonous FU@KS you snowflakes continue to defend.

WTF?!


.

 

[AntonToo]

Yes seriously, Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying.

When several FBI Agents testify/ state they do not believe Flynn was lying, and the only one to say he did was/is the FBI's #1 Counter-Intel Expert (such a high level FBI leadership position being involved in an interview usually done by Field Agents, another 'breach of standard protocol / from the norm the IG pointed out) who has been proven to have lied numerous times, helped the NSA and CIA Directors author the ICA and ICR - which they said they knew nothing about (a LIE)and considering all of the other criminal evidence against the FBI...according to the retired FBI Investigative expert in the article posted, this was a planned illegal set-up that required the FBI to bypass protocol so as not to alert the WY or WH legal Counsel to ensure Flynn was isolated and without legal Counsel. This was a set-up. Comey even admitted it (read the article).



"Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying."

That doesn't mean he WAS lying, either...and every one of the FBI Agents involved....except co-conspiring Strzok stated they did not believe Flynn lied.

That’s right, it doesn’t.

THE FACTS OF WHAT FLYNN SAID TO VP AND FBI BRAZENLY CONTRADICTING HIS CONVERSATIONS WITH RUSSIANS DOES.

So why did they decide to go back for a 2nd interview when they found nothing the first time? What many on the left love to do, invent reasons

Found nothing??? You read English right?

THE FACTS OF WHAT HE SAID TO VP AND FBI BRAZENLY CONTRADICTED HIS CONVERSATIONS WITH RUSSIANS.

Read until the meaning settles in your head. The interviewers were confused by the disconnect of Flynn's seemingly unflinching behaviour and what they knew to be directly contradicting him from recorded conversations he had with Kysliak.

 

[AntonToo]

Yes seriously, Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying.

When several FBI Agents testify/ state they do not believe Flynn was lying, and the only one to say he did was/is the FBI's #1 Counter-Intel Expert (such a high level FBI leadership position being involved in an interview usually done by Field Agents, another 'breach of standard protocol / from the norm the IG pointed out) who has been proven to have lied numerous times, helped the NSA and CIA Directors author the ICA and ICR - which they said they knew nothing about (a LIE)and considering all of the other criminal evidence against the FBI...according to the retired FBI Investigative expert in the article posted, this was a planned illegal set-up that required the FBI to bypass protocol so as not to alert the WY or WH legal Counsel to ensure Flynn was isolated and without legal Counsel. This was a set-up. Comey even admitted it (read the article).



"Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying."

That doesn't mean he WAS lying, either...and every one of the FBI Agents involved....except co-conspiring Strzok stated they did not believe Flynn lied.

That’s right, it doesn’t.

THE FACTS OF WHAT HE SAID TO VP AND FBI BRAZENLY CONTRADICTING HIS CONVERSATIONS WITH RUSSIANS DOES.

The evidence that already exists and that continues to come out speaks for itself:

The Obama administration initiated an illegitimate investigation into Trump and his team based on no legal, proper, legitimate justification for doing so.

Moron, Trump's DOJ IG report has already concluded this statement to be full of shit.

In a highly anticipated report released Monday, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz determined that the FBI had adequate cause in July 2016 to justify opening an investigation into links between the Trump campaign and Russia and did not find hard evidence of political bias in that decision, undermining allegations by President Trump and his allies that the bureau acted improperly in launching the probe.

Inspector General Finds FBI Probe into Trump Campaign Was Justified, But Not Perfect

Inspector General Michael Horowitz found the FBI had adequate cause to open its probe into links between the Trump campaign and Russia

time.com

What is it with you and total disregard for well-known facts?

 

[easyt65]

Deputy FBI Director / Counter-Intelligence expert Peter Strzok texted to his mistress, FBI Agent Page that key members trying to oust Trump had already been meeting, he said Barak Obama insisted on knowing EVERYTHING his administration was doing (supported by testimony by Clapper), and that they were already meeting. Page confirmed this when she testified these meetings were held in the WH by Barry, and she stated people who attended included Rice, Rosenstein, Comey, the VP, ETC...


FLASHBACK

The Obama White House held special meetings related to the Russia investigation in 2016. The odd thing is that crooked John Kerry from the State Department was invited but good guy Admiral Mike Rogers from the NSA was excluded. Susan Rice had the video cut off so the NSA could not see what was being discussed.


