Mueller Is Coming for Trump

[rightwinger]

You failed to answer the question

Up Yers. I just didn't give the answer your gray play-dough brain was trying to steer me into.

I always pegged you a coward

 

[eddiew]

They concluded it was Russia because of the IP address. I guess they never heard of IP Spoofing.

IP spoofing, also known as IP address forgery or a host file hijack, is a hijacking technique in which a cracker masquerades as a trusted host to conceal his identity, spoof a Web site, hijack browsers, or gain access to a network.

They SHOULDN'T have concluded that! They certainly know IP Spoofing because THEY DO IT THEMSELVES and they have both stated that the IP address could have come from anywhere (even from them), while Assuage of Wiki Leaks stated in an interview that the source WAS NOT RUSSIA.

IDIOTS Russia f-ed with the french election the german one too What makes you think that with HIGH CONFIDENCE that russia hacked , our agencies are wrong

hacked what? you still didn't answer the important question, what did they supposedly do?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


ODNI declassified assessment of "Russian activities and intentions in recent Donald Tr
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States
The United States Intelligence Community has concluded with high confidence that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.[1] A January 2017 assessment by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) stated that Russia favored presidential candidate Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, and that Russian President Vladimir Putin personally ordered an "influence campaign" to harm Clinton's electoral chances and "undermine public faith in the US democratic process".[2]

On October 7, 2016,[3] the ODNI and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) jointly stated that Russian intelligence services had hacked the email accounts of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, and forwarded their contents to WikiLeaks.[4][5] Several cybersecurity firms stated that the cyberattacks were committed by hacker groups Fancy Bear and Cozy Bearassociated with Russian intelligence.[6] In January 2017, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper testified that Russia also meddled in the elections by disseminating fake news promoted on social media.[7]

 

[jc456]

But aren't those if colluding ,doing so at their leaders bidding?

Nope. Not always. Supporters often get over zealous in their efforts to help the chief win, most times without the chief being aware.

It is a wild, partisan assumption to say Trump must have ordered his team to collude.

First, we need to have proof someone did collude. Then there is a much harder task of proving Trump ordered them to do so.

We don't even have the first yet, although Flynn's request for immunity certainly is tantalizing.

If anyone did collude, the person at the top of my list of suspects is Roger Stone. Then Paul Manafort.

What about the son in law?

I certainly would like to know why Jared Kushner met during the transition with the president of a Russian bank under US sanctions.

someone should ask him

I'm sure Mueller will.

One of many reasons why we need an investigation.

well I don't know that is a cause for a meeting with mueller since there is no investigation other than counter intelligence. I'm not sure how he, Kushner, fits in that since he wasn't there at the election. See it was the election thingy that came up out of fking nowhere like a scapegoat for a failed campaign.

 

[jc456]

They concluded it was Russia because of the IP address. I guess they never heard of IP Spoofing.

IP spoofing, also known as IP address forgery or a host file hijack, is a hijacking technique in which a cracker masquerades as a trusted host to conceal his identity, spoof a Web site, hijack browsers, or gain access to a network.

They SHOULDN'T have concluded that! They certainly know IP Spoofing because THEY DO IT THEMSELVES and they have both stated that the IP address could have come from anywhere (even from them), while Assuage of Wiki Leaks stated in an interview that the source WAS NOT RUSSIA.

IDIOTS Russia f-ed with the french election the german one too What makes you think that with HIGH CONFIDENCE that russia hacked , our agencies are wrong

hacked what? you still didn't answer the important question, what did they supposedly do?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


ODNI declassified assessment of "Russian activities and intentions in recent Donald Tr
The United States Intelligence Community has concluded with high confidence that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.[1] A January 2017 assessment by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) stated that Russia favored presidential candidate Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, and that Russian President Vladimir Putin personally ordered an "influence campaign" to harm Clinton's electoral chances and "undermine public faith in the US democratic process".[2]

On October 7, 2016,[3] the ODNI and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) jointly stated that Russian intelligence services had hacked the email accounts of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, and forwarded their contents to WikiLeaks.[4][5] Several cybersecurity firms stated that the cyberattacks were committed by hacker groups Fancy Bear and Cozy Bearassociated with Russian intelligence.[6] In January 2017, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper testified that Russia also meddled in the elections by disseminating fake news promoted on social media.[7]

old news different day. totally debunked shit.

