McEnany Announces 234 Pages of Affidavits Alleging Election Irregularities in Michigan

I don't understand why all you harris regime acolytes are having a problem with all the allegations- I'd think you'd want them investigated to prove just how wonderful the deacons in your church are-
Exactly.
I get it, they feel they won and want to celebrate, gloat, whatever. Ok. Itā€™s to be expected after 4 years of bullshit back and forth.
But the sudden attitude of ā€œour election process is solid, there is no fraud. Hell, there isnā€™t even anything that looks shadyā€ and the absolute desire to not have any type of investigation into shady looking things is what bothers me. You can win, and still be open minded.
I can tell you the Godā€™s honest truth that if all the swing states went RED/trump, I would believe that it was due to people being sick of the media/democrats constant bullshit. Iā€™d think Trump legit won. However, I can also tell you the democrats would be saying that it looks suspect that all the swing states flipped for trump. Iā€™d understand if they wanted to recount, to check ballots, see if software wasnt ā€œglitchingā€, etc.
Iā€™d want democrat voters to know that yes, the country went for Trump fair and square. There was no cheating. So if you want to bitch about policies and whatever, go for it. But shut up about the cheating bullshit.

One would think youā€™d want a recount, ballots checked for authenticity, etc.

I bet you didn't have this same energy when Trump won by a margin 3 times smaller than what Biden is winning by.....

And not only did evil Hillary concede the next day -- there were not 21893828 law suits alleging voter fraud with no evidence...

Even the Russian investigation produced 100 indictments filed by Trump's own DOJ
Actually evil Hilliary threw a hissy fit the night of the election (likely got drunk) and refused to go see her poor supporters who waited for her all night and into the wee hours of the next morning only to be told by an aid to go home.

It is likely that Hilliary CHEATED her arse off as the dems do every year but even more so in 2016 and didnt' want the the vote tallies looked at that closely as losing came as shock----

this year saw more FRAUD----------and the dems propaganda arm the media has been trying to hide it but it is still leaking out. There is plenty of evidence of voter Fraud---the numbers and the computer glitchs alone are more than enough to prove this.
And when people come out with evidence, the media smears them and lies.
Like this...
 
For 20 years we have had to listen to Dems cry and whine and go to court when they lose elections. NOW thereā€™s proof of their bullshit they claim Trump canā€™t go to court? Bullshit.
 
All the lawsuits are going to do is investigate the method used to process the votes there is zero claims that cheating occurred because there is no proof
What is considered proof by whom?


Actually, there is lots of proof in sworn affidavits.
A jury and/or judge can consider it so.


An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may require you to testify to the affidavit or they may consider it hearsay. Since hearsay is not admissible as evidence, your affidavit may not be used for evidence if someone objects to it unless you testify.

What Is An Affidavit And When Are They Used? | LegalNature
 
She was hired to lie for the administration so.......................................... If you have something we find out when the lawsuits are filed.

WHAT A BASELESS CLAIM---ATTACKING THE MESSENGER INSTEAD OF THE MESSAGE? lol
This is like Trump asking his retweets. He was just relating the message. He didnā€™t do it. The messenger was spreading misinformation and lies. Deserves to be debunked and blasted.
 
All the lawsuits are going to do is investigate the method used to process the votes there is zero claims that cheating occurred because there is no proof
What is considered proof by whom?


Actually, there is lots of proof in sworn affidavits.
A jury and/or judge can consider it so.


An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may require you to testify to the affidavit or they may consider it hearsay. Since hearsay is not admissible as evidence, your affidavit may not be used for evidence if someone objects to it unless you testify.
What Is An Affidavit And When Are They Used? | LegalNature
Sworn affidavits that uncle Rudy claimed? LOL. Uncle Rudy is a liability for Trump.
 
All the lawsuits are going to do is investigate the method used to process the votes there is zero claims that cheating occurred because there is no proof
What is considered proof by whom?


Actually, there is lots of proof in sworn affidavits.
A jury and/or judge can consider it so.


An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may require you to testify to the affidavit or they may consider it hearsay. Since hearsay is not admissible as evidence, your affidavit may not be used for evidence if someone objects to it unless you testify.
What Is An Affidavit And When Are They Used? | LegalNature
Sworn affidavits that uncle Rudy claimed? LOL. Uncle Rudy is a liability for Trump.


