More fake news by Rachel Maddow & MSNBC

[Hutch Starskey]

It doesn't pass the smell test that Putin preferred Trump over Hillary. Hillary was going to continue the Obama course, weakening the US military and reducing our presence around the world. She is also famous for the failed "reset" button, while Trump openly and repeatedly vowed to strengthen the US military. Which would a Putin prefer?

I think that Putin had dirt on everybody, and was spreading it around all over the place, trying to gain leverage over whomever won the election. One remembers questionable (read fake) garbage spewed about Trump as well as HIllary during the campaign.

It doesn't pass the smell test that Putin preferred Trump over Hillary.

You don't pass the intelligence test.
Logically, in working to diminish Clinton, the Russians were also working to help Trump. If they didn't prefer Trump, then why target Clinton?

 

[hadit]

It doesn't pass the smell test that Putin preferred Trump over Hillary. Hillary was going to continue the Obama course, weakening the US military and reducing our presence around the world. She is also famous for the failed "reset" button, while Trump openly and repeatedly vowed to strengthen the US military. Which would a Putin prefer?

I think that Putin had dirt on everybody, and was spreading it around all over the place, trying to gain leverage over whomever won the election. One remembers questionable (read fake) garbage spewed about Trump as well as HIllary during the campaign.

It doesn't pass the smell test that Putin preferred Trump over Hillary.

You don't pass the intelligence test.
Logically, in working to diminish Clinton, the Russians were also working to help Trump. If they didn't prefer Trump, then why target Clinton?

To gain leverage with what they held back. Again, why favor a candidate that is going to strengthen the military over one that will weaken it?

 

[AntonToo]

Your are a cluless fabricator.

I mean seriously, how stupid do you have to be to think that all conversations were recorded of people who where not even targets

The MSM, where libs get all their information, is flaming about Trump and Russian collusion and nothing is said about Obama surveilling the Trump team.

Lib Think:
1. Trump colluded with Russia to steal the election (no proof required, just lots of MSM reporting suffices)
2. Obama surveilling Trump...that is so funny...the Great Obama would never do that. No MSM reporting means it is a non-story.

The making of dupes.

How many fucking times, in how many different fucking ways do you need to be told by Democrats, by Republicans and by FBI that there was no improper surveillance?

There is NO SUCH CLAIM BY ANYONE, except Trump himself.

Nunes allegations are of improper UNMASKING, not SURVEILLANCE itself. Learn it, stop spreading falsehoods.

Trump got his balls in the vice and is screaming "LOOK SQUIRELLL!!" and all the Trumpster dumabasses run on off to chase the squirrels.

Another NPR listener.

Another non-reply from a dumbass.

Is this fake news?
Intelligence official who 'unmasked' Trump associates is 'very high up,' source says

Did you know that Alger Hiss was NOT a Soviet spy?
Did you know that Billy BJ Clinton NEVER had sex with that woman Monica?
Did you know that Obama would never surveil Trump, but he did surveil everyone else?

...you just conceded I'm correct - UNMASKING IS NOT AN ACT OF SURVEILLANCE.

Get it dumbass? You can stop deflecting now.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It doesn't pass the smell test that Putin preferred Trump over Hillary. Hillary was going to continue the Obama course, weakening the US military and reducing our presence around the world. She is also famous for the failed "reset" button, while Trump openly and repeatedly vowed to strengthen the US military. Which would a Putin prefer?

I think that Putin had dirt on everybody, and was spreading it around all over the place, trying to gain leverage over whomever won the election. One remembers questionable (read fake) garbage spewed about Trump as well as HIllary during the campaign.

It doesn't pass the smell test that Putin preferred Trump over Hillary.

You don't pass the intelligence test.
Logically, in working to diminish Clinton, the Russians were also working to help Trump. If they didn't prefer Trump, then why target Clinton?

To gain leverage with what they held back. Again, why favor a candidate that is going to strengthen the military over one that will weaken it?

Neither of us can speak to Putin's motives in making his choice but it is clear that they preferred Trump. In a two person race, you can't trip up one without helping the other. They meant to help Trump.

 

[hadit]

It doesn't pass the smell test that Putin preferred Trump over Hillary. Hillary was going to continue the Obama course, weakening the US military and reducing our presence around the world. She is also famous for the failed "reset" button, while Trump openly and repeatedly vowed to strengthen the US military. Which would a Putin prefer?

