Mexican is a nationality, not a race.

Here is another moment that hurt his campaign

cannotunsee7.gif

It does? How?
 
This judge literally risked his life for years going after drug smugglers.

Here's a thought. How do you people, or Trump for that matter, know the judge's position on border security?

That's Trump's bogus argument against this judge, which 1. is not grounds for recusal, and 2. may not even be true.

It's doubly stupid.

Are you ignorant of what goes on in courtrooms on a daily basis? Please educate yourself then get back to us.
 
The polls clearly show that Trump is behind.

Nothing indicates he is making up ground with women, Hispanics, and millennials.

Then he pulls 'the judge hates me' nonsense, America shakes its collective head, and begins turning is back on Trump forever.

Trump and his followers will not win on a campaign of hate for everyone else who disagrees with them.
 
The polls clearly show that Trump is behind.

Nothing indicates he is making up ground with women, Hispanics, and millennials.

Then he pulls 'the judge hates me' nonsense, America shakes its collective head, and begins turning is back on Trump forever.

Trump and his followers will not win on a campaign of hate for everyone else who disagrees with them.

I agree, this is a great courtroom strategy, terrible political strategy. I don't think Trump understands politics, he understands business, law but not politics.
 
And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.
.
Not impossible, just not likely based on the facts available, he is of Mexican descent and there is precedent for Americans of XYZ nationality descent harboring sympathies for the country of their ancestors origin.

In any case, it appears that even Trump has given up on this idiotic crusade so you probably should too.

Really? When has a right winger ever let anything go? Right wingers are still whining about made up scandals from three decades ago.

Like Iran Contra and Yellowcake?


Those weren't made up. and I really don't hear much about either of those unless somebody brings the subject up.

:lmao:

You didn't get it, I knew you wouldn't. That's the point, when a scandal is made up by you, it lives on forever. When it's a liberal who actually does something wrong, get over it already!


The Iran Contra situation, and claims of yellow cake actually happened. It wasn't made up by anybody.
 
Not impossible, just not likely based on the facts available, he is of Mexican descent and there is precedent for Americans of XYZ nationality descent harboring sympathies for the country of their ancestors origin.

In any case, it appears that even Trump has given up on this idiotic crusade so you probably should too.

Really? When has a right winger ever let anything go? Right wingers are still whining about made up scandals from three decades ago.

Like Iran Contra and Yellowcake?


Those weren't made up. and I really don't hear much about either of those unless somebody brings the subject up.

:lmao:

You didn't get it, I knew you wouldn't. That's the point, when a scandal is made up by you, it lives on forever. When it's a liberal who actually does something wrong, get over it already!


The Iran Contra situation, and claims of yellow cake actually happened. It wasn't made up by anybody.

Yellowcake was the lamest, fabricated "scandal" in history. Even if you tried to believe it, it never made sense.

W said "the British reported" and the British stuck by it. How was there a scandal to start with?

Why would the administration send someone to investigate it's own leader?

Why would they send a long time partisan Democrat to do it?

How could he disprove a statement that he didn't know what evidence the statement was based on?

How are you harming someone for working for the CIA who told the media she worked for the CIA?

The whole thing made no sense even if you tried to swallow it. Yet you're still all over it.

And Iran Contra was based on an Unconstitutional law, the executive, not the legislative branch has jurisdiction over foreign policy.
 
.... Being born here doesn't mean shit. ........


It means he's a citizen. At least as much as the likes of you.

Which doesn't mean shit.


Not in your case, but he is a productive citizen and an important member of society.

Not if he is allowing his biases to affect his judgement.


And is he?



He has released sealed court documents at the request of lefty media to enable their smear machine.

IMO, yes.
 
Trump has now been warned privately that he will be publicly sanctioned if he keeps attacking Curiel in public.


Which does not mean that the judge is not biased.
It does not mean that he is biased.

It does mean that Trump certainly hurt his campaign with his attack on Curiel.


Nope. If Trump has been hurt by this, he has been hurt by the massive campaign of Lefties, who have been spending months screaming that HIspanics Hate Trump, calling Trump a racist for agreeing with them.
Trump has given his opponents the right to attack him for his unfounded and ill judged attacks on Hispanics generally and Curiel specifically.


No, he has not.

THe media has been lying about what he has said.

And all Trump did with that Judge, was agree with something you have been stating over and over again for months.
 
This judge literally risked his life for years going after drug smugglers.

Here's a thought. How do you people, or Trump for that matter, know the judge's position on border security?

That's Trump's bogus argument against this judge, which 1. is not grounds for recusal, and 2. may not even be true.

It's doubly stupid.


Physical bravery does not mean you are not personally biased against someone.

The Judge is a member of a pro-illegal immigrant organization.
No, he is not. You are confused as usual.

Yes, he is.
 
And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.
.
Not impossible, just not likely based on the facts available, he is of Mexican descent and there is precedent for Americans of XYZ nationality descent harboring sympathies for the country of their ancestors origin.

In any case, it appears that even Trump has given up on this idiotic crusade so you probably should too.

Why didn't Trump say he is of Mexican decent then? Why did he say something that was clearly not true?

Why would you want a president who can't even get his facts straight ever? I mean a few mistakes here and there is normal, but ALL THE FUCKING TIME?


Because he is talking like a real person.

EVERYONE knew what he meant.

Some lefties have just chosen to lie about it, so they can play pretend.
 
1. Trump allegedly being "racist" does not "prove" that the Judge is not biased against him. You lefties... You have one argument, don't you? Cry Racism.

.

When someone says a judge can't be fair because he's Mexican-American, how is that not racist?


Because, as the Left has been pointing out loudly and constantly over the past several months, "Hispanics hate Trump".


