- Feb 22, 2017
- 109,086
- 37,907
why do you think using a gun or not determines if you are a good person or a bad person?
rather odd
Just going by what is posted.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
why do you think using a gun or not determines if you are a good person or a bad person?
rather odd
show me a post where someone said use of a fire arm determined if one was a good or bad personJust going by what is posted.
But that must not be reported on the news. The cover up is in full swing.This does not change the fact that he was a lib who hated trump
Remind me of all the gun laws past in the first two years of Obama and Biden, when both had majorities in the House and the Senate.The left opposes gun laws?
It isn`t both left and right that arms the crazies.
How would he get a gun if there was a gun ban? Would he make his own? Would the 6 year old who shot a teacher make his own? More guns or more of anything means easier access. That`s a 9th grade economics class lesson./——/ How many laws did the shooter break that day? You think he would have obeyed a gun ban?
There is not, and there will not be, a gun ban.How would he get a gun if there was a gun ban?
No, I did not miss it. But explain to me how you can tell who can legally own a gun without background checks. Go.Did you miss the fact that the law addresses those WHO CAN LEGALLY OWN A GUN?
How would he get a gun if there was a gun ban? Would he make his own? Would the 6 year old who shot a teacher make his own? More guns or more of anything means easier access. That`s a 9th grade economics class lesson.
Maybe we teach our children to learn from our mistakes and failures instead of getting angry and taking that anger out on others.The Louisville shooter was informed he would be fired and he sought revenge.
Trump supporters are bummed out because they wanted this to be a political thing about him not liking Trump or something like that.
View attachment 775445
![]()
Louisville shooting: Bank gunman told he would be fired, sources say
The victims were identified by police as Joshua Barrick, 40; Thomas Elliott, 63; Juliana Farmer, 45; James Tutt, 64; and Deana Eckert, 57.abc7chicago.com
/——/ How do drug addicts get heroin if there is a drug ban? How do pedos get kiddie porn if it’s banned?How would he get a gun if there was a gun ban? Would he make his own? Would the 6 year old who shot a teacher make his own? More guns or more of anything means easier access. That`s a 9th grade economics class lesson.
Thanks for admitting you are a troll. Now I will put you on ignore.Thanks for confirming you are not only a retard but a cowardly retard. And, nope. I am not surprised.
You would prefer someone dies before action is taken?If someone has not committed a crime, why should their rights be taken away from them?
Yep. That person is a troll.And you can't see the irony of that statement.
The Louisville shooter was informed he would be fired and he sought revenge.
Trump supporters are bummed out because they wanted this to be a political thing about him not liking Trump or something like that.
View attachment 775445
![]()
Louisville shooting: Bank gunman told he would be fired, sources say
The victims were identified by police as Joshua Barrick, 40; Thomas Elliott, 63; Juliana Farmer, 45; James Tutt, 64; and Deana Eckert, 57.abc7chicago.com
Yet up until the time they pull the trigger they are a "Good guy with a gun"
/——/ Give up your car before someone dies from a drunk driver. Give up your kitchen knives before someone is stabbed to death. And don’t get me started on baseball bats.You would prefer someone dies before action is taken?
You would prefer someone dies before action is taken?
Even when there are red flags showing the person is a danger to society?Well yeah. I think it is wrong to take away rights before a crime is committed.
Even when there are red flags showing the person is a danger to society?