Memo to President Trump: Prosecute Hillary Clinton or Perish

You can’t lock her up for conspiracies.

You can only lock her up for doing things like violating the Constitution or obstructing justice or well you know things Trump does.
A dictator can do that if he wants. Vote in November.
Obama sure ordered a whole mess of illegal things.. He and his staff are all complicit in treason..

You mean like selling weapons to our enemy to fund an illegal war?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Fast N Furious

They did not sell, they gave them away.
 
Way too many words, no way Trump will read it.

If you want it to get to Trump you have two choices, narrow it down to a tweet or have FoxNews read it.
We know you're hoping he won't read it.

It is startling how little you know about the man you worship.
I don't worship anyone, snowflake. I just prefer him to the douchebags you worship.

This is the only human being I come close to worshiping...but you go on with your dreams about Trump! :206::206::206:

5c7e9f8b89274833f041f71399273088.jpg
 
You can’t lock her up for conspiracies.

You can only lock her up for doing things like violating the Constitution or obstructing justice or well you know things Trump does.
A dictator can do that if he wants. Vote in November.
Obama sure ordered a whole mess of illegal things.. He and his staff are all complicit in treason..

You mean like selling weapons to our enemy to fund an illegal war?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Fast N Furious

They did not sell, they gave them away.
But Obama sold the illegal children to human traffickers...are you sure he just gave them weapons. Maybe he got some good Mexican weed or coke?
 
You can’t lock her up for conspiracies.

You can only lock her up for doing things like violating the Constitution or obstructing justice or well you know things Trump does.
Hillary has committed numerous crimes that can put her away for the rest of her life.
No, she hasn't. You fuckers have been trying to get something on the Clintons for 30+ years. If it was there we"d know.
Your dog and pony shows were never any type of investigation. Spare me your indignation... Were not that stupid.
”Were not that stupid.”

1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif
 
You can’t lock her up for conspiracies.

You can only lock her up for doing things like violating the Constitution or obstructing justice or well you know things Trump does.
Hillary has committed numerous crimes that can put her away for the rest of her life.
You would have to be pretty stupid to think such a thing. Or ugly stupid.

Republicans have had unlimited taxpayer money for decades and they used every cent they could investigating Hillary. There are only a couple of possible outcomes:

1. Hillary is the most vetted woman in America and Republicans couldn't find a single thing.

2. Hillary is the smartest woman in America and despite all the evidence, she fooled Republicans into thinking they found nothing.

3. Republicans are the most inept people in America not being able to do anything to a guilty woman.

4. Republicans are monsters attacking an innocent woman for decades and attacking her family.

I go with number four.


If there is a deep state, it does not contain members of both parties. It simply could not, and function. So tell me, when the GOP was investigating Hillary, who did they rely on to gather the evidence against her?

Mark

Ken Starr. He bullied Anita Broaddrick into changing her story and accusing Bill Clinton of rape, with a guaranteed perjury charge and possible jail time if she refused to recant her Affidavit in the Jones Trial which said he never raped her, but the statute of limitations had run out on any rape charge. Broaddrick had changed her story twice since that night so reasonable doubt is her Affidavit, which was given without duress.

If the FBI was in the tank for Hillary, they sure didn’t show it. Everybody in America knew they were investigating Clinton. Nobody knew Trump was similarly under investigation because so many top Trump advisors and Trump himself, has so many ties with Russia.

More and more, what happened in 2013 when Trump went to Moscow for the Miss Universe pageant and the Rusdians got a good up close look at what a tool he is and how useful he could be, they worked out this elaborate campaign strategy.

The first round of Mueller indictments of Russians centred around those who created the infrastructure they used to mask their identities and plant their propaganda. The second round of indictments was Trump’s staffers who were involved with the hacking and conspiracies except Roger Stone and Junior.

Stone has publically admitted to coordinating with both Gucifer and WikiLeaks and being in regular contact with them. When this stuff became public Trump stopped saying “no collusion” and switched to “collusion isn’t illegal” and “I knew nothing about this”.

Weissekberg, the accountant, reimbursed Michael Cohen $50,000 in cash for a campatechnical matters” from the Trump Corporation Trust
Except the server WASN’T ILLEGAL, nor was her possession of the material on it.

Snoopy-S.gif


Why then was it concealed, hidden from the government and contained top secret, classified material?

It was neither concealed nor hidden from the government. Everyone in government had her email address [email protected]. Does that look like a government email address to you?

So anyone who sent her an email was very aware that she was using a private server.

It was NEVER an issue when both of W’s Secretaries of State used private email. W had a private server in the White House. It’s not an issue now that Trump has installed a private server in the White House either.

The ONLY time use of a private server by members of any administration has been an issue, is when Hillary did it.

And no there was no top secret or sensitive information on her email but that’s because nobody sends truly sensitive information on such an insecure communications device as email.

The whole Clinton email Investigation was part of the overall witch hunt against the Clintons which yielded nothing. And in which the FBI knew it was being used for political purposes but such was their hatred of Clinton, Comey played right into it.
 
But Obama sold the illegal children to human traffickers...

:linky::link:
Try Scopes
Nope, nothing about it there —> www. scopes.com

The Obama administration placed immigrant children with human traffickers.

RATING
TRUE

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/did-obama-administration-children-human-traffickers/
Ahh, “snopes.” I thought you meant scopes.

Snopes is a joke.
 