I think that Putin had dirt on everybody, and was spreading it around all over the place, trying to gain leverage over whomever won the election. One remembers questionable (read fake) garbage spewed about Trump as well as HIllary during the campaign.

It doesn't pass the smell test that Putin preferred Trump over Hillary.

You don't pass the intelligence test.
Logically, in working to diminish Clinton, the Russians were also working to help Trump. If they didn't prefer Trump, then why target Clinton?

To gain leverage with what they held back. Again, why favor a candidate that is going to strengthen the military over one that will weaken it?

Neither of us can speak to Putin's motives in making his choice but it is clear that they preferred Trump. In a two person race, you can't trip up one without helping the other. They meant to help Trump.

Or maybe they just wanted to sow as much discord and confusion as possible to weaken the resulting administration, whomever won. If so, it's worked magnificently.

 

[sealybobo]

Swithching channels and only 2 seconds in the tabloid news MSNBC has blatant statements by Maddow that are known lies.
She states as fact that Russia specifically wanted Trump to win the election, however her statement is not known or even possible.
None of the supposed Russia involvements coincide with knowing the outcome of the Republican party nomination, in fact it is a known fact nobody including Hillary thought Donald would win the Republican nomination. If Putin wanted to meddle because he hated Hillary, then at that time it would have been to help Bernie who Putin would favor as soft, dovish, socialist leaning, and easy to pushover. However Clintons cheating and breaking the law allowed her to steal the Democrat nomination away from Bernie. To claim Putin wanted Trump to win before anyone knew he was the candidate is typical time line confused fake news by MSNBC. Were was her commentary on Obama wanting Netanyahu's
opponent to win, so much so that he sent his campaign expert to interfere with Israeli elections? Now that is a clear slam dunk case of meddling.....not a word from Maddow about REAL MEDDLING.
Conclusion: sensationalism buys tabloids but in viewership makes people click to another channel after 5 seconds of fake news insulting their intelligence as well as the fact people don't like teacher like lectures as news, it reminds them of mean teachers in school subjecting them to personal views that weren't their own.

Russia not wanting Hillary is not fake news it's fact dumb shit.

And Russia and Breitbart were the ones dumping the fake news. Fox too. Trump exposed fox for their lies when he tweeted news he heard from them. You dumb fucks eat up fake news

See and yet you listed 0 of them, because you just stated propaganda and where did you hear that from that you repeat like a parrot? From Tabloid TV, MSNBC & CNN the same network that Brought you imaginary exclusives like "historical Jesus", fake news about
the James Osury, FAKE news about the shroud of Turin.
I bet you get your history from the history channel too.

None of these topics is important. Just like Hillary being under fire, Warren being an Indian and Monica weren't important lies. Not even conspiring with Russia is that big of a deal. But lying us into Iraq was bad

She did the right thing, right? So then why did you hold it against her?

If Donald Trump Is So Upset About Iraq WMD Lies, Why Would He Want to Hire John Bolton?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It doesn't pass the smell test that Putin preferred Trump over Hillary. Hillary was going to continue the Obama course, weakening the US military and reducing our presence around the world. She is also famous for the failed "reset" button, while Trump openly and repeatedly vowed to strengthen the US military. Which would a Putin prefer?

I think that Putin had dirt on everybody, and was spreading it around all over the place, trying to gain leverage over whomever won the election. One remembers questionable (read fake) garbage spewed about Trump as well as HIllary during the campaign.

It doesn't pass the smell test that Putin preferred Trump over Hillary.

You don't pass the intelligence test.
Logically, in working to diminish Clinton, the Russians were also working to help Trump. If they didn't prefer Trump, then why target Clinton?

To gain leverage with what they held back. Again, why favor a candidate that is going to strengthen the military over one that will weaken it?

Neither of us can speak to Putin's motives in making his choice but it is clear that they preferred Trump. In a two person race, you can't trip up one without helping the other. They meant to help Trump.

Or maybe they just wanted to sow as much discord and confusion as possible to weaken the resulting administration, whomever won. If so, it's worked magnificently.

Comey and Rogers both testified to this point.

Comey stands by U.S. intelligence assessment that Putin wanted Trump to win election

 

[BULLDOG]

All Russian Communications With The Trump Team Were Recorded.

Nothing was found. No charges, No indictments or even talk of it by any of those theee agencies.

The Investigation really in the end will center On Criminal Activity by Obama and Clinton.

