Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is this fake news?
Intelligence official who 'unmasked' Trump associates is 'very high up,' source says
Did you know that Alger Hiss was NOT a Soviet spy?
Did you know that Billy BJ Clinton NEVER had sex with that woman Monica?
Did you know that Obama would never surveil Trump, but he did surveil everyone else?
...you just conceded I'm correct - UNMASKING IS NOT AN ACT OF SURVEILLANCE.
Get it dumbass? You can stop deflecting now.
Unmasking is a PRODUCT of surveillance. Are you so stupid that you don't understand that?
Lol, you are leaving off a crucial word: LEGAL survailance
There was no legal surveillance. That's the whole point.
No one knows wtf you are trying to say. OF COURSE there is legal surveillance.
SHE did not take anything. Her FOUNDATION, out of which Clintons do not draw even a dime from, accepted a donation.
Shouldn't you be in school? Didn't the first bell ring yet at Jr. High?
Swithching channels and only 2 seconds in the tabloid news MSNBC has blatant statements by Maddow that are known lies.
She states as fact that Russia specifically wanted Trump to win the election, however her statement is not known or even possible.
None of the supposed Russia involvements coincide with knowing the outcome of the Republican party nomination, in fact it is a known fact nobody including Hillary thought Donald would win the Republican nomination. If Putin wanted to meddle because he hated Hillary, then at that time it would have been to help Bernie who Putin would favor as soft, dovish, socialist leaning, and easy to pushover. However Clintons cheating and breaking the law allowed her to steal the Democrat nomination away from Bernie. To claim Putin wanted Trump to win before anyone knew he was the candidate is typical time line confused fake news by MSNBC. Were was her commentary on Obama wanting Netanyahu's
opponent to win, so much so that he sent his campaign expert to interfere with Israeli elections? Now that is a clear slam dunk case of meddling.....not a word from Maddow about REAL MEDDLING.
Conclusion: sensationalism buys tabloids but in viewership makes people click to another channel after 5 seconds of fake news insulting their intelligence as well as the fact people don't like teacher like lectures as news, it reminds them of mean teachers in school subjecting them to personal views that weren't their own.
...you just conceded I'm correct - UNMASKING IS NOT AN ACT OF SURVEILLANCE.
Get it dumbass? You can stop deflecting now.
Unmasking is a PRODUCT of surveillance. Are you so stupid that you don't understand that?
Lol, you are leaving off a crucial word: LEGAL survailance
There was no legal surveillance. That's the whole point.
No one knows wtf you are trying to say. OF COURSE there is legal surveillance.
Not the surveillance that was being run on the trumpster. That is every bit as illegal as the surveillance that your hero initiated on James Rosen. Why do you support people who wipe their asses with the COTUS?
Unmasking is a PRODUCT of surveillance. Are you so stupid that you don't understand that?
Lol, you are leaving off a crucial word: LEGAL survailance
There was no legal surveillance. That's the whole point.
No one knows wtf you are trying to say. OF COURSE there is legal surveillance.
Not the surveillance that was being run on the trumpster. That is every bit as illegal as the surveillance that your hero initiated on James Rosen. Why do you support people who wipe their asses with the COTUS?
Can you point to ANYONE of any prominence except Trump himself who claimed ILLEGAL surveillance?
Of course you can't, BECAUSE IT IS BULLSHIT.
Swithching channels and only 2 seconds in the tabloid news MSNBC has blatant statements by Maddow that are known lies.
She states as fact that Russia specifically wanted Trump to win the election, however her statement is not known or even possible.
None of the supposed Russia involvements coincide with knowing the outcome of the Republican party nomination, in fact it is a known fact nobody including Hillary thought Donald would win the Republican nomination. If Putin wanted to meddle because he hated Hillary, then at that time it would have been to help Bernie who Putin would favor as soft, dovish, socialist leaning, and easy to pushover. However Clintons cheating and breaking the law allowed her to steal the Democrat nomination away from Bernie. To claim Putin wanted Trump to win before anyone knew he was the candidate is typical time line confused fake news by MSNBC. Were was her commentary on Obama wanting Netanyahu's
opponent to win, so much so that he sent his campaign expert to interfere with Israeli elections? Now that is a clear slam dunk case of meddling.....not a word from Maddow about REAL MEDDLING.
