Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, you are admitting that you are totally ignorant about this tax break, and don't even know if they are getting it or not?I'm asking you is it true that they are getting a tax break? Yes or no?I'm saying you should tell me what break they're getting.
Then we can discuss it.
Assuming you can ever find the break they're getting.......
I hear all the libs talking about it, so it must be true.
Because they never lie.
I'm still waiting for one to tell me what the break actually is.
Will you be the first?
An American who does not know their history (public school again)
Actually, income tax had to be put into the Constitution by The 16th amendment.
It was not "ruled", as you say.
Actually, direct tax by the Feds was ruled unconstitutional in Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. (1895)
Our founding fathers had put limits on the Federal gov't and direct taxes on the people
Wonder why that would be?
As such, the gov't had to change the Constitution to collect tax
Also, there is no requirement in the amendment for it to be progressive.
The gov't could make it flat, if it wanted to
Who gives a fuck if it was included by the founding fathers? It's a Constitutional amendment, that has been ruled Constitutional by the SCOTUS.
Sucks for you, loser!
Indeed
the Left does tend to find the Constitution inconvenient at times
You're attacking the tax break and you don't even know what it is? LOL!So, you are admitting that you are totally ignorant about this tax break, and don't even know if they are getting it or not?I'm asking you is it true that they are getting a tax break? Yes or no?
I hear all the libs talking about it, so it must be true.
Because they never lie.
I'm still waiting for one to tell me what the break actually is.
Will you be the first?
Then why the fuck are you discussing it? Go learn, then come back when you know what you are talking about. I'm not your civics teacher.
I'll help you.You're attacking the tax break and you don't even know what it is? LOL!So, you are admitting that you are totally ignorant about this tax break, and don't even know if they are getting it or not?I hear all the libs talking about it, so it must be true.
Because they never lie.
I'm still waiting for one to tell me what the break actually is.
Will you be the first?
Then why the fuck are you discussing it? Go learn, then come back when you know what you are talking about. I'm not your civics teacher.
Be sure to let me know if you ever find out.
I'll wait.
Thanks for helping Synth.I'll help you.You're attacking the tax break and you don't even know what it is? LOL!So, you are admitting that you are totally ignorant about this tax break, and don't even know if they are getting it or not?
Then why the fuck are you discussing it? Go learn, then come back when you know what you are talking about. I'm not your civics teacher.
Be sure to let me know if you ever find out.
I'll wait.
It's Bush's "Bonus Depreciation."
He knows the numbers, it's you who knows nothing.Thanks for helping Synth.I'll help you.You're attacking the tax break and you don't even know what it is? LOL!
Be sure to let me know if you ever find out.
I'll wait.
It's Bush's "Bonus Depreciation."
Now help him with the actual numbers.
Who gives a fuck if it was included by the founding fathers? It's a Constitutional amendment, that has been ruled Constitutional by the SCOTUS.
Sucks for you, loser!
Indeed
the Left does tend to find the Constitution inconvenient at times
I find nothing inconvenient about progressive taxation.
You lose again!
American stupidity has nothing to do with public schools, as I have already said.
An American who does not know their history (public school again)
Actually, income tax had to be put into the Constitution by The 16th amendment.
It was not "ruled", as you say.
Actually, direct tax by the Feds was ruled unconstitutional in Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. (1895)
Our founding fathers had put limits on the Federal gov't and direct taxes on the people
Wonder why that would be?
As such, the gov't had to change the Constitution to collect tax
Also, there is no requirement in the amendment for it to be progressive.
The gov't could make it flat, if it wanted to
Who gives a fuck if it was included by the founding fathers? It's a Constitutional amendment, that has been ruled Constitutional by the SCOTUS.
Sucks for you, loser!
Indeed the Left does tend to find the Constitution inconvenient at times
snipped for nonsense![/SIZE]American stupidity has nothing to do with public schools, as I have already said.
If he knows the numbers, he could post them, instead of whining like a little bitch.He knows the numbers, it's you who knows nothing.Thanks for helping Synth.I'll help you.
It's Bush's "Bonus Depreciation."
Now help him with the actual numbers.
