Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why Ray because we have given more of their own money back in their own pockets and taken away government handouts? That's right you are all for giving more to the least needy. You my friend are not even close to a free enterprise capitalist.
What I am is a realist. You are not. You are one of those leftists who refuse to believe the theory or action/ reaction.
When you take a negative action against somebody, a negative reaction is likely to follow. When you take a positive action on somebody, it's likely to be met with a positive reaction.
So if you take a negative action on businesses, expect a negative reaction. Taking a negative action against somebody or something, and expecting a positive reaction is simply not logical.
The negative action of cutting taxes for all, oh the horror. You are truly a dupe.
Who said it's cutting taxes for all? There are plenty of corporations that pay less than that with their deductions. For them it would be a tax increase which is my point.
How dare your values corporations pay their fair share. Let the people pay it.
Tell you what, next time you go to work, and if you can talk to the company owner, present your idea to him or her and see what kind of reply you get. Chances are, the company you work for takes a fair if not large amount of deductions. And if they do, and lose those deductions, what do you think would happen to your future with the company?
To encourage house purchases, that's why.
That is not the government’s job. Taxes should be used to raise money to pay for the governments spending, nothing more.
It is wrong to use the tax code for social engineering.
With their expenditures they pay a lower effective tax rate then I.
Go look at the chart. It will tell you what they are paying over the years.
What expenditures are you speaking of?
The uber wealthy have incentives I can never get to because not wealthy enough.
Ok s0 get rid of the incentives and lower the tax rate accordingly. Otherwise the money is going to find a home somewhere else (overseas).
Dewey that is what I have been advocating from the start. Back to the kiddie table with you.
Are you for lowering the tax rate on the rich?
Why Ray because we have given more of their own money back in their own pockets and taken away government handouts? That's right you are all for giving more to the least needy. You my friend are not even close to a free enterprise capitalist.
What I am is a realist. You are not. You are one of those leftists who refuse to believe the theory or action/ reaction.
When you take a negative action against somebody, a negative reaction is likely to follow. When you take a positive action on somebody, it's likely to be met with a positive reaction.
So if you take a negative action on businesses, expect a negative reaction. Taking a negative action against somebody or something, and expecting a positive reaction is simply not logical.
The negative action of cutting taxes for all, oh the horror. You are truly a dupe.
Who said it's cutting taxes for all? There are plenty of corporations that pay less than that with their deductions. For them it would be a tax increase which is my point.
How dare your values corporations pay their fair share. Let the people pay it.
What are you saying?
what is the objective? what is it you're trying to solve? me? Spending.I advocated lowering their taxes over 100% and you cry for them poor mistreated corporations.
All I'm saying is that your theory is flawed. You think you can have a flat tax with no negative ramifications. What I am saying is that if you made such a drastic change, it would have a lot of negative results.
And more positive results. No system will be perfect. Let's try more fair.
Spending definitely needs to be cut. I am also for cutting tax rate for all.
I'm not. I think the taxes paid by the rich are about right at this time. You're proposing cutting them a huge deal. How is this going to square with the deficit?
And forget about a wealth tax. That is basically confiscating (stealing) money and assets from people which have already been taxed. That will certainly send money overseas.
To encourage house purchases, that's why.
That is not the government’s job. Taxes should be used to raise money to pay for the governments spending, nothing more.
It is wrong to use the tax code for social engineering.
Go look at the chart. It will tell you what they are paying over the years.
What expenditures are you speaking of?
The uber wealthy have incentives I can never get to because not wealthy enough.
Ok s0 get rid of the incentives and lower the tax rate accordingly. Otherwise the money is going to find a home somewhere else (overseas).
Dewey that is what I have been advocating from the start. Back to the kiddie table with you.
Are you for lowering the tax rate on the rich?
What I am is a realist. You are not. You are one of those leftists who refuse to believe the theory or action/ reaction.
When you take a negative action against somebody, a negative reaction is likely to follow. When you take a positive action on somebody, it's likely to be met with a positive reaction.
So if you take a negative action on businesses, expect a negative reaction. Taking a negative action against somebody or something, and expecting a positive reaction is simply not logical.
The negative action of cutting taxes for all, oh the horror. You are truly a dupe.
Who said it's cutting taxes for all? There are plenty of corporations that pay less than that with their deductions. For them it would be a tax increase which is my point.
How dare your values corporations pay their fair share. Let the people pay it.
What are you saying?
Lowering the tax rate on everyone.
