Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman: Account of Trump’s Ukraine Call Omitted Key Details

[Thunk]

We have the transcript!!!

 

[JGalt]

The Army officer doesn’t get to override the President’s policy because it hurts his feelings and isn’t good for the Ukraine.

Nor did he, nor has he imagined he could. We are hearing from him because he was asked about it. By the way, he has more cred in his little toe than the fat child president has in his entire blobbage.

No, but he did try to undermine the President, simply because he disagreed with his decision. He should be fired.
He lost all credibility when he testified his main concern was for his home country, Ukraine.

He performed the job he was there to perform.

That he did. In their desperation to take Trump down, the Democrats trotted out yet another low-level .gov. rube to make a fool of himself. A trained seal could have done a better job.

 

[edward37]

So we can all pretty much agree that Vindman's testimony was just another big fat nothingburger, served up on a platter by Bug-Eyes Schiff, right?

Sure, that will be a given in your little nut bag bubble, but the rest of the world knows better.

AH' republicans will stop at nothing to denigrate a hero , a man who knows republicans screwed around with the transcript

 

[bullwinkle]

The treasonous army dude got all dressed up with no where to go! It is hilarious that the impeachment hoax exists because democrats neglected to pass a law to make it illegal to investigate Biden's corruption and assorted illegal activities.

Hey, snouter, tell us again how nothing is too good for our military. Or have you come to believe that our military is now dishonorable and a bunch of liars..like the FBI, CIA and (ahem) the DOJ now under investigation by Barr.

Do you still have those purple heart band-aids Republicans used during the Republican Convention back in '04. That's a good way to show your contempt for wounded vets while you slobber crocodile tears all over your autographed picture of Donald Trump. I remember one lady at the '04 Convention in a stetson wearing one of those band-aids on her cheek as she laughed at the cuteness of it. BTW, I wanted to personally rip her lips off

 

[Lakhota]

Lt. Col. Vindman says the transcript is inaccurate. Americans have a right to see and hear the full and accurate transcript of Trump's call to Zelensky.

 

[bullwinkle]

We have the transcript!!!

No we don't. We have a memo with elipses. It says right on it, "This is not a transcript."

 

[pyetro]

Why did schiff direct the witness not answer questions from the republicans!? Lol hahhahahaha

Hahha

DUDE YOU WANT THIS IN PUBLIC?? Haha

You made that up.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

The Army officer doesn’t get to override the President’s policy because it hurts his feelings and isn’t good for the Ukraine.

Nor did he, nor has he imagined he could. We are hearing from him because he was asked about it. By the way, he has more cred in his little toe than the fat child president has in his entire blobbage.

No, but he did try to undermine the President, simply because he disagreed with his decision. He should be fired.
He lost all credibility when he testified his main concern was for his home country, Ukraine.

He performed the job he was there to perform.

That he did. In their desperation to take Trump down, the Democrats trotted out yet another low-level .gov. rube to make a fool of himself. A trained seal could have done a better job.

Americans might do better electing seals rather than entitled celebrities and pedophile oligarchs.

 

[pyetro]

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, arriving Tuesday on Capitol Hill to testify in the impeachment inquiry.Credit...Erin Schaff/The New York Times

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, who heard President Trump’s July phone call with Ukraine’s president and was alarmed, testified that he tried and failed to add key details to the rough transcript.

WASHINGTON — Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to include them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony.

The omissions, Colonel Vindman said, included Mr. Trump’s assertion that there were recordings of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. discussing Ukraine corruption, and an explicit mention by Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, of Burisma Holdings, the energy company whose board employed Mr. Biden’s son Hunter.

More: Account of Trump’s Ukraine Call Omitted Key Details, Official Testifies

I salute Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman for his service and patriotism! Someone has to answer for this.

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, arriving Tuesday on Capitol Hill to testify in the impeachment inquiry.Credit...Erin Schaff/The New York Times

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, who heard President Trump’s July phone call with Ukraine’s president and was alarmed, testified that he tried and failed to add key details to the rough transcript.

WASHINGTON — Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to include them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony.

The omissions, Colonel Vindman said, included Mr. Trump’s assertion that there were recordings of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. discussing Ukraine corruption, and an explicit mention by Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, of Burisma Holdings, the energy company whose board employed Mr. Biden’s son Hunter.

More: Account of Trump’s Ukraine Call Omitted Key Details, Official Testifies

I salute Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman for his service and patriotism! Someone has to answer for this.

I knew the "rough" transcript was nothing but made-up, incomplete BS.

 

[BULLDOG]

The Army officer doesn’t get to override the President’s policy because it hurts his feelings and isn’t good for the Ukraine.

Nor did he, nor has he imagined he could. We are hearing from him because he was asked about it. By the way, he has more cred in his little toe than the fat child president has in his entire blobbage.

No, but he did try to undermine the President, simply because he disagreed with his decision. He should be fired.
He lost all credibility when he testified his main concern was for his home country, Ukraine.

He performed the job he was there to perform.

That he did. In their desperation to take Trump down, the Democrats trotted out yet another low-level .gov. rube to make a fool of himself. A trained seal could have done a better job.

Given the massive amount of damning evidence against Trump, I believe a trained seal could convince sane people of Trump's lawlessness. Of course the crazies will never accept that that obese orange fool is scum.

 

[Crixus]

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, arriving Tuesday on Capitol Hill to testify in the impeachment inquiry.Credit...Erin Schaff/The New York Times

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, who heard President Trump’s July phone call with Ukraine’s president and was alarmed, testified that he tried and failed to add key details to the rough transcript.