But you're an asset to America??????

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

and anti-Semitismā€¦ the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.





Now......which is your favorite?

The Democrat Party stands for the very same ideas and desires that the Bolsheviks, who murdered 100 million men, women and children for those views....and you pretend to dispute how truly dumb your sort is???????
 
I don't understand why all you harris regime acolytes are having a problem with all the allegations- I'd think you'd want them investigated to prove just how wonderful the deacons in your church are-
Exactly.
I get it, they feel they won and want to celebrate, gloat, whatever. Ok. Itā€™s to be expected after 4 years of bullshit back and forth.
But the sudden attitude of ā€œour election process is solid, there is no fraud. Hell, there isnā€™t even anything that looks shadyā€ and the absolute desire to not have any type of investigation into shady looking things is what bothers me. You can win, and still be open minded.
I can tell you the Godā€™s honest truth that if all the swing states went RED/trump, I would believe that it was due to people being sick of the media/democrats constant bullshit. Iā€™d think Trump legit won. However, I can also tell you the democrats would be saying that it looks suspect that all the swing states flipped for trump. Iā€™d understand if they wanted to recount, to check ballots, see if software wasnt ā€œglitchingā€, etc.
Iā€™d want democrat voters to know that yes, the country went for Trump fair and square. There was no cheating. So if you want to bitch about policies and whatever, go for it. But shut up about the cheating bullshit.

One would think youā€™d want a recount, ballots checked for authenticity, etc.

I bet you didn't have this same energy when Trump won by a margin 3 times smaller than what Biden is winning by.....

And not only did evil Hillary concede the next day -- there were not 21893828 law suits alleging voter fraud with no evidence...

Even the Russian investigation produced 100 indictments filed by Trump's own DOJ
Actually evil Hilliary threw a hissy fit the night of the election (likely got drunk) and refused to go see her poor supporters who waited for her all night and into the wee hours of the next morning only to be told by an aid to go home.

It is likely that Hilliary CHEATED her arse off as the dems do every year but even more so in 2016 and didnt' want the the vote tallies looked at that closely as losing came as shock----

this year saw more FRAUD----------and the dems propaganda arm the media has been trying to hide it but it is still leaking out. There is plenty of evidence of voter Fraud---the numbers and the computer glitchs alone are more than enough to prove this.

This year? So far NONE has been proven or evidence of voter fraud. Most or all has been debunked even by the republicans that are in charge of the elections. But you can keep trying.
Here is an example where liars and desperate Trump supporters claimed dead people voted in Pennsylvania.....

No, dead people didn't vote in Philadelphia, elections boss says

"I have seen the most fantastical things on social media, making completely ridiculous allegations that have no basis in fact at all and seen them spread," Schmidt, a Republican co-chair of the three-member panel in charge of the city's elections, told CNN in an interview.


He cited a report about "a long list of people that they said were dead voters who voted in Philadelphia. So, when we took a break between everything else that we're doing, we looked it up, each one of them to see what their vote history was. Not a single one of them voted in Philadelphia after they died," Schmidt said.

The conspiracy theory was shared last week by Rudy Giuliani and Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz, among others on the right.
 
She's auditioning for a return to Faux News. With her record of lying no one else in their right mind will hire her. If she had half a brain she'd be dangerous. Proven by the fact that she agreed to be Trump's official bullshit artist.
 
I don't understand why all you harris regime acolytes are having a problem with all the allegations- I'd think you'd want them investigated to prove just how wonderful the deacons in your church are-
Exactly.
I get it, they feel they won and want to celebrate, gloat, whatever. Ok. Itā€™s to be expected after 4 years of bullshit back and forth.
But the sudden attitude of ā€œour election process is solid, there is no fraud. Hell, there isnā€™t even anything that looks shadyā€ and the absolute desire to not have any type of investigation into shady looking things is what bothers me. You can win, and still be open minded.
I can tell you the Godā€™s honest truth that if all the swing states went RED/trump, I would believe that it was due to people being sick of the media/democrats constant bullshit. Iā€™d think Trump legit won. However, I can also tell you the democrats would be saying that it looks suspect that all the swing states flipped for trump. Iā€™d understand if they wanted to recount, to check ballots, see if software wasnt ā€œglitchingā€, etc.
Iā€™d want democrat voters to know that yes, the country went for Trump fair and square. There was no cheating. So if you want to bitch about policies and whatever, go for it. But shut up about the cheating bullshit.

