Marvelous Michelle Obama Tried to Escape the White House to Celebrate Legalization of Gay Marriage

[cpicturetaker12]

The world howled with laughter when Baraq lit the WH in rainbow colors.

Well our democracy howled in pain from the notion that the Whitehouse manifested foreknowledge of how a USSC case was coming down well in advance of an announcement. Worse, the nation is hotly divided on motherless/fatherless (gay) marriage. To flaunt a middle finger from the Whitehouse to the losing party’ 100s of millions the night of the decision was an act of fascism.

Baraq said the muslim call to prayer was the most beautiful sound he'd ever heard.

Little did he know the call is to murder all the homos.

#HeteroPride.

When did he say that? But it is MESMERIZING. I heard it and watched it one time.

 

[Leo123]

Oh yeah like STRAIGHT MARRIAGE is such a success! You know like TRUMP's. All 3 of them.

Ahhhh! The TDS-hurt-rump-Trump-derangement-syndrome is strong with this one!! Completely irrelevant I might add. However, at least Trump has CHILDREN to show for it and bring them up how he sees fit. That ought to get your lefty panties in a knot.

Seriously, you didn't think about that before you typed your phony moralizing. And like daddy his oldest was banging a PORN STAR and left his wife and their 5 kids. Yepper, another straight marriage success story.

You got something against porn stars? Hey they gotta make a living too!! Who are you to fucking judge? Oh yeah, when it comes to Trump lefties suddenly come up with whatever convenient set of 'morals' needed to make them feel all 'warm and fuzzy.'

 

[elongobardi]

i wouldnt be alive if it werent for Obamacare. i wouldnt be married if it werent for Obama

She is such a phony and liar. She was a spoiled snob


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

A little envious are we?

She’s an asshole


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[elongobardi]

i wouldnt be alive if it werent for Obamacare. i wouldnt be married if it werent for Obama

She is such a phony and liar. She was a spoiled snob


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

A little envious are we?

That must really suck for the orange buffoon. I know Drumpfs book is required reading in several multi level marketing groups including the pyramid scheme company ANC that he openly supported and was paid by for featuring them on his show..

More dog shit come out of your mouth


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

It’s about legal homo marriage and the gov forcing people to accommodate (with some bad consequences) and subsidize. That’s fascism.

Having your feels hurt isn’t a bad consequence. Good lord, you’re a drama queen.

This is about the empirical. Hurting kids and ultimately the society.
Your ignorance is rooted in a stupid bigotry.

No, this about about your pearl-clutching drama and nothing more. Either way, gays will continue to marry and all you can do is whine about it. You’re irrelevant.

You’re OK with kids being intentionally deprived of the right to the opportunity to be raised by their actual parents in spite of the data that shows how unstructured families have led to social demise over the past fifty years? You think the population should accommodate tax breaks for unnatural behavior equivalent to booger-eating?
I expect people to wake up to this. But as long as judges circumvent the legislative process people will be denied that due process.
Fascism.

WTF???

Are you too brainwashed to get your head around reason and facts?

 

[Silhouette]

Your real complaint should be with why the government subsidizes marriage to begin with. It’s amazing how many people suddenly have a problem with tax dollars accommodating marriage the second fags could marry.

You know it’s funny you should bring that up. The new USSC will be discussing why states have the right to selectively incentivize man/ woman marriage. The discussion will revolve around how marriage helps children. You remember that argument, right? Your cult used it (emphasis on “used”) in Obergefell.

Trouble is that once ALL the considerations for childrens’ benefits from marriage began to be discussed, the fascist court system under Obama suddenly got a case of laryngitis.

Happily the selection of two new sane Justices has cured that. Now they can begin to discuss the key benefit stolen from children re: Obergefell. Both a vital father and mother for the two types of genders always present in children.

You can’t revise a contract where both kids & adults share benefits, where the revision harms children psychologically. This is about a contract revision. A contract the States also shared with adults & children. Their benefit ( healthy kids for a healthy future society) was removed also without their assent.

As a further point in law, even if children were allowed to have separate representation at the contract revision, they are disallowed by the Infancy Doctrine to assent to any contractual conditions that are known to be harmful to them (put them at a disadvantage to their peers). There is no disputing that deprivation of either a mother or father statistically puts kids so afflicted to a disadvantage to their peers.