Conclusion: sensationalism buys tabloids but in viewership makes people click to another channel after 5 seconds of fake news insulting their intelligence as well as the fact people don't like teacher like lectures as news, it reminds them of mean teachers in school subjecting them to personal views that weren't their own.
They still don't have evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians, so they they need to keep searching, and searching and searching. They will be searching a year from now. I'm just wondering at what point we can start charging Obama holdovers in these agencies and throw them in prison for sedition and trying to create a banana Republic.
Sessions was a civilian, Jared Kushner is a civilian =illegal to surveille civilians.Another NPR listener.
Another non-reply from a dumbass.
Is this fake news?
Intelligence official who 'unmasked' Trump associates is 'very high up,' source says
Did you know that Alger Hiss was NOT a Soviet spy?
Did you know that Billy BJ Clinton NEVER had sex with that woman Monica?
Did you know that Obama would never surveil Trump, but he did surveil everyone else?
...you just conceded I'm correct - UNMASKING IS NOT AN ACT OF SURVEILLANCE.
Get it dumbass? You can stop deflecting now.
Unmasking is a PRODUCT of surveillance. Are you so stupid that you don't understand that?
Lol, you are leaving off a crucial word: LEGAL surveillance.
Lol, you are leaving off a crucial word: LEGAL survailance
There was no legal surveillance. That's the whole point.
No one knows wtf you are trying to say. OF COURSE there is legal surveillance.
Not the surveillance that was being run on the trumpster. That is every bit as illegal as the surveillance that your hero initiated on James Rosen. Why do you support people who wipe their asses with the COTUS?
Can you point to ANYONE of any prominence except Trump himself who claimed ILLEGAL surveillance?
Of course you can't, BECAUSE IT IS BULLSHIT.
Yeah, pretty much anyone with a brain.
There was no legal surveillance. That's the whole point.
No one knows wtf you are trying to say. OF COURSE there is legal surveillance.
Not the surveillance that was being run on the trumpster. That is every bit as illegal as the surveillance that your hero initiated on James Rosen. Why do you support people who wipe their asses with the COTUS?
Can you point to ANYONE of any prominence except Trump himself who claimed ILLEGAL surveillance?
Of course you can't, BECAUSE IT IS BULLSHIT.
Yeah, pretty much anyone with a brain.
Does Nunes-the-Trumpster have a brain?
Quote him.
Oh I get it now. It is okay for Obama to surveill anyone he wants, but if an R does it to a D, all Hell breaks loose. Do you know what hypocrisy means?There was no legal surveillance. That's the whole point.
No one knows wtf you are trying to say. OF COURSE there is legal surveillance.
Not the surveillance that was being run on the trumpster. That is every bit as illegal as the surveillance that your hero initiated on James Rosen. Why do you support people who wipe their asses with the COTUS?
Can you point to ANYONE of any prominence except Trump himself who claimed ILLEGAL surveillance?
Of course you can't, BECAUSE IT IS BULLSHIT.
Yeah, pretty much anyone with a brain.
Does Nunes-the-Trumpster have a brain?
Quote him.
Trump was improperly surveilled. We may find out if your Messiah was complicit. Will you still love him if he was??Are you still clinging to the fallacy that Trump was NOT surveilled by Big Ears?You could be right, even though there are plenty of other places that information is available. Unfortunately, most of the sources you might accept, such as fox or Alex Jones prefer to spread the lie that there was improper surveillance.
Are you still clinging to the fallacy that that obese orange clown was improperly surveilled, or that Obama ordered any specific surveillance?
Proof that he was improperly surveilled?
The proof is that he was. There was no reason for him to be surveilled. And rice's now exposed complicity also brings your hero obummer into the loop. That whole house of cards is going to be collapsing. What are you going to do when his criminal acts are finally exposed?