Do you ever read your own words?
Plenty of Russian connection claims by conspiracy quacks, yet FBI, CIA, NSA and the investigative comittee say there are no found links.
"plenty claims, no links" Your words exactly.
*L*

Your are a cluless fabricator.

I mean seriously, how stupid do you have to be to think that all conversations were recorded of people who where not even targets

The MSM, where libs get all their information, is flaming about Trump and Russian collusion and nothing is said about Obama surveilling the Trump team.

Lib Think:
1. Trump colluded with Russia to steal the election (no proof required, just lots of MSM reporting suffices)
2. Obama surveilling Trump...that is so funny...the Great Obama would never do that. No MSM reporting means it is a non-story.

The making of dupes.

How many fucking times, in how many different fucking ways do you need to be told by Democrats, by Republicans and by FBI that there was no improper surveillance?

There is NO SUCH CLAIM BY ANYONE, except Trump himself.

Nunes allegations are of improper UNMASKING, not SURVEILLANCE itself. Learn it, stop spreading falsehoods.

Trump got his balls in the vice and is screaming "LOOK SQUIRELLL!!" and all the Trumpster dumabasses run on off to chase the squirrels.

Another NPR listener.

You could be right, even though there are plenty of other places that information is available. Unfortunately, most of the sources you might accept, such as fox or Alex Jones prefer to spread the lie that there was improper surveillance.

 

[gipper]

All Russian Communications With The Trump Team Were Recorded.

Nothing was found. No charges, No indictments or even talk of it by any of those theee agencies.

The Investigation really in the end will center On Criminal Activity by Obama and Clinton.

Your are a cluless fabricator.

I mean seriously, how stupid do you have to be to think that all conversations were recorded of people who where not even targets

The MSM, where libs get all their information, is flaming about Trump and Russian collusion and nothing is said about Obama surveilling the Trump team.

Lib Think:
1. Trump colluded with Russia to steal the election (no proof required, just lots of MSM reporting suffices)
2. Obama surveilling Trump...that is so funny...the Great Obama would never do that. No MSM reporting means it is a non-story.

The making of dupes.

How many fucking times, in how many different fucking ways do you need to be told by Democrats, by Republicans and by FBI that there was no improper surveillance?

There is NO SUCH CLAIM BY ANYONE, except Trump himself.

Nunes allegations are of improper UNMASKING, not SURVEILLANCE itself. Learn it, stop spreading falsehoods.

Trump got his balls in the vice and is screaming "LOOK SQUIRELLL!!" and all the Trumpster dumabasses run on off to chase the squirrels.

Another NPR listener.

You could be right, even though there are plenty of other places that information is available. Unfortunately, most of the sources you might accept, such as fox or Alex Jones prefer to spread the lie that there was improper surveillance.

Are you still clinging to the fallacy that Trump was NOT surveilled by Big Ears?

 

[BULLDOG]

Your are a cluless fabricator.

I mean seriously, how stupid do you have to be to think that all conversations were recorded of people who where not even targets

The MSM, where libs get all their information, is flaming about Trump and Russian collusion and nothing is said about Obama surveilling the Trump team.

Lib Think:
1. Trump colluded with Russia to steal the election (no proof required, just lots of MSM reporting suffices)
2. Obama surveilling Trump...that is so funny...the Great Obama would never do that. No MSM reporting means it is a non-story.

The making of dupes.

How many fucking times, in how many different fucking ways do you need to be told by Democrats, by Republicans and by FBI that there was no improper surveillance?

There is NO SUCH CLAIM BY ANYONE, except Trump himself.

Nunes allegations are of improper UNMASKING, not SURVEILLANCE itself. Learn it, stop spreading falsehoods.

Trump got his balls in the vice and is screaming "LOOK SQUIRELLL!!" and all the Trumpster dumabasses run on off to chase the squirrels.

Another NPR listener.

You could be right, even though there are plenty of other places that information is available. Unfortunately, most of the sources you might accept, such as fox or Alex Jones prefer to spread the lie that there was improper surveillance.

Are you still clinging to the fallacy that Trump was NOT surveilled by Big Ears?

Are you still clinging to the fallacy that that obese orange clown was improperly surveilled, or that Obama ordered any specific surveillance?

 

[gipper]

The MSM, where libs get all their information, is flaming about Trump and Russian collusion and nothing is said about Obama surveilling the Trump team.

Lib Think:
1. Trump colluded with Russia to steal the election (no proof required, just lots of MSM reporting suffices)
2. Obama surveilling Trump...that is so funny...the Great Obama would never do that. No MSM reporting means it is a non-story.

