And I know that it isn't bullshit. Mayor Nagin may not have said 'don't use them' but he made no plan to do so.
Thank you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And I know that it isn't bullshit. Mayor Nagin may not have said 'don't use them' but he made no plan to do so.
And then he set about transforming a budgetary surplus into the most destructive deficit in our history, which is what he left Office with.[...]
NEW YORK (CNN Money.com) -- After two weeks of contentious and often emotional debate, the federal government's far-reaching and historic plan to bail out the nation's financial system was signed into law by President Bush on Friday afternoon.
"By coming together on this legislation, we have acted boldly to prevent the crisis on Wall Street from becoming a crisis in communities across our country," Bush said less than an hour after the House voted 263 to 171 to pass the bill.
The House vote followed a strong lobbying push by the White House and other supporters of the bill. The House rejected a similar measure on Monday - a defeat that shocked the markets and congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle.
The law, which allows the Treasury Secretary to purchase as much as $700 billion in troubled assets in a bid to kick-start lending, ushers in one of the most far-reaching interventions in the economy since the Great Depression.
Remember?
And then he set about transforming a budgetary surplus into the most destructive deficit in our history, which is what he left Office with.[...]
NEW YORK (CNN Money.com) -- After two weeks of contentious and often emotional debate, the federal government's far-reaching and historic plan to bail out the nation's financial system was signed into law by President Bush on Friday afternoon.
"By coming together on this legislation, we have acted boldly to prevent the crisis on Wall Street from becoming a crisis in communities across our country," Bush said less than an hour after the House voted 263 to 171 to pass the bill.
The House vote followed a strong lobbying push by the White House and other supporters of the bill. The House rejected a similar measure on Monday - a defeat that shocked the markets and congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle.
The law, which allows the Treasury Secretary to purchase as much as $700 billion in troubled assets in a bid to kick-start lending, ushers in one of the most far-reaching interventions in the economy since the Great Depression.
Remember?
Bush had two LEGAL wars to fight, hurricane Katrina and the 911 tragedy that actually cost money. Obama has almost double the national debt. Even with the TARP money Bush gave him, Obama has had the slowest recovery in the history of the US.
Feel free to show me how commercial media --- which is a commercial, meaning profit-making, enterprise --- makes a penny on abstract stuff like ideologies.
I know how the media works Bub. I was part of it. It works to make money. Period.
Media bias is real, finds UCLA political scientist
http://scholar.harvard.edu/barro/files/04_0614_liberalmedia_bw.pdf
Pfft. I can cite studies saying the bias is to the right, but that's not what I asked.
The question is --- how does commercial media -- which is by definition in business to make money -- profit by selling some preferred ideology?
The operative question word is "How".
Ah, so since the study, by the not exactly conservative UCLA, doesn't fit YOUR bias, it's not worthy? Yes, you absolutely did work in the media.
Like I said, head in the sand.
--- so you don't have an answer.
That's OK. There isn't one. Because it doesn't work that way, which is what I said.
It starts in academia, which is totally dominated by leftist professors who indoctrinate and brainwash the youth. The media then chooses their future journalists by going to these leftist colleges and hiring the most radical leftist that can be found and then softens them up so that are more palatable to the general public.Feel free to show me how commercial media --- which is a commercial, meaning profit-making, enterprise --- makes a penny on abstract stuff like ideologies.
I know how the media works Bub. I was part of it. It works to make money. Period.
Media bias is real, finds UCLA political scientist
http://scholar.harvard.edu/barro/files/04_0614_liberalmedia_bw.pdf
Feel free to show me how commercial media --- which is a commercial, meaning profit-making, enterprise --- makes a penny on abstract stuff like ideologies.
I know how the media works Bub. I was part of it. It works to make money. Period.
Media bias is real, finds UCLA political scientist
http://scholar.harvard.edu/barro/files/04_0614_liberalmedia_bw.pdf
Pfft. I can cite studies saying the bias is to the right, but that's not what I asked.
The question is --- how does commercial media -- which is by definition in business to make money -- profit by selling some preferred ideology?
The operative question word is "How".
