Massachusetts: This Is The Nation’s Toughest Gun Law

[bgrouse]

Wonderful.

But what does it have to do with the right to bear arms? I wasn't aware this was a thread concerning the necessity and regulation of the militia. I could have sworn it was about gun laws and gun rights.

Only well regulated militia of the whole and entire People

No, dumbass, that's not what it says.

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms

It references "the right of the people," not the right of the well regulated militia. You're seeing something that isn't there you stupid piece of shit!

Then why is milita even mentioned ?

Look. No one is out to BAN ALL GUNS ! You couldn’t anyway . But stuff like background checks, vetting, registering , do not stop law abiding citizens.

All our rights have safety limits .

We know that a nation must have military might to protect itself, and we know how our past has shown how a government can use its military to enslave its own people, the right of the people to maintain arms to resist such an occurrence, is absolute.

Read your history books.

So you need an AR to shoot police officers ? That’s basically what you are saying .

Let’s say your crazy scenario played out . Trump orders Marshall law and refuses to step down as president. You will take on law enforcement and the military with your AR ?

Then why is milita even mentioned ?

Look. No one is out to BAN ALL GUNS ! You couldn’t anyway . But stuff like background checks, vetting, registering , do not stop law abiding citizens.

We don't believe you.

You know why?

Banning a particular type of rifle effectively bans all guns.

We think you know this. That is why we don't believe you.

Autos are effectively banned . Shit goes back to the Tommy gun days .

So much for your argument.

Oh wait a min? Do you think full autos should be legal ?

The push is for semi-automatics to be illegal, that would effectively ban most of all hand guns.

That is not the push . The push is for these people hunting AR types .

Before it was for automatic weapons. Now it's for scary looking rifles that make morons wet their beds. It's a slippery slope.

 

[Timmy]

Only well regulated militia of the whole and entire People

No, dumbass, that's not what it says.

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms

It references "the right of the people," not the right of the well regulated militia. You're seeing something that isn't there you stupid piece of shit!

Then why is milita even mentioned ?

Look. No one is out to BAN ALL GUNS ! You couldn’t anyway . But stuff like background checks, vetting, registering , do not stop law abiding citizens.

All our rights have safety limits .

We know that a nation must have military might to protect itself, and we know how our past has shown how a government can use its military to enslave its own people, the right of the people to maintain arms to resist such an occurrence, is absolute.

Read your history books.

So you need an AR to shoot police officers ? That’s basically what you are saying .

Let’s say your crazy scenario played out . Trump orders Marshall law and refuses to step down as president. You will take on law enforcement and the military with your AR ?

Then why is milita even mentioned ?

Look. No one is out to BAN ALL GUNS ! You couldn’t anyway . But stuff like background checks, vetting, registering , do not stop law abiding citizens.

We don't believe you.

You know why?

Banning a particular type of rifle effectively bans all guns.

We think you know this. That is why we don't believe you.

Autos are effectively banned . Shit goes back to the Tommy gun days .

So much for your argument.

Oh wait a min? Do you think full autos should be legal ?

The push is for semi-automatics to be illegal, that would effectively ban most of all hand guns.

That is not the push . The push is for these people hunting AR types .

Before it was for automatic weapons. Now it's for scary looking rifles that make morons wet their beds. It's a slippery slope.

No it’s not. Tommy guns were banned in the 30s . If it was a slippery slope you’d be at banning B.B. guns by now .

 

[bgrouse]

No, dumbass, that's not what it says.

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms

It references "the right of the people," not the right of the well regulated militia. You're seeing something that isn't there you stupid piece of shit!

Then why is milita even mentioned ?

Look. No one is out to BAN ALL GUNS ! You couldn’t anyway . But stuff like background checks, vetting, registering , do not stop law abiding citizens.

All our rights have safety limits .

We know that a nation must have military might to protect itself, and we know how our past has shown how a government can use its military to enslave its own people, the right of the people to maintain arms to resist such an occurrence, is absolute.

Read your history books.

So you need an AR to shoot police officers ? That’s basically what you are saying .

Let’s say your crazy scenario played out . Trump orders Marshall law and refuses to step down as president. You will take on law enforcement and the military with your AR ?

We don't believe you.

You know why?

Banning a particular type of rifle effectively bans all guns.

We think you know this. That is why we don't believe you.

Autos are effectively banned . Shit goes back to the Tommy gun days .

So much for your argument.

Oh wait a min? Do you think full autos should be legal ?

The push is for semi-automatics to be illegal, that would effectively ban most of all hand guns.

That is not the push . The push is for these people hunting AR types .