Come full circle now mdk, I hope you now understand why States are involved in the marriage contract. Because Alito, Roberts, Thomas, Kavanaugh & Gorsuch understand why. The problem most people have with fags marrying is that the children that lgbt said marriage was important to, that statistically arrive to it, and it created originally for their best shot at life, deprived children contractually, terms binding for life, of ever having a mother under their roof! That banishment is shocking to people and States.

 

[mdk]

Your real complaint should be with why the government subsidizes marriage to begin with. It’s amazing how many people suddenly have a problem with tax dollars accommodating marriage the second fags could marry.

You know it’s funny you should bring that up. The new USSC will be discussing why states have the right to selectively incentivize man/ woman marriage. The discussion will revolve around how marriage helps children. You remember that argument, right? Your cult used it (emphasis on “used”) in Obergefell.

Trouble is that once ALL the considerations for childrens’ benefits from marriage began to be discussed, the fascist court system under Obama suddenly got a case of laryngitis.

Happily the selection of two new sane Justices has cured that. Now they can begin to discuss the key benefit stolen from children re: Obergefell. Both a vital father and mother for the two types of genders always present in children.

You can’t revise a contract where both kids & adults share benefits, where the revision harms children psychologically. This is about a contract revision. A contract the States also shared with adults & children. Their benefit ( healthy kids for a healthy future society) was removed also without their assent.

As a further point in law, even if children were allowed to have separate representation at the contract revision, they are disallowed by the Infancy Doctrine to assent to any contractual conditions that are known to be harmful to them (put them at a disadvantage to their peers). There is no disputing that deprivation of either a mother or father statistically puts kids so afflicted to a disadvantage to their peers.

Come full circle now mdk, I hope you now understand why States are involved in the marriage contract. Because Alito, Roberts, Thomas, Kavanaugh & Gorsuch understand why. The problem most people have with fags marrying is that the children that lgbt said marriage was important to, that statistically arrive to it, and it created originally for their best shot at life, deprived children contractually, terms binding for life, of ever having a mother under their roof! That banishment is shocking to people and States.

Where’s the father under your roof? You demand gay people live by standard that you can’t meet. It’s okay for you b/c “hope” and children missing a parent in the house doesn’t matter when a contract isn’t involved.

 

[Skylar]

Your real complaint should be with why the government subsidizes marriage to begin with. It’s amazing how many people suddenly have a problem with tax dollars accommodating marriage the second fags could marry.

You know it’s funny you should bring that up. The new USSC will be discussing why states have the right to selectively incentivize man/ woman marriage. The discussion will revolve around how marriage helps children. You remember that argument, right? Your cult used it (emphasis on “used”) in Obergefell.

Trouble is that once ALL the considerations for childrens’ benefits from marriage began to be discussed, the fascist court system under Obama suddenly got a case of laryngitis.

Save of course, the court went into elaborate detail of the benefits of marriage for the children of same sex couples. And the harm caused to the children of same sex couples when the marriage of their parents wasn't recognized.

Remember, we can actually read the Obergefell ruling. So when you start to hallucinate an alternate version, its kinda obvious.

 

[Skylar]

Your real complaint should be with why the government subsidizes marriage to begin with. It’s amazing how many people suddenly have a problem with tax dollars accommodating marriage the second fags could marry.

You know it’s funny you should bring that up. The new USSC will be discussing why states have the right to selectively incentivize man/ woman marriage. The discussion will revolve around how marriage helps children. You remember that argument, right? Your cult used it (emphasis on “used”) in Obergefell.

Trouble is that once ALL the considerations for childrens’ benefits from marriage began to be discussed, the fascist court system under Obama suddenly got a case of laryngitis.

Happily the selection of two new sane Justices has cured that. Now they can begin to discuss the key benefit stolen from children re: Obergefell. Both a vital father and mother for the two types of genders always present in children.

You can’t revise a contract where both kids & adults share benefits, where the revision harms children psychologically. This is about a contract revision. A contract the States also shared with adults & children. Their benefit ( healthy kids for a healthy future society) was removed also without their assent.

As a further point in law, even if children were allowed to have separate representation at the contract revision, they are disallowed by the Infancy Doctrine to assent to any contractual conditions that are known to be harmful to them (put them at a disadvantage to their peers). There is no disputing that deprivation of either a mother or father statistically puts kids so afflicted to a disadvantage to their peers.