Ah, so since the study, by the not exactly conservative UCLA, doesn't fit YOUR bias, it's not worthy? Yes, you absolutely did work in the media.
Like I said, head in the sand.
--- so you don't have an answer.
That's OK. There isn't one. Because it doesn't work that way, which is what I said.
I provided you with the study. You're in denial just like the Trump Tards when the polls don't go their way
The FACT that neither Obama or Hillary has gone to the scene of the disaster speaks volumes about their interest in the victims.Does anyone care that 13 are dead and 85,000 have registered for disaster aid? I realize President Bush isn't in office anymore so there's no political points to score, but does anyone care at all? Obama has still not returned from his vacation at Martha’s Vineyard and Hillary is MIA. Trump and Pence are touring the devastated area today.
So you are upset that Obama hasn't come raised the dead?
These victims have a long memory!
Polls must not be showing enough support for Hillary so why bother right?
Obama going diverts resources from assistance which is why the Governor has asked him to stay away a few weeks. Workers that should be clearing storm drains instead have to go around inspecting them for explosives with cameras and then welding manholes shut; people that are cleaning streets in the neighborhoods have to converge on where the photo-op would be to clear all trash and debris, police have to be protecting the area for days once cleared and then provide parameter security. The POTUS bubble is insanely time consuming (and a bit excessive). As for Hillary, as long as she says she will spend lots of money she won't really be spending anyway on them, her supporters will cheer and vote for her.
So why was Bush criticized so heavily?The FACT that neither Obama or Hillary has gone to the scene of the disaster speaks volumes about their interest in the victims.So you are upset that Obama hasn't come raised the dead?
These victims have a long memory!
Polls must not be showing enough support for Hillary so why bother right?
Obama going diverts resources from assistance which is why the Governor has asked him to stay away a few weeks. Workers that should be clearing storm drains instead have to go around inspecting them for explosives with cameras and then welding manholes shut; people that are cleaning streets in the neighborhoods have to converge on where the photo-op would be to clear all trash and debris, police have to be protecting the area for days once cleared and then provide parameter security. The POTUS bubble is insanely time consuming (and a bit excessive). As for Hillary, as long as she says she will spend lots of money she won't really be spending anyway on them, her supporters will cheer and vote for her.
I don't recall him being criticized for that so much as things like the federal relief efforts were held up by them debating whether the officials would be wearing DHS jackets or FEMA jackets. Some of the criticism was unfounded in so much as the Mayor of New Orleans obstructed evacuation efforts by not letting them use school buses
Nobody "didn't let them" use the school buses. That was a photographer's Monday-morning quarterback myth.
So why was Bush criticized so heavily?Obama going diverts resources from assistance which is why the Governor has asked him to stay away a few weeks. Workers that should be clearing storm drains instead have to go around inspecting them for explosives with cameras and then welding manholes shut; people that are cleaning streets in the neighborhoods have to converge on where the photo-op would be to clear all trash and debris, police have to be protecting the area for days once cleared and then provide parameter security. The POTUS bubble is insanely time consuming (and a bit excessive). As for Hillary, as long as she says she will spend lots of money she won't really be spending anyway on them, her supporters will cheer and vote for her.
I don't recall him being criticized for that so much as things like the federal relief efforts were held up by them debating whether the officials would be wearing DHS jackets or FEMA jackets. Some of the criticism was unfounded in so much as the Mayor of New Orleans obstructed evacuation efforts by not letting them use school buses
Nobody "didn't let them" use the school buses. That was a photographer's Monday-morning quarterback myth.
Sure because you say so, all the media that reported it was wrong.
I'm a Katrinite.
The media didn't "report" anything like what you posted --- the media posted a photo of drowned buses, and then speculated about them after the fact. Buses which were by the way outside the city.
In the actual event, Katrina came up fast. I wasn't even aware a storm existed until Saturday afternoon (it hit at dawn Monday less than 40 hours later). That isn't realistically enough time to corral drivers and get buses ready and dispatch them effectively. On the other hand it's the easiest thing in the world to hover in days later, take a picture of something under water and go "woulda shoulda coulda".
