Bill OReilly took his medication last night the clear-vision pill that controls attacks of fair & balanced. His talking points about homosexual marriage must have sent the liberals in FOXs audience into shock and disbelief.
Speaking for myself, I was pleasantly surprised by this:
Its too bad Mr. OReilly did not ask if John Roberts got his marching orders from Steny Hoyer:
Im grateful to OReilly for getting the truth out to millions in his nightly audience who might not realize the damage done by the Supreme Court. If, and when, Congress tries to repeal the ACA, I can think of no argument for repeal more powerful than including the governments power to force Americans to purchase whatever the government orders them to purchase. Hillarycare II is only the beginning if it is not repealed.
Glick on the link to watch the video:
If you watched the video you heard OReilly say:
I think OReillys loophole interpretation was true away back when activist judges needed some justification for dismantling the Constitution. The SCOTUS has not needed justification for a long time; not since the Congress conspired with the Court, or, at the very least, did nothing when a majority among 9 lawyers decided they were better legislators than were the elected officials they bulldoze.
Or maybe it is nothing more than all of those lawyers in Congress having too much respect for their own kind. Note that respect for the High Court grew in leaps and bounds after 7 lawyers decriminalized infanticide. Also note that neither Congress nor the Courts will defund Planned Parenthood regardless of Kermit Gosnell. It seems that at least two branches of government can force Americans to purchase unwanted goods and services, but they do not have the authority to stop tax dollars from funding infanticide.
The Commerce Clause
Two words general welfare justified abusing the Commerce Clause. Those abuses were the Courts worst offenses until the ACA came along. Today, whenever Socialists want something the SCOTUS has only to call upon the Commerce Clause. No further justification is needed. In that sense liberals transformed OReillys loopholes into original intent. Everyone who knows the malevolence done under the Commerce Clause surely understands that the Affordable Care Act opened the door to butchers hellbent on expanding cruelty far wider than infanticide.
Regarding homosexual marriage from an average Americans perspective: Justice Scalia has it right when he calls the Court diseased:
Finally, You gotta love Scalia for chastising his pal Ruth Ginsburg:
Speaking for myself, I was pleasantly surprised by this:
Its too bad Mr. OReilly did not ask if John Roberts got his marching orders from Steny Hoyer:
Im grateful to OReilly for getting the truth out to millions in his nightly audience who might not realize the damage done by the Supreme Court. If, and when, Congress tries to repeal the ACA, I can think of no argument for repeal more powerful than including the governments power to force Americans to purchase whatever the government orders them to purchase. Hillarycare II is only the beginning if it is not repealed.
Glick on the link to watch the video:
If you watched the video you heard OReilly say:
I think OReillys loophole interpretation was true away back when activist judges needed some justification for dismantling the Constitution. The SCOTUS has not needed justification for a long time; not since the Congress conspired with the Court, or, at the very least, did nothing when a majority among 9 lawyers decided they were better legislators than were the elected officials they bulldoze.
Or maybe it is nothing more than all of those lawyers in Congress having too much respect for their own kind. Note that respect for the High Court grew in leaps and bounds after 7 lawyers decriminalized infanticide. Also note that neither Congress nor the Courts will defund Planned Parenthood regardless of Kermit Gosnell. It seems that at least two branches of government can force Americans to purchase unwanted goods and services, but they do not have the authority to stop tax dollars from funding infanticide.
The Commerce Clause
Two words general welfare justified abusing the Commerce Clause. Those abuses were the Courts worst offenses until the ACA came along. Today, whenever Socialists want something the SCOTUS has only to call upon the Commerce Clause. No further justification is needed. In that sense liberals transformed OReillys loopholes into original intent. Everyone who knows the malevolence done under the Commerce Clause surely understands that the Affordable Care Act opened the door to butchers hellbent on expanding cruelty far wider than infanticide.
Regarding homosexual marriage from an average Americans perspective: Justice Scalia has it right when he calls the Court diseased:
Finally, You gotta love Scalia for chastising his pal Ruth Ginsburg:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuMXqcK4Nrg&feature=player_embedded]SC Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg ~ to Egypt: "I would not look to the US constitution" - YouTube[/ame]