 

[eddiew]

They concluded it was Russia because of the IP address. I guess they never heard of IP Spoofing.

IP spoofing, also known as IP address forgery or a host file hijack, is a hijacking technique in which a cracker masquerades as a trusted host to conceal his identity, spoof a Web site, hijack browsers, or gain access to a network.

They SHOULDN'T have concluded that! They certainly know IP Spoofing because THEY DO IT THEMSELVES and they have both stated that the IP address could have come from anywhere (even from them), while Assuage of Wiki Leaks stated in an interview that the source WAS NOT RUSSIA.

IDIOTS Russia f-ed with the french election the german one too What makes you think that with HIGH CONFIDENCE that russia hacked , our agencies are wrong

hacked what? you still didn't answer the important question, what did they supposedly do?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


ODNI declassified assessment of "Russian activities and intentions in recent Donald Tr
The United States Intelligence Community has concluded with high confidence that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.[1] A January 2017 assessment by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) stated that Russia favored presidential candidate Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, and that Russian President Vladimir Putin personally ordered an "influence campaign" to harm Clinton's electoral chances and "undermine public faith in the US democratic process".[2]

On October 7, 2016,[3] the ODNI and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) jointly stated that Russian intelligence services had hacked the email accounts of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, and forwarded their contents to WikiLeaks.[4][5] Several cybersecurity firms stated that the cyberattacks were committed by hacker groups Fancy Bear and Cozy Bearassociated with Russian intelligence.[6] In January 2017, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper testified that Russia also meddled in the elections by disseminating fake news promoted on social media.[7]

old news different day. totally debunked shit.

Who debunked it ?? Trump??

 

[jc456]

They SHOULDN'T have concluded that! They certainly know IP Spoofing because THEY DO IT THEMSELVES and they have both stated that the IP address could have come from anywhere (even from them), while Assuage of Wiki Leaks stated in an interview that the source WAS NOT RUSSIA.

IDIOTS Russia f-ed with the french election the german one too What makes you think that with HIGH CONFIDENCE that russia hacked , our agencies are wrong

hacked what? you still didn't answer the important question, what did they supposedly do?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


ODNI declassified assessment of "Russian activities and intentions in recent Donald Tr
The United States Intelligence Community has concluded with high confidence that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.[1] A January 2017 assessment by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) stated that Russia favored presidential candidate Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, and that Russian President Vladimir Putin personally ordered an "influence campaign" to harm Clinton's electoral chances and "undermine public faith in the US democratic process".[2]

On October 7, 2016,[3] the ODNI and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) jointly stated that Russian intelligence services had hacked the email accounts of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, and forwarded their contents to WikiLeaks.[4][5] Several cybersecurity firms stated that the cyberattacks were committed by hacker groups Fancy Bear and Cozy Bearassociated with Russian intelligence.[6] In January 2017, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper testified that Russia also meddled in the elections by disseminating fake news promoted on social media.[7]

old news different day. totally debunked shit.

Who debunked it ?? Trump??

comey and the FBI, they haven't looked at the DNC Server or Podesta. so any thing from them regarding what was found, wasn't seen by them. debunked.

 

[jc456]

Trump most likely did not collude with Russia.

He has been silently consenting to Russia's attacks by his utter failure to condemn or retaliate or take measures to protect us from further attacks, but his Chumps clearly don't give a fuck about that. They, and Trump, are all colluding traitors in that respect.

However, I seriously doubt Trump actively colluded with the Russians during the campaign. Maybe some people on his team did, and for that reason the investigation needs to aggressively go forward.

Nonetheless, the Left is getting way too far over their skis on this one. Way too far.

Think about it.

By hurling everything they have, including the kitchen sink, at Trump over "this Russia thing", what will happen to Trump's drawing power if he is still standing at the end?

Yeah. Imagine how much more powerful he will look after having withstood "the greatest witch hunt EVAH!!!"

This could seriously backfire on the Left. Bigly.

Yeah g I guess it could But I remember a saying about folks who protest too much He's scared

dude he wants his agenda to be the highest priority in congress, not some witch hunt about russia. He's got a point.

