Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Full tilt denial and religious apocalyptic pronouncements --- like that CBS report.. That's whats left for the true believers...
NOTHING in that CBS report was real or correct.. Not the oysters, not the 212 degree GRAPHIC THAT THEY DISPLAYED...
And THAT is what public perception is supposed to be based on.. We're not stupid -- Even the stupid are not that stupid..
Guess that leaves you and the other holy rollers..
We are stupid when it comes to climate science and many other deep specialties.
Especially those like you who carefully avoid learning as its inconvenient to your politics.
You were going to supply us some science that proves that what Hansen said is categorically impossible under the circumstances that he clearly stated. As everyone expected, you don't have a clue. That makes you the hysterical one.
What were CO2 levels the last time the oceans boiled?
We are stupid when it comes to climate science and many other deep specialties.
Especially those like you who carefully avoid learning as its inconvenient to your politics.
You were going to supply us some science that proves that what Hansen said is categorically impossible under the circumstances that he clearly stated. As everyone expected, you don't have a clue. That makes you the hysterical one.
What were CO2 levels the last time the oceans boiled?
When is the last time that there were 7B humans on the planet dumping megatons of GHGs into the atmosphere?
What were CO2 levels the last time the oceans boiled?
When is the last time that there were 7B humans on the planet dumping megatons of GHGs into the atmosphere?
Why that would be the MULTIPLE TIMES that the CO2 atmos. concentrations were at LEAST 6 times higher than today... And the planet didn't self-destruct...
You are so ill-informed and politically wired --- it's hopeless to talk with you...
When is the last time that there were 7B humans on the planet dumping megatons of GHGs into the atmosphere?
Why that would be the MULTIPLE TIMES that the CO2 atmos. concentrations were at LEAST 6 times higher than today... And the planet didn't self-destruct...
You are so ill-informed and politically wired --- it's hopeless to talk with you...
Bingo!
PMS doesn't debate. He repeats his AGW cult talking points over and over. He spews on logical fallacy after another. He's too stupid to even know that he's spouting logical fallacies.
Why that would be the MULTIPLE TIMES that the CO2 atmos. concentrations were at LEAST 6 times higher than today... And the planet didn't self-destruct...
You are so ill-informed and politically wired --- it's hopeless to talk with you...
Bingo!
PMS doesn't debate. He repeats his AGW cult talking points over and over. He spews on logical fallacy after another. He's too stupid to even know that he's spouting logical fallacies.
Debate is my data vs yours. You have none.
You've been shown these FACTS multiple times and INTENTIONALLY you refuse to absorb them.. For a self-proclaimed "engineer" that's a fatal flaw bud.. Sanitation? HVAC? Theatrical Lighting? I can't imagine what kind of engineer would purposely not accept that CO2 levels on this planet have been much higher MANY TIMES in the past..
What were CO2 levels the last time the oceans boiled?
When is the last time that there were 7B humans on the planet dumping megatons of GHGs into the atmosphere?
Why that would be the MULTIPLE TIMES that the CO2 atmos. concentrations were at LEAST 6 times higher than today... And the planet didn't self-destruct...
You are so ill-informed and politically wired --- it's hopeless to talk with you...
You've been shown these FACTS multiple times and INTENTIONALLY you refuse to absorb them.. For a self-proclaimed "engineer" that's a fatal flaw bud.. Sanitation? HVAC? Theatrical Lighting? I can't imagine what kind of engineer would purposely not accept that CO2 levels on this planet have been much higher MANY TIMES in the past..
Bingo!
PMS doesn't debate. He repeats his AGW cult talking points over and over. He spews on logical fallacy after another. He's too stupid to even know that he's spouting logical fallacies.
Debate is my data vs yours. You have none.
You couldn't smell debate if you stepped in it.. I've told that science does NOT REQUIRE an alternative WORKING theory to destroy an existing one. Again --- you don't absorb reality. I NEED NO DATA..
WE NEED to see what YOUR DATA says about historical levels of CO2 that were 4 to 8 times HIGHER than they are today...
You missed the edit to post above..
You've been shown these FACTS multiple times and INTENTIONALLY you refuse to absorb them.. For a self-proclaimed "engineer" that's a fatal flaw bud.. Sanitation? HVAC? Theatrical Lighting? I can't imagine what kind of engineer would purposely not accept that CO2 levels on this planet have been much higher MANY TIMES in the past..
Why is that????
But eat your pudding and take a nap like the attending nurse wants you to before you bother to reply...
When is the last time that there were 7B humans on the planet dumping megatons of GHGs into the atmosphere?
Why that would be the MULTIPLE TIMES that the CO2 atmos. concentrations were at LEAST 6 times higher than today... And the planet didn't self-destruct...
You are so ill-informed and politically wired --- it's hopeless to talk with you...
You've been shown these FACTS multiple times and INTENTIONALLY you refuse to absorb them.. For a self-proclaimed "engineer" that's a fatal flaw bud.. Sanitation? HVAC? Theatrical Lighting? I can't imagine what kind of engineer would purposely not accept that CO2 levels on this planet have been much higher MANY TIMES in the past..
