Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A trial without witnesses Why get to the real truth ?No. We have defended the Constituion against the House's attempt to place themselves above the Law.Whether it's our Electoral System, the US Senate, Elections or the Supreme Court, if they don't get the results they want, they declare it illegitimate.ELIZABETH WARREN’S QUESTION
Former Harvard Law School Professor Elizabeth Warren posed a grandstanding question attacking Chief Justice Roberts and the Supreme Court in the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump yesterday. Warren was shrieking for attention. Why might that be? It is a little difficult to follow the logic of the question. The patent stupidity of the question should embarrass her and her target audience. Chief Justice Roberts was visibly chagrined by her ridiculous antics, and it was at that moment that Lisa Murkowski had had enough of the Democrats Unconstitutional Farce being used to attack the foundations of our Federal system.
Ted Cruz thinks the Dems were hoping to set Chief Justice Roberts up so they could take a swipe at the legitimacy of the Supreme Court while they were at it.
Face it Zorro you and your ilk have brought our great country to its knees You've shat on our constitution and like pigs you love getting dirty
Of course you are because you are a shill. No matter what the outcome was you would think it was a victory for the left.Knowing that the Senate Republicans would not convict Trump, the Senate Republicans voting to not allow any documents or witnesses is the BEST possible outcome for Democrats. I am extremely HAPPY.
Democrats may end up with all three branches of government in November.
Possibly.ELIZABETH WARREN’S QUESTION
Former Harvard Law School Professor Elizabeth Warren posed a grandstanding question attacking Chief Justice Roberts and the Supreme Court in the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump yesterday. Warren was shrieking for attention. Why might that be? It is a little difficult to follow the logic of the question. The patent stupidity of the question should embarrass her and her target audience. Chief Justice Roberts was visibly chagrined by her ridiculous antics, and it was at that moment that Lisa Murkowski had had enough of the Democrats Unconstitutional Farce being used to attack the foundations of our Federal system.
Ted Cruz thinks the Dems were hoping to set Chief Justice Roberts up so they could take a swipe at the legitimacy of the Supreme Court while they were at it.
McConnell says he doesn't have the votes.
Three Democrat presidential candidates may be neutered.
You seemed to have missed this as I have not seen your reference showing only 36% of republicans support Trump.If you ever were a republican you are way out in left field nowWhy are you telling us this?Yes, there are 11 Demo Senators running for reelection. I didn't name all the Rep Senators. I just named the 4 that are fighting to return and at least two of them don't have a snowballs chance in hell. To be specific, Colorado and Arizona. Try being honest for a change. It would be a nice addition to your portfolio.
if you think its going to be a big win for the dems what difference does it make today?
Now I can tell you my real background. I am part of the Lincoln Project. And Avid supporter. You think the Dems have played unfair? Here, hold my beer. We are Republicans and we are taking back the name of the Republican Party that you party of the rumpers stole in the night. That's why I am telling you. It's just started. The Lincoln Project has only been in operation for just over a month and already we are making quite a splash. Those 4 Senate Republicans are going to find that they are in REAL serious trouble in their home states. The Lincoln Project can do and say things that the Dems can't because they have to play nice.
What do I expect? Rump to completely go off his rocker (he doesn't have far to go) and pull more "Here, Hold My Beer" moments until they end up doing a 25 number on him or the Senate does another vote to get him out of office. Then I demand a decent Republican Candidate we all can be proud of. There are 4 that are willing and able.
But there are fallen republicans who would rather be part of a minor splinter group of no consequence than a ruling coalition
When only 36% of the so called Republicans actually support Rump then I suggest YOU are part of the splinter group. You can stop drinking the koolaid or there is going to be a sweep of Democrats into Washington. I have already stated I don't want to see the Democrats take over all 3 of the branches but the alternative is Rump and that can no longer be tolerated. The Senate Republicans pretty well declared war on America last week and America is striking back.
Can you share how the 36% figure of Republican Support for President Trump was calculated, or obtained?
If Moscow Mitch could block witnesses, did that make Trump supporters think Bolton's claims would just go away? Voters in the next election will know what Bolton says whether it is said as a witness in the senate or not.
You seemed to have missed this as I have not seen your reference showing only 36% of republicans support Trump.If you ever were a republican you are way out in left field nowWhy are you telling us this?
if you think its going to be a big win for the dems what difference does it make today?
Now I can tell you my real background. I am part of the Lincoln Project. And Avid supporter. You think the Dems have played unfair? Here, hold my beer. We are Republicans and we are taking back the name of the Republican Party that you party of the rumpers stole in the night. That's why I am telling you. It's just started. The Lincoln Project has only been in operation for just over a month and already we are making quite a splash. Those 4 Senate Republicans are going to find that they are in REAL serious trouble in their home states. The Lincoln Project can do and say things that the Dems can't because they have to play nice.