Then he should stop obstructing.

what?

 

[toobfreak]

You failed to answer the question

Up Yers. I just didn't give the answer your gray play-dough brain was trying to steer me into.

I always pegged you a coward

I always pegged you a flaming rectum.

 

[g5000]

They concluded it was Russia because of the IP address. I guess they never heard of IP Spoofing.

IP spoofing, also known as IP address forgery or a host file hijack, is a hijacking technique in which a cracker masquerades as a trusted host to conceal his identity, spoof a Web site, hijack browsers, or gain access to a network.

They SHOULDN'T have concluded that! They certainly know IP Spoofing because THEY DO IT THEMSELVES and they have both stated that the IP address could have come from anywhere (even from them), while Assuage of Wiki Leaks stated in an interview that the source WAS NOT RUSSIA.

IDIOTS Russia f-ed with the french election the german one too What makes you think that with HIGH CONFIDENCE that russia hacked , our agencies are wrong

hacked what? you still didn't answer the important question, what did they supposedly do?

Full transcript: Sally Yates and James Clapper testify on Russian election interference




Top-Secret NSA Report Details Russian Hacking Effort Days Before 2016 Election



Russian Cyber Hacks on U.S. Electoral System Far Wider Than Previously Known




https://www.us-cert.gov/sites/default/files/publications/JAR_16-20296A_GRIZZLY STEPPE-2016-1229.pdf

The U.S. Government confirms that two different RIS actors participated in the intrusion into a U.S. political party. The first actor group, known as Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) 29, entered into the party’s systems in summer 2015, while the second, known as APT28, entered in spring 2016.

Cybersecurity Expert Is Convinced Russia Was Behind DNC Hacking

NPR: Matt Tait is CEO of Capital Alpha Security, a British cybersecurity firm. I asked him why he was skeptical.

TAIT: Well, it just seemed to fantastical to be true. Russia has very good hackers. You know ,this is a government agency. So initially, what I decided, I’m going to prove Crowd Strike wrong.

NPR: They were hired by the Democratic National Committee to look into this.

TAIT: Absolutely. And so I basically went through all of the technical evidence published by them. I looked through the malware signatures they had come up with, and eventually what you start to discover is there’s a very large number of little pieces of information, some of which point to Russia, some of them point to Russia very, very strongly. And eventually, I came to the conclusion that there’s no other reasonable conclusion you can make.

NPR: Why couldn’t it have been any Joe Blow sitting in their bed, as Donald Trump suggested, masquerading as Russian and putting on a good disguise here?

TAIT: So there’s two different hacks that took place. There’s one hack that was of the DNC, and there was a different hack of John Podesta.

NPR: Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman.

TAIT: Absolutely. And there‘s a series of other smaller hacks of other Democratic members, but those are the two main hacks that took place. And the DNC hack used malware, it hacked into the DNC and placed malware on the DNC network, and we’re able to look at this malware and we’re able to analyze it and see where it talks to, which other companies have been hacked by similar malware, and quite quickly we’re able to see that this is malware that is communicating with servers that also were involved in the hack of the German parliament, the Bundestag. And one of the things that was very interesting is that this is a group we know quite well in the cybersecurity industry. This is a group called APT28. They’re very prolific. They’ve been involved in the hack of NATO organizations. They’ve been involved in the hack of journalists. They’ve been involved in the hack of people investigating the MH-17 airline that was shot down in Ukraine. And so this is a group that is so prolific that it is not really credible that this is an individual group.

NPR: Russia’s really good at this. Wouldn’t they disguise themselves better? Would Russia really want to put so many visible signs out there in the cybersecurity world that it was them and be identified?

TAIT: This wasn’t deliberate. They accidentally did this. And this is one of the problems of when you’re hacking at a really big scale, you look for efficiencies. There’s just not enough members of staff that Russia has in order to be able to hacks on this kind of scale and make sure they never screw up. What happens is that people make small mistakes, which means that when they’ve hacked a person A you might be able to say well that’s the same group, they’ve used the same malware, they’ve used the same control infrastructure as the hacker person B. Once you start to discover that there’s not just the DNC, there’s a thousand other people that have been hacked, all of whom are very narrowly tied to Russian military interests. The hacks of NATO, the hacks of the German parliament, the hacks of journalists reporting on things that Russia is not very happy about being reported on, you start quite quickly to build up this picture where in order for it to be someone else, it really has to be someone who is very prolific, who is doing this full time. There’s nobody else who would be willing to put that sort of cash, that sort of effort, into doing those types of hacks.


