Mattis lays it on the line about resigning

longknife

Diamond Member
Sep 21, 2012
42,221
13,091
First off, this piece is clearly written by a Never Trumper who tries every way possible to make the president look bad. He pushes and pushes but Mattis shows what a class act he is.

The duty of silence. If you leave an administration, you owe some silence. When you leave an administration over clear policy differences, you need to give the people who are still there as much opportunity as possible to defend the country. They still have the responsibility of protecting this great big experiment of ours. I know the malevolence some people feel for this country, and we have to give the people who are protecting us some time to carry out their duties without me adding my criticism to the cacophony that is right now so poisonous.”

But Goldburg keeps trying and gets this response:

I didn’t cook up a convenient tradition here,” he said. “You don’t endanger the country by attacking the elected commander in chief. I may not like a commander in chief one fricking bit, but our system puts the commander in chief there, and to further weaken him when we’re up against real threats—I mean, we could be at war on the Korean peninsula, every time they start launching something.”

The whole article is nothing more but attempt after attempt to make the president look bad. Read it, if you care, @ The Man Who Couldn’t Take It Anymore

Mattis suggests he might not like Trump 'one fricking bit' but says he's holding fire on him — for now @ Mattis suggests he might not like Trump 'one fricking bit' but says he's holding fire on him — for now
 
Again, their loyalty should be to the country, not the man.

The problem here is that we have a whole system, very well designed, compensating for a crazy person at its head.
 
Again, their loyalty should be to the country, not the man.

The problem here is that we have a whole system, very well designed, compensating for a crazy person at its head.

Sad that Mattis still has a loyalty to not report on Trump

Trump lacks the same loyalty
 
Again, their loyalty should be to the country, not the man.

The problem here is that we have a whole system, very well designed, compensating for a crazy person at its head.

Sad that Mattis still has a loyalty to not report on Trump

Trump lacks the same loyalty

Why is that sad? It's good that he doesn't want to undercut a sitting president and that he puts the needs of the country ahead of his own grievances. That's admirable. Is it really so important to have something to yell about?
 
Again, their loyalty should be to the country, not the man.

The problem here is that we have a whole system, very well designed, compensating for a crazy person at its head.

Sad that Mattis still has a loyalty to not report on Trump

Trump lacks the same loyalty

Why is that sad? It's good that he doesn't want to undercut a sitting president and that he puts the needs of the country ahead of his own grievances. That's admirable. Is it really so important to have something to yell about?
The sad part is that out of respect, he chooses to remain silent

Trump does not have the same respect and viciously attacks a man who will not talk back
 
Why is that sad? It's good that he doesn't want to undercut a sitting president and that he puts the needs of the country ahead of his own grievances. That's admirable. Is it really so important to have something to yell about?

Again, that would be fine if the sitting president was legitimate and not a crazy person.
 
Why is that sad? It's good that he doesn't want to undercut a sitting president and that he puts the needs of the country ahead of his own grievances. That's admirable. Is it really so important to have something to yell about?

Again, that would be fine if the sitting president was legitimate and not a crazy person.

There's nothing illegitimate about your president. He won fair and square because his opponent ran perhaps the worst campaign in modern history.
 
There's nothing illegitimate about your president. He won fair and square because his opponent ran perhaps the worst campaign in modern history.

Not my president.
Not legitimate
Not sane

You guys fucked this up, and you aren't man enough to admit it.
 
There's nothing illegitimate about your president. He won fair and square because his opponent ran perhaps the worst campaign in modern history.

Not my president.
Not legitimate
Not sane

You guys fucked this up, and you aren't man enough to admit it.

If he is not your President then you aren’t American.

Sounds like we have a Russian agent on our hands.
 
Sounds like we have a Russian agent on our hands.

We do. He lives in the White House, doing Putin's bidding...

upload_2019-8-30_12-0-27.jpeg
 
So if he professed to be more “flexible” to Putin, he wouldn’t be doing his bidding?