What do I expect? Rump to completely go off his rocker (he doesn't have far to go) and pull more "Here, Hold My Beer" moments until they end up doing a 25 number on him or the Senate does another vote to get him out of office. Then I demand a decent Republican Candidate we all can be proud of. There are 4 that are willing and able.
But there are fallen republicans who would rather be part of a minor splinter group of no consequence than a ruling coalition
When only 36% of the so called Republicans actually support Rump then I suggest YOU are part of the splinter group. You can stop drinking the koolaid or there is going to be a sweep of Democrats into Washington. I have already stated I don't want to see the Democrats take over all 3 of the branches but the alternative is Rump and that can no longer be tolerated. The Senate Republicans pretty well declared war on America last week and America is striking back.
Can you share how the 36% figure of Republican Support for President Trump was calculated, or obtained?
Let me help you, the Iowa Caucus gives those that do not have much support an out sized voice because of the way they are held.
Iowa caucus: Donald Trump wins with overwhelming Republican support
Granted, Trump only managed to get 97.1% of the vote. Just a smidgen higher than 36%....
You seemed to have missed this as I have not seen your reference showing only 36% of republicans support Trump.If you ever were a republican you are way out in left field nowWhy are you telling us this?
if you think its going to be a big win for the dems what difference does it make today?
Now I can tell you my real background. I am part of the Lincoln Project. And Avid supporter. You think the Dems have played unfair? Here, hold my beer. We are Republicans and we are taking back the name of the Republican Party that you party of the rumpers stole in the night. That's why I am telling you. It's just started. The Lincoln Project has only been in operation for just over a month and already we are making quite a splash. Those 4 Senate Republicans are going to find that they are in REAL serious trouble in their home states. The Lincoln Project can do and say things that the Dems can't because they have to play nice.
What do I expect? Rump to completely go off his rocker (he doesn't have far to go) and pull more "Here, Hold My Beer" moments until they end up doing a 25 number on him or the Senate does another vote to get him out of office. Then I demand a decent Republican Candidate we all can be proud of. There are 4 that are willing and able.
But there are fallen republicans who would rather be part of a minor splinter group of no consequence than a ruling coalition
When only 36% of the so called Republicans actually support Rump then I suggest YOU are part of the splinter group. You can stop drinking the koolaid or there is going to be a sweep of Democrats into Washington. I have already stated I don't want to see the Democrats take over all 3 of the branches but the alternative is Rump and that can no longer be tolerated. The Senate Republicans pretty well declared war on America last week and America is striking back.
Can you share how the 36% figure of Republican Support for President Trump was calculated, or obtained?
Let me help you, the Iowa Caucus gives those that do not have much support an out sized voice because of the way they are held.
Iowa caucus: Donald Trump wins with overwhelming Republican support
Granted, Trump only managed to get 97.1% of the vote. Just a smidgen higher than 36%....
Sorry longo It's not over till I say it's over The liar trumps tax returns bs will be in SC soon and a vote before election day is coming Lets find out just how big a crook your king isWhat now libtards. The vote is done no more witnesses. Take that and stick it where the sun don’t shine. Your losers and will continue to be losers.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Right, like tax returns would make a difference to a voter.
Plus the tax returns are none of your business. Eddie asshole
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sure. How much corrupt motive is okay? Like, as long as most of his motive isn’t corrupt, is that good enough?Can a president have more than one motive for taking an action?You mean like claiming Trump was asking the Ukrainians to investigate his political opponent? Like claiming Trump personally held up aid to Ukraine at the same time?but Clinton lied to the fbi.
Or is that no longer an issue?.. and like I've said many times this was never about Trump 9n as much as revenge. you just proved that's what it is to you.
Sure she did. And you totally have proof of this; right? I mean, you wouldn’t be one of those posters who makes claims and doesn’t back them up.
You mean like the Democrats who always make claims with no evidence
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
leftists, (extreme anyway) and the media - always saying trump is racist and his supporters are "deplorables"Oh, yeah, like that's a huge worry.
Apparently. Otherwise y’all wouldn’t be going to such lengths making fools of yourselfs to go after him.
Or we're not going to any lengths, and he and the other Dems are so corrupt it bubbles to the surface like a fart in a bathtub.
Only a leftist could be brain-damaged and delusional enough to come out of the last few months thinking it's the REPUBLICANS putting out huge efforts to destroy their opponents.
You guys say that about every Democrat. Years and years of these accusations and nothing to show for it. Do you think y’all have any credibility left?
Who is "you guys"? I've checked my pockets, and there are no mice in any of them. There's just me here.
Republicans, right wing media, Trump, his supporters. Never ending claims of proof of corruption among Democrats, never any substance.
