No, the fact you leave out is accident versus premeditation.
If you dont understand the terms, perhaps its time to entertain looking them up.
Grass and babyshit are only really comparable in that theyre both green. Plugging your ears and going lalala to ignore their HUGE differences is intellectual dishonesty.
It would only be an accident if it was not premediated. He knew he could kill someone driving drunk and he did so. Thats why they convict people of murder now when they kill someone driving drunk. So your babyshit analogy while funny on its own merits doesnt hide how flawed your argument is.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/22/nyregion/murder-convictions-upheld-in-3-impaired-driving-cases.html?_r=0
"knew he COULD kill" does not equal premeditation.
Premeditation is planning on committing the act.
You have no proof he killed them on purpose.
Vick's is an obvious open and shut case for pre meditation.
The two cases are *NOT COMPARABLE.
It's disingenuous, it's unjust to do so, and it hurts whatever point or cause you're attempting to get across.
Credibility is important, especially if you're trying to change something. Comparing these two cases diminishes your credibility.