Marvelous Michelle Obama Tried to Escape the White House to Celebrate Legalization of Gay Marriage

[mdk]

Dred Scott involved freed blacks.
Both DS and legal homo marriage are bad decisions. Just because the SCOTUS makes up law doesn’t mean it’s a good thing.

The Scott decision is almost universally considered awful. Obergefell not so much. You'll get over it.

 

[Skylar]

I think it’s lovely they wanted to be apart of the celebration. We had our own little one here as well with friends and family.

Are you still sore?

-Geaux

Not as much as you after three years of still whining about gay marriage. Get over it already.

I assume you apply the same logic to the Dred Scott decision.

Yes, b/c the court's decision on allow gay people to marry is comparable to owning another human being aganist their will.

Dred Scott involved freed blacks.
Both DS and legal homo marriage are bad decisions. Just because the SCOTUS makes up law doesn’t mean it’s a good thing.

And why, pray tell, is recognizing gay marriage a 'bad decision'? Just because you don't like a decision doesn't mean its a bad one.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Dred Scott involved freed blacks.
Both DS and legal homo marriage are bad decisions. Just because the SCOTUS makes up law doesn’t mean it’s a good thing.

The Scott decision is almost universally considered awful. Obergefell not so much. You'll get over it.

Applying today’s standards to history is not only disingenuous it’s usually a dishonest attempt to qualify something bad.
Hopefully people will wake up to legal homo marriage the way they did re DS.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Are you still sore?

-Geaux

Not as much as you after three years of still whining about gay marriage. Get over it already.

I assume you apply the same logic to the Dred Scott decision.

Yes, b/c the court's decision on allow gay people to marry is comparable to owning another human being aganist their will.

Dred Scott involved freed blacks.
Both DS and legal homo marriage are bad decisions. Just because the SCOTUS makes up law doesn’t mean it’s a good thing.

And why, pray tell, is recognizing gay marriage a 'bad decision'? Just because you don't like a decision doesn't mean its a bad one.

It’s about legal homo marriage and the gov forcing people to accommodate (with some bad consequences) and subsidize. That’s fascism.

 

[mdk]

Dred Scott involved freed blacks.
Both DS and legal homo marriage are bad decisions. Just because the SCOTUS makes up law doesn’t mean it’s a good thing.

The Scott decision is almost universally considered awful. Obergefell not so much. You'll get over it.

Applying today’s standards to history is not only disingenuous it’s usually a dishonest attempt to qualify something bad.
Hopefully people will wake up to legal homo marriage the way they did re DS.

Which is exactly what you did when you lamely tried to equate the two.

 

[mdk]

Not as much as you after three years of still whining about gay marriage. Get over it already.

I assume you apply the same logic to the Dred Scott decision.

Yes, b/c the court's decision on allow gay people to marry is comparable to owning another human being aganist their will.

Dred Scott involved freed blacks.
Both DS and legal homo marriage are bad decisions. Just because the SCOTUS makes up law doesn’t mean it’s a good thing.

And why, pray tell, is recognizing gay marriage a 'bad decision'? Just because you don't like a decision doesn't mean its a bad one.

It’s about legal homo marriage and the gov forcing people to accommodate (with some bad consequences) and subsidize. That’s fascism.

Having your feels hurt isn’t a bad consequence. Good lord, you’re a drama queen.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Dred Scott involved freed blacks.
Both DS and legal homo marriage are bad decisions. Just because the SCOTUS makes up law doesn’t mean it’s a good thing.

The Scott decision is almost universally considered awful. Obergefell not so much. You'll get over it.

Applying today’s standards to history is not only disingenuous it’s usually a dishonest attempt to qualify something bad.
Hopefully people will wake up to legal homo marriage the way they did re DS.

Which is exactly what you did when you lamely tried to equate the two.

Not at all. I’m not trying to qualify anything. You did. I was demonstrating what is wrong with both.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

I assume you apply the same logic to the Dred Scott decision.

Yes, b/c the court's decision on allow gay people to marry is comparable to owning another human being aganist their will.

Dred Scott involved freed blacks.
Both DS and legal homo marriage are bad decisions. Just because the SCOTUS makes up law doesn’t mean it’s a good thing.

And why, pray tell, is recognizing gay marriage a 'bad decision'? Just because you don't like a decision doesn't mean its a bad one.

