More Proof the skeptics are WINNING!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
What I hear from your side is do nothing. That’s your solution????? To what problem is doing nothing a solution for?????


How much of a naïve mofu is this one?:coffee:

There is ZERO proof........as in EGG.........that any curtailing of fossil fuel use is going to even have a smidgen of impact on shit. NONE......and that is just assuming any kind of climate change is due to man-made causes, also something that is not provable


Which is exactly why the sceptics are winning BIG!!


What a far left people known for? They are known for, if nothing else, wanting to spend other peoples money because "the intentions are good". Results don't matter for shit to these people......like they don't matter.


Thankfully, to MOST people in the world, costs do matter.


Hey......most people would love to have a nice big Mercedes in their driveway.:rock::rock::rock: , however, most people have the ability to think on the margin......but not people on the far left. Its not a matter of intelligence.......its a matter of fucked up thought processing. There is a huge difference.

Meaningless bullshit.






Your specialty.
 
What I hear from your side is do nothing. That’s your solution????? To what problem is doing nothing a solution for?????


How much of a naïve mofu is this one?:coffee:

There is ZERO proof........as in EGG.........that any curtailing of fossil fuel use is going to even have a smidgen of impact on shit. NONE......and that is just assuming any kind of climate change is due to man-made causes, also something that is not provable


Which is exactly why the sceptics are winning BIG!!


What a far left people known for? They are known for, if nothing else, wanting to spend other peoples money because "the intentions are good". Results don't matter for shit to these people......like they don't matter.


Thankfully, to MOST people in the world, costs do matter.


Hey......most people would love to have a nice big Mercedes in their driveway.:rock::rock::rock: , however, most people have the ability to think on the margin......but not people on the far left. Its not a matter of intelligence.......its a matter of fucked up thought processing. There is a huge difference.

Except for

600px-Temp-sunspot-co2.svg.png


Oh, that is Standford, that university where you didn't get a college education.







StanDford?:eusa_whistle:
 
How much of a naïve mofu is this one?:coffee:

There is ZERO proof........as in EGG.........that any curtailing of fossil fuel use is going to even have a smidgen of impact on shit. NONE......and that is just assuming any kind of climate change is due to man-made causes, also something that is not provable


Which is exactly why the sceptics are winning BIG!!


What a far left people known for? They are known for, if nothing else, wanting to spend other peoples money because "the intentions are good". Results don't matter for shit to these people......like they don't matter.


Thankfully, to MOST people in the world, costs do matter.


Hey......most people would love to have a nice big Mercedes in their driveway.:rock::rock::rock: , however, most people have the ability to think on the margin......but not people on the far left. Its not a matter of intelligence.......its a matter of fucked up thought processing. There is a huge difference.

Except for

600px-Temp-sunspot-co2.svg.png


Oh, that is Standford, that university where you didn't get a college education.







StanDford?:eusa_whistle:

You, apparently, don't mind being wrong. With the continued supply of adequate energy at stake.

Fine. Do whatever you want to.

Here's what we're going to do.

Continue developing climate science through the IPCC.

Continue building as demand requires new sustainable energy production capacity.

Continue efforts to reduce energy waste.

Continue the development of electrical and CNG vehicles.

Continue protecting our cities and farms from the perils of different weather patterns and sea level increases as they become apparent.
Continue the search for science that will predict the optimum economic rate of transition to fuel free, waste free energy supplies.

This is great. You stand around doing nothing and we'll make progress just as conservatives and liberals are supposed to do.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Yes sir. You smart ones who avoid problems like the plague are the ones to be admired. Avoid education, avoid solving problems, avoid responsibility, avoid organization, avoid science, that's the ticket. What would the world do without you?

You're beginning to sound a lot like Jake the Fake, but someone else on this board said that you're a sock for another forum member.
 
Last edited:
OK back to topic since the k00ks are always trying to change it (Geee......what a surprise:eusa_dance:)

Back to more nutter losing >>>>

So......how about fossil fuel divestment at Harvard University where the climate crusaders are pushing hard!!

Apparently.......the University says No


Fossil Fuel Divestment: Harvard Says No | Power Line



Im laughing.....even in the liberal bastion of the world, the people who run things know that the climate k00ks live in a world of fantasy!!:fu:
 
OK back to topic since the k00ks are always trying to change it (Geee......what a surprise:eusa_dance:)

Back to more nutter losing >>>>

So......how about fossil fuel divestment at Harvard University where the climate crusaders are pushing hard!!