Rice would chair the principals’ meetings — which brought together Brennan; Comey; Kerry; Director of National Intelligence James Clapper; Defense Secretary Ash Carter; Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson; Treasury Secretary Jack Lew; Attorney General Loretta Lynch; and Gen. Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff — with only a few other White House officials present, including White House chief of staff Denis McDonough; homeland security adviser Lisa Monaco, and Colin Kahl, Vice President Joe Biden’s national security adviser. (Kahl had to insist to Rice that he be allowed to attend so that Biden could be fully briefed.)

Rice’s No. 2, deputy national security adviser Avril Haines, oversaw the deputies’ sessions. White House officials who were absent from the meetings were not told what was being discussed. This even included other NSC staffers — some of whom bristled at being shut out. Often the intelligence material covered in these meetings was not placed in the President’s Daily Brief, the top-secret document presented to the president every morning. Too many people had access to the PDB. “The opsec on this” — the operational security — “was as tight as it could be,” one White House official later said.
-- YAHOO NEWS, 2016

Rice said, she feared leaks and therefore she hid the discussions from these meetings from the NSA; however, out of all the leaks that have made their way into the press, not a single one can be found that came from the NSA. Mike Rogers ran a pretty tight ship. Rice did not want Rogers at these meetings because the Obama team did not trust Rogers to conceal their crimes.


When Rogers took over the NSA he ordered an audit of the FISA Court program.......and fecal matter hit the oscillating rotator.....

"On April 26, 2017, an unsealed FISA Court Ruling unveiled a number of criminal activities that Barack Obama’s FBI, NSA and DOJ participated in during his time in office. The FISA Court Ruling shows widespread abuse of the FISA mandate. According to the report, Obama’s FBI, NSA and DOJ performed searches on Americans that were against their 4th Amendment rights. This went on for years. One paragraph in the report states that 85% of the Section 704 and 705(b) FISA searches made during the time of the audit (a few months in 2015) were non-compliant with applicable laws and therefore criminal."

In addition, Obama’s DOJ and FBI were illegally searching Americans against their rights. Unbeknownst to most Americans, Obama’s FBI was providing this information to outside contractors who had no business or legal cause or claim the information.

A further review of the report shows that the Court stated that the Obama government had an institutional “lack of candor”.

So the Obama gang held meetings regarding the Russia scandal from the White House and kept the NSA out when they should have been a part of the team but allowed creepy Secretary of State John Kerry to attend when he had no business being there. Huh!

FLASHBACK: Obama Held ‘Russia Meetings’ in the White House and Invited John Kerry but Not NSA’s Honorable Admiral Mike Rogers

The following post was published nearly 2 years ago on June 25, 2018 The Obama White House held special meetings related to the Russia investigation in 2016. The odd thing is that crooked John Kerry from the State Department was invited but good guy Admiral Mike Rogers from the NSA was excluded...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

SHIT like this is part of the reason why Barry's administration was declared to be the most criminally compliant administration in US history in regards to the FOIA and Federal Records Act, why their failed coup attempt is the largest political scandal in US history...and why these criminals need to go to prison...or it WILL happen again. Without punishment to deter a 'next time', it will happen again.

 

[easyt65]

Yes seriously, Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying.

When several FBI Agents testify/ state they do not believe Flynn was lying, and the only one to say he did was/is the FBI's #1 Counter-Intel Expert (such a high level FBI leadership position being involved in an interview usually done by Field Agents, another 'breach of standard protocol / from the norm the IG pointed out) who has been proven to have lied numerous times, helped the NSA and CIA Directors author the ICA and ICR - which they said they knew nothing about (a LIE)and considering all of the other criminal evidence against the FBI...according to the retired FBI Investigative expert in the article posted, this was a planned illegal set-up that required the FBI to bypass protocol so as not to alert the WY or WH legal Counsel to ensure Flynn was isolated and without legal Counsel. This was a set-up. Comey even admitted it (read the article).



"Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying."

That doesn't mean he WAS lying, either...and every one of the FBI Agents involved....except co-conspiring Strzok stated they did not believe Flynn lied.

That’s right, it doesn’t.

THE FACTS OF WHAT HE SAID TO VP AND FBI BRAZENLY CONTRADICTING HIS CONVERSATIONS WITH RUSSIANS DOES.

The evidence that already exists and that continues to come out speaks for itself:

The Obama administration initiated an illegitimate investigation into Trump and his team based on no legal, proper, legitimate justification for doing so.

Moron, Trump's DOJ IG report has already concluded this statement to be full of shit.

In a highly anticipated report released Monday, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz determined that the FBI had adequate cause in July 2016 to justify opening an investigation into links between the Trump campaign and Russia and did not find hard evidence of political bias in that decision, undermining allegations by President Trump and his allies that the bureau acted improperly in launching the probe.