Swithching channels and only 2 seconds in the tabloid news MSNBC has blatant statements by Maddow that are known lies.
She states as fact that Russia specifically wanted Trump to win the election, however her statement is not known or even possible.
None of the supposed Russia involvements coincide with knowing the outcome of the Republican party nomination, in fact it is a known fact nobody including Hillary thought Donald would win the Republican nomination. If Putin wanted to meddle because he hated Hillary, then at that time it would have been to help Bernie who Putin would favor as soft, dovish, socialist leaning, and easy to pushover. However Clintons cheating and breaking the law allowed her to steal the Democrat nomination away from Bernie. To claim Putin wanted Trump to win before anyone knew he was the candidate is typical time line confused fake news by MSNBC. Were was her commentary on Obama wanting Netanyahu's
opponent to win, so much so that he sent his campaign expert to interfere with Israeli elections? Now that is a clear slam dunk case of meddling.....not a word from Maddow about REAL MEDDLING.
Conclusion: sensationalism buys tabloids but in viewership makes people click to another channel after 5 seconds of fake news insulting their intelligence as well as the fact people don't like teacher like lectures as news, it reminds them of mean teachers in school subjecting them to personal views that weren't their own.
They still don't have evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians, so they they need to keep searching, and searching and searching. They will be searching a year from now. I'm just wondering at what point we can start charging Obama holdovers in these agencies and throw them in prison for sedition and trying to create a banana Republic.
In 1972 burglars were arrested at DNC and Nixon didn't get "convicted" until 1974. Just because it takes time, does not mean it is not true.
If you believe the Ds did not surveill Trump for political reasons, you are dumber than you look. That is really dumb.Trump was improperly surveilled. We may find out if your Messiah was complicit. Will you still love him if he was??Are you still clinging to the fallacy that Trump was NOT surveilled by Big Ears?
Are you still clinging to the fallacy that that obese orange clown was improperly surveilled, or that Obama ordered any specific surveillance?
Proof that he was improperly surveilled?
The proof is that he was. There was no reason for him to be surveilled. And rice's now exposed complicity also brings your hero obummer into the loop. That whole house of cards is going to be collapsing. What are you going to do when his criminal acts are finally exposed?
The only reason Trump might have had a legitimate claim would be that he was surveilled for political purposes. That has been shown to be bullshit. Being surveilled in connection with investigation of illegal activities is not a reason to engender sympathy for him.
Nixon was never convictedSwithching channels and only 2 seconds in the tabloid news MSNBC has blatant statements by Maddow that are known lies.
She states as fact that Russia specifically wanted Trump to win the election, however her statement is not known or even possible.
None of the supposed Russia involvements coincide with knowing the outcome of the Republican party nomination, in fact it is a known fact nobody including Hillary thought Donald would win the Republican nomination. If Putin wanted to meddle because he hated Hillary, then at that time it would have been to help Bernie who Putin would favor as soft, dovish, socialist leaning, and easy to pushover. However Clintons cheating and breaking the law allowed her to steal the Democrat nomination away from Bernie. To claim Putin wanted Trump to win before anyone knew he was the candidate is typical time line confused fake news by MSNBC. Were was her commentary on Obama wanting Netanyahu's
opponent to win, so much so that he sent his campaign expert to interfere with Israeli elections? Now that is a clear slam dunk case of meddling.....not a word from Maddow about REAL MEDDLING.
Conclusion: sensationalism buys tabloids but in viewership makes people click to another channel after 5 seconds of fake news insulting their intelligence as well as the fact people don't like teacher like lectures as news, it reminds them of mean teachers in school subjecting them to personal views that weren't their own.
They still don't have evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians, so they they need to keep searching, and searching and searching. They will be searching a year from now. I'm just wondering at what point we can start charging Obama holdovers in these agencies and throw them in prison for sedition and trying to create a banana Republic.
In 1972 burglars were arrested at DNC and Nixon didn't get "convicted" until 1974. Just because it takes time, does not mean it is not true.
