Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Very entertaining but educational stuff.
Not that the trolls are interested in knowledge....they want to hide information.
How many times did you ask Dale Smith and others the exact same question ?Why should anyone watch the videos you post when you fail miserably to backup your bullshit?
I don't recall delusional dale ever claiming beams were cut in between the 50th and 60th floor. Had I seen him claim such nonsense, I would have challenged that loser on it too. Regardless, he fled and you're here now making that claim.How many times did you ask Dale Smith and others the exact same question ?Why should anyone watch the videos you post when you fail miserably to backup your bullshit?
Or am I supposed to feel special ?
Thanks for your brief moment of honesty and posting how firefighters fully expected building #7 to collapse.
Nice spin, but fire isn't why they were saying that.
That's the point. All three towers were damaged in different ways, but they all collapsed in free fall
the same way.
Very entertaining but educational stuff.
Not that the trolls are interested in knowledge....they want to hide information.
Thanks for your brief moment of honesty and posting how firefighters fully expected building #7 to collapse.
Very entertaining but educational stuff.
Not that the trolls are interested in knowledge....they want to hide information.
So I watched your video, and it made an interesting comment; the police and the fire department all know it was an inside job. Both the police and especially the fire department lost many people on 9/11. If they actually believed it was an inside job, they would be screaming it from the rooftops. At the very least they would have stated as much in their depositions they made after 9/11.
How do you explain the complacency of the very people who lost their friends and co-workers to a supposed inside job?
That's the point. All three towers were damaged in different ways, but they all collapsed in free fallI see. So you're saying the towers collapsed initially from somewhere between the 50th and 60th floor?The inner support beams were "cut" at 45° angles at two levels--probably somewhere between 50th and 60th floors and then below at the ground floor . Gravity and two jets did the rest.
the same way.
And is Tower 7 the new precedent for skyscraper fires ?
I wonder how firefighters will be able to determine whether or not burning buildings are safe to enter from now on ?
Thanks for your brief moment of honesty and posting how firefighters fully expected building #7 to collapse.
9-11 nut jobs keep posting how important WTC was
Yet firefighters gave up on fighting the fires
Back to the first question you guys never answered.
Why did Bush lie ?
Demolition experts are happy. Now they know that to demolish a building all they have to do is set it on fire.Which they all agreed the reason being was that early on, they recognized the futility of trying to save building #7.
Not wasting my time schooling you anymore.Do you not know the difference between a lie and a mistake? Bush was mistaken. He, remembers the second plane as being the first because of all of the replays. Now, he knows what he said was wrong, as do I. A lie would be knowing that you were wrong and still claiming that he saw the first plane hit, when no one did for some time.
You lie, because you know what you say is wrong and yet you refuse to accept it and keep spreading your imagined events.
For example, you backtracked on the beams being cut about 5 times in this thread, and even posted a video showing that the main structural support for the buildings is in the exterior beams. You lied, again and again after you were proven wrong.
BBC.The person who actually ordered the evacuation said he did so because of "heavy fires on many floors". Daniel Nigro was chief of operations on 9/11. So who are we to believe? You or the person who actually ordered the evacuation and the perimeter?
The burden of proof lays upon the simple question-- could the towers have collapsed at near freefall accelleration without the assistance of explosives and/or thermite charges ? Over 2000 architects and engineers say NIST is full of shit.I asked you a question. Why can't you answer it?
Are you saying the towers collapsed initially from somewhere between the 50th and 60th floor, where you claim beams were cut....?
Near-Free-Fall Acceleration | Twin Towers
Demolition experts are happy. Now they know that to demolish a building all they have to do is set it on fire.Which they all agreed the reason being was that early on, they recognized the futility of trying to save building #7.
Not wasting my time schooling you anymore.Do you not know the difference between a lie and a mistake? Bush was mistaken. He, remembers the second plane as being the first because of all of the replays. Now, he knows what he said was wrong, as do I. A lie would be knowing that you were wrong and still claiming that he saw the first plane hit, when no one did for some time.
You lie, because you know what you say is wrong and yet you refuse to accept it and keep spreading your imagined events.
For example, you backtracked on the beams being cut about 5 times in this thread, and even posted a video showing that the main structural support for the buildings is in the exterior beams. You lied, again and again after you were proven wrong.
BBC.The person who actually ordered the evacuation said he did so because of "heavy fires on many floors". Daniel Nigro was chief of operations on 9/11. So who are we to believe? You or the person who actually ordered the evacuation and the perimeter?
You are so full of shit.
Do you not know the difference in some air-headed reported saying a building has collapsed, not knowing which fucking building they were talking about, and as statement saying they were signs that building 7 WOULD collapse?
Demolition experts are happy. Now they know that to demolish a building all they have to do is set it on fire.Which they all agreed the reason being was that early on, they recognized the futility of trying to save building #7.
Not wasting my time schooling you anymore.Do you not know the difference between a lie and a mistake? Bush was mistaken. He, remembers the second plane as being the first because of all of the replays. Now, he knows what he said was wrong, as do I. A lie would be knowing that you were wrong and still claiming that he saw the first plane hit, when no one did for some time.
You lie, because you know what you say is wrong and yet you refuse to accept it and keep spreading your imagined events.
For example, you backtracked on the beams being cut about 5 times in this thread, and even posted a video showing that the main structural support for the buildings is in the exterior beams. You lied, again and again after you were proven wrong.
BBC.The person who actually ordered the evacuation said he did so because of "heavy fires on many floors". Daniel Nigro was chief of operations on 9/11. So who are we to believe? You or the person who actually ordered the evacuation and the perimeter?
You are so full of shit.
Do you not know the difference in some air-headed reported saying a building has collapsed, not knowing which fucking building they were talking about, and as statement saying they were signs that building 7 WOULD collapse?
No.
Most people who see this smell a rat, just like I do.