One would think youā€™d want a recount, ballots checked for authenticity, etc.

I bet you didn't have this same energy when Trump won by a margin 3 times smaller than what Biden is winning by.....

And not only did evil Hillary concede the next day -- there were not 21893828 law suits alleging voter fraud with no evidence...

Even the Russian investigation produced 100 indictments filed by Trump's own DOJ
Actually evil Hilliary threw a hissy fit the night of the election (likely got drunk) and refused to go see her poor supporters who waited for her all night and into the wee hours of the next morning only to be told by an aid to go home.

It is likely that Hilliary CHEATED her arse off as the dems do every year but even more so in 2016 and didnt' want the the vote tallies looked at that closely as losing came as shock----

this year saw more FRAUD----------and the dems propaganda arm the media has been trying to hide it but it is still leaking out. There is plenty of evidence of voter Fraud---the numbers and the computer glitchs alone are more than enough to prove this.

This year? So far NONE has been proven or evidence of voter fraud. Most or all has been debunked even by the republicans that are in charge of the elections. But you can keep trying.
Here is an example where liars and desperate Trump supporters claimed dead people voted in Pennsylvania.....

No, dead people didn't vote in Philadelphia, elections boss says

"I have seen the most fantastical things on social media, making completely ridiculous allegations that have no basis in fact at all and seen them spread," Schmidt, a Republican co-chair of the three-member panel in charge of the city's elections, told CNN in an interview.


He cited a report about "a long list of people that they said were dead voters who voted in Philadelphia. So, when we took a break between everything else that we're doing, we looked it up, each one of them to see what their vote history was. Not a single one of them voted in Philadelphia after they died," Schmidt said.

The conspiracy theory was shared last week by Rudy Giuliani and Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz, among others on the right.



Here's your lesson in jurisprudence.....



An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may require you to testify to the affidavit or they may consider it hearsay. Since hearsay is not admissible as evidence, your affidavit may not be used for evidence if someone objects to it unless you testify.

What Is An Affidavit And When Are They Used? | LegalNature
 
All the lawsuits are going to do is investigate the method used to process the votes there is zero claims that cheating occurred because there is no proof
What is considered proof by whom?


Actually, there is lots of proof in sworn affidavits.
A jury and/or judge can consider it so.


An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may require you to testify to the affidavit or they may consider it hearsay. Since hearsay is not admissible as evidence, your affidavit may not be used for evidence if someone objects to it unless you testify.
What Is An Affidavit And When Are They Used? | LegalNature
Sworn affidavits that uncle Rudy claimed? LOL. Uncle Rudy is a liability for Trump.


But you're an asset to America??????

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

and anti-Semitismā€¦ the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.





Now......which is your favorite?

The Democrat Party stands for the very same ideas and desires that the Bolsheviks, who murdered 100 million men, women and children for those views....and you pretend to dispute how truly dumb your sort is???????

77 millions and counting voted to remove that moron out of WH.
Your Dude literally destroyed this country almost on purpose and if we let him 4 more years. This country will turn to a dictatorship shithole.
Conceding is not a law itā€™s a custom but we are not worried we will flush him out of the White House. Then fumigate to kill all those virus and racist germs that are circulating inside the WH.
 
All the lawsuits are going to do is investigate the method used to process the votes there is zero claims that cheating occurred because there is no proof
What is considered proof by whom?


Actually, there is lots of proof in sworn affidavits.
A jury and/or judge can consider it so.


An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may require you to testify to the affidavit or they may consider it hearsay. Since hearsay is not admissible as evidence, your affidavit may not be used for evidence if someone objects to it unless you testify.
What Is An Affidavit And When Are They Used? | LegalNature
Sworn affidavits that uncle Rudy claimed? LOL. Uncle Rudy is a liability for Trump.


