Megyn Kelly debunks Smith's claims against Trump and makes the case he is election interfering

[OKTexas]

Trump failed to argue it was going to be prejudicial. Blame him.

Besides, the conservative media says this is nothing new and it’s inconsequential. DONT READ IT.

Nothing but double standards with you guys. One day you’re screaming for transparency. The next day you’re screaming that things should be kept secret. I get whiplash listening to you guys.

Exactly how do you win arguments with an obviously biased judge? The only hope is apelet courts. But the damage has already been done, you can't unring the bell. And the judge was fully aware of what she's doing. She threw red meat to the propaganda media barely a month before a presidential election, and there's no way you can prove she had any other motive.

.

 

[Clipper]

There is another thread about Smith engaging in election interference. But this is more about the expert discussion by Megyn Kelly who is actually a lawyer.
Watch her dismiss Smith now. Smith will be dismissed later by a Judge as he was when Cannon Dismissed him earlier.

If the subhuman ape Trump didn't drag this case out for months & months on endless appeals Smith's findings would have been released long ago.

That ape fuck can't have it both ways, tough shit that the election is near.

 

[OKTexas]

If the subhuman ape Trump didn't drag this case out for months & months on endless appeals Smith's findings would have been released long ago.

That ape fuck can't have it both ways, tough shit that the election is near.

The wheels of justice move slow, except when they can interfere to aid commiecrats.

.

 

[Marener]

Exactly how do you win arguments with an obviously biased judge? The only hope is apelet courts. But the damage has already been done, you can't unring the bell. And the judge was fully aware of what she's doing. She threw red meat to the propaganda media barely a month before a presidential election, and there's no way you can prove she had any other motive.

.

First step is to make an argument. You can’t attack a judge for not accepting an argument you didn’t make. The judge made the ruling based on the facts and the arguments. Your accusation that she’s biased has no basis.

Am I supposed to feel bad that the voters can read the terrible things Trump did to try and overturn the election in 2020? Are you scared that people might not want to vote for him if they know the truth? The people of this country don’t have a right to know these facts?

The only reason this is happening before the election is that Trump and his conservative buddies in SCOTUS tried to delay as long as they can. They fucked up. But once again, you’ll blame everyone else.

 

[OKTexas]

First step is to make an argument. You can’t attack a judge for not accepting an argument you didn’t make. The judge made the ruling based on the facts and the arguments. Your accusation that she’s biased has no basis.

Am I supposed to feel bad that the voters can read the terrible things Trump did to try and overturn the election in 2020? Are you scared that people might not want to vote for him if they know the truth? The people of this country don’t have a right to know these facts?

The only reason this is happening before the election is that Trump and his conservative buddies in SCOTUS tried to delay as long as they can. They fucked up. But once again, you’ll blame everyone else.

You own freaking link said the argument was made. You can stop with the lies now.

.

 

[Marener]

You own freaking link said the argument was made. You can stop with the lies now.

.

Where?

 

[OKTexas]

Where?

You posted the ruling, didn't you read it?

.

 

[Marener]

You posted the ruling, didn't you read it?

.

I did and I read the opposite of what you’re claiming.

Go ahead and provide the language when you feel like ever substantiating any of your claims.