NPR: You said something very important there. You’re saying Russia, in your words, screwed up here.

TAIT: Absolutely. And this is normal. It’s actually very common that we see mistakes in malware, we see mistakes in hacking campaigns which allow us to work out who it was that did this.

NPR: Another major cybersecurity firm, Kaspersky Lab, very respected. We should mention Kaspersky is an NPR funder, and we do work with them on our computers. They said that there can be false flags. There can be a lack of reliable metrics. And Americans have gone through a situation with the Iraq War where there was talk of weapons of mass destruction, the intelligence community’s credibility was really called into question after that, but a President took this nation to war based on intelligence. I mean, are you absolutely certain here, or could we find later on down the road that there was some amazing hacker out there who was able to pull this off and make it look like Russia?

TAIT: One of the pieces of evidence that to me is more compelling than any other one is an email that was sent to John Podesta saying, hey we’re from Google, you need to change your password, and they sent him a link to click on. And when clicked on that link it took him to a page that wasn’t Google and asked him to input his password, and that’s how they hacked his account. But the URL shortening service that they used were able to basically look at the user that was logged in and discover all the other URLs they were shortening, and discovered this was not just the hack of John Podesta, it was the hack of a thousand people, and it becomes immediately, once you look at this, incredible to suggest this was a false flag operation. This was someone’s entire intelligence operation that was accidentally exposed due to this one error. So while false flag operations do exist and we have to always be on the lookout for them, the only plausible alternative explanation is that Russian intelligence was hacked. So it’s not credible to suggest this particular hack was a false flag operation.

NPR: It’s impossible that Russia’s intelligence community was hacked?


TAIT: In attribution, nothing is impossible, but this is about as impossible as it comes.

NPR: Matt Tait is founder and CEO of Capital Alpha Security, a cybersecurity firm in Britain. We should also note here Kaspersky Lab, whose doubts about the hack that we cited, has its headquarters in Moscow.







Face the Nation transcript April 2, 2017: Haley, Cornyn, King

DICKERSON: Vladimir Putin said that Russia did not interfere in the U.S. election. Did he lie?

HALEY: Well, I have always said we don’t trust Russia. And I think we’re all aware that Russia was involved in the elections.






You're welcome.

 

[g5000]

If you tell a Trump Chump that Obama signed an EO banning white underwear on federal property, they wouldn't be able to get to this forum fast enough to repeat it.

Fool Me A Thousand Times

So their mock skepticism about Russia's attacks is not fooling a single person with more than two brain cells.

 

[mudwhistle]

'
Mueller Is Coming for Trump

The special counsel’s expanding probe will reveal loads of dirt from the president’s financial past

What you don’t know can hurt you very badly, and there is a great deal that Republicans do not know about Donald Trump. From shady business dealings to questionable tax schemes to potential Russian collusion, the president is dogged by scandals whose depth and significance remain unclear. With few exceptions, Republicans are eager to protect Trump from serious inquiries, running interference where they can while pushing through their legislative agenda as quickly and secretively as possible. The GOP isn’t quite sure what it’s helping Trump to cover up—but as long as he promises to sign its bills, the party will condone his outrageous misdeeds.

This strategy now appears poised to backfire spectacularly. On Wednesday, both the New York Times and the Washington Post reported that special counsel Robert Mueller is investigating Trump’s inner circle for financial crimes. This aggressive shift toward Trump associates’ personal dealings is disastrous news for the president, his allies, and his enablers. At long last, federal investigators will probe Trump’s sprawling network for wrongdoing, picking up where reporters left off, only this time with subpoena power. And Trump can only stop them by firing Mueller—a blatant obstruction of justice that would likely be more damaging than any crime the president may have committed in the past.

.

Of course the author is gay....so obviously he's full of poop.

Mark Joseph Stern is a writer for Slate. He covers the law and LGBTQ issues.

