More Liberal tears. Banning assualt weapons & magazines doesn't lower homicide

[miketx]

AND more frequent

If you think mass shootings are becoming more frequent, and worse — you're right

It's a shame your kind are responsible for them.

 

[Lesh]

AND more frequent

If you think mass shootings are becoming more frequent, and worse — you're right

It's a shame your kind are responsible for them.

That's pure bullshit but we're used to your garbage.

 

[Lesh]

...The highest casualty mass killings in this country were done with fertilizer and airplanes...

Irrelevant to either the question or the answer.

...Actually, what you stupid Moon Bats call "mass shootings" are statistically insignificant...

Tell that to the ghosts of the children of Columbine or Sandy Hook or Parkland or San Bernadino et al...

What I care about is my Constitutional rights and the deaths of those children, no matter how tragic, is not an excuse to take away my rights.

Taking away my Constitutional rights will not prevent more tragic deaths but it will diminish my liberties and the liberties of all Americans and that ain't right.

Are you as concerned about the deaths of a million American children killed on demand every year, for the sake of convince, as you are for the relatively minor number that are killed by deranged sickos?

Why should I have my liberties taken away because somebody does something illegal with a firearm? Everyday in this country there are millions of Americans that use fire arms legally. Why are you an asshole?

Ahhh thoughts and prayers huh?

You do not have a constitutional right to an assault weapon just as you don't have a Constitutional right to a machine gun.

 

[miketx]

AND more frequent

If you think mass shootings are becoming more frequent, and worse — you're right

It's a shame your kind are responsible for them.

That's pure bullshit but we're used to your garbage.

You scum promote this and your traitor politicians make it possible. I pray you fuckers are mowed down in the next one.

 

[RealDave]

I suspect the stupid Liberals will be crying themselves to sleep. Their precious oppressive gun laws that they want doesn't lower killings.

Study: ‘Assault Weapons’ and Magazine Bans Do Not Lower Homicide Rates

A study on state-level gun control laws in the U.S. shows that bans on “high-capacity” magazines and “assault weapons” do not lower homicide rates.


The study was headed by Boston University School of Public Health’s Michael Siegel and another listed study author was Harvard gun control advocate David Hemenway.


The study, The Impact of State Firearm Laws on Homicide and Suicide Deaths in the USA, 1991–2016: a Panel Study, isolated four states to study ten different types of gun control to see if certain gun controls were successful in reducing homicide and/or suicide rates. Via their research, they discovered that “high-capacity” magazine and “assault weapons” bans do not lower homicide rates.

That is because it was to lower the number of deaths in these mass shootings.

But hey, you bury that aspect in all homicides.

Typical chickenshit Trumpette maneuver

 

[Dragonlady]

AND more frequent

If you think mass shootings are becoming more frequent, and worse — you're right

It's a shame your kind are responsible for them.

All terrorist deaths in the USA in 2018, came from right wing terrorists.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...f7f24a-deb4-11e8-85df-7a6b4d25cfbb_story.html

 

[miketx]

AND more frequent

If you think mass shootings are becoming more frequent, and worse — you're right

It's a shame your kind are responsible for them.

All terrorist deaths in the USA in 2018, came from right wing terrorists.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...f7f24a-deb4-11e8-85df-7a6b4d25cfbb_story.html

Fake news liar.

 

[Rustic]

That Vegas mass shooter sure would have had a lot of trouble firing so many rounds with small
magazines...

Na, not really
You have no understanding

 

[skye]

We don't care about mass shootings in this country.

But you stupid Liberals sure as hell care about taking away our Constitutional rights, even when the studies prove that it doesn't do anything to curtail crime.

Exactly.

F**** stupid liberals!

 

[Rustic]

AND more frequent

If you think mass shootings are becoming more frequent, and worse — you're right

It's a shame your kind are responsible for them.

All terrorist deaths in the USA in 2018, came from right wing terrorists.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...f7f24a-deb4-11e8-85df-7a6b4d25cfbb_story.html

Fake news

 

[WEATHER53]

Pretty much they could not take Trump down so just take 63 million people down instead.