But you're an asset to America??????

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

and anti-Semitismā€¦ the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.





Now......which is your favorite?

The Democrat Party stands for the very same ideas and desires that the Bolsheviks, who murdered 100 million men, women and children for those views....and you pretend to dispute how truly dumb your sort is???????
Your tanTrumps will get you nowhere. All your rants did nothing for your boy & life will hit you hard on 1/21/21. Hang up your MAGA hat. Adults & sane people are taking over. Too bad for you, Trumptard.
 
All the lawsuits are going to do is investigate the method used to process the votes there is zero claims that cheating occurred because there is no proof
What is considered proof by whom?


Actually, there is lots of proof in sworn affidavits.
A jury and/or judge can consider it so.


An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may require you to testify to the affidavit or they may consider it hearsay. Since hearsay is not admissible as evidence, your affidavit may not be used for evidence if someone objects to it unless you testify.
What Is An Affidavit And When Are They Used? | LegalNature
Sworn affidavits that uncle Rudy claimed? LOL. Uncle Rudy is a liability for Trump.


But you're an asset to America??????

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

and anti-Semitismā€¦ the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.





Now......which is your favorite?

The Democrat Party stands for the very same ideas and desires that the Bolsheviks, who murdered 100 million men, women and children for those views....and you pretend to dispute how truly dumb your sort is???????

77 millions and counting voted to remove that moron out of WH.
Your Dude literally destroyed this country almost on purpose and if we let him 4 more years. This country will turn to a dictatorship shithole.
Conceding is not a law itā€™s a custom but we are not worried we will flush him out of the White House. Then fumigate to kill all those virus and racist germs that are circulating inside the WH.



All evidence indicates that that is a false total.

Let's see what is known:

In 2016, Trump received 62,984, 828 votes

He got 6% of the black vote, and 28% of the Hispanic.

He got 24% of the Jewish vote. In 2020, 30%



In 2020, Trump received 71, 926, 263 votesā€¦.9 million more Americans.

He got 12% of the black vote, and 32% of Hispanic.



ā€œā€¦less anticipated was the level of support Trump received from Muslim voters, a third of whom backed him, according to the AP VoteCast survey.ā€ A third of Muslim voters backed Trump. Why? | Spectator USA



It remains to be seen if the mass cheating by Democrats holds up.
ā€œBREAKING: Republicans Flip Nine Seats in California!ā€ BREAKING: Republicans Flip Nine Seats in California! - Geller Report News


ā€œRepublicans have so far cut into the Democratic majority mostly by gaining back ground they lost in the 2018 midterms, when Democrats flipped House control. The GOP will defeat at least seven House Democrats, including six first-term representatives. They will also gain a seat previously occupied by independent Rep. Justin Amash.

Entering Election Day, forecasters projected Democrats would gain House seats and challenge for the Senate majority. Now, Democrats may only end up with a narrow majority in the House, as states count final results to determine whether Republicans hold their advantage in the Senate.ā€ https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/05/202...ts-to-lose-house-seats-but-keep-majority.html



You're sweatin,' huh?
 
I don't understand why all you harris regime acolytes are having a problem with all the allegations- I'd think you'd want them investigated to prove just how wonderful the deacons in your church are-
Exactly.
I get it, they feel they won and want to celebrate, gloat, whatever. Ok. Itā€™s to be expected after 4 years of bullshit back and forth.
But the sudden attitude of ā€œour election process is solid, there is no fraud. Hell, there isnā€™t even anything that looks shadyā€ and the absolute desire to not have any type of investigation into shady looking things is what bothers me. You can win, and still be open minded.
I can tell you the Godā€™s honest truth that if all the swing states went RED/trump, I would believe that it was due to people being sick of the media/democrats constant bullshit. Iā€™d think Trump legit won. However, I can also tell you the democrats would be saying that it looks suspect that all the swing states flipped for trump. Iā€™d understand if they wanted to recount, to check ballots, see if software wasnt ā€œglitchingā€, etc.
Iā€™d want democrat voters to know that yes, the country went for Trump fair and square. There was no cheating. So if you want to bitch about policies and whatever, go for it. But shut up about the cheating bullshit.