Trump had an investigation into his racist practices in leasing apartments. He settled but the report is very damning. Also the Central Park 5 was really bad. There’s evidence if you want to find it.leftists, (extreme anyway) and the media - always saying trump is racist and his supporters are "deplorables"Apparently. Otherwise y’all wouldn’t be going to such lengths making fools of yourselfs to go after him.
Or we're not going to any lengths, and he and the other Dems are so corrupt it bubbles to the surface like a fart in a bathtub.
Only a leftist could be brain-damaged and delusional enough to come out of the last few months thinking it's the REPUBLICANS putting out huge efforts to destroy their opponents.
You guys say that about every Democrat. Years and years of these accusations and nothing to show for it. Do you think y’all have any credibility left?
Who is "you guys"? I've checked my pockets, and there are no mice in any of them. There's just me here.
Republicans, right wing media, Trump, his supporters. Never ending claims of proof of corruption among Democrats, never any substance.
never seen you bitch at the lack of evidence there. hence, you are NEVER out to be fair, just push your crap around with a wicker-stick and pretend it's better crap.
by what criteria are we going to set to judge this AND WILL YOU use the same criteria on yourself / your side?Sure. How much corrupt motive is okay? Like, as long as most of his motive isn’t corrupt, is that good enough?Can a president have more than one motive for taking an action?You mean like claiming Trump was asking the Ukrainians to investigate his political opponent? Like claiming Trump personally held up aid to Ukraine at the same time?but Clinton lied to the fbi.
Or is that no longer an issue?.. and like I've said many times this was never about Trump 9n as much as revenge. you just proved that's what it is to you.
Sure she did. And you totally have proof of this; right? I mean, you wouldn’t be one of those posters who makes claims and doesn’t back them up.
You mean like the Democrats who always make claims with no evidence
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
then why did the left reject up to 16 of them?A trial without witnesses Why get to the real truth ?No. We have defended the Constituion against the House's attempt to place themselves above the Law.Whether it's our Electoral System, the US Senate, Elections or the Supreme Court, if they don't get the results they want, they declare it illegitimate.ELIZABETH WARREN’S QUESTION
Former Harvard Law School Professor Elizabeth Warren posed a grandstanding question attacking Chief Justice Roberts and the Supreme Court in the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump yesterday. Warren was shrieking for attention. Why might that be? It is a little difficult to follow the logic of the question. The patent stupidity of the question should embarrass her and her target audience. Chief Justice Roberts was visibly chagrined by her ridiculous antics, and it was at that moment that Lisa Murkowski had had enough of the Democrats Unconstitutional Farce being used to attack the foundations of our Federal system.
Ted Cruz thinks the Dems were hoping to set Chief Justice Roberts up so they could take a swipe at the legitimacy of the Supreme Court while they were at it.
Face it Zorro you and your ilk have brought our great country to its knees You've shat on our constitution and like pigs you love getting dirty
Sure. How much corrupt motive is okay? Like, as long as most of his motive isn’t corrupt, is that good enough?Can a president have more than one motive for taking an action?You mean like claiming Trump was asking the Ukrainians to investigate his political opponent? Like claiming Trump personally held up aid to Ukraine at the same time?but Clinton lied to the fbi.
Or is that no longer an issue?.. and like I've said many times this was never about Trump 9n as much as revenge. you just proved that's what it is to you.
Sure she did. And you totally have proof of this; right? I mean, you wouldn’t be one of those posters who makes claims and doesn’t back them up.
You mean like the Democrats who always make claims with no evidence
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Trump had an investigation into his racist practices in leasing apartments. He settled but the report is very damning. Also the Central Park 5 was really bad. There’s evidence if you want to find it.leftists, (extreme anyway) and the media - always saying trump is racist and his supporters are "deplorables"Or we're not going to any lengths, and he and the other Dems are so corrupt it bubbles to the surface like a fart in a bathtub.
Only a leftist could be brain-damaged and delusional enough to come out of the last few months thinking it's the REPUBLICANS putting out huge efforts to destroy their opponents.
You guys say that about every Democrat. Years and years of these accusations and nothing to show for it. Do you think y’all have any credibility left?
Who is "you guys"? I've checked my pockets, and there are no mice in any of them. There's just me here.
Republicans, right wing media, Trump, his supporters. Never ending claims of proof of corruption among Democrats, never any substance.
never seen you bitch at the lack of evidence there. hence, you are NEVER out to be fair, just push your crap around with a wicker-stick and pretend it's better crap.
That said, I don’t think he’s like a David Duke racist or anything. He’s pretty deplorable for a lot of reasons but that’s not chief among them for me.
