Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman: Account of Trump’s Ukraine Call Omitted Key Details

[Jitss617]

I’ll tell you if you show me Barack Obama‘s birth certificate Lol

Couple of things: his birth certificate has already been shown. Also, show me Trump's tax returns.

His taxes are none of your business, obama should be in Africa

How's Moscow, comarade?

Hyde park ave in Boston born and raised haha


Remember this cloud strike

 

[Coyote]

Was their account that they were “concerned” for the Ukraine as well?

Yes, that was literally part of their jobs. Republican Senators expressed their concern for Ukraine. Publicly. You're really flailing on this one. Move on.

It’s doesn’t matter what their opinions are. They can disagree with the President’s policy and decisions all day. The Army officer doesn’t get to override the President’s policy because it hurts his feelings and isn’t good for the Ukraine. The President’s job is to do what is best for the United States, that includes investigating corruption and exposing it to the public.

Except for some curious facts. The President's claims of corruption are yet to be substantiated in any way. The President is focusing solely on his political rival. And people like this man and others who are testifying and you folks are shredding - don't have a horse in the partisan arena. They are professionals with long distinguished careers of service under multiple administrations. After a while the attempts to smear them get kind of thin as the numbers pile up.

If the President is acting in a way that is harmful to our national interest....is he doing his job?

 

[edward37]

[

So bad mouthing his CIC should land him in a world of hurt.

The CIC is above criticism? You neocon whackadoodles sure to love your robots who go lock-step with politicians...who follow them like good little lapdogs.


....unless it's Obama, or Clinton, or Pelosi, or.....

He has to be careful. As active military, saying the wrong thing about the president can earn him a court-martial. You do know that, right?

court martial me ,,, trump is a low life shithead a moron like his followers

 

[keepitreal]

[

So bad mouthing his CIC should land him in a world of hurt.

The CIC is above criticism? You neocon whackadoodles sure to love your robots who go lock-step with politicians...who follow them like good little lapdogs.


....unless it's Obama, or Clinton, or Pelosi, or.....

He has to be careful. As active military, saying the wrong thing about the president can earn him a court-martial. You do know that, right?

Such as telling the truth under oath?

How he says it can get him in trouble. Then, of course, there's always what happens under cross examination, if he's lying.

Same can apply to Trump

Why won’t he testify under oath?
Clinton did

Um, could you refresh my memory please...
Which Clinton, I don't recall

 

[Dr Grump]

Um, could you refresh my memory please...
Which Clinton, I don't recall

The ones that know they are accountable to the American people. Unlike the Bottom-Feeder in the WH as the moment.

 

[Third Party]

OOPS!

Vindman Attempted to Edit White House Log of President Trump's Ukraine Phone
Call

National security official tells Congress he tried to add edits to White House memo about Trump Ukraine call

Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told members of Congress that he tried to edit a White House log of a July call between President Donald Trump and Ukraine's president to include details that were omitted, one lawmaker present at the testimony and another source familiar with it confirmed to NBC News.

White House memo about Trump's Ukraine call left out details, NSC official testifies

Edit to include the TRUTH?

told members of Congress that he tried to edit a White House log of a July call between President Donald Trump and Ukraine's president to include details that were omitted

What are the "omitted" details? I have yet to hear anyone provide an answer.

Vindman is a foreign born fraud.

What did he say that is not true?

I forget-but i read something he said was debunked. Maybe somebody else here knows

 

[theHawk]

Was their account that they were “concerned” for the Ukraine as well?

Yes, that was literally part of their jobs. Republican Senators expressed their concern for Ukraine. Publicly. You're really flailing on this one. Move on.

It’s doesn’t matter what their opinions are. They can disagree with the President’s policy and decisions all day. The Army officer doesn’t get to override the President’s policy because it hurts his feelings and isn’t good for the Ukraine. The President’s job is to do what is best for the United States, that includes investigating corruption and exposing it to the public.

Except for some curious facts. The President's claims of corruption are yet to be substantiated in any way. The President is focusing solely on his political rival. And people like this man and others who are testifying and you folks are shredding - don't have a horse in the partisan arena. They are professionals with long distinguished careers of service under multiple administrations. After a while the attempts to smear them get kind of thin as the numbers pile up.

If the President is acting in a way that is harmful to our national interest....is he doing his job?

Biden is on tape bragging about how he threatened the Ukraine to drop its investigation into the company his son worked for.

You know, the company that just happened to hire a drug using loser who didn’t speak Ukrainian and had no energy expertise, and yet paid him hundreds of thousands of dollars.

“Yet to be substantiated”...LOL.