Come full circle now mdk, I hope you now understand why States are involved in the marriage contract. Because Alito, Roberts, Thomas, Kavanaugh & Gorsuch understand why. The problem most people have with fags marrying is that the children that lgbt said marriage was important to, that statistically arrive to it, and it created originally for their best shot at life, deprived children contractually, terms binding for life, of ever having a mother under their roof! That banishment is shocking to people and States.

Where’s the father under your roof? You demand gay people live by standard that you can’t meet. It’s okay for you b/c “hope” and children missing a parent in the house doesn’t matter when a contract isn’t involved.

Yeah, the litany of self contradicting pseudo-legal gibberish that comes pouring out of Sil is equal parts sad and adorable.

 

[AveryJarhman]

i wouldnt be alive if it werent for Obamacare. i wouldnt be married if it werent for Obama

#TheLargerIssue #Fatherlessness #ChildNeglectMaltreatment #MentalHealth #Solutions

​

Hello. I'm not trying to deflect from the topic, though I am really curious to learn your opinion.

Was apparent HATE & VIOLENCE embracing PRO BLACK minded First Lady Mrs. Michelle 'GIRL POWER' Obama acting in the best interests of our Nation's people, in particular our black or American friends, neighbors, co-workers & family members of African descent...

...when she WILLFULLY IGNORED our Nation's expanding black or African American Culture of Child Abuse & Emotional Maltreatment responsible for inspiring more than a dozen of Obama music making friends to compose VIOLENCE riddled music art HATEFULLY denigrating black or American moms, sisters, grandmas, daughters, aunts & nieces of African descent as less than human *itches and 'hoes', 't.h.o.t.s' (That Hoe Over There) or RATCHET females undeserving of being treated with basic human respect?

YouTube Search Terms: 'Exposing 'PRO BLACK' Modus Operandi, Logic, Fvvkery, Savagery, White Supremacy' ~Mrs. Princella Clark-Carr


___
YouTube Search Terms: Dysfunctional 'PRO BLACK American' Logic Succinctly Explained By Social Commentator Mr. David Carroll

​

Peace.
___
American *(Children's)* Lives Matter; Take Pride In Parenting; End Our National Health Crisis; Child Abuse and Neglect; End Community Violence/Fear, Police Anxiety & Educator's Frustrations

 

[Skylar]

i wouldnt be alive if it werent for Obamacare. i wouldnt be married if it werent for Obama

#TheLargerIssue #Fatherlessness #ChildNeglectMaltreatment #MentalHealth #Solutions

View attachment 232421 ​

Hello. I'm not trying to deflect from the topic, though I am really curious to learn your opinion.

Was apparent HATE & VIOLENCE embracing PRO BLACK minded First Lady Mrs. Michelle 'GIRL POWER' Obama acting in the best interests of our Nation's people, in particular our black or American friends, neighbors, co-workers & family members of African descent...

...when she WILLFULLY IGNORED our Nation's expanding black or African American Culture of Child Abuse & Emotional Maltreatment responsible for inspiring more than a dozen of Obama music making friends to compose VIOLENCE riddled music art HATEFULLY denigrating black or American moms, sisters, grandmas, daughters, aunts & nieces of African descent as less than human *itches and 'hoes', 't.h.o.t.s' (That Hoe Over There) or RATCHET females undeserving of being treated with basic human respect?

YouTube Search Terms: 'Exposing 'PRO BLACK' Modus Operandi, Logic, Fvvkery, Savagery, White Supremacy' ~Mrs. Princella Clark-Carr


___
YouTube Search Terms: Dysfunctional 'PRO BLACK American' Logic Succinctly Explained By Social Commentator Mr. David Carroll

View attachment 232422​

Peace.
___
American *(Children's)* Lives Matter; Take Pride In Parenting; End Our National Health Crisis; Child Abuse and Neglect; End Community Violence/Fear, Police Anxiety & Educator's Frustrations

You can start a thread on this topic if you'd like. As it really doesn't have much to do with this one.

 

[Olde Europe]

Michelle showed her true America hating self when she said that she was proud of her country for the first time when Barack was elected. Meaning she held utter disdain for the U.S. all the years prior. Even though Affirmative Action GAVE her, and her husband the opportunities they were afforded, and to GET RICH of the system. Nice huh?

It'd be even nicer if it weren't, from the first word to the last, a bunch of lies.