Inspector General Finds FBI Probe into Trump Campaign Was Justified, But Not Perfect

Inspector General Michael Horowitz found the FBI had adequate cause to open its probe into links between the Trump campaign and Russia

time.com

What is it with you and total disregard for well-known facts?

That was before all of this information / internal docs (as recent as yesterday) began being unsealed...

 

[AntonToo]

I challenge you to be able to exactly recall, to the finest detail, a conversation you had weeks ago.

Nobody asked Flynn for the finest detail. he either discussed with Russians sanctions or he didn't.

I would obviously have ZERO problems recalling something so sensitive in nature and I would OBVIOUSLY not be pleading guilty to lying to FBI (on multiple counts no less) if I simply forgot something.

The only reason it is not obvious to you is that like most politico nutters, you have a nasty habit of shutting down your common sense facilities if they lead to inconvenient conclusions.

Yes, they did, he misstated a fact. That's all. You are either willfully ignorant of the case, or simply don't care.

Regardless of your bullshit opinion, Flynn is going to be exonerated because he committed no crime.

The fbi however, did.

No he will be exonerated because Tramp told Barr to exert pressure.

According to you trampers its ok to lie to the FBI and its ok to ignore the house investigations,
and its ok to lie, because tramp does it all the time.
You tramper's are so low.

Can I lie to the FBI. You guys have absolutely no morals.

For the sake of argument, lets say he lied.

Why was Flynn not convicted of anything other than lying? Just wondering, since Flynn has been used by the left as a justification for the Mueller investigation. Was the the entire investigation nothing more than an attempt to get a bunch of process crimes out of Trump associates? Sure does seem that way to the logical mind.

Because he took a guilty plea on straight forward perjury charges instead of a rare Logan Act charge. Prosecutors like to keep their case as clear as possible while getting the just outcome, probably even more so for high profile, politically sensitive cases.

Your assertion that Flynn had ANYTHING to do with justification for investigation, which began in 2016 is pure ignorance. It was a tangent episode to operation Hurricane until Trump pressured Comey to "let Flynn go" and eventually fired him, which resulted in Mueller being assigned.

 

[eagle7-31]

Michael Flynn case should be dismissed to preserve justice

Some more documents reveal an unlawful reason for this case.

thehill.com

will be in denial. And Flynn could very well have one heck of a civil suit to file as well.

 

[AntonToo]

Yes seriously, Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying.

When several FBI Agents testify/ state they do not believe Flynn was lying, and the only one to say he did was/is the FBI's #1 Counter-Intel Expert (such a high level FBI leadership position being involved in an interview usually done by Field Agents, another 'breach of standard protocol / from the norm the IG pointed out) who has been proven to have lied numerous times, helped the NSA and CIA Directors author the ICA and ICR - which they said they knew nothing about (a LIE)and considering all of the other criminal evidence against the FBI...according to the retired FBI Investigative expert in the article posted, this was a planned illegal set-up that required the FBI to bypass protocol so as not to alert the WY or WH legal Counsel to ensure Flynn was isolated and without legal Counsel. This was a set-up. Comey even admitted it (read the article).



"Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying."

That doesn't mean he WAS lying, either...and every one of the FBI Agents involved....except co-conspiring Strzok stated they did not believe Flynn lied.

That’s right, it doesn’t.

THE FACTS OF WHAT HE SAID TO VP AND FBI BRAZENLY CONTRADICTING HIS CONVERSATIONS WITH RUSSIANS DOES.

The evidence that already exists and that continues to come out speaks for itself:

The Obama administration initiated an illegitimate investigation into Trump and his team based on no legal, proper, legitimate justification for doing so.

Moron, Trump's DOJ IG report has already concluded this statement to be full of shit.

In a highly anticipated report released Monday, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz determined that the FBI had adequate cause in July 2016 to justify opening an investigation into links between the Trump campaign and Russia and did not find hard evidence of political bias in that decision, undermining allegations by President Trump and his allies that the bureau acted improperly in launching the probe.

Inspector General Finds FBI Probe into Trump Campaign Was Justified, But Not Perfect

Inspector General Michael Horowitz found the FBI had adequate cause to open its probe into links between the Trump campaign and Russia

time.com

What is it with you and total disregard for well-known facts?

That was before all of this information / internal docs (as recent as yesterday) began being unsealed...

Nothing in these 2017 documents deals with why 2016 investigation was initiated.

As usual, you grossly misunderstand what you mouth off about.

