Missouri Lawmaker Brilliantly Proposes Bill To Regulate Guns Like Abortions

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2011
164,998
87,769
"If the appetite is for more and more reproductive restrictions, then it makes sense to apply those to gun purchases."

A Missouri lawmaker is introducing a bill that would subject gun buyers in the state to the same kind of restrictions that women face if they choose to have an abortion.

State Rep. Stacey Newman (D-St. Louis) has pre-filed a bill for the state legislature's 2016 session that would require buyers to wait 72 hours to make a gun purchase, which they would only be able to do at a store at least 120 miles from their home. Women in the state must wait 72 hours before they can get an abortion and the 120-mile restriction is intended to draw attention to the long distances that women must travel to have one.

Newman told The Huffington Post that since Missouri has one of the strictest abortion regulation states in the country, it makes sense to use similar restrictions to lower the high gun violence rates.

"If the appetite is for more and more reproductive restrictions, then it makes sense to apply those to gun purchases," she said.

"My colleagues leave me no choice, because all we hear about is pro-life, pro-life pro-life."

The bill would require gun buyers to undergo an evaluation and receive counseling from a physician about the risks associated with owning a gun. Women in Missouri must sign a consent form 72 hours before an abortion, be given a chance to look at an ultrasound of the baby and be informed about potential health hazards of the procedure, according to the Columbia Daily Tribune.

Under Newman's bill, the gun purchaser would be required to tour an emergency trauma center between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. on a weekend when firearms victims are present and meet with at least two families affected by gun violence as well as two people who have officiated the funerals of minors who were shot dead. The Washington Post reported in October that there had been more shootings by toddlers in Missouri than any other state.

More: Missouri Lawmaker Brilliantly Proposes Bill To Regulate Guns Like Abortions

This makes perfect sense to me! How could anyone who truly values life oppose such legislation? Does pro-life only apply to fetuses?
 
You call this brilliant? Merging two entirely unrelated issues is brilliant?

Conservative wingnuts say gay marriage will lead to man-dog marriage. Liberals complain that's a slippery slope fallacy. And they're right.

Here, liberal wingnuts want to slide gun regulation into abortion regulation. That's not just a slippery slope. That's a slippery galaxy.

The problem with our country is that too many people are trying to beat the other side in a competition of stupidity.

Please don't reproduce, whatever you do.
 
Protecting life should be important to everyone.

5661bd811b0000520129f3ac.jpg
 
Oh, so Lakoturd thinks that restricting someone's legitimate rights enshrined in the COTUS will make the sand in her vag feel better?


Idiot, too bad Sherman didn't wipe out the last of you neanderthals.


 
You call this brilliant? Merging two entirely unrelated issues is brilliant?

Conservative wingnuts say gay marriage will lead to man-dog marriage. Liberals complain that's a slippery slope fallacy. And they're right.

Here, liberal wingnuts want to slide gun regulation into abortion regulation. That's not just a slippery slope. That's a slippery galaxy.

The problem with our country is that too many people are trying to beat the other side in a competition of stupidity.

Please don't reproduce, whatever you do.
It's not merging the two, it's modeling one after the other
 
"If the appetite is for more and more reproductive restrictions, then it makes sense to apply those to gun purchases."

A Missouri lawmaker is introducing a bill that would subject gun buyers in the state to the same kind of restrictions that women face if they choose to have an abortion.

State Rep. Stacey Newman (D-St. Louis) has pre-filed a bill for the state legislature's 2016 session that would require buyers to wait 72 hours to make a gun purchase, which they would only be able to do at a store at least 120 miles from their home. Women in the state must wait 72 hours before they can get an abortion and the 120-mile restriction is intended to draw attention to the long distances that women must travel to have one.

Newman told The Huffington Post that since Missouri has one of the strictest abortion regulation states in the country, it makes sense to use similar restrictions to lower the high gun violence rates.

"If the appetite is for more and more reproductive restrictions, then it makes sense to apply those to gun purchases," she said.

"My colleagues leave me no choice, because all we hear about is pro-life, pro-life pro-life."

The bill would require gun buyers to undergo an evaluation and receive counseling from a physician about the risks associated with owning a gun. Women in Missouri must sign a consent form 72 hours before an abortion, be given a chance to look at an ultrasound of the baby and be informed about potential health hazards of the procedure, according to the Columbia Daily Tribune.

Under Newman's bill, the gun purchaser would be required to tour an emergency trauma center between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. on a weekend when firearms victims are present and meet with at least two families affected by gun violence as well as two people who have officiated the funerals of minors who were shot dead. The Washington Post reported in October that there had been more shootings by toddlers in Missouri than any other state.

More: Missouri Lawmaker Brilliantly Proposes Bill To Regulate Guns Like Abortions

This makes perfect sense to me! How could anyone who truly values life oppose such legislation? Does pro-life only apply to fetuses?