.
Trump was improperly surveilled. We may find out if your Messiah was complicit. Will you still love him if he was??Are you still clinging to the fallacy that Trump was NOT surveilled by Big Ears?
Are you still clinging to the fallacy that that obese orange clown was improperly surveilled, or that Obama ordered any specific surveillance?
Proof that he was improperly surveilled?
The proof is that he was. There was no reason for him to be surveilled. And rice's now exposed complicity also brings your hero obummer into the loop. That whole house of cards is going to be collapsing. What are you going to do when his criminal acts are finally exposed?
The only reason Trump might have had a legitimate claim would be that he was surveilled for political purposes. That has been shown to be bullshit. Being surveilled in connection with investigation of illegal activities is not a reason to engender sympathy for him.
Trump was improperly surveilled. We may find out if your Messiah was complicit. Will you still love him if he was??Are you still clinging to the fallacy that Trump was NOT surveilled by Big Ears?
Are you still clinging to the fallacy that that obese orange clown was improperly surveilled, or that Obama ordered any specific surveillance?
Proof that he was improperly surveilled?
The proof is that he was. There was no reason for him to be surveilled. And rice's now exposed complicity also brings your hero obummer into the loop. That whole house of cards is going to be collapsing. What are you going to do when his criminal acts are finally exposed?
The only reason Trump might have had a legitimate claim would be that he was surveilled for political purposes. That has been shown to be bullshit. Being surveilled in connection with investigation of illegal activities is not a reason to engender sympathy for him.
No one knows wtf you are trying to say. OF COURSE there is legal surveillance.
Not the surveillance that was being run on the trumpster. That is every bit as illegal as the surveillance that your hero initiated on James Rosen. Why do you support people who wipe their asses with the COTUS?
Can you point to ANYONE of any prominence except Trump himself who claimed ILLEGAL surveillance?
Of course you can't, BECAUSE IT IS BULLSHIT.
Yeah, pretty much anyone with a brain.
Does Nunes-the-Trumpster have a brain?
Quote him.
Yes, he does. That's why he did what he did. You are IGNORING the simple fact that it is ILLEGAL to spy on American citizens. That is exactly what your hero obummer was doing. And no one would have ever found out if their "chosen one" had won the election. It would have been the final decline of this once great country under the manchurian candidate known as obummer.
Yet again, why do you support people who violate the COTUS for their own personal gain?
Nixon was never convictedSwithching channels and only 2 seconds in the tabloid news MSNBC has blatant statements by Maddow that are known lies.
She states as fact that Russia specifically wanted Trump to win the election, however her statement is not known or even possible.
None of the supposed Russia involvements coincide with knowing the outcome of the Republican party nomination, in fact it is a known fact nobody including Hillary thought Donald would win the Republican nomination. If Putin wanted to meddle because he hated Hillary, then at that time it would have been to help Bernie who Putin would favor as soft, dovish, socialist leaning, and easy to pushover. However Clintons cheating and breaking the law allowed her to steal the Democrat nomination away from Bernie. To claim Putin wanted Trump to win before anyone knew he was the candidate is typical time line confused fake news by MSNBC. Were was her commentary on Obama wanting Netanyahu's
opponent to win, so much so that he sent his campaign expert to interfere with Israeli elections? Now that is a clear slam dunk case of meddling.....not a word from Maddow about REAL MEDDLING.
Conclusion: sensationalism buys tabloids but in viewership makes people click to another channel after 5 seconds of fake news insulting their intelligence as well as the fact people don't like teacher like lectures as news, it reminds them of mean teachers in school subjecting them to personal views that weren't their own.
They still don't have evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians, so they they need to keep searching, and searching and searching. They will be searching a year from now. I'm just wondering at what point we can start charging Obama holdovers in these agencies and throw them in prison for sedition and trying to create a banana Republic.
In 1972 burglars were arrested at DNC and Nixon didn't get "convicted" until 1974. Just because it takes time, does not mean it is not true.
.
He was for all intent and purposes, they just let him fly off into the sunset.