 

[mudwhistle]

He's only doing his job by going after any possible criminality by the Trump Campaign that is connected or gotten from the Russian interference investigation...Mueller has a pretty narrow scope on what he oversees as special counsel was my understanding.

But that's not what he's doing. He's going on a fishing-expedition hoping he can find something in his past he can use to trash him in public with.

 

[rightwinger]

He's only doing his job by going after any possible criminality by the Trump Campaign that is connected or gotten from the Russian interference investigation...Mueller has a pretty narrow scope on what he oversees as special counsel was my understanding.

But that's not what he's doing. He's going on a fishing-expedition hoping he can find something in his past he can use to trash him in public with.

Lot of fish in that lake

Seems like Trumps whole election team

 

[eddiew]

They concluded it was Russia because of the IP address. I guess they never heard of IP Spoofing.

IP spoofing, also known as IP address forgery or a host file hijack, is a hijacking technique in which a cracker masquerades as a trusted host to conceal his identity, spoof a Web site, hijack browsers, or gain access to a network.

They SHOULDN'T have concluded that! They certainly know IP Spoofing because THEY DO IT THEMSELVES and they have both stated that the IP address could have come from anywhere (even from them), while Assuage of Wiki Leaks stated in an interview that the source WAS NOT RUSSIA.

IDIOTS Russia f-ed with the french election the german one too What makes you think that with HIGH CONFIDENCE that russia hacked , our agencies are wrong

hacked what? you still didn't answer the important question, what did they supposedly do?

Full transcript: Sally Yates and James Clapper testify on Russian election interference




Top-Secret NSA Report Details Russian Hacking Effort Days Before 2016 Election



Russian Cyber Hacks on U.S. Electoral System Far Wider Than Previously Known




https://www.us-cert.gov/sites/default/files/publications/JAR_16-20296A_GRIZZLY STEPPE-2016-1229.pdf

The U.S. Government confirms that two different RIS actors participated in the intrusion into a U.S. political party. The first actor group, known as Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) 29, entered into the party’s systems in summer 2015, while the second, known as APT28, entered in spring 2016.

Cybersecurity Expert Is Convinced Russia Was Behind DNC Hacking

NPR: Matt Tait is CEO of Capital Alpha Security, a British cybersecurity firm. I asked him why he was skeptical.

TAIT: Well, it just seemed to fantastical to be true. Russia has very good hackers. You know ,this is a government agency. So initially, what I decided, I’m going to prove Crowd Strike wrong.

NPR: They were hired by the Democratic National Committee to look into this.

TAIT: Absolutely. And so I basically went through all of the technical evidence published by them. I looked through the malware signatures they had come up with, and eventually what you start to discover is there’s a very large number of little pieces of information, some of which point to Russia, some of them point to Russia very, very strongly. And eventually, I came to the conclusion that there’s no other reasonable conclusion you can make.

NPR: Why couldn’t it have been any Joe Blow sitting in their bed, as Donald Trump suggested, masquerading as Russian and putting on a good disguise here?

TAIT: So there’s two different hacks that took place. There’s one hack that was of the DNC, and there was a different hack of John Podesta.

NPR: Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman.

TAIT: Absolutely. And there‘s a series of other smaller hacks of other Democratic members, but those are the two main hacks that took place. And the DNC hack used malware, it hacked into the DNC and placed malware on the DNC network, and we’re able to look at this malware and we’re able to analyze it and see where it talks to, which other companies have been hacked by similar malware, and quite quickly we’re able to see that this is malware that is communicating with servers that also were involved in the hack of the German parliament, the Bundestag. And one of the things that was very interesting is that this is a group we know quite well in the cybersecurity industry. This is a group called APT28. They’re very prolific. They’ve been involved in the hack of NATO organizations. They’ve been involved in the hack of journalists. They’ve been involved in the hack of people investigating the MH-17 airline that was shot down in Ukraine. And so this is a group that is so prolific that it is not really credible that this is an individual group.

NPR: Russia’s really good at this. Wouldn’t they disguise themselves better? Would Russia really want to put so many visible signs out there in the cybersecurity world that it was them and be identified?