It’s about legal homo marriage and the gov forcing people to accommodate (with some bad consequences) and subsidize. That’s fascism.

Having your feels hurt isn’t a bad consequence. Good lord, you’re a drama queen.

This is about the empirical. Hurting kids and ultimately the society.
Your ignorance is rooted in a stupid bigotry.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Because "Michelle" is the T is LGBT

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

I assume you apply the same logic to the Dred Scott decision.

Yes, b/c the court's decision on allow gay people to marry is comparable to owning another human being aganist their will.

Dred Scott involved freed blacks.
Both DS and legal homo marriage are bad decisions. Just because the SCOTUS makes up law doesn’t mean it’s a good thing.

And why, pray tell, is recognizing gay marriage a 'bad decision'? Just because you don't like a decision doesn't mean its a bad one.

It’s about legal homo marriage and the gov forcing people to accommodate (with some bad consequences) and subsidize. That’s fascism.

Having your feels hurt isn’t a bad consequence. Good lord, you’re a drama queen.

Can’t rebut, eh?

 

[cpicturetaker12]

i wouldnt be alive if it werent for Obamacare. i wouldnt be married if it werent for Obama

Well then you must be a commie pinko free loading "deviant" who doesn't love his country. My kinda people!!

(But I probably could never like you as much as I like her. Just saying.)

 

[mdk]

Yes, b/c the court's decision on allow gay people to marry is comparable to owning another human being aganist their will.

Dred Scott involved freed blacks.
Both DS and legal homo marriage are bad decisions. Just because the SCOTUS makes up law doesn’t mean it’s a good thing.

And why, pray tell, is recognizing gay marriage a 'bad decision'? Just because you don't like a decision doesn't mean its a bad one.

It’s about legal homo marriage and the gov forcing people to accommodate (with some bad consequences) and subsidize. That’s fascism.

Having your feels hurt isn’t a bad consequence. Good lord, you’re a drama queen.

This is about the empirical. Hurting kids and ultimately the society.
Your ignorance is rooted in a stupid bigotry.

No, this about your pearl-clutching drama and nothing more. Either way, gays will continue to marry and all you can do is whine about it. You’re irrelevant.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Dred Scott involved freed blacks.
Both DS and legal homo marriage are bad decisions. Just because the SCOTUS makes up law doesn’t mean it’s a good thing.

And why, pray tell, is recognizing gay marriage a 'bad decision'? Just because you don't like a decision doesn't mean its a bad one.

It’s about legal homo marriage and the gov forcing people to accommodate (with some bad consequences) and subsidize. That’s fascism.

Having your feels hurt isn’t a bad consequence. Good lord, you’re a drama queen.

This is about the empirical. Hurting kids and ultimately the society.
Your ignorance is rooted in a stupid bigotry.

No, this about about your pearl-clutching drama and nothing more. Either way, gays will continue to marry and all you can do is whine about it. You’re irrelevant.

You’re OK with kids being intentionally deprived of the right to the opportunity to be raised by their actual parents in spite of the data that shows how unstructured families have led to social demise over the past fifty years? You think the population should accommodate tax breaks for unnatural behavior equivalent to booger-eating?
I expect people to wake up to this. But as long as judges circumvent the legislative process people will be denied that due process.
Fascism.

 

[Leo123]

i wouldnt be alive if it werent for Obamacare. i wouldnt be married if it werent for Obama

Oh brother, what a cluck-fest. Celebrating the fall of one of America's most successful traditions which is marriage between a man and woman. Here we have the wife of a failed President talking to.....who knows? Peter Pan? Both of them clucking like hens and celebrating aberrant behavior. More like a cartoon than real life.

 

[mdk]

And why, pray tell, is recognizing gay marriage a 'bad decision'? Just because you don't like a decision doesn't mean its a bad one.

It’s about legal homo marriage and the gov forcing people to accommodate (with some bad consequences) and subsidize. That’s fascism.

Having your feels hurt isn’t a bad consequence. Good lord, you’re a drama queen.

This is about the empirical. Hurting kids and ultimately the society.
Your ignorance is rooted in a stupid bigotry.

No, this about about your pearl-clutching drama and nothing more. Either way, gays will continue to marry and all you can do is whine about it. You’re irrelevant.

