g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 125,538
- 69,256
- 2,605
Under US jurisdiction. This is the ONLY condition necessary. You fail.United States v. Wong Kim ArkLevin is a whiney little Limbaugh wanna be. Nothing he says is believable.
Can't refute what he said so you attack the messenger, how leftist of you. The reason you can't refute what he said in the framers of the 14th specifically said that the phrase "and subject to the jurisdiction there of" was meant to exclude foreigners, aliens and diplomats. It also excluded American Indians which were finally made American citizens by an act of congress in the 1920's.
Sure I can refute it. He's wrong.
you said it now back it up.
Not an illegal, try again.