daveman
Diamond Member
- Jun 25, 2010
- 76,336
- 29,356
Welcome to climate science!How many times was the word "estimate" used in the OP?
Answer: way too many for it to be "settled" science.
Sounds like one long string of guesses to me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to climate science!How many times was the word "estimate" used in the OP?
Answer: way too many for it to be "settled" science.
Sounds like one long string of guesses to me.
what laws of physics were broken by finding advantageous y axis units? when you plot two different things on the same graph and make them look similar by adjusting the scale it is a very powerful tool. when people see similar things side by side they assume a correlation/causation.
The basic flaw is in the assumption that CO2 can alter atmospheric temperature. It does not retain heat. It absorbs it, and immediately emits precisely the same amount. If one assumes downward radiation, one violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics if one assumes that downward radiation is actually absorbed by the earth, one violates the law of conservation of energy.
what laws of physics were broken by finding advantageous y axis units? when you plot two different things on the same graph and make them look similar by adjusting the scale it is a very powerful tool. when people see similar things side by side they assume a correlation/causation.
The basic flaw is in the assumption that CO2 can alter atmospheric temperature. It does not retain heat. It absorbs it, and immediately emits precisely the same amount. If one assumes downward radiation, one violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics if one assumes that downward radiation is actually absorbed by the earth, one violates the law of conservation of energy.
Oh my sir.
I thouht you were still trying to do the calculations to show us how greenhouse gas properties change when you release them from a fish tank which radiates heat into the atmosphere into the atmosphere which radiates heat into space.
Seems more like a hope it changes to me.
None the less, I do not want to take away your car so calm down. How about we mandate passenger vehicles and trucks average 40mpg by 2020 as a way of supporting our troops and un supporting the value of oil in Iran?
What you are stating is that if I shine a flashlight at one of the furnaces I inspect regulary, the beam will avoid the furnace because of the high energy of the wall of the furnace. None the less, I see the spot of light on the furnace.
"...........if I shine a flashlight at one of the furnaces"
Oh my sir.
I thouht you were still trying to do the calculations to show us how greenhouse gas properties change when you release them from a fish tank which radiates heat into the atmosphere into the atmosphere which radiates heat into space.
None the less, I do not want to take away your car so calm down. How about we mandate passenger vehicles and trucks average 40mpg by 2020 as a way of supporting our troops and un supporting the value of oil in Iran?
what laws of physics were broken by finding advantageous y axis units? when you plot two different things on the same graph and make them look similar by adjusting the scale it is a very powerful tool. when people see similar things side by side they assume a correlation/causation.
The basic flaw is in the assumption that CO2 can alter atmospheric temperature. It does not retain heat. It absorbs it, and immediately emits precisely the same amount. If one assumes downward radiation, one violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics if one assumes that downward radiation is actually absorbed by the earth, one violates the law of conservation of energy.
Oh my sir.
I thouht you were still trying to do the calculations to show us how greenhouse gas properties change when you release them from a fish tank which radiates heat into the atmosphere into the atmosphere which radiates heat into space.
Seems more like a hope it changes to me.
None the less, I do not want to take away your car so calm down. How about we mandate passenger vehicles and trucks average 40mpg by 2020 as a way of supporting our troops and un supporting the value of oil in Iran?
The basic flaw is in the assumption that CO2 can alter atmospheric temperature. It does not retain heat. It absorbs it, and immediately emits precisely the same amount. If one assumes downward radiation, one violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics if one assumes that downward radiation is actually absorbed by the earth, one violates the law of conservation of energy.
Oh my sir.
I thouht you were still trying to do the calculations to show us how greenhouse gas properties change when you release them from a fish tank which radiates heat into the atmosphere into the atmosphere which radiates heat into space.
Seems more like a hope it changes to me.
None the less, I do not want to take away your car so calm down. How about we mandate passenger vehicles and trucks average 40mpg by 2020 as a way of supporting our troops and un supporting the value of oil in Iran?
s0n......time to do some research. Americans dont want gay little 2 door Specks!! And we dont want the fcukking government dictating what we want to drive.
Drive a SMARTCAR.............have fun!!!!
A buck says Roxy doesn't understand a damn bit of that.
I understand every bit as much of it as does Bentwire.
You don't need to drive tiny cars. The Germans (who else) have developed diesel engines that get more then 50 mpg now and they are powerful. Mid size cars can get better mileage then even hybrids.
Thirty years ago NOAA predicted a new ice age.
Every geophysicist knows that the data was biased by excluding high latitudes and high altitudes from the measurements.
Every geophysicist knows that the data was biased by excluding high latitudes and high altitudes from the measurements.
The basic flaw is in the assumption that CO2 can alter atmospheric temperature. It does not retain heat. It absorbs it, and immediately emits precisely the same amount. If one assumes downward radiation, one violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics if one assumes that downward radiation is actually absorbed by the earth, one violates the law of conservation of energy.
Oh my sir.
I thouht you were still trying to do the calculations to show us how greenhouse gas properties change when you release them from a fish tank which radiates heat into the atmosphere into the atmosphere which radiates heat into space.
Seems more like a hope it changes to me.
None the less, I do not want to take away your car so calm down. How about we mandate passenger vehicles and trucks average 40mpg by 2020 as a way of supporting our troops and un supporting the value of oil in Iran?
s0n......time to do some research. Americans dont want gay little 2 door Specks!! And we dont want the fcukking government dictating what we want to drive.
Drive a SMARTCAR.............have fun!!!!
Percentage of the public that really has a clue about "what scientists say" --- 12%
Percentage of scientists who say that "humans have evolved" -- 97%
Percentage of scientists who say that "humans evolved from slimemold" -- somewhat lower%
What a bunch of ditsy questions.. Humans have evolved. Yeah -- we stopped listening to Jefferson Airplane and started to like NPR...