 

[ralfy]

Interestingly enough, the statement may go both ways. That is, they are not responsible for increasing homicide rates, but they don't lower them, either.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

That Vegas mass shooter sure would have had a lot of trouble firing so many rounds with small
magazines...

 

[Kondor3]

...What I care about is my Constitutional rights...

As do we all.

...and the deaths of those children, no matter how tragic, is not an excuse to take away my rights...

Agreed.

No one is proposing to do that.

The Colorado law merely proposes to temporarily impound the firearms of those deemed by a law court to be mentally unhealthy.

Due process... no illegal seizures nor violations of the Constitution at-work in any of that.

...Taking away my Constitutional rights will not prevent more tragic deaths but it will diminish my liberties and the liberties of all Americans and that ain't right...

Happily, that does not come into play here.

...Are you as concerned about the deaths of a million American children killed on demand every year, for the sake of convince, as you are for the relatively minor number that are killed by deranged sickos?...

I am anti-Abortion.

However, you need to take that to a thread discussing Abortion.

It has absolutely nothing... zero... to do with the subject of the Colorado law in-question here.

Focus, grasshopper... focus.

...Why should I have my liberties taken away because somebody does something illegal with a firearm?...

Happily, that does not come into play here.

...Everyday in this country there are millions of Americans that use fire arms legally...

Quite true. Also, completely irrelevant to the matter at hand.

...Why are you an asshole?

Good catch, and good question, however...

People who live in glass sphincters... playing the part of Walking Echo-Chamber for NRA Bumper-Sticker slogans-as-defense...

Really have no room to talk; besides...

My status as an Asshole... or yours, for that matter... are absolutely irrelevant to the debate on the Colorado law in-question here.

Focus, grasshopper... focus.

 

[Blues Man]

We don't care about mass shootings in this country.

But you stupid Liberals sure as hell care about taking away our Constitutional rights, even when the studies prove that it doesn't do anything to curtail crime.

I am pro-2nd Amendment. But this is another thing...we don't care about mass shootings in this country.

If you want to stop mass shootings banning a rifle will not do it.

 

[Kondor3]

...The highest casualty mass killings in this country were done with fertilizer and airplanes...

Irrelevant to either the question or the answer.

...Actually, what you stupid Moon Bats call "mass shootings" are statistically insignificant...

Tell that to the ghosts of the children of Columbine or Sandy Hook or Parkland or San Bernadino et al...

You tell them as you try to disarm their parents so they cant stop any criminal from killing them or others.

Nobody is proposing to disarm anyone who should be allowed to possess firearms.

The Colorado law merely provides for temporary impounding of firearms belonging to suspected mentally ill persons.

Each case must be vetted by a law judge, and it is temporary; it is an "impounding", not a permanent "seizure" or "disarming".

It is taking People-Killing Tools out of the hands of the mentally unbalanced; a wise precaution supported by existing case law.

It is Due Process, as called for in the US Constitution.

If the law needs a bit of tweaking... like making the State pay for mental health assessments (at time of impounding, and proposed return), OK.

It may be assumed that you are fine with are fine with the idea of Unstable People possessing People-Killing Tools.

Vast numbers of your fellow countrymen are not, and we are also willing to call-out attempts at distraction and deflection.

The de-tox station for Drama Queens, Over-Exaggerators and Sophomoric Deflectors is down the hall, second door on the right.

 

[rightwinger]

I suspect the stupid Liberals will be crying themselves to sleep. Their precious oppressive gun laws that they want doesn't lower killings.

Study: ‘Assault Weapons’ and Magazine Bans Do Not Lower Homicide Rates

A study on state-level gun control laws in the U.S. shows that bans on “high-capacity” magazines and “assault weapons” do not lower homicide rates.


The study was headed by Boston University School of Public Health’s Michael Siegel and another listed study author was Harvard gun control advocate David Hemenway.


The study, The Impact of State Firearm Laws on Homicide and Suicide Deaths in the USA, 1991–2016: a Panel Study, isolated four states to study ten different types of gun control to see if certain gun controls were successful in reducing homicide and/or suicide rates. Via their research, they discovered that “high-capacity” magazine and “assault weapons” bans do not lower homicide rates.