Powered by Google Docs
Aircraft Incentives and Pitfalls of the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008
Highlights of Legislation that Affect the Aircraft Industry
By Victor Anvick - Private / Instrument Pilot
Aviation Tax Specialist
President George Bush signs HR 5140 - the Economic
Stimulus Act of 2008 - into law in the East Room of the
White House.
On Feb 13, 2008, President Bush signed the Economic
Stimulus Act of 2008 into law. For the aircraft industry, the
act provides a revival of the 50% bonus depreciation
allowance as well as an enhanced expensing election under
Internal Revenue Code, IRC § 179.
Those aircraft used predominantly in Part 91 operations qualify for 5-year MACRS as long as the business use is over 50%.
Yes, and thank you for proving you know nothing. If you were going to object to something it should have been the 50% first year depreciation. Not only did the GOP get the 5 year depreciation restored in the 2010 Tax Relief Act negotiations, they got the 50% upped to 100%. These changes expire on Jan 1, 2012.If he knows the numbers, he could post them, instead of whining like a little bitch.He knows the numbers, it's you who knows nothing.Thanks for helping Synth.
Now help him with the actual numbers.
Powered by Google Docs
Aircraft Incentives and Pitfalls of the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008
Highlights of Legislation that Affect the Aircraft Industry
By Victor Anvick - Private / Instrument Pilot
Aviation Tax Specialist
President George Bush signs HR 5140 - the Economic
Stimulus Act of 2008 - into law in the East Room of the
White House.
On Feb 13, 2008, President Bush signed the Economic
Stimulus Act of 2008 into law. For the aircraft industry, the
act provides a revival of the 50% bonus depreciation
allowance as well as an enhanced expensing election under
Internal Revenue Code, IRC § 179.
Those aircraft used predominantly in Part 91 operations qualify for 5-year MACRS as long as the business use is over 50%.
The current number is 5 years? Are you sure? Maybe Synth can help you?
Yes, and thank you for proving you know nothing. If you were going to object to something it should have been the 50% first year depreciation. Not only did the GOP get the 5 year depreciation restored in the 2010 Tax Relief Act negotiations, they got the 50% upped to 100%. These changes expire on Jan 1, 2012.If he knows the numbers, he could post them, instead of whining like a little bitch.He knows the numbers, it's you who knows nothing.
Powered by Google Docs
Aircraft Incentives and Pitfalls of the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008
Highlights of Legislation that Affect the Aircraft Industry
By Victor Anvick - Private / Instrument Pilot
Aviation Tax Specialist
President George Bush signs HR 5140 - the Economic
Stimulus Act of 2008 - into law in the East Room of the
White House.
On Feb 13, 2008, President Bush signed the Economic
Stimulus Act of 2008 into law. For the aircraft industry, the
act provides a revival of the 50% bonus depreciation
allowance as well as an enhanced expensing election under
Internal Revenue Code, IRC § 179.
Those aircraft used predominantly in Part 91 operations qualify for 5-year MACRS as long as the business use is over 50%.
The current number is 5 years? Are you sure? Maybe Synth can help you?
The law already applies to heavy equipment, not just jets.Yes, and thank you for proving you know nothing. If you were going to object to something it should have been the 50% first year depreciation. Not only did the GOP get the 5 year depreciation restored in the 2010 Tax Relief Act negotiations, they got the 50% upped to 100%. These changes expire on Jan 1, 2012.If he knows the numbers, he could post them, instead of whining like a little bitch.
The current number is 5 years? Are you sure? Maybe Synth can help you?
Not only did the GOP get the 5 year depreciation restored in the 2010 Tax Relief Act negotiations, they got the 50% upped to 100%
Yeah, 100% depreciation means it's 1 year, not 5 years.
Thanks for proving you knew nothing.
At least you know now.
I think we need to remove this unfair tax advantage by allowing all companies to write off all equipment 100% immediately.
Where is the outrage over these cuts?!
Cuts in US welfare programs hit hundreds of thousands of poor families
By James Brewer
30 May 2011
US states are implementing drastic cuts to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program, creating further hardships for 700,000 families that include 1.3 million children. The slashing of funding for TANF, the welfare program financed by block grants to states from the federal government, is part of an overall attack on all social programs in the US.
Cuts in US welfare programs hit hundreds of thousands of poor families
