- Moderator
- #41
Does anyone care that 13 are dead and 85,000 have registered for disaster aid? I realize President Bush isn't in office anymore so there's no political points to score, but does anyone care at all? Obama has still not returned from his vacation at Martha’s Vineyard and Hillary is MIA. Trump and Pence are touring the devastated area today.
No. There is a Democrat in the White House so the media doesn't want to pile on. It's also mostly white people affected this time, so there are no poor blacks to exploit from this tragedy.
--- and the Great Myth that the media is run by some kind of evil doctor behind a curtain pulling levers according to some paranoid "political agenda" lives on......
Take a look at this passage from a USA Today article that puts it into perspective. See if you can find it.
Louisiana flooding is worst disaster since Sandy, but people aren’t talking about it
>> The Louisiana flooding is a classic case of a "bad-timing” for media coverage, according to Moeller. She notes that while the floods have been covered, they’ve escaped the attention they would have received at another time.Did y'all see it? Here's the key phrase:
“It’s a presidential election year, and the Olympics are ongoing,” she said. “There’s very little oxygen in the newsroom for covering it.”
Moller said all it takes is one scroll through your newsfeed to see the coverage is predominately about Trump and Clinton, the U.S. swimming fiasco in Rio, and the Olympic medal count.
More than a dozen USA TODAY stories on the topic have performed average, at best. Readers simply aren’t clicking on them. Maybe this article will be the same.
The lack of national interest in the flood, is likely because Americans are becoming almost numb to the onslaught of human suffering.
“There is a bit of disaster fatigue,” Moeller said. “We’ve seen a string of horrors over the past number of years. Yes, natural disasters, but also very human disasters of violence.” <<
"More than a dozen USA TODAY stories on the topic have performed average, at best"--- "Performed"!?
What a dead giveaway. "Performed" is what a stock does when you invest in it. It's what an athlete does when your team buys a free agent.
News, if that's what you're dealing in, cannot "perform". COMMERCIALISM performs. Media is not in the business of distributing news, and it's not in the business of dispensing ideologies. It's in the business of selling papers. And it will play up whatever sells and play down whatever doesn't. Doesn't matter how credible or irrelevant it may be --- hence the blitz of "how Michael Jackson died" stories.
Nobody ever made money selling ideologies. It's all about the money, and that's all it's ever been about. What the article here says in a rare moment of candor is not "this story is not important" --- it's saying "we can't $ell it".
It's no myth that the media is inherently biased. Anyone who can't see that has their head willingly stuck in the sand.