- Apr 21, 2010
- 98,556
- 59,728
The man didn't murder anyone. Charge him with not keeping his dogs locked up, or something.
Because his negligence led to this woman's death. He knew the dogs were vicious and had attacked other people. Dog owners need to be responsible for their pets' behavior. I agree, however, with another poster. Murder charges will probably not stick. It should be negligent homicide. It's like dangerous driving that results in a death.
If the dogs had attacked other people, why wasn't he charged and ordered to surrender the animals? Why was he allowed to keep animals that had already proven to be dangerous?
Seems to me that this is a problem with appropriate charges not being laid from the start - that could have prevented this.
Because governments move slowly for one thing. Also, people are reticent to report bad guys do to fear and sadly, eventually something like this happens which finally takes it out of their hands.