The making of dupes.

How many fucking times, in how many different fucking ways do you need to be told by Democrats, by Republicans and by FBI that there was no improper surveillance?

There is NO SUCH CLAIM BY ANYONE, except Trump himself.

Nunes allegations are of improper UNMASKING, not SURVEILLANCE itself. Learn it, stop spreading falsehoods.

Trump got his balls in the vice and is screaming "LOOK SQUIRELLL!!" and all the Trumpster dumabasses run on off to chase the squirrels.

Another NPR listener.

You could be right, even though there are plenty of other places that information is available. Unfortunately, most of the sources you might accept, such as fox or Alex Jones prefer to spread the lie that there was improper surveillance.

Are you still clinging to the fallacy that Trump was NOT surveilled by Big Ears?

Are you still clinging to the fallacy that that obese orange clown was improperly surveilled, or that Obama ordered any specific surveillance?

Trump was improperly surveilled. We may find out if your Messiah was complicit. Will you still love him if he was??

 

[easyt65]

Her increased popularity is proportional to the increased level of snowflake delusion and denial...

 

[HaShev]

It doesn't pass the smell test that Putin preferred Trump over Hillary. Hillary was going to continue the Obama course, weakening the US military and reducing our presence around the world. She is also famous for the failed "reset" button, while Trump openly and repeatedly vowed to strengthen the US military. Which would a Putin prefer?

I think that Putin had dirt on everybody, and was spreading it around all over the place, trying to gain leverage over whomever won the election. One remembers questionable (read fake) garbage spewed about Trump as well as HIllary during the campaign.

It doesn't pass the smell test that Putin preferred Trump over Hillary.

You don't pass the intelligence test.
Logically, in working to diminish Clinton, the Russians were also working to help Trump. If they didn't prefer Trump, then why target Clinton?

The basis of this post was:
How can they prefer a candidate that
nobody at that time thought was gonna win their party nomination?
WHY would they support the capitalist over the socialists?
You assume who hacked, you assume why countries would hack and how they use the info. Making your own correlations & narative is what Gutfeld mocked Maddow for doing. I mocked it by saying you are playing a giant game of 6 degrees of Kevin Bacon using Putin instead of the actor.
I even proved how silly it was as I myself brought the degrees of seperation I have to Putin from 5 to as low as 3 now.
5 through Obama and Hillary being 4 degrees
but it's actually 3 because I forgot I did work for then D.A. Ed Rendell who is seperated
by 1 to Hillary who is 1 seperation to Putin=3 degrees seperation to Putin.
Come on you try it, who do you know who knows Obama and Hillary or Schumer all 1 degrees seperation from Putin?

 

[blastoff]

It's madcow, did anyone really expect journalism from this so called woman?

To be fair she's no more a journalist than Hannity

Hannity makes no such claim, but I don't know about Ritchie.

 

[BULLDOG]

How many fucking times, in how many different fucking ways do you need to be told by Democrats, by Republicans and by FBI that there was no improper surveillance?

There is NO SUCH CLAIM BY ANYONE, except Trump himself.

Nunes allegations are of improper UNMASKING, not SURVEILLANCE itself. Learn it, stop spreading falsehoods.

Trump got his balls in the vice and is screaming "LOOK SQUIRELLL!!" and all the Trumpster dumabasses run on off to chase the squirrels.

Another NPR listener.

You could be right, even though there are plenty of other places that information is available. Unfortunately, most of the sources you might accept, such as fox or Alex Jones prefer to spread the lie that there was improper surveillance.

Are you still clinging to the fallacy that Trump was NOT surveilled by Big Ears?

Are you still clinging to the fallacy that that obese orange clown was improperly surveilled, or that Obama ordered any specific surveillance?

Trump was improperly surveilled. We may find out if your Messiah was complicit. Will you still love him if he was??

Proof that he was improperly surveilled?

 

[westwall]

The MSM, where libs get all their information, is flaming about Trump and Russian collusion and nothing is said about Obama surveilling the Trump team.

Lib Think:
1. Trump colluded with Russia to steal the election (no proof required, just lots of MSM reporting suffices)
2. Obama surveilling Trump...that is so funny...the Great Obama would never do that. No MSM reporting means it is a non-story.

The making of dupes.

How many fucking times, in how many different fucking ways do you need to be told by Democrats, by Republicans and by FBI that there was no improper surveillance?