Very true

We need to ban handguns to have a significant impact on shooting deaths

 

[miketx]

...The highest casualty mass killings in this country were done with fertilizer and airplanes...

Irrelevant to either the question or the answer.

...Actually, what you stupid Moon Bats call "mass shootings" are statistically insignificant...

Tell that to the ghosts of the children of Columbine or Sandy Hook or Parkland or San Bernadino et al...

You tell them as you try to disarm their parents so they cant stop any criminal from killing them or others.

Nobody is proposing to disarm anyone who should be allowed to possess firearms.

The Colorado law merely provides for temporary impounding of firearms belonging to suspected mentally ill persons.

Each case must be vetted by a law judge, and it is temporary; it is an "impounding", not a permanent "seizure" or "disarming".

It is taking People-Killing Tools out of the hands of the mentally unbalanced; a wise precaution supported by existing case law.

It is Due Process, as called for in the US Constitution.

If the law needs a bit of tweaking... like making the State pay for mental health assessments (at time of impounding, and proposed return), OK.

It may be assumed that you are fine with are fine with the idea of Unstable People possessing People-Killing Tools.

Vast numbers of your fellow countrymen are not, and we are also willing to call-out attempts at distraction and deflection.

The de-tox station for Drama Queens, Over-Exaggerators and Sophomoric Deflectors is down the hall, second door on the right.

Total BS.

 

[miketx]

I suspect the stupid Liberals will be crying themselves to sleep. Their precious oppressive gun laws that they want doesn't lower killings.

Study: ‘Assault Weapons’ and Magazine Bans Do Not Lower Homicide Rates

A study on state-level gun control laws in the U.S. shows that bans on “high-capacity” magazines and “assault weapons” do not lower homicide rates.


The study was headed by Boston University School of Public Health’s Michael Siegel and another listed study author was Harvard gun control advocate David Hemenway.


The study, The Impact of State Firearm Laws on Homicide and Suicide Deaths in the USA, 1991–2016: a Panel Study, isolated four states to study ten different types of gun control to see if certain gun controls were successful in reducing homicide and/or suicide rates. Via their research, they discovered that “high-capacity” magazine and “assault weapons” bans do not lower homicide rates.

Very true

We need to ban handguns to have a significant impact on shooting deaths

First ban liberal idiots.

 

[Kondor3]

...The highest casualty mass killings in this country were done with fertilizer and airplanes...

Irrelevant to either the question or the answer.

...Actually, what you stupid Moon Bats call "mass shootings" are statistically insignificant...

Tell that to the ghosts of the children of Columbine or Sandy Hook or Parkland or San Bernadino et al...

You tell them as you try to disarm their parents so they cant stop any criminal from killing them or others.

Nobody is proposing to disarm anyone who should be allowed to possess firearms.

The Colorado law merely provides for temporary impounding of firearms belonging to suspected mentally ill persons.

Each case must be vetted by a law judge, and it is temporary; it is an "impounding", not a permanent "seizure" or "disarming".

It is taking People-Killing Tools out of the hands of the mentally unbalanced; a wise precaution supported by existing case law.

It is Due Process, as called for in the US Constitution.

If the law needs a bit of tweaking... like making the State pay for mental health assessments (at time of impounding, and proposed return), OK.

It may be assumed that you are fine with are fine with the idea of Unstable People possessing People-Killing Tools.

Vast numbers of your fellow countrymen are not, and we are also willing to call-out attempts at distraction and deflection.

The de-tox station for Drama Queens, Over-Exaggerators and Sophomoric Deflectors is down the hall, second door on the right.

Total BS.

View attachment 253771

Thus sayeth the Walking NRA Bumper Sticker Slogan Echo Chamber...

Yeah... yeah... yeah...

There are, indeed, wing-nuts out there who want to do just that...

However, the vast majority of your fellow citizens who want better firearms control do not hold such positions...

But it is in the best interests of gun manufacturers and your NRA masters to hoodwink you into believing (and braying) otherwise...

It is clear that you are incapable of distinguishing in such matters...

Thank you for playing...

Have a good day.