A trial without witnesses Why get to the real truth ?No. We have defended the Constituion against the House's attempt to place themselves above the Law.Whether it's our Electoral System, the US Senate, Elections or the Supreme Court, if they don't get the results they want, they declare it illegitimate.ELIZABETH WARREN’S QUESTION
Former Harvard Law School Professor Elizabeth Warren posed a grandstanding question attacking Chief Justice Roberts and the Supreme Court in the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump yesterday. Warren was shrieking for attention. Why might that be? It is a little difficult to follow the logic of the question. The patent stupidity of the question should embarrass her and her target audience. Chief Justice Roberts was visibly chagrined by her ridiculous antics, and it was at that moment that Lisa Murkowski had had enough of the Democrats Unconstitutional Farce being used to attack the foundations of our Federal system.
Ted Cruz thinks the Dems were hoping to set Chief Justice Roberts up so they could take a swipe at the legitimacy of the Supreme Court while they were at it.
Face it Zorro you and your ilk have brought our great country to its knees You've shat on our constitution and like pigs you love getting dirty
here is where things fall quickly apart.Sure. How much corrupt motive is okay? Like, as long as most of his motive isn’t corrupt, is that good enough?Can a president have more than one motive for taking an action?You mean like claiming Trump was asking the Ukrainians to investigate his political opponent? Like claiming Trump personally held up aid to Ukraine at the same time?Sure she did. And you totally have proof of this; right? I mean, you wouldn’t be one of those posters who makes claims and doesn’t back them up.
You mean like the Democrats who always make claims with no evidence
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How much ASSumption are we supposed to accept? Because you have yet to prove that his motive was corrupt. You're just ASSuming that because it was Joe Biden who was mentioned, that MUST mean it was because Joe was running for President. And since I'm pretty sure that if we were talking about a Democrat President calling for corruption investigations for a Republican running for office, you'd be falling all over yourself telling us about his pure, high-minded motivations, I'm less than willing to work off of your ASSumptions.
leftists, (extreme anyway) and the media - always saying trump is racist and his supporters are "deplorables"Apparently. Otherwise y’all wouldn’t be going to such lengths making fools of yourselfs to go after him.
Or we're not going to any lengths, and he and the other Dems are so corrupt it bubbles to the surface like a fart in a bathtub.
Only a leftist could be brain-damaged and delusional enough to come out of the last few months thinking it's the REPUBLICANS putting out huge efforts to destroy their opponents.
You guys say that about every Democrat. Years and years of these accusations and nothing to show for it. Do you think y’all have any credibility left?
Who is "you guys"? I've checked my pockets, and there are no mice in any of them. There's just me here.
Republicans, right wing media, Trump, his supporters. Never ending claims of proof of corruption among Democrats, never any substance.
never seen you bitch at the lack of evidence there. hence, you are NEVER out to be fair, just push your crap around with a wicker-stick and pretend it's better crap.
and how many times did colfax_m provide proof of any one of these 4100 opportunities?leftists, (extreme anyway) and the media - always saying trump is racist and his supporters are "deplorables"Or we're not going to any lengths, and he and the other Dems are so corrupt it bubbles to the surface like a fart in a bathtub.
Only a leftist could be brain-damaged and delusional enough to come out of the last few months thinking it's the REPUBLICANS putting out huge efforts to destroy their opponents.
You guys say that about every Democrat. Years and years of these accusations and nothing to show for it. Do you think y’all have any credibility left?
Who is "you guys"? I've checked my pockets, and there are no mice in any of them. There's just me here.
Republicans, right wing media, Trump, his supporters. Never ending claims of proof of corruption among Democrats, never any substance.
never seen you bitch at the lack of evidence there. hence, you are NEVER out to be fair, just push your crap around with a wicker-stick and pretend it's better crap.
CNN, MSNBC said 'racist' more than 4,100 times from July 14-21
That’s the thing. No Democratic President is going to be calling for an investigation into Republicans running for office. No former Republican President would do so either. Presidents just don’t do that.Sure. How much corrupt motive is okay? Like, as long as most of his motive isn’t corrupt, is that good enough?Can a president have more than one motive for taking an action?You mean like claiming Trump was asking the Ukrainians to investigate his political opponent? Like claiming Trump personally held up aid to Ukraine at the same time?Sure she did. And you totally have proof of this; right? I mean, you wouldn’t be one of those posters who makes claims and doesn’t back them up.
You mean like the Democrats who always make claims with no evidence
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How much ASSumption are we supposed to accept? Because you have yet to prove that his motive was corrupt. You're just ASSuming that because it was Joe Biden who was mentioned, that MUST mean it was because Joe was running for President. And since I'm pretty sure that if we were talking about a Democrat President calling for corruption investigations for a Republican running for office, you'd be falling all over yourself telling us about his pure, high-minded motivations, I'm less than willing to work off of your ASSumptions.