How dare your valued corporations pay an equal share. That is just shameless.
what is the objective? what is it you're trying to solve? me? Spending.All I'm saying is that your theory is flawed. You think you can have a flat tax with no negative ramifications. What I am saying is that if you made such a drastic change, it would have a lot of negative results.
And more positive results. No system will be perfect. Let's try more fair.
Spending definitely needs to be cut. I am also for cutting tax rate for all.
I'm not. I think the taxes paid by the rich are about right at this time. You're proposing cutting them a huge deal. How is this going to square with the deficit?
And forget about a wealth tax. That is basically confiscating (stealing) money and assets from people which have already been taxed. That will certainly send money overseas.
Because you're taking away all expenditures.
What I am is a realist. You are not. You are one of those leftists who refuse to believe the theory or action/ reaction.
When you take a negative action against somebody, a negative reaction is likely to follow. When you take a positive action on somebody, it's likely to be met with a positive reaction.
So if you take a negative action on businesses, expect a negative reaction. Taking a negative action against somebody or something, and expecting a positive reaction is simply not logical.
The negative action of cutting taxes for all, oh the horror. You are truly a dupe.
Who said it's cutting taxes for all? There are plenty of corporations that pay less than that with their deductions. For them it would be a tax increase which is my point.
How dare your values corporations pay their fair share. Let the people pay it.
Tell you what, next time you go to work, and if you can talk to the company owner, present your idea to him or her and see what kind of reply you get. Chances are, the company you work for takes a fair if not large amount of deductions. And if they do, and lose those deductions, what do you think would happen to your future with the company?
Since I am advocating cutting their tax rate from 21% to 10%. Probably a pay on the back. And since I am sure a will never meet the owner of Bechtel I doubt I get the chance. Maybe if your owner had a lower tax rate you would have health care Ray.
equal share? wtf does that mean? you making shit up now?Go look at the chart. It will tell you what they are paying over the years.
What expenditures are you speaking of?
The uber wealthy have incentives I can never get to because not wealthy enough.
Ok s0 get rid of the incentives and lower the tax rate accordingly. Otherwise the money is going to find a home somewhere else (overseas).
Dewey that is what I have been advocating from the start. Back to the kiddie table with you.
Are you for lowering the tax rate on the rich?
What I am is a realist. You are not. You are one of those leftists who refuse to believe the theory or action/ reaction.
When you take a negative action against somebody, a negative reaction is likely to follow. When you take a positive action on somebody, it's likely to be met with a positive reaction.
So if you take a negative action on businesses, expect a negative reaction. Taking a negative action against somebody or something, and expecting a positive reaction is simply not logical.
The negative action of cutting taxes for all, oh the horror. You are truly a dupe.
Who said it's cutting taxes for all? There are plenty of corporations that pay less than that with their deductions. For them it would be a tax increase which is my point.
How dare your values corporations pay their fair share. Let the people pay it.
What are you saying?
Lowering the tax rate on everyone.
How dare your valued corporations pay an equal share. That is just shameless.
To encourage house purchases, that's why.
That is not the government’s job. Taxes should be used to raise money to pay for the governments spending, nothing more.
It is wrong to use the tax code for social engineering.
Ray, the dude can't even answer the question with explaining fair!To encourage house purchases, that's why.
That is not the government’s job. Taxes should be used to raise money to pay for the governments spending, nothing more.
It is wrong to use the tax code for social engineering.
That's not social engineering. Social engineering is like when HUD moves their lowlifes to a nice middle-class neighborhood, and they destroy the place. Allowing tax deductions for a mortgage encourages home buying, which also influences house construction.
The uber wealthy have incentives I can never get to because not wealthy enough.
Ok s0 get rid of the incentives and lower the tax rate accordingly. Otherwise the money is going to find a home somewhere else (overseas).
Dewey that is what I have been advocating from the start. Back to the kiddie table with you.
Are you for lowering the tax rate on the rich?
The negative action of cutting taxes for all, oh the horror. You are truly a dupe.
Who said it's cutting taxes for all? There are plenty of corporations that pay less than that with their deductions. For them it would be a tax increase which is my point.
How dare your values corporations pay their fair share. Let the people pay it.
What are you saying?
Lowering the tax rate on everyone.
How dare your valued corporations pay an equal share. That is just shameless.
They don't pay shit! The cost is passed on to the consumer. LOL. Step back and look at the larger picture.
The negative action of cutting taxes for all, oh the horror. You are truly a dupe.
Who said it's cutting taxes for all? There are plenty of corporations that pay less than that with their deductions. For them it would be a tax increase which is my point.