There is NO SUCH CLAIM BY ANYONE, except Trump himself.

Nunes allegations are of improper UNMASKING, not SURVEILLANCE itself. Learn it, stop spreading falsehoods.

Trump got his balls in the vice and is screaming "LOOK SQUIRELLL!!" and all the Trumpster dumabasses run on off to chase the squirrels.

Another NPR listener.

Another non-reply from a dumbass.

Is this fake news?
Intelligence official who 'unmasked' Trump associates is 'very high up,' source says

Did you know that Alger Hiss was NOT a Soviet spy?
Did you know that Billy BJ Clinton NEVER had sex with that woman Monica?
Did you know that Obama would never surveil Trump, but he did surveil everyone else?

...you just conceded I'm correct - UNMASKING IS NOT AN ACT OF SURVEILLANCE.

Get it dumbass? You can stop deflecting now.

Unmasking is a PRODUCT of surveillance. Are you so stupid that you don't understand that?

 

[AntonToo]

How many fucking times, in how many different fucking ways do you need to be told by Democrats, by Republicans and by FBI that there was no improper surveillance?

There is NO SUCH CLAIM BY ANYONE, except Trump himself.

Nunes allegations are of improper UNMASKING, not SURVEILLANCE itself. Learn it, stop spreading falsehoods.

Trump got his balls in the vice and is screaming "LOOK SQUIRELLL!!" and all the Trumpster dumabasses run on off to chase the squirrels.

Another NPR listener.

Another non-reply from a dumbass.

Is this fake news?
Intelligence official who 'unmasked' Trump associates is 'very high up,' source says

Did you know that Alger Hiss was NOT a Soviet spy?
Did you know that Billy BJ Clinton NEVER had sex with that woman Monica?
Did you know that Obama would never surveil Trump, but he did surveil everyone else?

...you just conceded I'm correct - UNMASKING IS NOT AN ACT OF SURVEILLANCE.

Get it dumbass? You can stop deflecting now.

Unmasking is a PRODUCT of surveillance. Are you so stupid that you don't understand that?

Lol, you are leaving off a crucial word: LEGAL surveillance.

 

[westwall]

Another NPR listener.

You could be right, even though there are plenty of other places that information is available. Unfortunately, most of the sources you might accept, such as fox or Alex Jones prefer to spread the lie that there was improper surveillance.

Are you still clinging to the fallacy that Trump was NOT surveilled by Big Ears?

Are you still clinging to the fallacy that that obese orange clown was improperly surveilled, or that Obama ordered any specific surveillance?

Trump was improperly surveilled. We may find out if your Messiah was complicit. Will you still love him if he was??

Proof that he was improperly surveilled?

The proof is that he was. There was no reason for him to be surveilled. And rice's now exposed complicity also brings your hero obummer into the loop. That whole house of cards is going to be collapsing. What are you going to do when his criminal acts are finally exposed?

 

[westwall]

Another NPR listener.

Another non-reply from a dumbass.

Is this fake news?
Intelligence official who 'unmasked' Trump associates is 'very high up,' source says

Did you know that Alger Hiss was NOT a Soviet spy?
Did you know that Billy BJ Clinton NEVER had sex with that woman Monica?
Did you know that Obama would never surveil Trump, but he did surveil everyone else?

...you just conceded I'm correct - UNMASKING IS NOT AN ACT OF SURVEILLANCE.

Get it dumbass? You can stop deflecting now.

Unmasking is a PRODUCT of surveillance. Are you so stupid that you don't understand that?

Lol, you are leaving off a crucial word: LEGAL survailance

There was no legal surveillance. That's the whole point.

 

[AntonToo]

Another non-reply from a dumbass.

Is this fake news?
Intelligence official who 'unmasked' Trump associates is 'very high up,' source says

Did you know that Alger Hiss was NOT a Soviet spy?
Did you know that Billy BJ Clinton NEVER had sex with that woman Monica?
Did you know that Obama would never surveil Trump, but he did surveil everyone else?

...you just conceded I'm correct - UNMASKING IS NOT AN ACT OF SURVEILLANCE.

Get it dumbass? You can stop deflecting now.

Unmasking is a PRODUCT of surveillance. Are you so stupid that you don't understand that?

Lol, you are leaving off a crucial word: LEGAL survailance

There was no legal surveillance. That's the whole point.

No one knows wtf you are trying to say. OF COURSE there is legal surveillance.

Nunes specifically said that he didn't see anything illegal as far as the surveillance.