TAIT: This wasn’t deliberate. They accidentally did this. And this is one of the problems of when you’re hacking at a really big scale, you look for efficiencies. There’s just not enough members of staff that Russia has in order to be able to hacks on this kind of scale and make sure they never screw up. What happens is that people make small mistakes, which means that when they’ve hacked a person A you might be able to say well that’s the same group, they’ve used the same malware, they’ve used the same control infrastructure as the hacker person B. Once you start to discover that there’s not just the DNC, there’s a thousand other people that have been hacked, all of whom are very narrowly tied to Russian military interests. The hacks of NATO, the hacks of the German parliament, the hacks of journalists reporting on things that Russia is not very happy about being reported on, you start quite quickly to build up this picture where in order for it to be someone else, it really has to be someone who is very prolific, who is doing this full time. There’s nobody else who would be willing to put that sort of cash, that sort of effort, into doing those types of hacks.


NPR: You said something very important there. You’re saying Russia, in your words, screwed up here.

TAIT: Absolutely. And this is normal. It’s actually very common that we see mistakes in malware, we see mistakes in hacking campaigns which allow us to work out who it was that did this.

NPR: Another major cybersecurity firm, Kaspersky Lab, very respected. We should mention Kaspersky is an NPR funder, and we do work with them on our computers. They said that there can be false flags. There can be a lack of reliable metrics. And Americans have gone through a situation with the Iraq War where there was talk of weapons of mass destruction, the intelligence community’s credibility was really called into question after that, but a President took this nation to war based on intelligence. I mean, are you absolutely certain here, or could we find later on down the road that there was some amazing hacker out there who was able to pull this off and make it look like Russia?

TAIT: One of the pieces of evidence that to me is more compelling than any other one is an email that was sent to John Podesta saying, hey we’re from Google, you need to change your password, and they sent him a link to click on. And when clicked on that link it took him to a page that wasn’t Google and asked him to input his password, and that’s how they hacked his account. But the URL shortening service that they used were able to basically look at the user that was logged in and discover all the other URLs they were shortening, and discovered this was not just the hack of John Podesta, it was the hack of a thousand people, and it becomes immediately, once you look at this, incredible to suggest this was a false flag operation. This was someone’s entire intelligence operation that was accidentally exposed due to this one error. So while false flag operations do exist and we have to always be on the lookout for them, the only plausible alternative explanation is that Russian intelligence was hacked. So it’s not credible to suggest this particular hack was a false flag operation.

NPR: It’s impossible that Russia’s intelligence community was hacked?


TAIT: In attribution, nothing is impossible, but this is about as impossible as it comes.

NPR: Matt Tait is founder and CEO of Capital Alpha Security, a cybersecurity firm in Britain. We should also note here Kaspersky Lab, whose doubts about the hack that we cited, has its headquarters in Moscow.







Face the Nation transcript April 2, 2017: Haley, Cornyn, King

DICKERSON: Vladimir Putin said that Russia did not interfere in the U.S. election. Did he lie?

HALEY: Well, I have always said we don’t trust Russia. And I think we’re all aware that Russia was involved in the elections.






You're welcome.

With high confidence which means they are SURE

 

[Care4all]

He's only doing his job by going after any possible criminality by the Trump Campaign that is connected or gotten from the Russian interference investigation...Mueller has a pretty narrow scope on what he oversees as special counsel was my understanding.

But that's not what he's doing. He's going on a fishing-expedition hoping he can find something in his past he can use to trash him in public with.

Mueller is NOT a Ken Starr Mudwhistle....don't believe the fishing expedition rumors...and bloggers saying such....

ONLY Russian interference past relations will be brought in to the investigation if there are any...

Mueller has never in his career, been a "grandstand-er" and he is at the very end of a patriotic career and has no need for 15 minutes of fame.... you've completely misjudged his character imo.

 

[bripat9643]

"the attacks by a hostile enemy" farce

This right here is why the investigation must continue, so that even willfully blind tards like yourself will be forced to admit we were attacked.

It is downright traitorous that you tards are deliberately turning a blind eye to this fact, and that you are not demanding our government take punitive and preventive action.

well then why don't you demand that the fbi look at the DNC server?

