healthmyths
Platinum Member
- Sep 19, 2011
- 29,043
- 10,525
- Thread starter
- #61
No I don't have any proof you are right.It’s funny you sound like the Dems claiming trump stole from Hillary. The signatures are easily caught as mismatching. My signature was flagged this past election. The system works as far as I’ve seen. Do you have any proof that is isn’t working? Anything to show at all?
The problem though is this:
169,519 people from Milwaukee voted absentee.
Of those, 23,642 voted for President Trump (14%) and
143,124 voted for Biden (84%).
No, Joe Biden did not get 100 percent of all Milwaukee absentee ballots
Unofficial numbers from the City of Milwaukee show that of the 169,000 absentee ballots received, 23,000 contained votes for President Donald Trump.
www.tmj4.com
And with this fact:
just 44,000 votes in Georgia, Arizona and Wisconsin separated Biden and Trump from a tie in the Electoral College."
Narrow Wins In These Key States Powered Biden To The Presidency
Joe Biden topped President Trump by nearly 7 million votes, and 74 votes in the Electoral College, but his victory really was stitched together with narrow margins in key states.
www.npr.org
But you are right, NO proof but to any logical thinking person this seems unclear:
A) 44,000 votes for Biden provides win
B) Biden had 84% ballots that required signature verification.
C) Ballot harvesting, the posting of completed ballots on behalf of a third party, is legal in several states, including Georgia
“Many people need encouragement to vote and offering to collect and bring to ballot boxes is,
in many states, a legal and legitimate way to increase voter participation which is often low.”
“[In Georgia] In 2020 we were using signature verification to verify absentee ballots, so there were safety mechanisms in place to
ensure it wasn’t a fraudulent ballot.”
D) “2) You need to successfully forge the voter’s signature.
3) You need to deposit the envelope and have it validated by a local official.
https://www.reuters.com/article/fac...mules-provide-evidence-of-voter-fraud-in-the- 2020-u-s-presidential-election-idUSL2N2XJ0OQ
Now when you consider that the BIASED MSM donated 96% to Hillary and spent another $400 million in 37 hours negative evening news on Trump AND then donated 90% to Biden why would any one of the according to this "expert" “If there are 400,000 people who had their ballot collected and returned for nefarious reasons, there should be significant numbers of people willing to tell their story. It is hard for two people to keep a secret. Asserting that 400,000 people are keeping a secret is beyond credibility.”
testify with the BIASED MSM defending the simple fact that at least 41,000 was all that separated Biden's win in the swing state electoral college vote. Think about it.
And these signature verification efforts are allowed JUST 5 seconds!
Figure 2 shows a drastic increase in the number of invalid signature rejections in the runoff compared to the general election, even while there were about 350,000 fewer absentee voters in the runoff.
Specifically, there were more than four times as many absentee ballots rejected for invalid signatures after Trump made his controversial claims (4,520) than before (1,056). This amounts to a nearly five-fold increase in a voter’s likelihood of being rejected in the runoff compared to the general.
There was also a drastic increase in the rate at which invalid signature rejections were cured in the runoff.
We saw this rate increase from 32.4% in the general election to 60.6% in the runoff (figure 3),
Finally, while the increase is noticeable for final rejections alone (an increase of more than 100%), only when we consider the cures do we see the true magnitude of the change in rejection behavior (an increase of more than 300%).
Think about it! increase in rejections due to signatures of 300%!!!