One would think youā€™d want a recount, ballots checked for authenticity, etc.

I bet you didn't have this same energy when Trump won by a margin 3 times smaller than what Biden is winning by.....

And not only did evil Hillary concede the next day -- there were not 21893828 law suits alleging voter fraud with no evidence...

Even the Russian investigation produced 100 indictments filed by Trump's own DOJ
Actually evil Hilliary threw a hissy fit the night of the election (likely got drunk) and refused to go see her poor supporters who waited for her all night and into the wee hours of the next morning only to be told by an aid to go home.

It is likely that Hilliary CHEATED her arse off as the dems do every year but even more so in 2016 and didnt' want the the vote tallies looked at that closely as losing came as shock----

this year saw more FRAUD----------and the dems propaganda arm the media has been trying to hide it but it is still leaking out. There is plenty of evidence of voter Fraud---the numbers and the computer glitchs alone are more than enough to prove this.
And when people come out with evidence, the media smears them and lies.
Like this...
Saraa Carter works for Hannity must be credible? LOL. According to Fox yes he did recanted his claim.

 
All the lawsuits are going to do is investigate the method used to process the votes there is zero claims that cheating occurred because there is no proof
What is considered proof by whom?


Actually, there is lots of proof in sworn affidavits.
A jury and/or judge can consider it so.


An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may require you to testify to the affidavit or they may consider it hearsay. Since hearsay is not admissible as evidence, your affidavit may not be used for evidence if someone objects to it unless you testify.
What Is An Affidavit And When Are They Used? | LegalNature
Sworn affidavits that uncle Rudy claimed? LOL. Uncle Rudy is a liability for Trump.


But you're an asset to America??????

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

and anti-Semitismā€¦ the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.





Now......which is your favorite?

The Democrat Party stands for the very same ideas and desires that the Bolsheviks, who murdered 100 million men, women and children for those views....and you pretend to dispute how truly dumb your sort is???????I
Your tanTrumps will get you nowhere. All your rants did nothing for your boy & life will hit you hard on 1/21/21. Hang up your MAGA hat. Adults & sane people are taking over. Too bad for you, Trumptard.


I never rant.

I simply post the truth.

See if you can find any errors in my posts, dunce.
 
All the lawsuits are going to do is investigate the method used to process the votes there is zero claims that cheating occurred because there is no proof
What is considered proof by whom?


Actually, there is lots of proof in sworn affidavits.
A jury and/or judge can consider it so.


An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may require you to testify to the affidavit or they may consider it hearsay. Since hearsay is not admissible as evidence, your affidavit may not be used for evidence if someone objects to it unless you testify.
What Is An Affidavit And When Are They Used? | LegalNature
Sworn affidavits that uncle Rudy claimed? LOL. Uncle Rudy is a liability for Trump.


But you're an asset to America??????

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

and anti-Semitismā€¦ the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.





Now......which is your favorite?

The Democrat Party stands for the very same ideas and desires that the Bolsheviks, who murdered 100 million men, women and children for those views....and you pretend to dispute how truly dumb your sort is???????

77 millions and counting voted to remove that moron out of WH.
Your Dude literally destroyed this country almost on purpose and if we let him 4 more years. This country will turn to a dictatorship shithole.
Conceding is not a law itā€™s a custom but we are not worried we will flush him out of the White House. Then fumigate to kill all those virus and racist germs that are circulating inside the WH.



All evidence indicates that that is a false total.

Let's see what is known:

In 2016, Trump received 62,984, 828 votes

He got 6% of the black vote, and 28% of the Hispanic.

He got 24% of the Jewish vote. In 2020, 30%



In 2020, Trump received 71, 926, 263 votesā€¦.9 million more Americans.

He got 12% of the black vote, and 32% of Hispanic.



ā€œā€¦less anticipated was the level of support Trump received from Muslim voters, a third of whom backed him, according to the AP VoteCast survey.ā€ A third of Muslim voters backed Trump. Why? | Spectator USA



It remains to be seen if the mass cheating by Democrats holds up.
ā€œBREAKING: Republicans Flip Nine Seats in California!ā€ BREAKING: Republicans Flip Nine Seats in California! - Geller Report News


ā€œRepublicans have so far cut into the Democratic majority mostly by gaining back ground they lost in the 2018 midterms, when Democrats flipped House control. The GOP will defeat at least seven House Democrats, including six first-term representatives. They will also gain a seat previously occupied by independent Rep. Justin Amash.