Well, since that's not what Obama said or anywhere near that... you have no point.

Obama is the one who threw Putin out of the G-8 for invading Ukraine. Trump wants to let them back in.
 
There's nothing illegitimate about your president. He won fair and square because his opponent ran perhaps the worst campaign in modern history.

Not my president.
Not legitimate
Not sane

You guys fucked this up, and you aren't man enough to admit it.

Nope, if you're an American, he's your president. He won against possibly the worst opponent in the history of presidential elections. Seriously, y'all couldn't pick a better candidate?
 
First off, this piece is clearly written by a Never Trumper who tries every way possible to make the president look bad. He pushes and pushes but Mattis shows what a class act he is.

The duty of silence. If you leave an administration, you owe some silence. When you leave an administration over clear policy differences, you need to give the people who are still there as much opportunity as possible to defend the country. They still have the responsibility of protecting this great big experiment of ours. I know the malevolence some people feel for this country, and we have to give the people who are protecting us some time to carry out their duties without me adding my criticism to the cacophony that is right now so poisonous.”

But Goldburg keeps trying and gets this response:

I didn’t cook up a convenient tradition here,” he said. “You don’t endanger the country by attacking the elected commander in chief. I may not like a commander in chief one fricking bit, but our system puts the commander in chief there, and to further weaken him when we’re up against real threats—I mean, we could be at war on the Korean peninsula, every time they start launching something.”

The whole article is nothing more but attempt after attempt to make the president look bad. Read it, if you care, @ The Man Who Couldn’t Take It Anymore

Mattis suggests he might not like Trump 'one fricking bit' but says he's holding fire on him — for now @ Mattis suggests he might not like Trump 'one fricking bit' but says he's holding fire on him — for now
I think Mattis already shot his wad.
 
So if he professed to be more “flexible” to Putin, he wouldn’t be doing his bidding?

Well, since that's not what Obama said or anywhere near that... you have no point.

Obama is the one who threw Putin out of the G-8 for invading Ukraine. Trump wants to let them back in.

Putin didn’t invade the Ukraine. The rightfully elected President of the Ukraine asked for his help to prevent ethnic Russians from being slaughtered. The government and thus the nation of “Ukraine” was dissolved when the revolutionaries decided to throw their constitution out. Forming a new government requires the consent of all those involved. Did the people in Crimea consent or vote to be in the new Ukraine government? No, they didn’t.

I know these distinctions can be confusing to a dumb Marxist that believes anything the MSM globalists tells them.
 
Might be legit if what we were doing is defending the country. It's not.
 
There's nothing illegitimate about your president. He won fair and square because his opponent ran perhaps the worst campaign in modern history.

Not my president.
Not legitimate
Not sane

You guys fucked this up, and you aren't man enough to admit it.

If he is not your President then you aren’t American.

Sounds like we have a Russian agent on our hands.

He ain't mine either.
 
Nope, if you're an American, he's your president. He won against possibly the worst opponent in the history of presidential elections. Seriously, y'all couldn't pick a better candidate?

Still not legitimate
Still a Russian Stooge
Still a buffoon.

The only advantage is we will see a bunch of laws changed after he's run out of town next year... to make sure THIS never happens again.
 
Putin didn’t invade the Ukraine. The rightfully elected President of the Ukraine asked for his help to prevent ethnic Russians from being slaughtered. The government and thus the nation of “Ukraine” was dissolved when the revolutionaries decided to throw their constitution out. Forming a new government requires the consent of all those involved. Did the people in Crimea consent or vote to be in the new Ukraine government? No, they didn’t.

I know these distinctions can be confusing to a dumb Marxist that believes anything the MSM globalists tells them.

Um, no. What Russia did was a violation of international law and the soveriegnty of the Ukraine.

Also, when you blurt out shit like "Globalist", it shows you are a bit on the crazy side.
 

Forum List

Back
Top