How dare your values corporations pay their fair share. Let the people pay it.
Tell you what, next time you go to work, and if you can talk to the company owner, present your idea to him or her and see what kind of reply you get. Chances are, the company you work for takes a fair if not large amount of deductions. And if they do, and lose those deductions, what do you think would happen to your future with the company?
Since I am advocating cutting their tax rate from 21% to 10%. Probably a pay on the back. And since I am sure a will never meet the owner of Bechtel I doubt I get the chance. Maybe if your owner had a lower tax rate you would have health care Ray.
If he lost his deductions, he'd probably have to close up shop.
equal share? wtf does that mean? you making shit up now?The uber wealthy have incentives I can never get to because not wealthy enough.
Ok s0 get rid of the incentives and lower the tax rate accordingly. Otherwise the money is going to find a home somewhere else (overseas).
Dewey that is what I have been advocating from the start. Back to the kiddie table with you.
Are you for lowering the tax rate on the rich?
The negative action of cutting taxes for all, oh the horror. You are truly a dupe.
Who said it's cutting taxes for all? There are plenty of corporations that pay less than that with their deductions. For them it would be a tax increase which is my point.
How dare your values corporations pay their fair share. Let the people pay it.
What are you saying?
Lowering the tax rate on everyone.
How dare your valued corporations pay an equal share. That is just shameless.
Who said it's cutting taxes for all? There are plenty of corporations that pay less than that with their deductions. For them it would be a tax increase which is my point.
How dare your values corporations pay their fair share. Let the people pay it.
Tell you what, next time you go to work, and if you can talk to the company owner, present your idea to him or her and see what kind of reply you get. Chances are, the company you work for takes a fair if not large amount of deductions. And if they do, and lose those deductions, what do you think would happen to your future with the company?
Since I am advocating cutting their tax rate from 21% to 10%. Probably a pay on the back. And since I am sure a will never meet the owner of Bechtel I doubt I get the chance. Maybe if your owner had a lower tax rate you would have health care Ray.
If he lost his deductions, he'd probably have to close up shop.
Maybe he should run a better company and you would have health care.
To encourage house purchases, that's why.
That is not the government’s job. Taxes should be used to raise money to pay for the governments spending, nothing more.
It is wrong to use the tax code for social engineering.
Except when it comes to the free stuff I suppose.
why do you think they should?Ok s0 get rid of the incentives and lower the tax rate accordingly. Otherwise the money is going to find a home somewhere else (overseas).
Dewey that is what I have been advocating from the start. Back to the kiddie table with you.
Are you for lowering the tax rate on the rich?
Who said it's cutting taxes for all? There are plenty of corporations that pay less than that with their deductions. For them it would be a tax increase which is my point.
How dare your values corporations pay their fair share. Let the people pay it.
What are you saying?
Lowering the tax rate on everyone.
How dare your valued corporations pay an equal share. That is just shameless.
They don't pay shit! The cost is passed on to the consumer. LOL. Step back and look at the larger picture.
So like I have said then are you advocating that corporations pay no taxes at all of any kind.
How dare your values corporations pay their fair share. Let the people pay it.
Tell you what, next time you go to work, and if you can talk to the company owner, present your idea to him or her and see what kind of reply you get. Chances are, the company you work for takes a fair if not large amount of deductions. And if they do, and lose those deductions, what do you think would happen to your future with the company?
Since I am advocating cutting their tax rate from 21% to 10%. Probably a pay on the back. And since I am sure a will never meet the owner of Bechtel I doubt I get the chance. Maybe if your owner had a lower tax rate you would have health care Ray.
If he lost his deductions, he'd probably have to close up shop.
Maybe he should run a better company and you would have health care.
No, maybe people shouldn't elect a bunch of control freak commies to our federal government and I would still have my healthcare.
Ok s0 get rid of the incentives and lower the tax rate accordingly. Otherwise the money is going to find a home somewhere else (overseas).
Dewey that is what I have been advocating from the start. Back to the kiddie table with you.
Are you for lowering the tax rate on the rich?
Who said it's cutting taxes for all? There are plenty of corporations that pay less than that with their deductions. For them it would be a tax increase which is my point.
How dare your values corporations pay their fair share. Let the people pay it.
What are you saying?
Lowering the tax rate on everyone.
How dare your valued corporations pay an equal share. That is just shameless.
They don't pay shit! The cost is passed on to the consumer. LOL. Step back and look at the larger picture.
So like I have said then are you advocating that corporations pay no taxes at all of any kind.