From Wikipedia:
'' The concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in Earth's atmosphere determines its contribution to the greenhouse effect and the rates of plant and algal photosynthesis. The concentration has increased markedly in the 21st century, at a rate of 2.0 ppm/yr during 2000–2009 and faster since then.[1][2] It was 280 ppm in pre-industrial times, and has risen to 400 ppm (parts per million) as of May 2013,[3] with the increase largely attributed to anthropogenic sources.[4] About 57% of the CO2 emissions go to increase the atmospheric level, with much of the remainder contributing to ocean acidification. Carbon dioxide is used in photosynthesis (in plants and other photoautotrophs), and is also a prominent greenhouse gas. Despite its relatively small overall concentration in the atmosphere, CO2 is an important component of Earth's atmosphere because it absorbs and emits infrared radiation at wavelengths of 4.26 µm (asymmetric stretching vibrational mode) and 14.99 µm (bending vibrational mode), thereby playing a role in the greenhouse effect.[5] The present level appears to be the highest in the past 800,000 years[6] and likely the highest in the past 20 million years,[7] but well below 10% of its 500-million-year peak.[8]
I'm going to make the assumption that there were many things different 500 million years ago and the record of those times is, to say the least, incomplete.
Why that would be the MULTIPLE TIMES that the CO2 atmos. concentrations were at LEAST 6 times higher than today... And the planet didn't self-destruct...
You are so ill-informed and politically wired --- it's hopeless to talk with you...
Bingo!
PMS doesn't debate. He repeats his AGW cult talking points over and over. He spews on logical fallacy after another. He's too stupid to even know that he's spouting logical fallacies.
Debate is my data vs yours. You have none.
We are stupid when it comes to climate science and many other deep specialties.
Especially those like you who carefully avoid learning as its inconvenient to your politics.
You were going to supply us some science that proves that what Hansen said is categorically impossible under the circumstances that he clearly stated. As everyone expected, you don't have a clue. That makes you the hysterical one.
What were CO2 levels the last time the oceans boiled?
When is the last time that there were 7B humans on the planet dumping megatons of GHGs into the atmosphere?
Debate is my data vs yours. You have none.
You couldn't smell debate if you stepped in it.. I've told that science does NOT REQUIRE an alternative WORKING theory to destroy an existing one. Again --- you don't absorb reality. I NEED NO DATA..
WE NEED to see what YOUR DATA says about historical levels of CO2 that were 4 to 8 times HIGHER than they are today...
You missed the edit to post above..
You've been shown these FACTS multiple times and INTENTIONALLY you refuse to absorb them.. For a self-proclaimed "engineer" that's a fatal flaw bud.. Sanitation? HVAC? Theatrical Lighting? I can't imagine what kind of engineer would purposely not accept that CO2 levels on this planet have been much higher MANY TIMES in the past..
Why is that????
But eat your pudding and take a nap like the attending nurse wants you to before you bother to reply...
Thank you for sharing your particular definition of pseudoscience. It was entertaining. I'm not sure that anyone would pay you a salary for thinking like though.
LMAO....almost every day I can come into this THREAD and display the losing.......
Been saying for a loooooong time that the climate crusaders have no Plan B!!! The bomb throwing has only gotten more absurd in recent years ( see above......"oceans could boil...." ). These people have something about shooting themselves in the face ALL THE TIME!!!
Now comes a new study and turns out? The public doesnt like the environmentalist crowd.....I fact, is weirded by them >>>>
October 2, 2013
Greens Are Their Own Worst Enemies
For one-third of the participants, the writer was described as a stereotypical environmentalist . Another third were told he was an atypical, less-abrasive environmentalist . For the final third, his profile did not mention environmental activism at all.
After reading the article, participants were asked whether it inspired them to do more recycling, or otherwise take more eco-friendly actions.
Participants were less motivated to adopt pro-environmental behaviors when these behaviors were advocated by the typical environmentalist, rather than by the atypical environmentalist or the undefined target, the researchers report.
not winning!!!!!
LMAO....almost every day I can come into this THREAD and display the losing.......
Been saying for a loooooong time that the climate crusaders have no Plan B!!! The bomb throwing has only gotten more absurd in recent years ( see above......"oceans could boil...." ). These people have something about shooting themselves in the face ALL THE TIME!!!
Now comes a new study and turns out? The public doesnt like the environmentalist crowd.....I fact, is weirded by them >>>>
October 2, 2013
Greens Are Their Own Worst Enemies
For one-third of the participants, the writer was described as a stereotypical environmentalist . Another third were told he was an atypical, less-abrasive environmentalist . For the final third, his profile did not mention environmental activism at all.
After reading the article, participants were asked whether it inspired them to do more recycling, or otherwise take more eco-friendly actions.
Participants were less motivated to adopt pro-environmental behaviors when these behaviors were advocated by the typical environmentalist, rather than by the atypical environmentalist or the undefined target, the researchers report.
not winning!!!!!
Absolutely.. The planet needs more "ATYPICAL" environmentalists.. The ones that dont IMPOSE their ideas thru coercion.. And who operate with a COOPERATIVE attitude, rather than a tyrannical HYSTERICAL one...