Before it was for automatic weapons. Now it's for scary looking rifles that make morons wet their beds. It's a slippery slope.

No it’s not. Tommy guns were banned in the 30s . If it was a slippery slope you’d be at banning B.B. guns by now .

Fast or slow, it's still a slippery slope.

They also banned suppressors on guns.

 

[bgrouse]

Then why is milita even mentioned ?

Look. No one is out to BAN ALL GUNS ! You couldn’t anyway . But stuff like background checks, vetting, registering , do not stop law abiding citizens.

We don't believe you.

You know why?

Banning a particular type of rifle effectively bans all guns.

We think you know this. That is why we don't believe you.

Autos are effectively banned . Shit goes back to the Tommy gun days .

So much for your argument.

Oh wait a min? Do you think full autos should be legal ?

AR15s are not full autos.

Right . Because they are pretty much illegal . But AR’s are designed to kill/maime lots of people really fast .

Makes it a great self-defense weapon.

Scalpels make it easy to cut people. That's dangerous. Next time you or your loved one need surgery, please have your doctor use a dull rock for surgery instead. Then you won't be a hypocrite. And you won't be alive either. It's a win-win!

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

We need machine guns to protect up from illegal xchild molesting Mexican rapists like danpalos.

Machine guns or Valhalla motherfuckers

Kill an illegal for fun. They deserve to die, those fucking cockroaches.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The slippery slope is going our way. Machine guns or Valhalla.

Mow down a Mexican for mommy.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

No, dumbass, that's not what it says.

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms

It references "the right of the people," not the right of the well regulated militia. You're seeing something that isn't there you stupid piece of shit!

Then why is milita even mentioned ?

Look. No one is out to BAN ALL GUNS ! You couldn’t anyway . But stuff like background checks, vetting, registering , do not stop law abiding citizens.

All our rights have safety limits .

We know that a nation must have military might to protect itself, and we know how our past has shown how a government can use its military to enslave its own people, the right of the people to maintain arms to resist such an occurrence, is absolute.

Read your history books.

So you need an AR to shoot police officers ? That’s basically what you are saying .

Let’s say your crazy scenario played out . Trump orders Marshall law and refuses to step down as president. You will take on law enforcement and the military with your AR ?

We don't believe you.

You know why?

Banning a particular type of rifle effectively bans all guns.

We think you know this. That is why we don't believe you.

Autos are effectively banned . Shit goes back to the Tommy gun days .

So much for your argument.

Oh wait a min? Do you think full autos should be legal ?

The push is for semi-automatics to be illegal, that would effectively ban most of all hand guns.

That is not the push . The push is for these people hunting AR types .

Before it was for automatic weapons. Now it's for scary looking rifles that make morons wet their beds. It's a slippery slope.

No it’s not. Tommy guns were banned in the 30s . If it was a slippery slope you’d be at banning B.B. guns by now .

They were not banned, they were taxed. The 2nd didn't allow the fed gov to ban.

We are getting them back soon. We will use them to mow down the illegal Mexican trash.

 

[Pop23]

We don't believe you.

You know why?

Banning a particular type of rifle effectively bans all guns.

We think you know this. That is why we don't believe you.

Autos are effectively banned . Shit goes back to the Tommy gun days .

So much for your argument.

Oh wait a min? Do you think full autos should be legal ?

The push is for semi-automatics to be illegal, that would effectively ban most of all hand guns.

That is not the push . The push is for these people hunting AR types . Which is what they are . They ain’t hunting rifles , they are not practical for home or personal defense .

And obviously not for murder either as they are used in less than 2% of those.

I dont care how effective you THINK they are in home defense, it is not your opinion that matters.

And I will ask again. If your daughter fought off a rapist, does it matter to you what weapon she used to accomplish this?

Please answer, but I doubt you will.

I’d give her a handgun. Wouldn’t you ? Who gives their kid an AR for self protection !?

She doesn’t need you or I to give her anything.

And I will ask again. If your daughter fought off a rapist, does it matter to you what weapon she used to accomplish this?

Try to be honest and answer the question.

 

[Pop23]

Wonderful.

But what does it have to do with the right to bear arms? I wasn't aware this was a thread concerning the necessity and regulation of the militia. I could have sworn it was about gun laws and gun rights.

Only well regulated militia of the whole and entire People

No, dumbass, that's not what it says.

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms

It references "the right of the people," not the right of the well regulated militia. You're seeing something that isn't there you stupid piece of shit!

Then why is milita even mentioned ?

Look. No one is out to BAN ALL GUNS ! You couldn’t anyway . But stuff like background checks, vetting, registering , do not stop law abiding citizens.