Unconstitutional.
 
nonsense...tying gun ownership to The bill would require gun buyers to undergo an evaluation and receive counseling from a physician about the risks associated with owning a gun.

so..is this "doctor" a licensed firearm holder?

Has this "doctor" been properly instructed in the use and care of firearms?

Has he taken a course on gun safety?

Who taught the course?

How were they determined to be "qualified"?

What if the doctor makes a mistake one way or the other?..can he be sued for malpractice?

Isn't doctor-patient information confidential?

You want to open it up to gvt inspection? Who will determine what is "confidential", then, the government?

What about swimming pools? more kids drown in pools than are shot to death...should "doctors" be allowed to monitor which patients have pools and if they're using them "safely"?

Bicycles? more kids are killed on bikes than...etc..etc...should doctors be allowed to monitor and report people they don't think are using bicycles correctly?

it's a boondoggle of unenforceable feelgood nonsense by people with a political interest in an anti-gun agenda.
 
You call this brilliant? Merging two entirely unrelated issues is brilliant?

Conservative wingnuts say gay marriage will lead to man-dog marriage. Liberals complain that's a slippery slope fallacy. And they're right.

Here, liberal wingnuts want to slide gun regulation into abortion regulation. That's not just a slippery slope. That's a slippery galaxy.

The problem with our country is that too many people are trying to beat the other side in a competition of stupidity.

Please don't reproduce, whatever you do.
While it may be tongue-in-cheek, or perhaps NOT, there's not a thing wrong with demanding the same restrictions, tests and hoops of gun buyers. Its purpose is to put a bullet through something.
 
"If the appetite is for more and more reproductive restrictions, then it makes sense to apply those to gun purchases."

A Missouri lawmaker is introducing a bill that would subject gun buyers in the state to the same kind of restrictions that women face if they choose to have an abortion.

State Rep. Stacey Newman (D-St. Louis) has pre-filed a bill for the state legislature's 2016 session that would require buyers to wait 72 hours to make a gun purchase, which they would only be able to do at a store at least 120 miles from their home. Women in the state must wait 72 hours before they can get an abortion and the 120-mile restriction is intended to draw attention to the long distances that women must travel to have one.

Newman told The Huffington Post that since Missouri has one of the strictest abortion regulation states in the country, it makes sense to use similar restrictions to lower the high gun violence rates.

"If the appetite is for more and more reproductive restrictions, then it makes sense to apply those to gun purchases," she said.

"My colleagues leave me no choice, because all we hear about is pro-life, pro-life pro-life."

The bill would require gun buyers to undergo an evaluation and receive counseling from a physician about the risks associated with owning a gun. Women in Missouri must sign a consent form 72 hours before an abortion, be given a chance to look at an ultrasound of the baby and be informed about potential health hazards of the procedure, according to the Columbia Daily Tribune.

Under Newman's bill, the gun purchaser would be required to tour an emergency trauma center between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. on a weekend when firearms victims are present and meet with at least two families affected by gun violence as well as two people who have officiated the funerals of minors who were shot dead. The Washington Post reported in October that there had been more shootings by toddlers in Missouri than any other state.

More: Missouri Lawmaker Brilliantly Proposes Bill To Regulate Guns Like Abortions

This makes perfect sense to me! How could anyone who truly values life oppose such legislation? Does pro-life only apply to fetuses?

Unconstitutional.
How so? And since when have you cared about the Constitution?
 
nonsense...tying gun ownership to The bill would require gun buyers to undergo an evaluation and receive counseling from a physician about the risks associated with owning a gun.

so..is this "doctor" a licensed firearm holder?

Has this "doctor" been properly instructed in the use and care of firearms?

Has he taken a course on gun safety?

Who taught the course?

How were they determined to be "qualified"?

What if the doctor makes a mistake one way or the other?..can he be sued for malpractice?

Isn't doctor-patient information confidential?

You want to open it up to gvt inspection? Who will determine what is "confidential", then, the government?

What about swimming pools? more kids drown in pools than are shot to death...should "doctors" be allowed to monitor which patients have pools and if they're using them "safely"?

Bicycles? more kids are killed on bikes than...etc..etc...should doctors be allowed to monitor and report people they don't think are using bicycles correctly?

it's a boondoggle of unenforceable feelgood nonsense by people with a political interest in an anti-gun agenda.
Yes, yes, we understand kids die in pools and cars and buckets. As I've said before, none of those things were designed to put a bullet through someone. How far are you going to take this "counter argument"? Rocks kill children, too. Won't someone please make the argument that rocks need to be outlawed so we can get that nonsense out of the way and move on to rational thinking? I've never suggested outlawing guns. I have strongly urged that we have more and better background checks even if they only save a few lives. Someone will give us the numbers again on how many people are killed by guns, the mentally ill, ISIS or accidents as if that will convince us a few lives are too few to bother with.
 

Forum List

Back
Top