A contractor with expertise in that area already did that for them.

they are not government nor do they have the authority to act as such. sorry bubba, you don't want transparency so your farce is nothing but a witch hunt.

You're talking out of your ass, retard. The government contracts out to expert civilians all the time.

Additionally, the DNC server was a private entity's server, not a government server.

Jesus, you tards have no idea how our government works!

The government didn't contract out anything, numskull. The DNC did.

Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[toobfreak]

Jc has his head in the sand about the HUGE conflict of interest of the pussy grabber's where he's in violation of the Constitution for the emolument clause.
He's getting richer on the tax payers dime and his sheep just look the other way..

Sorry, but the emoluments clause speaks to taking gifts while in office like Hillary did, presumed quid pro quo, not a legitimate guest just paying a legitimate fee to rent out a room in a hotel.

 

[eddiew]

'
Mueller Is Coming for Trump

The special counsel’s expanding probe will reveal loads of dirt from the president’s financial past

What you don’t know can hurt you very badly, and there is a great deal that Republicans do not know about Donald Trump. From shady business dealings to questionable tax schemes to potential Russian collusion, the president is dogged by scandals whose depth and significance remain unclear. With few exceptions, Republicans are eager to protect Trump from serious inquiries, running interference where they can while pushing through their legislative agenda as quickly and secretively as possible. The GOP isn’t quite sure what it’s helping Trump to cover up—but as long as he promises to sign its bills, the party will condone his outrageous misdeeds.

This strategy now appears poised to backfire spectacularly. On Wednesday, both the New York Times and the Washington Post reported that special counsel Robert Mueller is investigating Trump’s inner circle for financial crimes. This aggressive shift toward Trump associates’ personal dealings is disastrous news for the president, his allies, and his enablers. At long last, federal investigators will probe Trump’s sprawling network for wrongdoing, picking up where reporters left off, only this time with subpoena power. And Trump can only stop them by firing Mueller—a blatant obstruction of justice that would likely be more damaging than any crime the president may have committed in the past.

.

Of course the author is gay....so obviously he's full of poop.

Mark Joseph Stern is a writer for Slate. He covers the law and LGBTQ issues.

This the guy repubs want to bash??
Robert Swan Mueller III /ˈmʌlər/ (born August 7, 1944) is an American lawyer and civil servant who was the sixth Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, serving from September 4, 2001, to September 4, 2013. A Republican, he was appointed by President George W. Bush and his original ten-year term was given a two-year extension by President Barack Obama, making him the second longest-serving FBI director since J. Edgar Hoover.

Before his appointment as FBI director, he served as a United States Attorney, as Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division and as acting Deputy Attorney General.

On May 17, 2017, Mueller was appointed by the Justice Department as Special Counseloverseeing the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States electionsand related matters.

Cleared from potential prosecution by the Supreme Court for post-9/11 detention of Muslims under policies then brought into place. Ruling does not address Christian detnetions.



Contents
[1Early life and education

• 2Military service

• 3Law career

• 4FBI director

• 5Later career
  • 5.1Private sector
  • 5.22017 appointment as special counsel

• 6References

• 7Further reading

• 8External links

Early life and education[edit]
Mueller was born in New York City,[2] the son of Alice C. (née Truesdale) and Robert Swan Mueller II, an executive with DuPont.[3][4]

Mueller is of German, English and Scottish descent. His paternal great-grandfather, Gustave A. Mueller, was a prominent physician in Pittsburgh, whose father August C. E. Mueller had immigrated to the United States in 1855, from Pomerania, Germany.[5] On his mother's side he is a great-grandson of the railroad executive William Truesdale. Mueller grew up outside of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.[2] He graduated from St. Paul's School, in 1962, where he was captain of the soccer, hockey, and lacrosse teams, and won the Gordon Medal as the school's top athlete in 1962.[6]

He went on to study at Princeton University, receiving an A.B., in 1966, where he continued to play lacrosse. He has cited his teammate David Spencer Hackett's death in the Vietnam War as an influence on his decision to pursue military service.[7] Hackett was a Marine Corps first lieutenant in the infantry and was killed in 1967, by small arms fire.[8] Mueller earned an M.A. in international relations from New York University in 1967 before pursuing his Juris Doctor degree. In 1973, after a period of military service, he was graduated from the University of Virginia School of Law,[9] where he served on the Virginia Law Review.