All our rights have safety limits .

We know that a nation must have military might to protect itself, and we know how our past has shown how a government can use its military to enslave its own people, the right of the people to maintain arms to resist such an occurrence, is absolute.

Read your history books.

So you need an AR to shoot police officers ? That’s basically what you are saying .

Let’s say your crazy scenario played out . Trump orders Marshall law and refuses to step down as president. You will take on law enforcement and the military with your AR ?

If a police officer tried to rape your daughter, would you care what weapon she used to fight him off?

 

[Pop23]

Wonderful.

But what does it have to do with the right to bear arms? I wasn't aware this was a thread concerning the necessity and regulation of the militia. I could have sworn it was about gun laws and gun rights.

Only well regulated militia of the whole and entire People

No, dumbass, that's not what it says.

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms

It references "the right of the people," not the right of the well regulated militia. You're seeing something that isn't there you stupid piece of shit!

Then why is milita even mentioned ?

Look. No one is out to BAN ALL GUNS ! You couldn’t anyway . But stuff like background checks, vetting, registering , do not stop law abiding citizens.

All our rights have safety limits .

We know that a nation must have military might to protect itself, and we know how our past has shown how a government can use its military to enslave its own people, the right of the people to maintain arms to resist such an occurrence, is absolute.

Read your history books.

So you need an AR to shoot police officers ? That’s basically what you are saying .

Let’s say your crazy scenario played out . Trump orders Marshall law and refuses to step down as president. You will take on law enforcement and the military with your AR ?

Better to fight and die a free man than to live a slave.

Of course a pinhead like you wouldn’t understand, right?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Better to fight and die a free man than to live a slave.

Of course a pinhead like you wouldn’t understand, right?

Freedom or Valhalla.

 

[danielpalos]

all you have, is a fallacy of false cause via a fallacy of composition.

The People are the Militia; you are either, well regulated or unorganized.

Which subset of the whole and entire People are declared Necessary.

Only the right wing, is full of fallacy instead of any reason.

Wonderful.

But what does it have to do with the right to bear arms? I wasn't aware this was a thread concerning the necessity and regulation of the militia. I could have sworn it was about gun laws and gun rights.

Only well regulated militia of the whole and entire People

No, dumbass, that's not what it says.

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms

It references "the right of the people," not the right of the well regulated militia. You're seeing something that isn't there you stupid piece of shit!

The People are the Militia. Only the right wing, appeals to ignorance.

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

So your argument is neither the people's nor the militia's right to bear arms shall be infringed? OK.

Only one subset of the whole People shall not be Infringed, when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union, not natural rights.

 

[bgrouse]

Wonderful.

But what does it have to do with the right to bear arms? I wasn't aware this was a thread concerning the necessity and regulation of the militia. I could have sworn it was about gun laws and gun rights.

Only well regulated militia of the whole and entire People

No, dumbass, that's not what it says.

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms

It references "the right of the people," not the right of the well regulated militia. You're seeing something that isn't there you stupid piece of shit!

The People are the Militia. Only the right wing, appeals to ignorance.

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

So your argument is neither the people's nor the militia's right to bear arms shall be infringed? OK.

Only one subset of the whole People shall not be Infringed, when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union, not natural rights.

Is that something out of the constitution in the Judge Dredd universe?

 

[danielpalos]

Only well regulated militia of the whole and entire People

No, dumbass, that's not what it says.

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms

It references "the right of the people," not the right of the well regulated militia. You're seeing something that isn't there you stupid piece of shit!

The People are the Militia. Only the right wing, appeals to ignorance.

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

So your argument is neither the people's nor the militia's right to bear arms shall be infringed? OK.

Only one subset of the whole People shall not be Infringed, when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union, not natural rights.

Is that something out of the constitution in the Judge Dredd universe?

What does DC v Heller paragraph (2), mean to you.

 

[skye]

Massachusetts is stupid and gone.....too many ingrown liberal/ Communists/lost souls over there

 

[skye]

....all that northern East Coast.....Maine included too.....My God.....how stupid are those lost liberal idiotic residents over there!

Vote Trump you ignoramus there....grrrrrr

 

[skye]

Thank You Pop23!

 

[skye]

jon_berzerk thank you!

 

[Pop23]

Massachusetts is stupid and gone.....too many ingrown liberal/ Communists/lost souls over there

Any state that supports the needs of the rapist over that of the needs of the victims to protect themselves, needs to be removed from the union.

 

[skye]

Just one question ...for those who know

Why the East Coast of America ....over there ...you know ....all along that long East coast

why so communist? why so Left? in a few words....why so scum?

What is the problem with them?