Oh btw it was not an outdoor stadium it was the Superdone. The people were instructed to go there by city officials.
I will give you that, but my understanding at the time was that even though Bush had the help he could not by law intervene until the officials of Louisiana formerly asked.I don't care what it was or how those people got there. I'm talking about the conditions they endured there and how nothing was done about it in spite of the fact the Nation, which includes Bush, was watching it on tv.Oh btw it was not an outdoor stadium it was the Superdone. The people were instructed to go there by city officials.
I couldn't do anything about it -- but Bush could have.
NOLA had an evacuation plan which they did not follow! Airlines offered to fly people out and were turned down, the buses sat unused. The storm surge did not sink NOLA. When the hurricane passed over it hit Ponchatrain and pushed the waters back toward the ninth ward. The levees broke and the rest is history. So let's Give Bush the blame, he warned them. Nagin and Blanco were both incompetent nincompoops. After the damn hurricane half the police force ran away andNaginsent the rest on vacation. Yep! That!/ all Bush's fault.
So why was Bush criticized so heavily?
I don't recall him being criticized for that so much as things like the federal relief efforts were held up by them debating whether the officials would be wearing DHS jackets or FEMA jackets. Some of the criticism was unfounded in so much as the Mayor of New Orleans obstructed evacuation efforts by not letting them use school buses
Nobody "didn't let them" use the school buses. That was a photographer's Monday-morning quarterback myth.
Sure because you say so, all the media that reported it was wrong.
I'm a Katrinite.
The media didn't "report" anything like what you posted --- the media posted a photo of drowned buses, and then speculated about them after the fact. Buses which were by the way outside the city.
In the actual event, Katrina came up fast. I wasn't even aware a storm existed until Saturday afternoon (it hit at dawn Monday less than 40 hours later). That isn't realistically enough time to corral drivers and get buses ready and dispatch them effectively. On the other hand it's the easiest thing in the world to hover in days later, take a picture of something under water and go "woulda shoulda coulda".
NOT true. Katrina did not come up fast. Convicted felon mayor Ray Nagin delayed the decision to evacuate until it was too late. His excuse was he didn't want to disrupt New Orleans economy if it went in a different direction. The path went across Florida and the storm filled the entire Gulf of Mexico. Virtually all the models showed it hitting or coming very close to New Orleans.
NOLA had an evacuation plan which they did not follow! Airlines offered to fly people out and were turned down, the buses sat unused. The storm surge did not sink NOLA. When the hurricane passed over it hit Ponchatrain and pushed the waters back toward the ninth ward. The levees broke and the rest is history. So let's Give Bush the blame, he warned them. Nagin and Blanco were both incompetent nincompoops. After the damn hurricane half the police force ran away andNaginsent the rest on vacation. Yep! That!/ all Bush's fault.
Trains and commercial buses offered free space to and were rejected.
I will give you that, but my understanding at the time was that even though Bush had the help he could not by law intervene until the officials of Louisiana formerly asked.I don't care what it was or how those people got there. I'm talking about the conditions they endured there and how nothing was done about it in spite of the fact the Nation, which includes Bush, was watching it on tv.Oh btw it was not an outdoor stadium it was the Superdone. The people were instructed to go there by city officials.
I couldn't do anything about it -- but Bush could have.
That is 100% true. The Federal Government could not send in troops and other help without a formal request from Gov. Blanco. Subsequent to the storm, President Bush put through legislation that makes an exception for such circumstances.
Show me!I will give you that, but my understanding at the time was that even though Bush had the help he could not by law intervene until the officials of Louisiana formerly asked.I don't care what it was or how those people got there. I'm talking about the conditions they endured there and how nothing was done about it in spite of the fact the Nation, which includes Bush, was watching it on tv.Oh btw it was not an outdoor stadium it was the Superdone. The people were instructed to go there by city officials.
I couldn't do anything about it -- but Bush could have.
That is 100% true. The Federal Government could not send in troops and other help without a formal request from Gov. Blanco. Subsequent to the storm, President Bush put through legislation that makes an exception for such circumstances.
Blanco sent the request to the White House on Saturday, two days before landfall. Same day I became aware of it (27th).