Military service[edit]
Mueller enlisted in the United States Marine Corps in 1968, attending training at Parris Island, Officer Candidate School, Army Ranger School, and Army jump school.[10]

In July 1968, he was sent to South Vietnam where he served as a rifle platoon commander with H Company, 2nd Battalion, 4th Marines, 3rd Marine Division;[2][11] he eventually became aide-de-camp to 3rd Marine Division's commanding general.[10] In April 1969, he received an enemy gunshot wound in the thigh, recovered, and returned to lead his platoon until June 1969.[12] For his service in and during the Vietnam War, his military decorations and awards include: the Bronze Star Medal with Combat "V" for heroism, Purple Heart Medal, two Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medals with Combat "V", Combat Action Ribbon, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross for heroism, Vietnam Service Medalwith three  3⁄16" bronze stars, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and Parachutist Badge.[2][13]

Law career[edit]
After receiving his law degree in 1973, Mueller worked as a litigator at the firm Pillsbury, Madison and Sutro in San Francisco until 1976. He then served for 12 years in United States Attorney offices. He first worked in the office of the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of California in San Francisco,[10] where he rose to be chief of the criminal division, and in 1982, he moved to Boston to work in the office of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts as Assistant United States Attorney,[2] where he investigated and prosecuted major financial fraud, terrorism and public corruption cases, as well as narcotics conspiracies and international money launderers.[citation needed]

After serving as a partner at the Boston law firm of Hill and Barlow, Mueller returned to government service. In 1989, he served in the United States Department of Justice as an assistant to Attorney General Dick Thornburgh. The following year he took charge of its criminal division.[10] During his tenure, he oversaw prosecutions that included Panamanianleader Manuel Noriega, the Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockerbie bombing) case, and the Gambino crime family boss John Gotti. In 1991, he was elected a fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers.[2]

In 1993, Mueller became a partner at Boston's Hale and Dorr, specializing in white-collar crime litigation.[10] He returned to public service in 1995 as senior litigator in the homicide section of the District of Columbia United States Attorney's Office. In 1998, Mueller was named U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of California and held that position until 2001.[2]

 

[toobfreak]

When You have been engaged in INSANITY rooted in HATRED since The President Was ELECTED, even the most SANE act is going to confuse and befuddle you.
So my explanation is, you need to seek professional help.

Thank you for those videos! Seeing this stuff for the first time I am now beginning to understand the phrase: "liberal trigger," and beginning to wonder whether or not having freedoms of speech, to vote, etc., should not be accompanied with some sort of test to qualify you as not a complete idiot!

I mean, these people are simply IRRATIONAL, quite mad, deranged, the result of bad wiring------ and environmental causes cannot explain it all, and I doubt any amount of rehabilitation can ever be effective in repairing it.

When a healthy organism becomes infected with diseased tissue, the only medical remedy is to remove it before it consumes the body.

 

[toobfreak]

I want a complete investigation into the attacks by a hostile enemy on our country. Why don't you, traitor?

I JUST WONDER---- Russia has been cyber attacking this country and many others the world over for DECADES! Why just now has it become such an issue? Russia is not doing anything new it hasn't tried many times before. And while all evidence points to them not getting very far, indeed, last year when Stein called for a recount of three states, it was LAUGHED AT the possibility, saying that our system was beyond reproach! Remember? BUT I AGREE, it should be looked into closely and if it can be made more safe, certainly. BUT THEN, why don't we pay more attention to the actual Russians themselves and less about Trump and his staff? No reasonable person actually thinks that Donald Trump or his cabinet were actually foreign agents collaborating to destroy our election system or some other nefarious deed, do they? I mean, except for the totally irrational, partisan hopeless wackos. So just what does all of this "investigation" really seek to accomplish or solve for us other than to tie up Washington ad nauseam while nothing actually good addressing the real issue ever gets fixed?! I think we ought to get serious, get our collective heads together and tackle the real issues facing this country rather than chasing our own shadow. Or is maybe all these investigations really meant to keep us constantly running in circles to deflect us from ever fixing the actual issue?

Sorry for asking---- honest minds just want to know.