 

[iceberg]

Yes seriously, Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying.

When several FBI Agents testify/ state they do not believe Flynn was lying, and the only one to say he did was/is the FBI's #1 Counter-Intel Expert (such a high level FBI leadership position being involved in an interview usually done by Field Agents, another 'breach of standard protocol / from the norm the IG pointed out) who has been proven to have lied numerous times, helped the NSA and CIA Directors author the ICA and ICR - which they said they knew nothing about (a LIE)and considering all of the other criminal evidence against the FBI...according to the retired FBI Investigative expert in the article posted, this was a planned illegal set-up that required the FBI to bypass protocol so as not to alert the WY or WH legal Counsel to ensure Flynn was isolated and without legal Counsel. This was a set-up. Comey even admitted it (read the article).



"Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying."

That doesn't mean he WAS lying, either...and every one of the FBI Agents involved....except co-conspiring Strzok stated they did not believe Flynn lied.

That’s right, it doesn’t.

THE FACTS OF WHAT FLYNN SAID TO VP AND FBI BRAZENLY CONTRADICTING HIS CONVERSATIONS WITH RUSSIANS DOES.

So why did they decide to go back for a 2nd interview when they found nothing the first time? What many on the left love to do, invent reasons

Found nothing??? You read English right?

THE FACTS OF WHAT HE SAID TO VP AND FBI BRAZENLY CONTRADICTED HIS CONVERSATIONS WITH RUSSIANS.

Read until the meaning settles in your head. The interviewers were confused by the disconnect of Flynn's seemingly unflinching behaviour and what they knew to be directly contradicting him from recorded conversations he had with Kysliak.

Well after the fbi altered the 302s.

Please keep up. The fbi was going to close this til strozk stepped in and I VENTED FUCKING Reasons to go back

Fucking maroon.

 

[easyt65]

I challenge you to be able to exactly recall, to the finest detail, a conversation you had weeks ago.

Nobody asked Flynn for the finest detail. he either discussed with Russians sanctions or he didn't.

I would obviously have ZERO problems recalling something so sensitive in nature and I would OBVIOUSLY not be pleading guilty to lying to FBI (on multiple counts no less) if I simply forgot something.

The only reason it is not obvious to you is that like most politico nutters, you have a nasty habit of shutting down your common sense facilities if they lead to inconvenient conclusions.

Yes, they did, he misstated a fact. That's all. You are either willfully ignorant of the case, or simply don't care.

Regardless of your bullshit opinion, Flynn is going to be exonerated because he committed no crime.

The fbi however, did.

No he will be exonerated because Tramp told Barr to exert pressure.

According to you trampers its ok to lie to the FBI and its ok to ignore the house investigations,
and its ok to lie, because tramp does it all the time.
You tramper's are so low.

Can I lie to the FBI. You guys have absolutely no morals.

For the sake of argument, lets say he lied.

Why was Flynn not convicted of anything other than lying? Just wondering, since Flynn has been used by the left as a justification for the Mueller investigation. Was the the entire investigation nothing more than an attempt to get a bunch of process crimes out of Trump associates? Sure does seem that way to the logical mind.

Because he took a guilty plea on straight forward perjury charges instead of a rare Logan Act charge. Prosecutors like to keep their case as clear as possible while getting the just outcome.

Your assertion that Flynn had ANYTHING to with justification for Mueller investigation, which began in 2016 is pure ignorance. It was a tangent episode to operation Hurricane until Trump pressured Comey to "let Flynn go" and eventually fired him, which resulted in Mueller being assigned.

The Obama administration wanted so badly to get convictions on Trump team members on anything that would support their false, manufactured narrative about 'Russian Collusion' that they withheld exculpatory information in order to commit FISA Court Abuses to illegally get warrants to spy on him and his team.

PRIME EXAMPLE: Evidence proves the FBI damn-well know Carter Page was working with the State Department as an 'informant' on Russians; yet, Comey and Rosenstein deliberately withheld that information from the FISA Court, selling the idea that Carter Page was illegally colluding with / working as a go-between between Trump and the Russians. THE FBI KNEW THIS WAS NOT THE CASE, BUILT THE FALSE NARRATIVE, AND SOLD IT TO THER FISA COURT.

Almost the entire Obama coup attempt was built on false / manufactured lies / narratives and known false . Russian Intelligence Service propaganda, which the FBI assessed was the case themselves before ever using it to commit FISA Court abuses, to author the ICA/ICR, open an official investigation, and appoint Mueller as Special Counsel.

