Macaca Joe goes out giving West Point the finger

[bripat9643]

Is she the best qualified candidate or just the best qualified female candidate?

How many of the men have been the best candidate?

Every last one of them.

Evidence? You have no way of knowing that.

The odds are 99.99% in favor of it being true.

 

[konradv]

It necessarily includes being a warrior.

Where's the evidence that she isn't a warrior?

She's a social science professor. When did she ever get any experience being a warrior?

That isn't evidence she isn't a warrior. Try again.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Is she the best qualified candidate or just the best qualified female candidate?

How many of the men have been the best candidate?

Every last one of them.

Evidence? You have no way of knowing that.

The odds are 99.99% in favor of it being true.

Of course they are, Sgt. Hur Dur.

 

[konradv]

Is she the best qualified candidate or just the best qualified female candidate?

How many of the men have been the best candidate?

Every last one of them.

Evidence? You have no way of knowing that.

The odds are 99.99% in favor of it being true.

Once again, a statement with no evidence. All you've proven is your bias.

 

[my2¢]

Her appointment needs to be confirmed by the Senate. Should they block it? What does it say if they don't?

 

[bripat9643]

It necessarily includes being a warrior.

Where's the evidence that she isn't a warrior?

She's a social science professor. When did she ever get any experience being a warrior?

That isn't evidence she isn't a warrior. Try again.

It sure as hell is. For one thing, 99% of sociologists are Marxist and are downright hostile to the U.S. military. Nothing they teach has any relevance to the Military, except to condemn it, of course.

Now tell us, where did she get any experience or on the job training as a warrior?

 

[bripat9643]

Is she the best qualified candidate or just the best qualified female candidate?

How many of the men have been the best candidate?

Every last one of them.

Evidence? You have no way of knowing that.

The odds are 99.99% in favor of it being true.

Once again, a statement with no evidence. All you've proven is your bias.

I'm biased in favor of granting appointments based on merit, not political correctness.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

It necessarily includes being a warrior.

Where's the evidence that she isn't a warrior?

She's a social science professor. When did she ever get any experience being a warrior?

That isn't evidence she isn't a warrior. Try again.

It sure as hell is. For one thing, 99% of sociologists are Marxist and are downright hostile to the U.S. military. Nothing they teach has any relevance to the Military, except to condemn it, of course.

Now tell us, where did she get any experience or on the job training as a warrior?

She's not a "sociologist", clown. She's taught Comparative Politics, International Security, Cultural Anthropology, Terrorism and Counterterrorism, and Officership, as well as advanced seminar classes on Strategy and Force Planning.

 

[konradv]

How many of the men have been the best candidate?

Every last one of them.

Evidence? You have no way of knowing that.

The odds are 99.99% in favor of it being true.

Once again, a statement with no evidence. All you've proven is your bias.

I'm biased in favor of granting appointments based on merit, not political correctness.

Another statement with no evidence to back it up.

 

[konradv]

Now tell us, where did she get any experience or on the job training as a warrior?

She got the same basic training as all officers. That's where.

 

[bripat9643]

It necessarily includes being a warrior.

Where's the evidence that she isn't a warrior?

She's a social science professor. When did she ever get any experience being a warrior?

That isn't evidence she isn't a warrior. Try again.

It sure as hell is. For one thing, 99% of sociologists are Marxist and are downright hostile to the U.S. military. Nothing they teach has any relevance to the Military, except to condemn it, of course.

Now tell us, where did she get any experience or on the job training as a warrior?

She's not a "sociologist", clown. She's taught Comparative Politics, International Security, Cultural Anthropology, Terrorism and Counterterrorism, and Officership, as well as advanced seminar classes on Strategy and Force Planning.

She's the head of the Social Sciences Dept, clown.

 

[Katzndogz]

This is part and parcel of femininizing the military to make it less effective.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Where's the evidence that she isn't a warrior?

She's a social science professor. When did she ever get any experience being a warrior?

That isn't evidence she isn't a warrior. Try again.

It sure as hell is. For one thing, 99% of sociologists are Marxist and are downright hostile to the U.S. military. Nothing they teach has any relevance to the Military, except to condemn it, of course.

Now tell us, where did she get any experience or on the job training as a warrior?

She's not a "sociologist", clown. She's taught Comparative Politics, International Security, Cultural Anthropology, Terrorism and Counterterrorism, and Officership, as well as advanced seminar classes on Strategy and Force Planning.

She's the head of the Social Sciences Dept, clown.

Yes, she is.

Are you under the impression that sociology is the only "Social Science"?

 

[rightwinger]

Is she qualified to do the job?

Yes, her resume is impressive. She has experience in all the areas of importance for applying to a modern force of officers, including assignments to both intelligence, strategy, and force planning. She served as an officer after graduating as an intelligence officer and worked at NSA.

Impressive background

I can see why conservatives are outraged

 

[bripat9643]

Every last one of them.

Evidence? You have no way of knowing that.

The odds are 99.99% in favor of it being true.

Once again, a statement with no evidence. All you've proven is your bias.

I'm biased in favor of granting appointments based on merit, not political correctness.

Another statement with no evidence to back it up.

When have you ever provided any evidence to backup your infantile claims?

 

[bripat9643]

Is she qualified to do the job?

Yes, her resume is impressive. She has experience in all the areas of importance for applying to a modern force of officers, including assignments to both intelligence, strategy, and force planning. She served as an officer after graduating as an intelligence officer and worked at NSA.

Does she have combat experience?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

What else do you expect from an American Hating, dumb fuck POTUS who doesn't know our traditions or holidays, how old we are or even how many states are in the nation he leads rounded to the nearest ten.

True to form Macaca Joe Obama, appoints a woman as Dean of West Point.

It's just plain fucking wrong

"(Reuters) - The United States Military Academy is poised to have its first woman dean in its 216-year history after President Barack Obama nominated to the post a West Point graduate who currently leads the school's Department of Social Sciences."

U.S. West Point academy set for first woman dean in two century history

lol

Typical of most on the ridiculous, reprehensible right: fear of change and diversity.

There’s no rational, intelligent, or factual reason why a woman can’t be dean.

 

[konradv]

Evidence? You have no way of knowing that.

The odds are 99.99% in favor of it being true.

Once again, a statement with no evidence. All you've proven is your bias.

I'm biased in favor of granting appointments based on merit, not political correctness.

Another statement with no evidence to back it up.

When have you ever provided any evidence to backup your infantile claims?

Don't try to deflect. The matter at hand is your refusal to back up anything you have to say about this topic. It's your typical tactic, just sling the bullshit until your opponent gets sick of the stupidity.

 

[ogibillm]

Is she qualified to do the job?

Obviously not.

Why not?

Be specific.

What does she know about fighting a war?

more than you ever could

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The odds are 99.99% in favor of it being true.

Once again, a statement with no evidence. All you've proven is your bias.

I'm biased in favor of granting appointments based on merit, not political correctness.

Another statement with no evidence to back it up.

When have you ever provided any evidence to backup your infantile claims?

Don't try to deflect. The matter at hand is your refusal to back up anything you have to say about this topic. It's your typical tactic, just sling the bullshit until your opponent gets sick of the stupidity.

Conservatives: masters of the red herring fallacy.