 

[rightwinger]

The CIC is above criticism? You neocon whackadoodles sure to love your robots who go lock-step with politicians...who follow them like good little lapdogs.


....unless it's Obama, or Clinton, or Pelosi, or.....

He has to be careful. As active military, saying the wrong thing about the president can earn him a court-martial. You do know that, right?

Such as telling the truth under oath?

How he says it can get him in trouble. Then, of course, there's always what happens under cross examination, if he's lying.

Same can apply to Trump

Why won’t he testify under oath?
Clinton did

Um, could you refresh my memory please...
Which Clinton, I don't recall

Both

Why won’t Trump testify under oath?

 

[rightwinger]

Was their account that they were “concerned” for the Ukraine as well?

Yes, that was literally part of their jobs. Republican Senators expressed their concern for Ukraine. Publicly. You're really flailing on this one. Move on.

It’s doesn’t matter what their opinions are. They can disagree with the President’s policy and decisions all day. The Army officer doesn’t get to override the President’s policy because it hurts his feelings and isn’t good for the Ukraine. The President’s job is to do what is best for the United States, that includes investigating corruption and exposing it to the public.

Except for some curious facts. The President's claims of corruption are yet to be substantiated in any way. The President is focusing solely on his political rival. And people like this man and others who are testifying and you folks are shredding - don't have a horse in the partisan arena. They are professionals with long distinguished careers of service under multiple administrations. After a while the attempts to smear them get kind of thin as the numbers pile up.

If the President is acting in a way that is harmful to our national interest....is he doing his job?

Biden is on tape bragging about how he threatened the Ukraine to drop its investigation into the company his son worked for.

You know, the company that just happened to hire a drug using loser who didn’t speak Ukrainian and had no energy expertise, and yet paid him hundreds of thousands of dollars.

“Yet to be substantiated”...LOL.

Linky, linky

 

[Clipper]

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, arriving Tuesday on Capitol Hill to testify in the impeachment inquiry.Credit...Erin Schaff/The New York Times

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, who heard President Trump’s July phone call with Ukraine’s president and was alarmed, testified that he tried and failed to add key details to the rough transcript.

WASHINGTON — Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to include them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony.

The omissions, Colonel Vindman said, included Mr. Trump’s assertion that there were recordings of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. discussing Ukraine corruption, and an explicit mention by Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, of Burisma Holdings, the energy company whose board employed Mr. Biden’s son Hunter.

More: Account of Trump’s Ukraine Call Omitted Key Details, Official Testifies

I salute Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman for his service and patriotism! Someone has to answer for this.

Are you aware Vindman is a Ukrainian immigrant, and he testified that his concern was that Ukraine would stop receiving bi-partisan support if it agreed to reopen the investigation into corruption that Biden had shut down?

Vindman emigrated to this Country when he was 3 years old, asshat. But yea, he's more loyal to Ukraine. Now run along.

 

[Clipper]

The treasonous army dude got all dressed up with no where to go! It is hilarious that the impeachment hoax exists because democrats neglected to pass a law to make it illegal to investigate Biden's corruption and assorted illegal activities.

Keep telling yourself it's a hoax. Have fun with that.

 

[Contumacious]

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, arriving Tuesday on Capitol Hill to testify in the impeachment inquiry.Credit...Erin Schaff/The New York Times

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, who heard President Trump’s July phone call with Ukraine’s president and was alarmed, testified that he tried and failed to add key details to the rough transcript.

WASHINGTON — Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to include them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony.

The omissions, Colonel Vindman said, included Mr. Trump’s assertion that there were recordings of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. discussing Ukraine corruption, and an explicit mention by Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, of Burisma Holdings, the energy company whose board employed Mr. Biden’s son Hunter.

More: Account of Trump’s Ukraine Call Omitted Key Details, Official Testifies

I salute Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman for his service and patriotism! Someone has to answer for this.

Nonsense.

You know that the Pelosi-Schiff crime family is abusing their power in order to effectuate a coup disguised as an impeachment.

They will create a precedent whereby if the deep state, swamp , lamestream media don't like a president , they simply can remove him/her by concocting a similar scam.

The President is the Constitutional Head of the executive branch.

There are THREE THREE THREE branches of government.

The Legislative can NOT COMPEL THE EXECUTIVE TO INCRIMINATE HIM/HERSELF.

The Legislative can not use evidence obtained in violation of the 4th Amendment.

Lt Vindman as an employee of the NSA has NO AUTHORITY WHATSOEVER to monitor , surveil the president's telephone conversations.Nor does the Agency have the authority to investigate Americans. Nor can his testimony be compelled if his Commander-in-chief did not consent.