(D-Schiff ended up trying to to this himself later when he authored a false transcript between the US Pres and Ukraine PM then tried to submit it as 'evidence' against Trump.)

 

[AntonToo]

Yes seriously, Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying.

When several FBI Agents testify/ state they do not believe Flynn was lying, and the only one to say he did was/is the FBI's #1 Counter-Intel Expert (such a high level FBI leadership position being involved in an interview usually done by Field Agents, another 'breach of standard protocol / from the norm the IG pointed out) who has been proven to have lied numerous times, helped the NSA and CIA Directors author the ICA and ICR - which they said they knew nothing about (a LIE)and considering all of the other criminal evidence against the FBI...according to the retired FBI Investigative expert in the article posted, this was a planned illegal set-up that required the FBI to bypass protocol so as not to alert the WY or WH legal Counsel to ensure Flynn was isolated and without legal Counsel. This was a set-up. Comey even admitted it (read the article).



"Flynn didn't give off the body language, hence the statement about not detecting him lying during the interview. But that doesn't mean that he wasn't actually lying."

That doesn't mean he WAS lying, either...and every one of the FBI Agents involved....except co-conspiring Strzok stated they did not believe Flynn lied.

That’s right, it doesn’t.

THE FACTS OF WHAT FLYNN SAID TO VP AND FBI BRAZENLY CONTRADICTING HIS CONVERSATIONS WITH RUSSIANS DOES.

So why did they decide to go back for a 2nd interview when they found nothing the first time? What many on the left love to do, invent reasons

Found nothing??? You read English right?

THE FACTS OF WHAT HE SAID TO VP AND FBI BRAZENLY CONTRADICTED HIS CONVERSATIONS WITH RUSSIANS.

Read until the meaning settles in your head. The interviewers were confused by the disconnect of Flynn's seemingly unflinching behaviour and what they knew to be directly contradicting him from recorded conversations he had with Kysliak.

Well after the fbi altered the 302s.

Please keep up. The fbi was going to close this til strozk stepped in and I VENTED FUCKING Reasons to go back

Fucking maroon.

Dummy the 302's you are talking about had to do with CARTER'S warrants and NOTHING to do with Flynn's case.

If you rightwingers have set out to conclusively prove to me that y'all are just a bunch of ignorant idiots consistently clueless about wtf you are talking about then congratulations, you are doing great.

 

[AntonToo]

I challenge you to be able to exactly recall, to the finest detail, a conversation you had weeks ago.

Nobody asked Flynn for the finest detail. he either discussed with Russians sanctions or he didn't.

I would obviously have ZERO problems recalling something so sensitive in nature and I would OBVIOUSLY not be pleading guilty to lying to FBI (on multiple counts no less) if I simply forgot something.

The only reason it is not obvious to you is that like most politico nutters, you have a nasty habit of shutting down your common sense facilities if they lead to inconvenient conclusions.

Yes, they did, he misstated a fact. That's all. You are either willfully ignorant of the case, or simply don't care.

Regardless of your bullshit opinion, Flynn is going to be exonerated because he committed no crime.

The fbi however, did.

No he will be exonerated because Tramp told Barr to exert pressure.

According to you trampers its ok to lie to the FBI and its ok to ignore the house investigations,
and its ok to lie, because tramp does it all the time.
You tramper's are so low.

Can I lie to the FBI. You guys have absolutely no morals.

For the sake of argument, lets say he lied.

Why was Flynn not convicted of anything other than lying? Just wondering, since Flynn has been used by the left as a justification for the Mueller investigation. Was the the entire investigation nothing more than an attempt to get a bunch of process crimes out of Trump associates? Sure does seem that way to the logical mind.

Because he took a guilty plea on straight forward perjury charges instead of a rare Logan Act charge. Prosecutors like to keep their case as clear as possible while getting the just outcome.

Your assertion that Flynn had ANYTHING to with justification for Mueller investigation, which began in 2016 is pure ignorance. It was a tangent episode to operation Hurricane until Trump pressured Comey to "let Flynn go" and eventually fired him, which resulted in Mueller being assigned.

The Obama administration wanted so badly

Look moron, if you have an actual refute to what I said then directly post, I'm not interested in your tangent diarrheas of the mouth.

Flynn's 2017 case had nothing to do with the origins of the broader investigation into Russian interference that began in 2016 PERIOD.

 

[easyt65]

Nothing in these 2017 documents deals with why 2016 investigation was initiated. As usual, you grossly misunderstand what you mouth off about.

As usual, you are too stupid to keep up.

The 'Russian Hack Of the DNC Server' was the 1st big 'Russian Collusion' LIE.