Entering Election Day, forecasters projected Democrats would gain House seats and challenge for the Senate majority. Now, Democrats may only end up with a narrow majority in the House, as states count final results to determine whether Republicans hold their advantage in the Senate.ā€ https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/05/202...ts-to-lose-house-seats-but-keep-majority.html



You're sweatin,' huh?
Where you got that from uncle Rudy? Sweatin? Nah! Iā€™m very happy and comfortable just enjoy watching people like you pounding the sands crying. Fraud fraud fraud...
WAAAAAAAAH WAAAAAH

Tissue.
 
I don't understand why all you harris regime acolytes are having a problem with all the allegations- I'd think you'd want them investigated to prove just how wonderful the deacons in your church are-
Exactly.
I get it, they feel they won and want to celebrate, gloat, whatever. Ok. Itā€™s to be expected after 4 years of bullshit back and forth.
But the sudden attitude of ā€œour election process is solid, there is no fraud. Hell, there isnā€™t even anything that looks shadyā€ and the absolute desire to not have any type of investigation into shady looking things is what bothers me. You can win, and still be open minded.
I can tell you the Godā€™s honest truth that if all the swing states went RED/trump, I would believe that it was due to people being sick of the media/democrats constant bullshit. Iā€™d think Trump legit won. However, I can also tell you the democrats would be saying that it looks suspect that all the swing states flipped for trump. Iā€™d understand if they wanted to recount, to check ballots, see if software wasnt ā€œglitchingā€, etc.
Iā€™d want democrat voters to know that yes, the country went for Trump fair and square. There was no cheating. So if you want to bitch about policies and whatever, go for it. But shut up about the cheating bullshit.

One would think youā€™d want a recount, ballots checked for authenticity, etc.

I bet you didn't have this same energy when Trump won by a margin 3 times smaller than what Biden is winning by.....

And not only did evil Hillary concede the next day -- there were not 21893828 law suits alleging voter fraud with no evidence...

Even the Russian investigation produced 100 indictments filed by Trump's own DOJ
Actually evil Hilliary threw a hissy fit the night of the election (likely got drunk) and refused to go see her poor supporters who waited for her all night and into the wee hours of the next morning only to be told by an aid to go home.

It is likely that Hilliary CHEATED her arse off as the dems do every year but even more so in 2016 and didnt' want the the vote tallies looked at that closely as losing came as shock----

this year saw more FRAUD----------and the dems propaganda arm the media has been trying to hide it but it is still leaking out. There is plenty of evidence of voter Fraud---the numbers and the computer glitchs alone are more than enough to prove this.
And when people come out with evidence, the media smears them and lies.
Like this...
Saraa Carter works for Hannity must be credible? LOL. According to Fox yes he did recanted his claim.



This is your side:

If you have any doubts as to the lengths the Fascists will go, note that Jennifer Rubin, at WaPo, Jake Tapper, and AOC are calling for lists of trump supporters, to inform employers to make sure they never work again.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

First AOCā€™s ā€˜list,ā€™ now CNN warns of blacklisting Trump team
Just three days after liberal New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez urged the creation of a list of President Trumpā€™s ā€œsycophants,ā€ a top CNN host has piled on with a warning that Trump aides battling the presidentā€™s legal case could see their job possibilities dry up.
www.washingtonexaminer.com
www.washingtonexaminer.com
 
All the lawsuits are going to do is investigate the method used to process the votes there is zero claims that cheating occurred because there is no proof
What is considered proof by whom?


Actually, there is lots of proof in sworn affidavits.
A jury and/or judge can consider it so.


An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may require you to testify to the affidavit or they may consider it hearsay. Since hearsay is not admissible as evidence, your affidavit may not be used for evidence if someone objects to it unless you testify.
What Is An Affidavit And When Are They Used? | LegalNature
Sworn affidavits that uncle Rudy claimed? LOL. Uncle Rudy is a liability for Trump.