That article is right on the money...
Lemme channel our pal PMZ here..
We will carry the rest of the posers. The folks like us who truly care --- have the ideas and solutions to fix the problems..
LMAO....almost every day I can come into this THREAD and display the losing.......
Been saying for a loooooong time that the climate crusaders have no Plan B!!! The bomb throwing has only gotten more absurd in recent years ( see above......"oceans could boil...." ). These people have something about shooting themselves in the face ALL THE TIME!!!
Now comes a new study and turns out? The public doesnt like the environmentalist crowd.....I fact, is weirded by them >>>>
October 2, 2013
Greens Are Their Own Worst Enemies
For one-third of the participants, the writer was described as a stereotypical environmentalist . Another third were told he was an atypical, less-abrasive environmentalist . For the final third, his profile did not mention environmental activism at all.
After reading the article, participants were asked whether it inspired them to do more recycling, or otherwise take more eco-friendly actions.
Participants were less motivated to adopt pro-environmental behaviors when these behaviors were advocated by the typical environmentalist, rather than by the atypical environmentalist or the undefined target, the researchers report.
not winning!!!!!
Absolutely.. The planet needs more "ATYPICAL" environmentalists.. The ones that dont IMPOSE their ideas thru coercion.. And who operate with a COOPERATIVE attitude, rather than a tyrannical HYSTERICAL one...
That article is right on the money...
Lemme channel our pal PMZ here..
We will carry the rest of the posers. The folks like us who truly care --- have the ideas and solutions to fix the problems..
What I hear from your side is do nothing. Thats your solution????? To what problem is doing nothing a solution for?????
You couldn't smell debate if you stepped in it.. I've told that science does NOT REQUIRE an alternative WORKING theory to destroy an existing one. Again --- you don't absorb reality. I NEED NO DATA..
WE NEED to see what YOUR DATA says about historical levels of CO2 that were 4 to 8 times HIGHER than they are today...
You missed the edit to post above..
Why is that????
But eat your pudding and take a nap like the attending nurse wants you to before you bother to reply...
Thank you for sharing your particular definition of pseudoscience. It was entertaining. I'm not sure that anyone would pay you a salary for thinking like though.
You wouldn't know science if it fell on you and killed you. Flacal is telling you what science is. You're spouting logical fallacies. No one needs to produce alternative data to show that yours is bogus. Every time you insist they do, you only prove that you're a scientific ignoramus.
More bad news for the climate crusading nutters.......
Less people than ever believe in global warming!!!
What climate change? Fewer people than EVER believe the world is really warming up | UK | News | Daily Express
As Ive said many times and been 100% accurate......nobody cares about the science!!
What were CO2 levels the last time the oceans boiled?
When is the last time that there were 7B humans on the planet dumping megatons of GHGs into the atmosphere?
What were CO2 levels the last time the oceans boiled?
LMAO....almost every day I can come into this THREAD and display the losing.......
Been saying for a loooooong time that the climate crusaders have no Plan B!!! The bomb throwing has only gotten more absurd in recent years ( see above......"oceans could boil...." ). These people have something about shooting themselves in the face ALL THE TIME!!!
Now comes a new study and turns out? The public doesnt like the environmentalist crowd.....I fact, is weirded by them >>>>
October 2, 2013
Greens Are Their Own Worst Enemies
People dont like environmentalists, and that personal disdain is hurting the green cause. Thats the gist of a new study, which found that the stereotypes people hold about environmental activists make them much less likely to adopt the kinds of behaviors greens promote, such as recycling. Pacific Standard reports:
In one [study], 140 Americans read an article about climate change and the need for individuals to adopt sustainable lifestyles.
For one-third of the participants, the writer was described as a stereotypical environmentalist . Another third were told he was an atypical, less-abrasive environmentalist . For the final third, his profile did not mention environmental activism at all.
After reading the article, participants were asked whether it inspired them to do more recycling, or otherwise take more eco-friendly actions.
Participants were less motivated to adopt pro-environmental behaviors when these behaviors were advocated by the typical environmentalist, rather than by the atypical environmentalist or the undefined target, the researchers report.
Did you catch that? If the author was just described as an environmentalist, it made readers less likely to live sustainably than if the author was unidentified.
Our pointing out this story isnt about directing snark at clueless greens. The truth is that the world needs smarter environmentalistspeople who understand that mass migration to sustainable communes isnt a viable solution, who understand that society isnt about to voluntarily retreat to an 18th-century lifestyle or curtail economic growth. These environmentalists exist. Bjørn Lomborg, for one, has as solid a grasp of policy as he does of science.
The world deserves a smart green movement, capable of effectively advocating for sustainable development. It doesnt have one, and thats a shame.
Greens Are Their Own Worst Enemies | Via Meadia
These dolt climate crusaders really think the world is going to embrace their scorched earth idea's based upon a Hail Mary Pass guess......like we'll tomorrow go back to horse and buggy and candlelit rooms to ensure the earths survival!!!
Well guess what ?????????
not winning!!!!!