WASHINGTON — Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to include them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony.

The omissions, Colonel Vindman said, included Mr. Trump’s assertion that there were recordings of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. discussing Ukraine corruption, and an explicit mention by Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, of Burisma Holdings, the energy company whose board employed Mr. Biden’s son Hunter.

More: Account of Trump’s Ukraine Call Omitted Key Details, Official Testifies

I salute Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman for his service and patriotism! Someone has to answer for this.

Alex will. After 2020 election I figure there will be a reckoning.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

NaziCons tried desperately to get Lt. Colonel Vindman to help them learn the identity of the whistleblower - but Adam Schiff quickly nipped that in the bud.

Who the fuck cares about the Whistleblowers? Trump released the transcript

 

[edward37]

My question to moron republicans is why did they try to hide the transcript?? We know the answer but repub punks can't admit it

 

[Jitss617]

Why did schiff direct the witness not answer questions from the republicans!? Lol hahhahahaha

Hahha

DUDE YOU WANT THIS IN PUBLIC?? Haha

You made that up.

Ummm ok

 

[Jitss617]

My question to moron republicans is why did they try to hide the transcript?? We know the answer but repub punks can't admit it

Hide? It’s released you need a link?

 

[Crixus]

The Army officer doesn’t get to override the President’s policy because it hurts his feelings and isn’t good for the Ukraine.

Nor did he, nor has he imagined he could. We are hearing from him because he was asked about it. By the way, he has more cred in his little toe than the fat child president has in his entire blobbage.

No, but he did try to undermine the President, simply because he disagreed with his decision. He should be fired.
He lost all credibility when he testified his main concern was for his home country, Ukraine.

He performed the job he was there to perform.

That he did. In their desperation to take Trump down, the Democrats trotted out yet another low-level .gov. rube to make a fool of himself. A trained seal could have done a better job.

Given the massive amount of damning evidence against Trump, I believe a trained seal could convince sane people of Trump's lawlessness. Of course the crazies will never accept that that obese orange fool is scum.

Dang man, I hate it when you talk like that. It reminds me of the birthers.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The Army officer doesn’t get to override the President’s policy because it hurts his feelings and isn’t good for the Ukraine.

Nor did he, nor has he imagined he could. We are hearing from him because he was asked about it. By the way, he has more cred in his little toe than the fat child president has in his entire blobbage.

No, but he did try to undermine the President, simply because he disagreed with his decision. He should be fired.
He lost all credibility when he testified his main concern was for his home country, Ukraine.

He performed the job he was there to perform.

That he did. In their desperation to take Trump down, the Democrats trotted out yet another low-level .gov. rube to make a fool of himself. A trained seal could have done a better job.

Given the massive amount of damning evidence against Trump, I believe a trained seal could convince sane people of Trump's lawlessness. Of course the crazies will never accept that that obese orange fool is scum.

All that "evidence" but no impeachment vote. Why do you suppose that is?

 

[bodecea]

Why did schiff direct the witness not answer questions from the republicans!? Lol hahhahahaha

Hahha

DUDE YOU WANT THIS IN PUBLIC?? Haha

Prove that he did so.

 

[Lakhota]

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, arriving Tuesday on Capitol Hill to testify in the impeachment inquiry.Credit...Erin Schaff/The New York Times

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, who heard President Trump’s July phone call with Ukraine’s president and was alarmed, testified that he tried and failed to add key details to the rough transcript.

WASHINGTON — Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to include them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony.

The omissions, Colonel Vindman said, included Mr. Trump’s assertion that there were recordings of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. discussing Ukraine corruption, and an explicit mention by Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, of Burisma Holdings, the energy company whose board employed Mr. Biden’s son Hunter.

More: Account of Trump’s Ukraine Call Omitted Key Details, Official Testifies

I salute Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman for his service and patriotism! Someone has to answer for this.

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, arriving Tuesday on Capitol Hill to testify in the impeachment inquiry.Credit...Erin Schaff/The New York Times

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, who heard President Trump’s July phone call with Ukraine’s president and was alarmed, testified that he tried and failed to add key details to the rough transcript.

WASHINGTON — Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to include them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony.

The omissions, Colonel Vindman said, included Mr. Trump’s assertion that there were recordings of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. discussing Ukraine corruption, and an explicit mention by Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, of Burisma Holdings, the energy company whose board employed Mr. Biden’s son Hunter.

More: Account of Trump’s Ukraine Call Omitted Key Details, Official Testifies

I salute Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman for his service and patriotism! Someone has to answer for this.

I knew the "rough" transcript was nothing but made-up, incomplete BS.

Except for omitting some key details - apparently it is fairly accurate. However, it does not include the corrections that Lt. Col. Vindman provided.

 

[JGalt]

So we can all pretty much agree that Vindman's testimony was just another big fat nothingburger, served up on a platter by Bug-Eyes Schiff, right?

Sure, that will be a given in your little nut bag bubble, but the rest of the world knows better.

AH' republicans will stop at nothing to denigrate a hero , a man who knows republicans screwed around with the transcript

Hero, my ass. He is either a simple Ukrainian potato-eater expressing his sentiment for his homeland.....

...or a covert Russian operative.

You do know how far the KGB has it's fingers in Ukraine’s panties, don't you? Don't let the uniform fool you: If it's not unreasonable like you people say, that "Trump is a Russian agent", how much more reasonable would it be to suspect that a US military officer is playing both sides?

He was born in Ukraine, you know. Donald Trump was born in New York, BTW.