The release of DNC server information was DEVASTATING to the Democrats:
- It proved the DNC had rigged their primaries, had helped Hillary cheat in debates, and that 'the fix was in' for Hillary over Bernie.
- It contained damaging racist, sexist, homophobic, and anti-Semitic comments / language in their e-mails.

The Democrats quickly spun the story to cover their ass by claiming they were 'HACKED BY THE RUSSIANS'.
- The 'hack' was never investigated, and the DNC's claim / BS was NEVER confirmed. The Democrats never released their server for analysis.

Despite calling this a matter of 'National Security', the Federal Bureau of Investigation - the United States' Investigative service responsible for handling such crimes, were told to 'stand-down, and Barak Obama and the DNC brought in an outside NON-govt agency to step in and 'investigate'.

WTF?

Obama and his secret criminal Cabinet members mentioned above began secretly meeting...and SECRET is the 'key word'. Only key, Obama-insiders attended, and RICE cut the audio/video feed inside the Oval office so no one could see what went on.

The outside agency was brought in, the Democrats declared it had thoroughly investigated and had come to the conclusion the Russians had hacked their server, and the founder of the company whpo had 'investigated' the server was given a position on Obama's Cabinet.
--- Recently (posted in its separate thread with supportive links), this company - who was being investigated, made the public announcement that THEY HAD NEVER BEEN HIRED TO INVESTIGATE THE DNC SERVER, THAT ONLKY THEIR PR DEPARTMENT HAD BEEN HIRED TO CRAFT THE RESPONSE EFFORT REGARDING THE DNC'S LEAKED INFO AND THE PRESENTED NARRATIVE THAT THE RUSSIANS HACKED THE SERVER.


FALSE NARRATIVE #1 - 'THE RUSSIANS HACKED THE DNC SERVER' - EXPOSED


Then came the False Narrative #2 - 'ILLEGAL RUSSIAN COLLUSION':

The Democrats immediately pointed fingers at Trump and followed up with the 'Russian Collusion' story supported by / based on the RUSSIAN INTELIGENCE SERVICE PROPAGANDA that the FBI itself assessed to be RIS propaganda already being used by the RIS against Trump foreign policy elsewhere....information passed from the Russians to Steelee who sold it to Hillary and Obama's FBI.....

The Dossier, The ICA, the ICR, FISA Court warrant abuses, illegal spying, targeting and blackmailing Flynn into giving his guilty plea, the initiation of the official investigation, the appointment of Mueller as Special Counsel -

The SAME Obama criminal, inner circle, trusted core of Obama traitors once again held secret meetings (according to Page, Strok, and now Baker) to plot, plan, and carry out every step of Obama's failed coup attempt...

IT WAS ALL EXPOSED, DEBUNKED, PROVEN TO BE BASED ON THE RUSSIAN INTEL SERVICE PROPAGANDA AND OBAMA FALSE NARRATIVE OF 'RUSSIAN COLLUSION' ....

FALSE NARRATIVE #2 - 'ILLEGAL RUSSIAN COLLUSION' - EXPOSED

Try to keep up, snowflake.

 

[easyt65]

Look moron, if you have an actual refute to what I said then directly post, I'm not interested in your tangent diarrheas of the mouth.

I have continuously posted links, articles, testimony, evidence, laws, etc.. and all I have gotten back from snowflakes are rants and uneducated, debunked opinion.

I can lead a jackass to water, but I can't make you drink / open your eyes.

 

[AntonToo]

Look moron, if you have an actual refute to what I said then directly post, I'm not interested in your tangent diarrheas of the mouth.

I have continuously posted links, articles, testimony, evidence, laws, etc.. and all I have gotten back from snowflakes are rants and uneducated, debunked opinion.

I can lead a jackass to water, but I can't make you drink / open your eyes.

Flynn's case was based on his discussion of sanctions with the Russians (that's on Flynn) and then lying about it (again, that's on Flynn). He also had dealings with Turkey that he lied about (again, that's on him). He then pled guilty to multiple counts of perjury (that's again on Flynn)

Pleadings that FBI somehow tricked him into this behavior because they were after Trump are laughable and nothing you said refutes that. Nobody made Flynn lie his ass off to obstruct investigations but Flynn himself.

 

[easyt65]

Flynn's 2017 case had nothing to do with the origins of the broader investigation into Russian interference that began in 2016 PERIOD.

