Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman: Account of Trump’s Ukraine Call Omitted Key Details

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It’s doesn’t matter what their opinions are.

When building a political case for impeachment? Oh yes it does.

 

[Lesh]

The President’s job is to do what is best for the United States,

Which of course he wasn't doing.

He was doing what he thought was best for DJT.

He was wrong. It will get him Impeached

 

[BULLDOG]

Did you see Vindmens Tie!? Lol what a mess!

Good point. You didn't like his tie, so Trump must be innocent. Keep up the good work.

 

[Jitss617]

Sounds like he’s the one that told the whistle blower

You say that like it's a bad thing

Just a false echo.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The Army officer doesn’t get to override the President’s policy because it hurts his feelings and isn’t good for the Ukraine.

Nor did he, nor has he imagined he could. We are hearing from him because he was asked about it. By the way, he has more cred in his little toe than the fat child president has in his entire blobbage.

 

[Jitss617]

Did you see Vindmens Tie!? Lol what a mess!

Good point. You didn't like his tie, so Trump must be innocent. Keep up the good work.

He’s a mess! A joke.. he fumbled upon a Purple Heart! Loser

 

[theHawk]

The President’s job is to do what is best for the United States,

Which of course he wasn't doing.

He was doing what he thought was best for DJT.

He was wrong. It will get him Impeached

Bringing justice to criminals like the Bidens is good for America.

But of course for Democrat hacks like you, corrupt Dems are immune from any possible investigations, especially when running against President Trump.

 

[Lakhota]

Republicans Push For Whistleblower’s Identity In Impeachment Inquiry

Democrats say the whistleblower’s testimony is not needed at this point because it has been corroborated by other witnesses. Bringing him or her forward after repeated attacks by Trump would only put the whistleblower’s safety at risk, they said.

“We have a long-standing concern that the president and his allies in Congress aren’t interested in the underlying act but are interested in risking the life of the whistleblower,” Representative Eric Swalwell told reporters.

Government personnel have been assigned to protect the whistleblower, according to sources familiar with the matter, after Trump has attacked the whistleblower and conservative news outlets and social-media activists speculated about the individual’s identity.

GOP PUSH TO OUT WHISTLEBLOWER

The fact that whistleblowers are protected by law means nothing to NaziCons like Gym Jordan and Mark Meadows.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

He’s a mess! A joke.. he fumbled upon a Purple Heart! Loser

You know, Jitss617 , there is something just a little off about your posts. Nobody actually thinks what you just posted. Nobody. So this is bad acting. What motivates a person to do this? Attention? Money? Who knows...

 

[theHawk]

The Army officer doesn’t get to override the President’s policy because it hurts his feelings and isn’t good for the Ukraine.

Nor did he, nor has he imagined he could. We are hearing from him because he was asked about it. By the way, he has more cred in his little toe than the fat child president has in his entire blobbage.

No, but he did try to undermine the President, simply because he disagreed with his decision. He should be fired.
He lost all credibility when he testified his main concern was for his home country, Ukraine.

 

[Jitss617]

He’s a mess! A joke.. he fumbled upon a Purple Heart! Loser

You know, Jitss617 , there is something just a little off about your posts. Nobody actually thinks what you just posted. Nobody. So this is bad acting. What motivates a person to do this? Attention? Money? Who knows...

Huh

 

[JGalt]

So we can all pretty much agree that Vindman's testimony was just another big fat nothingburger, served up on a platter by Bug-Eyes Schiff, right?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No, but he did try to undermine the President, simply because he disagreed with his decision.

No. He simply disagreed. He found it concerning enough to go through the proper channels and report it. This is not "undermining the President". That is proper, as is responding to a subpoena.

 

[BULLDOG]

The Army officer doesn’t get to override the President’s policy because it hurts his feelings and isn’t good for the Ukraine.

Nor did he, nor has he imagined he could. We are hearing from him because he was asked about it. By the way, he has more cred in his little toe than the fat child president has in his entire blobbage.

No, but he did try to undermine the President, simply because he disagreed with his decision. He should be fired.
He lost all credibility when he testified his main concern was for his home country, Ukraine.

He performed the job he was there to perform.

 

[edward37]

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, arriving Tuesday on Capitol Hill to testify in the impeachment inquiry.Credit...Erin Schaff/The New York Times

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, who heard President Trump’s July phone call with Ukraine’s president and was alarmed, testified that he tried and failed to add key details to the rough transcript.

WASHINGTON — Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to include them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony.

The omissions, Colonel Vindman said, included Mr. Trump’s assertion that there were recordings of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. discussing Ukraine corruption, and an explicit mention by Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, of Burisma Holdings, the energy company whose board employed Mr. Biden’s son Hunter.

More: Account of Trump’s Ukraine Call Omitted Key Details, Official Testifies

I salute Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman for his service and patriotism! Someone has to answer for this.

And republican scum bash this American hero ?? Trump the low life punk couldn't hold a candle to this guy and the AH trump bashes this hero on twitter ??

 

[Lakhota]

The Army officer doesn’t get to override the President’s policy because it hurts his feelings and isn’t good for the Ukraine.

Nor did he, nor has he imagined he could. We are hearing from him because he was asked about it. By the way, he has more cred in his little toe than the fat child president has in his entire blobbage.

No, but he did try to undermine the President, simply because he disagreed with his decision. He should be fired.
He lost all credibility when he testified his main concern was for his home country, Ukraine.

He performed the job he was there to perform.

I agree - and he was uniquely qualified to perform that job.

 

[BULLDOG]

So we can all pretty much agree that Vindman's testimony was just another big fat nothingburger, served up on a platter by Bug-Eyes Schiff, right?

Sure, that will be a given in your little nut bag bubble, but the rest of the world knows better.

 

[edward37]

NaziCons tried desperately to get Lt. Colonel Vindman to help them learn the identity of the whistleblower - but Adam Schiff quickly nipped that in the bud.

Yea, have to protect those Never-Trumpers. How dare anyone suggest someone accusing someone of a crime have to testify to it.

Do any of you fn morons know the laws that protect whistle blowers?

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

The treasonous army dude got all dressed up with no where to go! It is hilarious that the impeachment hoax exists because democrats neglected to pass a law to make it illegal to investigate Biden's corruption and assorted illegal activities.

Yeah, Biden's kid gets a cushy job on his daddy's name and Don Jr, Eric and Ivanka are in Don's administration. Go figure, your ruling aristocracy is corrupt.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

NaziCons tried desperately to get Lt. Colonel Vindman to help them learn the identity of the whistleblower - but Adam Schiff quickly nipped that in the bud.

Yea, have to protect those Never-Trumpers. How dare anyone suggest someone accusing someone of a crime have to testify to it.

Do any of you fn morons know the laws that protect whistle blowers?

We are not a nation of laws, embrace the reality over the sloganeering.