You’re OK with kids being intentionally deprived of the right to the opportunity to be raised by their actual parents in spite of the data that shows how unstructured families have led to social demise over the past fifty years? You think the population should accommodate tax breaks for unnatural behavior equivalent to booger-eating?
I expect people to wake up to this. But as long as judges circumvent the legislative process people will be denied that due process.
Fascism.

Your real complaint should be with why the government subsidizes marriage to begin with. It’s amazing how many people suddenly have a problem with tax dollars accommodating marriage the second fags could marry.

 

[Leo123]

It’s about legal homo marriage and the gov forcing people to accommodate (with some bad consequences) and subsidize. That’s fascism.

Having your feels hurt isn’t a bad consequence. Good lord, you’re a drama queen.

This is about the empirical. Hurting kids and ultimately the society.
Your ignorance is rooted in a stupid bigotry.

No, this about about your pearl-clutching drama and nothing more. Either way, gays will continue to marry and all you can do is whine about it. You’re irrelevant.

You’re OK with kids being intentionally deprived of the right to the opportunity to be raised by their actual parents in spite of the data that shows how unstructured families have led to social demise over the past fifty years? You think the population should accommodate tax breaks for unnatural behavior equivalent to booger-eating?
I expect people to wake up to this. But as long as judges circumvent the legislative process people will be denied that due process.
Fascism.

Your real complaint should be with why the government subsidizes marriage to begin with. It’s amazing how many people suddenly have a problem with tax dollars accommodating marriage the second fags could marry.

The government (which is We The People) has/have a vested interest in the propagation of the American culture, traditions, laws, etc. The heterosexual family unit is one of the best ways to ensure it's continuance. Those who would drive a spike between heterosexual marriage and government approval do not have America's best interests at heart.

 

[mdk]

The government (which is We The People) has/have a vested interest in the propagation of the American culture, traditions, laws, etc. The heterosexual family unit is one of the best ways to ensure it's continuance. Those who would drive a spike between heterosexual marriage and government approval do not have America's best interests at heart.

Heterosexual marriage is more than capable of surviving without all the government cash and prizes. It did so for thousands of years without it.

 

[Aba Incieni]

The world howled with laughter when Baraq lit the WH in rainbow colors.

Well our democracy howled in pain from the notion that the Whitehouse manifested foreknowledge of how a USSC case was coming down well in advance of an announcement. Worse, the nation is hotly divided on motherless/fatherless (gay) marriage. To flaunt a middle finger from the Whitehouse to the losing party’ 100s of millions the night of the decision was an act of fascism.

Baraq said the muslim call to prayer was the most beautiful sound he'd ever heard.

Little did he know the call is to murder all the homos.

#HeteroPride.

 

[cpicturetaker12]

And why, pray tell, is recognizing gay marriage a 'bad decision'? Just because you don't like a decision doesn't mean its a bad one.

It’s about legal homo marriage and the gov forcing people to accommodate (with some bad consequences) and subsidize. That’s fascism.

Having your feels hurt isn’t a bad consequence. Good lord, you’re a drama queen.

This is about the empirical. Hurting kids and ultimately the society.
Your ignorance is rooted in a stupid bigotry.

No, this about about your pearl-clutching drama and nothing more. Either way, gays will continue to marry and all you can do is whine about it. You’re irrelevant.

You’re OK with kids being intentionally deprived of the right to the opportunity to be raised by their actual parents in spite of the data that shows how unstructured families have led to social demise over the past fifty years? You think the population should accommodate tax breaks for unnatural behavior equivalent to booger-eating?
I expect people to wake up to this. But as long as judges circumvent the legislative process people will be denied that due process.
Fascism.

WTF???

 

[cpicturetaker12]

i wouldnt be alive if it werent for Obamacare. i wouldnt be married if it werent for Obama

Oh brother, what a cluck-fest. Celebrating the fall of one of America's most successful traditions which is marriage between a man and woman. Here we have the wife of a failed President talking to.....who knows? Peter Pan? Both of them clucking like hens and celebrating aberrant behavior. More like a cartoon than real life.

Oh yeah like STRAIGHT MARRIAGE is such a success! You know like TRUMP's. All 3 of them.

Seriously, you didn't think about that before you typed your phony moralizing. And like daddy his oldest was banging a PORN STAR and left his wife and their 5 kids. Yepper, another straight marriage success story.