But you're an asset to America??????

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

and anti-Semitismā€¦ the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.





Now......which is your favorite?

The Democrat Party stands for the very same ideas and desires that the Bolsheviks, who murdered 100 million men, women and children for those views....and you pretend to dispute how truly dumb your sort is???????

77 millions and counting voted to remove that moron out of WH.
Your Dude literally destroyed this country almost on purpose and if we let him 4 more years. This country will turn to a dictatorship shithole.
Conceding is not a law itā€™s a custom but we are not worried we will flush him out of the White House. Then fumigate to kill all those virus and racist germs that are circulating inside the WH.



All evidence indicates that that is a false total.

Let's see what is known:

In 2016, Trump received 62,984, 828 votes

He got 6% of the black vote, and 28% of the Hispanic.

He got 24% of the Jewish vote. In 2020, 30%



In 2020, Trump received 71, 926, 263 votesā€¦.9 million more Americans.

He got 12% of the black vote, and 32% of Hispanic.



ā€œā€¦less anticipated was the level of support Trump received from Muslim voters, a third of whom backed him, according to the AP VoteCast survey.ā€ A third of Muslim voters backed Trump. Why? | Spectator USA



It remains to be seen if the mass cheating by Democrats holds up.
ā€œBREAKING: Republicans Flip Nine Seats in California!ā€ BREAKING: Republicans Flip Nine Seats in California! - Geller Report News


ā€œRepublicans have so far cut into the Democratic majority mostly by gaining back ground they lost in the 2018 midterms, when Democrats flipped House control. The GOP will defeat at least seven House Democrats, including six first-term representatives. They will also gain a seat previously occupied by independent Rep. Justin Amash.

Entering Election Day, forecasters projected Democrats would gain House seats and challenge for the Senate majority. Now, Democrats may only end up with a narrow majority in the House, as states count final results to determine whether Republicans hold their advantage in the Senate.ā€ https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/05/202...ts-to-lose-house-seats-but-keep-majority.html



You're sweatin,' huh?
Where you got that from uncle Rudy? Sweatin? Nah! Iā€™m very happy and comfortable just enjoy watching people like you pounding the sands crying. Fraud fraud fraud...
WAAAAAAAAH WAAAAAH

Tissue.


1. I voted early, and the lines were enormous. On more than one day the lines went as much as five blocks, with lots of people bringing lawn chairs, and settling in for the duration.



Imagine two hypothetical voters..

Voter A is willing to wait on the long line, get up to the ballot and mark the presidential, and then go down the line, usually along party lines. As I did.



Voter B is an apparatchik of the Bolshevik Democrat apparatus, there for one reason: to do what he had been instructed to do to purloin the election for Biden. This individual need to fill in tons of ballots, and doesnā€™t plan to spend a great deal of time on each one. Itā€™s quantity, not quality.



2. Person B is essentially a spy for the Democrats, which is fitting as their presidential candidate has been bought and paid for by a foreign government.



3. Here comes the circumstantial/mathematical evidence, specifically from the Georgia election: how do you explain 95,000 votes with only Biden markedā€¦..the rest of the Democrat candidates for office ignored?

Only one way: the Democrat agent was sent in to win the election for Biden, and spent no time on any other aspirant.



4. ā€œIn most elections, the majority of votes are cast ā€œdown the ticketā€ ā€“ meaning, a voter supports both partyā€™s presidential nominee and state Congressional candidates. In fact, according to Pew Research, ā€œoverwhelming shares of voters who are supporting Trump and Biden say they are also supporting the same-party candidate for Senate.ā€

Typically, this means that that the number of votes for a presidential candidate and that partyā€™s Senate candidates are relatively close. ā€¦the number of votes cast for Joe Biden far exceeds those cast for that stateā€™s Senate candidates in swing states, while those cast for Trump and GOP Senators remains far closer.



In Georgia, there was an 818 vote difference between Trump and the GOP Senator, vs. a 95,000 difference between Biden and the Democratic candidate for Senator.ā€ https://www.theburningplatform.com/2020/11/05/why-does-biden-have-so-many-more-votes-than-democrat-senators-in-swing-states/
 

Forum List

Back
Top