The Pelosi-Schiff crime family is encouraging mutiny and a constitutional crisis. WE THE PEOPLE will not allow the President to be removed under the circumstances. No way , no how,

If the DemoRats want to remove the president they better come up with a candidate who is worth a damn.

Otherwise DJT will be removed from office at 12;01 PM on January 20th, 2024.

Mark my words.

.

 

[Lakhota]

A running list of who’s who in the attempted quid pro quo between Donald Trump and Ukrainian leaders that fueled an impeachment inquiry.

Everyone You Need To Know In The Trump-Ukraine Investigation

Good information - with charts and pictures.

 

[keepitreal]

He has to be careful. As active military, saying the wrong thing about the president can earn him a court-martial. You do know that, right?

Such as telling the truth under oath?

How he says it can get him in trouble. Then, of course, there's always what happens under cross examination, if he's lying.

Same can apply to Trump

Why won’t he testify under oath?
Clinton did

Um, could you refresh my memory please...
Which Clinton, I don't recall

Both

Why won’t Trump testify under oath?

I don't know...er, uh, I don't recall..shit, I don't remember
I have no recollection

 

[Lakhota]

Transcript Of Trump Call Was Reportedly Moved To Secure Server After Aide Voiced Concerns

Interesting...

 

[Hutch Starskey]

[

So bad mouthing his CIC should land him in a world of hurt.

The CIC is above criticism? You neocon whackadoodles sure to love your robots who go lock-step with politicians...who follow them like good little lapdogs.


....unless it's Obama, or Clinton, or Pelosi, or.....

He has to be careful. As active military, saying the wrong thing about the president can earn him a court-martial. You do know that, right?

No, dope.
No such thing exists.

Check out the UCMJ, then get back to us. How he talks about the president when he's active duty can earn him a court-martial.

Nonsense.

You check it out and post it.

 

[hadit]

[

So bad mouthing his CIC should land him in a world of hurt.

The CIC is above criticism? You neocon whackadoodles sure to love your robots who go lock-step with politicians...who follow them like good little lapdogs.


....unless it's Obama, or Clinton, or Pelosi, or.....

He has to be careful. As active military, saying the wrong thing about the president can earn him a court-martial. You do know that, right?

Vindman knows that better than you do. So don't worry about it. He has more integrity and honor in his pinkie than you have in your whole tin foil hat.

They're so cute when they get frustrated and try to insult.

 

[hadit]

[

So bad mouthing his CIC should land him in a world of hurt.

The CIC is above criticism? You neocon whackadoodles sure to love your robots who go lock-step with politicians...who follow them like good little lapdogs.


....unless it's Obama, or Clinton, or Pelosi, or.....

He has to be careful. As active military, saying the wrong thing about the president can earn him a court-martial. You do know that, right?

Such as telling the truth under oath?

How he says it can get him in trouble. Then, of course, there's always what happens under cross examination, if he's lying.

Same can apply to Trump

Why won’t he testify under oath?
Clinton did

Because he's not on trial. Bubba was.

 

[hadit]

[

So bad mouthing his CIC should land him in a world of hurt.

The CIC is above criticism? You neocon whackadoodles sure to love your robots who go lock-step with politicians...who follow them like good little lapdogs.


....unless it's Obama, or Clinton, or Pelosi, or.....

He has to be careful. As active military, saying the wrong thing about the president can earn him a court-martial. You do know that, right?

No, dope.
No such thing exists.

Check out the UCMJ, then get back to us. How he talks about the president when he's active duty can earn him a court-martial.

You mean like telling Congress the truth under oath? Lt. Col. Vindman swore an oath to the U.S. Constitution - not Trump.

I mean like expressing contempt for the CIC can get him court-martialed. He has to be careful how he expresses himself.

 

[hadit]

[

So bad mouthing his CIC should land him in a world of hurt.

The CIC is above criticism? You neocon whackadoodles sure to love your robots who go lock-step with politicians...who follow them like good little lapdogs.


....unless it's Obama, or Clinton, or Pelosi, or.....

He has to be careful. As active military, saying the wrong thing about the president can earn him a court-martial. You do know that, right?

No, dope.
No such thing exists.

Check out the UCMJ, then get back to us. How he talks about the president when he's active duty can earn him a court-martial.

The war hero is not worried about that. He's braver than all you tards put together. All he has to do is tell the truth, and that terrifies you, obviously.

Next time read the instructions better. The XB-15 mind reading ring you bought from the back of that comic book isn't working.