Again, you prove to be too dense to keep up. The common thread throughout the coup attempt was 'Russian Collusion / Russia, Russia, Russia.
- There was no 'Russia Hack of the DNC Server'
- Carter Page was not a spy / colluding with Russians
- Papa was not colluding with the Russians
- Flynn was not colluding with Russians - Strzok, Comey, Obama, et al... got him in a perjury trap.,

...when the FBI reported they had no evidence on Flynn, Strzok had the case remain open so they could set up / carry out the Perjury Trap. They went after Papa, Flynn, Page, Trump......

 

[AntonToo]

Nothing in these 2017 documents deals with why 2016 investigation was initiated. As usual, you grossly misunderstand what you mouth off about.

As usual, you are too stupid to keep up.

The 'Russian Hack Of the DNC Server' was the 1st big 'Russian Collusion' LIE.

The release of DNC server information was DEVASTATING to the Democrats:
- It proved the DNC had rigged their primaries, had helped Hillary cheat in debates, and that 'the fix was in' for Hillary over Bernie.
- It contained damaging racist, sexist, homophobic, and anti-Semitic comments / language in their e-mails.

The Democrats quickly spun the story to cover their ass by claiming they were 'HACKED BY THE RUSSIANS'.
- The 'hack' was never investigated, and the DNC's claim / BS was NEVER confirmed. The Democrats never released their server for analysis.

Despite calling this a matter of 'National Security', the Federal Bureau of Investigation - the United States' Investigative service responsible for handling such crimes, were told to 'stand-down, and Barak Obama and the DNC brought in an outside NON-govt agency to step in and 'investigate'.

WTF?

Obama and his secret criminal Cabinet members mentioned above began secretly meeting...and SECRET is the 'key word'. Only key, Obama-insiders attended, and RICE cut the audio/video feed inside the Oval office so no one could see what went on.

The outside agency was brought in, the Democrats declared it had thoroughly investigated and had come to the conclusion the Russians had hacked their server, and the founder of the company whpo had 'investigated' the server was given a position on Obama's Cabinet.
--- Recently (posted in its separate thread with supportive links), this company - who was being investigated, made the public announcement that THEY HAD NEVER BEEN HIRED TO INVESTIGATE THE DNC SERVER, THAT ONLKY THEIR PR DEPARTMENT HAD BEEN HIRED TO CRAFT THE RESPONSE EFFORT REGARDING THE DNC'S LEAKED INFO AND THE PRESENTED NARRATIVE THAT THE RUSSIANS HACKED THE SERVER.


FALSE NARRATIVE #1 - 'THE RUSSIANS HACKED THE DNC SERVER' - EXPOSED


Then came the False Narrative #2 - 'ILLEGAL RUSSIAN COLLUSION':

The Democrats immediately pointed fingers at Trump and followed up with the 'Russian Collusion' story supported by / based on the RUSSIAN INTELIGENCE SERVICE PROPAGANDA that the FBI itself assessed to be RIS propaganda already being used by the RIS against Trump foreign policy elsewhere....information passed from the Russians to Steelee who sold it to Hillary and Obama's FBI.....

The Dossier, The ICA, the ICR, FISA Court warrant abuses, illegal spying, targeting and blackmailing Flynn into giving his guilty plea, the initiation of the official investigation, the appointment of Mueller as Special Counsel -

The SAME Obama criminal, inner circle, trusted core of Obama traitors once again held secret meetings (according to Page, Strok, and now Baker) to plot, plan, and carry out every step of Obama's failed coup attempt...

IT WAS ALL EXPOSED, DEBUNKED, PROVEN TO BE BASED ON THE RUSSIAN INTEL SERVICE PROPAGANDA AND OBAMA FALSE NARRATIVE OF 'RUSSIAN COLLUSION' ....

FALSE NARRATIVE #2 - 'ILLEGAL RUSSIAN COLLUSION' - EXPOSED

Try to keep up, snowflake.

Your lengthy reply refutes nothing of what you quoted.

That's a very common theme in your retarded posting.

 

[easyt65]

Nothing in these 2017 documents deals with why 2016 investigation was initiated. As usual, you grossly misunderstand what you mouth off about.

As usual, you are too stupid to keep up.

The 'Russian Hack Of the DNC Server' was the 1st big 'Russian Collusion' LIE.

The release of DNC server information was DEVASTATING to the Democrats:
- It proved the DNC had rigged their primaries, had helped Hillary cheat in debates, and that 'the fix was in' for Hillary over Bernie.
- It contained damaging racist, sexist, homophobic, and anti-Semitic comments / language in their e-mails.

