defcon4
Platinum Member
- Jan 26, 2015
- 20,001
- 8,660
- 950
I have problem with monuments.. they were erected to commemorate an era and mostly dedicated to persons.Sherman is buried in a cemetery. There is a monument/Memorial to him near the White House. I suppose if somebody wanted to have it removed it would be a difficult project to accomplish, but certainly possible.I am not an apologist for the Confederacy. I read the page and saw the atrocities exemplified were tilting heavily to the Confederate side but I did not have to think about giving the webpage or not. The truth is truth. I stand for truth according to my best judgment what is truth. I know truth means different things to different people.Why would you post a page of mostly confederate atrocities? Your source for Sherman witnessing atrocities while they foraged and looted is weak at best and in no way compares to a general ordering his men to commit a specific atrocity such as mass murder of unarmed POW's."Sherman personally saw his men rape and murder unyielding slaves throughout the march and gave no order to stop this."Lots of examples are available from both sides about mistreatment of POW's. Did other confederate or Union generals commit the kind of massacre that Forrest did? Seems pretty brazen that he simply ordered all the captured black POW's to be executed on the spot while they begged for mercy. Maybe you know of a comparable incident by a general on either side.I have little sympathy for the Confederacy, a gang of hoodlums seeking to perpetrate a virtual feudal state. Still, war is a situation where people get killed. Forrest did what he was charged to do, and what any Union General would do.
10 War Crimes of the US Civil War - Listverse
Nobody owns patented right to atrocities and war crimes. It is not owned solely by one army or the other. Let them rest, do not dig them up. Learn from the past and it can be done only if we do not revise, alter or eradicate our history.
I know for fact that this story is true, I verified it. In the past on the other side of the pond cities and municipalities erected fighting units. One regiment in WW I was erected from this certain city and fought valiantly during the war. Many of the cities' sons, husbands, brothers and fathers fell in that war and after the war ended the city erected a memorial for them listing the names of all who have fallen. The memorial was not an endorsement of any ideology it was solely for the memory of the fallen son's of the city. Then a few decades later the regime changed. The new regime erased/chiseled out all the names on that monument first, then mutilated the monument to almost nothing. Now, the regime has changed again and the people of the city see how stupid it was to desecrate the memory of the regiment. That's what's happening here too. It makes no difference to me if you believe it or not, the main thing is that I know it is true.