Apparently.......the University says No


Fossil Fuel Divestment: Harvard Says No | Power Line



Im laughing.....even in the liberal bastion of the world, the people who run things know that the climate k00ks live in a world of fantasy!!:fu:

Have you noticed how much today's world looks like the liberal ''world of fantasy'' and how much the conservative ''world of fantasy'' looks like the 50s?
 
What I hear from your side is do nothing. That’s your solution????? To what problem is doing nothing a solution for?????


How much of a naïve mofu is this one?:coffee:

There is ZERO proof........as in EGG.........that any curtailing of fossil fuel use is going to even have a smidgen of impact on shit. NONE......and that is just assuming any kind of climate change is due to man-made causes, also something that is not provable


Which is exactly why the sceptics are winning BIG!!


What a far left people known for? They are known for, if nothing else, wanting to spend other peoples money because "the intentions are good". Results don't matter for shit to these people......like they don't matter.


Thankfully, to MOST people in the world, costs do matter.


Hey......most people would love to have a nice big Mercedes in their driveway.:rock::rock::rock: , however, most people have the ability to think on the margin......but not people on the far left. Its not a matter of intelligence.......its a matter of fucked up thought processing. There is a huge difference.

Except for

600px-Temp-sunspot-co2.svg.png


Oh, that is Standford, that university where you didn't get a college education.

Number of sunspots IS NOT Total Solar Irradiation.. 52nd time I've told you that. The temperature forcing needs to be in Watts/m2 ---- not sunspot number.. But you are denser than lead and refuse to learn anything that might cause you to think for yourself..

Warmer zealots drag out sunspot number to deflect and confuse..

Furthermore the effects of the sun are not FULLY ACCOUNTED for until you consider any changes in SPECTRAL density of the radiative flux.. Small shifts in energy at particular frequencies are enough to modulate the GreenHouse window and could have sufficient and measurable effects on atmos temps and absorption of heat..
 
Last edited:
Wrong again.

What a moron.

He Can't or W'ont read the graph I posted for him at lunch.. If it's because he can't --- he's never been in engineering.. If it's because he won't --- it's because he's a progressive zealot who ignores reality to survive.

Do I care which it is ?? Not really...

Oh, I can guarantee you haven't received any secondary education. We can test that anytime you are ready.


:eusa_hand:

Your a pretend dweeb that runs around owning factoids they stole from random math/science sites.. I'm really not concerned what you think of my education or experience.
 
How much of a naïve mofu is this one?:coffee:

There is ZERO proof........as in EGG.........that any curtailing of fossil fuel use is going to even have a smidgen of impact on shit. NONE......and that is just assuming any kind of climate change is due to man-made causes, also something that is not provable


Which is exactly why the sceptics are winning BIG!!


What a far left people known for? They are known for, if nothing else, wanting to spend other peoples money because "the intentions are good". Results don't matter for shit to these people......like they don't matter.


Thankfully, to MOST people in the world, costs do matter.


Hey......most people would love to have a nice big Mercedes in their driveway.:rock::rock::rock: , however, most people have the ability to think on the margin......but not people on the far left. Its not a matter of intelligence.......its a matter of fucked up thought processing. There is a huge difference.

Except for

600px-Temp-sunspot-co2.svg.png


Oh, that is Standford, that university where you didn't get a college education.

Number of sunspots IS NOT Total Solar Irradiation.. 52nd time I've told you that. The temperature forcing needs to be in Watts/m2 ---- not sunspot number.. But you are denser than lead and refuse to learn anything that might cause you to think for yourself..

Warmer zealots drag out sunspot number to deflect and confuse..

Furthermore the effects of the sun are not FULLY ACCOUNTED for until you consider any changes in SPECTRAL density of the radiative flux.. Small shifts in energy at particular frequencies are enough to modulate the GreenHouse window and could have sufficient and measurable effects on atmos temps and absorption of heat..

From Wikipedia.