Really, all Trump is doing is agreeing with you.

So, what does that make you?

It makes me smarter than you because your argument is fucking retarded.


Touched a nerve did I?

My point is completely and obviously valid.

Do you dare respond to it?



Because, as the Left has been pointing out loudly and constantly over the past several months, "Hispanics hate Trump".


Really, all Trump is doing is agreeing with you.

So, what does that make you?

1. Is it your position that all Hispanics hate Trump?


Why should I answer your questions, if you do not answer mine?


the Left has been pointing out loudly and constantly over the past several months, "Hispanics hate Trump".


Really, all Trump is doing is agreeing with you.

So, what does that make you?
 
This judge literally risked his life for years going after drug smugglers.

Here's a thought. How do you people, or Trump for that matter, know the judge's position on border security?

That's Trump's bogus argument against this judge, which 1. is not grounds for recusal, and 2. may not even be true.

It's doubly stupid.


Physical bravery does not mean you are not personally biased against someone.

The Judge is a member of a pro-illegal immigrant organization.

That is not true.


Yes, it is.
 
This judge literally risked his life for years going after drug smugglers.

Here's a thought. How do you people, or Trump for that matter, know the judge's position on border security?

That's Trump's bogus argument against this judge, which 1. is not grounds for recusal, and 2. may not even be true.

It's doubly stupid.


Physical bravery does not mean you are not personally biased against someone.

The Judge is a member of a pro-illegal immigrant organization.

Disagreeing with a person on a political issue is not grounds for recusal. Pro-life judges on the Supreme Court don't have to recuse themselves when an abortion rights case comes before them.


Personally hating someone, like the Left has been saying that HIspanics do, is.
 
This judge literally risked his life for years going after drug smugglers.

Here's a thought. How do you people, or Trump for that matter, know the judge's position on border security?

That's Trump's bogus argument against this judge, which 1. is not grounds for recusal, and 2. may not even be true.

It's doubly stupid.


Physical bravery does not mean you are not personally biased against someone.

The Judge is a member of a pro-illegal immigrant organization.
No, he is not. You are confused as usual.

Yes, he is.

Then name the organization and post evidence that they support illegal immigration.
 
This judge literally risked his life for years going after drug smugglers.

Here's a thought. How do you people, or Trump for that matter, know the judge's position on border security?

That's Trump's bogus argument against this judge, which 1. is not grounds for recusal, and 2. may not even be true.

It's doubly stupid.


Physical bravery does not mean you are not personally biased against someone.

The Judge is a member of a pro-illegal immigrant organization.

Disagreeing with a person on a political issue is not grounds for recusal. Pro-life judges on the Supreme Court don't have to recuse themselves when an abortion rights case comes before them.


Personally hating someone, like the Left has been saying that HIspanics do, is.

So all Hispanics hate Trump? Prove it.
 
The polls clearly show that Trump is behind.

Nothing indicates he is making up ground with women, Hispanics, and millennials.

Then he pulls 'the judge hates me' nonsense, America shakes its collective head, and begins turning is back on Trump forever.

Trump and his followers will not win on a campaign of hate for everyone else who disagrees with them.



The Race Card and panic mongering works.

That is why you lefties do it.

That is what this "Scandal" is about.
 
This judge literally risked his life for years going after drug smugglers.

Here's a thought. How do you people, or Trump for that matter, know the judge's position on border security?

That's Trump's bogus argument against this judge, which 1. is not grounds for recusal, and 2. may not even be true.

It's doubly stupid.


Physical bravery does not mean you are not personally biased against someone.

The Judge is a member of a pro-illegal immigrant organization.

Disagreeing with a person on a political issue is not grounds for recusal. Pro-life judges on the Supreme Court don't have to recuse themselves when an abortion rights case comes before them.


Personally hating someone, like the Left has been saying that HIspanics do, is.

Setting aside that you're not making a coherent argument, who on the left says all Hispanics hate Trump?
 
This judge literally risked his life for years going after drug smugglers.

Here's a thought. How do you people, or Trump for that matter, know the judge's position on border security?

That's Trump's bogus argument against this judge, which 1. is not grounds for recusal, and 2. may not even be true.

It's doubly stupid.


Physical bravery does not mean you are not personally biased against someone.

The Judge is a member of a pro-illegal immigrant organization.
No, he is not. You are confused as usual.

Yes, he is.

Then name the organization and post evidence that they support illegal immigration.

Can't be bothered to take the time with such a dishonest lefty.
 
The polls clearly show that Trump is behind.

Nothing indicates he is making up ground with women, Hispanics, and millennials.

Then he pulls 'the judge hates me' nonsense, America shakes its collective head, and begins turning is back on Trump forever.

Trump and his followers will not win on a campaign of hate for everyone else who disagrees with them.



The Race Card and panic mongering works.

That is why you lefties do it.

That is what this "Scandal" is about.

Trump played the race card. He was the first to make any issue out of the Judge's race.
 
This judge literally risked his life for years going after drug smugglers.

Here's a thought. How do you people, or Trump for that matter, know the judge's position on border security?

That's Trump's bogus argument against this judge, which 1. is not grounds for recusal, and 2. may not even be true.

It's doubly stupid.


Physical bravery does not mean you are not personally biased against someone.

The Judge is a member of a pro-illegal immigrant organization.

Disagreeing with a person on a political issue is not grounds for recusal. Pro-life judges on the Supreme Court don't have to recuse themselves when an abortion rights case comes before them.


Personally hating someone, like the Left has been saying that HIspanics do, is.

So all Hispanics hate Trump? Prove it.


You aren't responding to my questions, why do you think I will respond to yours?
 

Forum List

Back
Top