The Democrats quickly spun the story to cover their ass by claiming they were 'HACKED BY THE RUSSIANS'.
- The 'hack' was never investigated, and the DNC's claim / BS was NEVER confirmed. The Democrats never released their server for analysis.

Despite calling this a matter of 'National Security', the Federal Bureau of Investigation - the United States' Investigative service responsible for handling such crimes, were told to 'stand-down, and Barak Obama and the DNC brought in an outside NON-govt agency to step in and 'investigate'.

WTF?

Obama and his secret criminal Cabinet members mentioned above began secretly meeting...and SECRET is the 'key word'. Only key, Obama-insiders attended, and RICE cut the audio/video feed inside the Oval office so no one could see what went on.

The outside agency was brought in, the Democrats declared it had thoroughly investigated and had come to the conclusion the Russians had hacked their server, and the founder of the company whpo had 'investigated' the server was given a position on Obama's Cabinet.
--- Recently (posted in its separate thread with supportive links), this company - who was being investigated, made the public announcement that THEY HAD NEVER BEEN HIRED TO INVESTIGATE THE DNC SERVER, THAT ONLKY THEIR PR DEPARTMENT HAD BEEN HIRED TO CRAFT THE RESPONSE EFFORT REGARDING THE DNC'S LEAKED INFO AND THE PRESENTED NARRATIVE THAT THE RUSSIANS HACKED THE SERVER.


FALSE NARRATIVE #1 - 'THE RUSSIANS HACKED THE DNC SERVER' - EXPOSED


Then came the False Narrative #2 - 'ILLEGAL RUSSIAN COLLUSION':

The Democrats immediately pointed fingers at Trump and followed up with the 'Russian Collusion' story supported by / based on the RUSSIAN INTELIGENCE SERVICE PROPAGANDA that the FBI itself assessed to be RIS propaganda already being used by the RIS against Trump foreign policy elsewhere....information passed from the Russians to Steelee who sold it to Hillary and Obama's FBI.....

The Dossier, The ICA, the ICR, FISA Court warrant abuses, illegal spying, targeting and blackmailing Flynn into giving his guilty plea, the initiation of the official investigation, the appointment of Mueller as Special Counsel -

The SAME Obama criminal, inner circle, trusted core of Obama traitors once again held secret meetings (according to Page, Strok, and now Baker) to plot, plan, and carry out every step of Obama's failed coup attempt...

IT WAS ALL EXPOSED, DEBUNKED, PROVEN TO BE BASED ON THE RUSSIAN INTEL SERVICE PROPAGANDA AND OBAMA FALSE NARRATIVE OF 'RUSSIAN COLLUSION' ....

FALSE NARRATIVE #2 - 'ILLEGAL RUSSIAN COLLUSION' - EXPOSED

Try to keep up, snowflake.

Your lengthy reply refutes nothing of what you quoted.

That's a very common theme in your retarded posting.

Your parents must have been forced to give you connect-the-dots books that only had one (1) dot per page, and reading comprehension books for you must have been pop-ups.

 

[AntonToo]

Flynn's 2017 case had nothing to do with the origins of the broader investigation into Russian interference that began in 2016 PERIOD.

Again, you ptove to be too dense to keep up. The common thread throughout the coup attempt was 'Russian Collusion / Russia, Russia, Russia.
- There was no 'Russia Hack of the DNC Server'

American Intelligence, Russians indicted for this operation and Republican Senate report on 2016 interference into our election says you are full of shit.

No one except crazy rw politico idiots like you are still trying to refute that Russians hacked DNC.

Hell, even Trump admitted it.

- Carter Page was not a spy / colluding with Russians

That's mostly true, though his activities and constant trips to Moscow were plenty conspicuous.

- Papa was not colluding with the Russians'

But he did lie to FBI in an attempt to cover up his dealings re. Russian kompromat emails on Clinton and trying to set up a meeting between Trump and Putin. He was convicted and served time for it.

- Flynn was not colluding with Russians - Strzok, Comey, Obama, et al... got him in a perjury trap.,

Flynn lied about discussing sanctions with Russians and working as an undeclared foreign agent for Turkey. He pled guilty to that, but withdrew it when the judge told him he is looking at a significant time in jail for it.

There is no doubt he will be convicted.

...when the FBI reported they had no evidence on Flynn, Strzok had the case remain open so they could set up / carry out the Perjury Trap. They went after Papa, Flynn, Page, Trump......

FBI "reported" nothing of the sort, that's just more of your counter-factual idiocy.

In the plea agreement FBI "reported" Flynn lying about discussing sanctions with the Russian ambassador and Flynn even pled guilty to it.