''Variations in total solar irradiance were too small to detect with technology available before the satellite era, although the small fraction in ultra-violet light has recently been found to vary significantly more than previously thought over the course of a solar cycle.[2] Total solar output is now measured to vary (over the last three 11-year sunspot cycles) by approximately 0.1%,[3][4][5] or about 1.3 Watts per square meter (W/m2) peak-to-trough from solar maximum to solar minimum during the 11-year sunspot cycle. The amount of solar radiation received at the outer surface of Earth's atmosphere averages 1366 W/m2.[1][6][7] There are no direct measurements of the longer-term variation, and interpretations of proxy measures of variations differ. The intensity of solar radiation reaching Earth has been relatively constant through the last 2000 years, with variations estimated at around 0.1–0.2%.[8][9][10] Solar variation, together with volcanic activity are hypothesized to have contributed to climate change, for example during the Maunder Minimum. However, some research indicates that changes in solar brightness are too weak to explain recent climate change.[11]''
 
He Can't or W'ont read the graph I posted for him at lunch.. If it's because he can't --- he's never been in engineering.. If it's because he won't --- it's because he's a progressive zealot who ignores reality to survive.

Do I care which it is ?? Not really...

Oh, I can guarantee you haven't received any secondary education. We can test that anytime you are ready.


:eusa_hand:

Your a pretend dweeb that runs around owning factoids they stole from random math/science sites.. I'm really not concerned what you think of my education or experience.

You might want to rethink that, at least for the field of science. There is a pretty high correlation between education and credibility for complex science.
 
How much of a naïve mofu is this one?:coffee:

There is ZERO proof........as in EGG.........that any curtailing of fossil fuel use is going to even have a smidgen of impact on shit. NONE......and that is just assuming any kind of climate change is due to man-made causes, also something that is not provable


Which is exactly why the sceptics are winning BIG!!


What a far left people known for? They are known for, if nothing else, wanting to spend other peoples money because "the intentions are good". Results don't matter for shit to these people......like they don't matter.


Thankfully, to MOST people in the world, costs do matter.


Hey......most people would love to have a nice big Mercedes in their driveway.:rock::rock::rock: , however, most people have the ability to think on the margin......but not people on the far left. Its not a matter of intelligence.......its a matter of fucked up thought processing. There is a huge difference.

Except for

600px-Temp-sunspot-co2.svg.png


Oh, that is Standford, that university where you didn't get a college education.

Number of sunspots IS NOT Total Solar Irradiation.. 52nd time I've told you that. The temperature forcing needs to be in Watts/m2 ---- not sunspot number.. But you are denser than lead and refuse to learn anything that might cause you to think for yourself..

Warmer zealots drag out sunspot number to deflect and confuse..

Furthermore the effects of the sun are not FULLY ACCOUNTED for until you consider any changes in SPECTRAL density of the radiative flux.. Small shifts in energy at particular frequencies are enough to modulate the GreenHouse window and could have sufficient and measurable effects on atmos temps and absorption of heat..

''Furthermore the effects of the sun are not FULLY ACCOUNTED for until you consider any changes in SPECTRAL density of the radiative flux.''

Power includes that consideration.
 
Except for

600px-Temp-sunspot-co2.svg.png


Oh, that is Standford, that university where you didn't get a college education.







StanDford?:eusa_whistle:

You, apparently, don't mind being wrong. With the continued supply of adequate energy at stake.

Fine. Do whatever you want to.

Here's what we're going to do.

Continue developing climate science through the IPCC.

Continue building as demand requires new sustainable energy production capacity.

Continue efforts to reduce energy waste.

Continue the development of electrical and CNG vehicles.

Continue protecting our cities and farms from the perils of different weather patterns and sea level increases as they become apparent.
Continue the search for science that will predict the optimum economic rate of transition to fuel free, waste free energy supplies.

This is great. You stand around doing nothing and we'll make progress just as conservatives and liberals are supposed to do.







Look jackass, you're the moron who thinks life began 6,000 years ago. Go read a fucking book and learn something.
 
I
Yes sir. You smart ones who avoid problems like the plague are the ones to be admired. Avoid education, avoid solving problems, avoid responsibility, avoid organization, avoid science, that's the ticket. What would the world do without you?








Yes, us "unedumacated" types who happen to know that life on this planet began at least 3.5 BILLION years ago. As I said, ignorant dickheads like you should just go back to your nunnery. You're useless in the real world.
 
Have you noticed how much today's world looks like the liberal ''world of fantasy'' and how much the conservative ''world of fantasy'' looks like the 50s?

No, I haven't noticed that.
 
Oh......and philosophy is gay.

Besides being the stupidest poster on this forum (though 52nd Street could give you a run for the money), you're also a blatantly obvious homophobe.

You really need to go find a real life somewhere cause you certainly don't have one here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top