beagle9
Diamond Member
- Nov 28, 2011
- 44,182
- 16,469
- 2,250
Kind of like the left does here huh ?Damn right they lied:Yet you still say the dossier was based on good procedure? Was it right to pass off a partially fake document to the FISA court as verfied?Oh yeah where he found "apparent errors or inadequately supported facts' in every single FBI Fisa application? Where he said that was indicative of a wider problem.Geez Coyote....They tried to say he was traitor, they called him 'unfit' for office, they tried to impeach him for a fucking phone call. They indicted and jailed members of his team on obscure charges like violating the Logan Act. They outright LIED in a hearing about the actual transcript of the phone call. Seems to me they damn-sure were plotting to remove Trump.,lk
These turds can’t form an honest argument. The IG did find many issues with the way the investigation was conducted yet they still need to lie and distort what is valid criticism. That’s pathetic
And frustrating. They are turning valid criticisms into grist to fuel their huge, multifaceted conspiracy theory of a coup. You can’t argue conspiracy theories, logic has no place there, it becomes an exercise in frustation. That is what I found with birthers.
And you willfully ignore the political classes own statements where 19 minutes after inauguration they were already plotting on how to remove him.
Like I said Coyote, look in the mirror.
I did. And I found this.
![]()
The Party of No: New Details on the GOP Plot to Obstruct Obama | TIME.com
TIME just published “The Party of No,” an article adapted from my new book, The New New Deal: The Hidden Story of Change in the Obama Era. It reveals some of my reporting on the Republican plot to obstruct President Obama before he even took office, including secret meetings led by House GOP whi...swampland.time.com
Do you not understand that there is a HUGE gulf between obstructing a president, and trying to ILLEGALLY remove one from office? C'mon Coyote. You are not dumb. You are smart, but there is NO equivalency here. One groups actions were LEGAL. The other groups actions, were not.
Do you have a link for that - illegally trying to remove him from office? The only thing I can find is that a CA Dem candidate started a super pac called "Impeach Trump".
BEFORE Trump was elected the FBI was spying on his campaign. ILLEGALLY. You tell me.
Actually, according to Horowitz's report it wasn't illegal, there was sufficient reason for it.
Are you saying that is the basis of the claim that the Dems were plotting to remove Trump?
I'm basing my opinion on the Horowitz report which is the most complete and non-partisan source of information we have.
Yup. I agree on that. Which is why I agree that the FBI must be reformed.
Well no, I never said that. All I said is I was a raw intelligence dump some of which was subsequently verified and some not.
If they claimed it was all verified then they lied to the FISA courts.
"Steele in his “reports” embellished his sources’ quotes, played up nonexistent angles, invented attributions, and ignored inconsistencies. The FBI then transplanted this bad reporting in the form of a warrant application and an addendum to the Intelligence Assessment that included the Steele material, ignoring a new layer of inconsistencies and red flags its analysts uncovered in the review process. "
![]()
'Corroboration Zero': An Inspector General's Report Reveals the Steele Dossier Was Always a Joke
The reports throws water on one “deep state” conspiracy theory of the Russia investigation, but validates complaints about “fake news”www.rollingstone.com