But Obama sold the illegal children to human traffickers...

:linky::link:
Try Scopes
Nope, nothing about it there —> www. scopes.com

The Obama administration placed immigrant children with human traffickers.

RATING
TRUE

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/did-obama-administration-children-human-traffickers/
Ahh, “snopes.” I thought you meant scopes.

Snopes is a joke.

Scopes are serious bidness

hitachi-s-4700-field-emission-scanning-electron-microscope.jpg
 
But Obama sold the illegal children to human traffickers...

:linky::link:
Try Scopes
Nope, nothing about it there —> www. scopes.com

The Obama administration placed immigrant children with human traffickers.

RATING
TRUE

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/did-obama-administration-children-human-traffickers/
Ahh, “snopes.” I thought you meant scopes.

Snopes is a joke.
All so-called "fact check" sites are a joke.
 
Ahh, “snopes.” I thought you meant scopes.

Snopes is a joke.
All so-called "fact check" sites are a joke.
Fucking moron... I was quoting the imbecile who now cites snopes when he likes what they say.
 
Last edited:
This is an interesting article. I hope Trump takes the man's advice:


Years ago, I agreed to represent a client who wanted to bring a lawsuit against a particular department of the federal government.

Since the opposing counsel would be the U.S. Department of Justice, and with my being new to that game, I enlisted as co-counsel an accomplished federal litigator with extensive experience in dealing with the DOJ.

At one of our first meetings, I asked him, “What do you think are our odds of beating the DOJ?” I will never forget his response.

With a silent smile, he slowly nodded, looked down and scribbled something on a sheet of paper before handing it to me.

The text of his properly signed and dated memorandum to me contained only two words:

“You’re f--ked.”

Now, nearly 20 years later, that is the exact memo — or warning — I want to send to President Trump.

That is … unless he demonstrates soon a willingness to exercise his constitutionally delegated powers to terminate and remove the partisan factions within his Department of Justice that are either failing to use, or are intentionally misusing, their authority to unlawfully destroy his Presidency.

If he does not, I believe the abbreviated ineloquence of my former colleague’s memo could likely convey an accurate forecast of his fate.

The DOJ is an institution vested with formidable resources, including its authority over the FBI.

It is also often the beneficiary of a thinly veiled, yet presumed, allegiance with most of the federal courts in which its attorneys operate.

As a result, and given enough time, in most cases, the DOJ is empowered — via favorable rulings and otherwise — to access, manipulate and maneuver the federal laws, rules, regulations and procedures — not to mention witness testimony — in whatever ways it may deem necessary to ultimately bring most of those it targets to heel … perhaps, even including a President.

Unconstrained, those with such potentially unlimited power could easily go rogue and morph into a government unto to themselves.

Theoretically, however, that should not be possible. The Constitution empowers the people to elect a President to whom they give their proxy to keep it in check.

Yet, today we are witnessing this chain of authority being turned on its head and a President who seems — on the surface, anyway — to be doing little with the powers of his office to put it right.

In the course of Sessions’ apparent hibernation subsequent to his recusal, a good portion of his responsibility as a member of the President’s Cabinet to run the DOJ appears to have been handed off to his unlawfully conflicted Deputy Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein, who, in turn, has unlawfully delegated unfettered authority to an unlawfully conflicted Special Counsel, Robert Mueller, to prosecute any crime he sees fit and who, in turn, has unlawfully abused that unfettered authority to unlawfully establish what is an unlawfully conflicted — not to mention unconstitutional — shadow Department of Justice.

Distilled to its essence — it is a creation of the corrupt — controlled by the corrupt — to protect the corrupt — by empowering the corrupt — to achieve but one corrupt purpose:

To stalk all allies, friends, relatives and associates of this nation’s duly elected President in the hope of removing that President from office before his Administration is able to fully discover, expose and prosecute the many felonies the corrupt have committed.

What crime ? This is America , you can’t just invent charges. There has to be a criminal law that’s violated .
 
Try Scopes
Nope, nothing about it there —> www. scopes.com

The Obama administration placed immigrant children with human traffickers.

RATING
TRUE

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/did-obama-administration-children-human-traffickers/
Ahh, “snopes.” I thought you meant scopes.

Snopes is a joke.
All so-called "fact check" sites are a joke.
Fucking moron... I was quoting by the imbecile who now cites snopes when he likes what they say.
"I was quoting by the imbecile?" A guy who can write proper English looks more like an imbecile than CrusaderFrank.
 
Nope, nothing about it there —> www. scopes.com

The Obama administration placed immigrant children with human traffickers.

RATING
TRUE

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/did-obama-administration-children-human-traffickers/
Ahh, “snopes.” I thought you meant scopes.

Snopes is a joke.
All so-called "fact check" sites are a joke.
Fucking moron... I was quoting by the imbecile who now cites snopes when he likes what they say.
"I was quoting by the imbecile?" A guy who can write proper English looks more like an imbecile than CrusaderFrank.
Thanks for taking the effort in pointing out my grammatical mistake. I corrected it.
 
Way too many words, no way Trump will read it.

If you want it to get to Trump you have two choices, narrow it down to a tweet or have FoxNews read it.
We know you're hoping he won't read it.

It is startling how little you know about the man you worship.
I don't worship anyone, snowflake. I just prefer him to the douchebags you worship.

You have never criticized a single thing Trump has done or said. You agree with everything he’s done or said, although. There is no more willing dupe than you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top