Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.
Muelle'rs own report STATES that no American colluded with Russians in attempting to unlawfully influence the election. Not sure we can say the same for MI-6 agents involved. Democrats are trying for obstruction charges well after the investigation started. Of Course everyone knows Mueller couldn't indict if there was no crime.
And furthermore, The FBI had surveilance of Trump tower.... so if they had something besides partisan bullshit we would know about it.
On what page does his report state that no American colluded with Russians?
He couldn't indict because DOJ POLICY said he couldn't indict.
You already know about it, you are just the usual Trump Humper who is in denial.
so - again - what specific actions did trump do?dunno. but if he was, was it to hide guilt or he knew he didn't do it and wanted to end the madness? if you were accused of a crime you didn't commit, would you defend yourself?so - you can't answer the question. you just lob more asinine speculation on top of your previous bullshit but can't answer questions of logic.That's a damn good question, since we know for a fact Trump was working hard to end it they probably never thought it would go this far.
Was Trump working behind the scenes to end the investigation?
now - what specific actions did he do to obstruct?
Yes if I am innocent I put everything out in the open I don't try and hide it.
i never seem to get good answers here, just return rage and sideshow bobs.
Have you bothered to read Mueller's report?so - again - what specific actions did trump do?
i never seem to get good answers here, just return rage and sideshow bobs.
It's a Constitutional responsibility to hold a president accountable.if they couldn't do anything with the results cause they knew it wouldn't happen - why did they do it?No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.
Because it does. It totally destroys Barr's testimony and his reading of the report. It proves Barr was being Trumps cover to try and hide wrong doing by Trump. Katyal: AG Barr distorted Mueller's work and public debate Kurt Bardella and Neal Katyal made the perfect case for impeachment. You can't have the AG and Trump hijacking the rule of law by distorting the report with all these lies and misreadings..One person's opinion: Mueller proved himself a political hack and a coward.
The main thrust of his 9-minute, self-serving speech was that everything he wanted to say was included in his lengthy but grossly incomplete "Report."
Specifically, he is trying his best NEVER to answer the questions (by Republicans) that his report DEMANDS, to wit, "When did you realize that there was no conspiracy between operatives of the Russian Federation and the Trump Campaign?"
"Why did you not announce that fact publicly, given the fact that a sitting President was being slandered constantly in Congress and in the Media for the past two plus years?"
And so on.
He said NOTHING that had not already been stated in his Report. Why are Democrats acting like "This changes everything!"?
Because it's being done for corrupt purposes to use it as a distraction.dunno. but if he was, was it to hide guilt or he knew he didn't do it and wanted to end the madness? if you were accused of a crime you didn't commit, would you defend yourself?so - you can't answer the question. you just lob more asinine speculation on top of your previous bullshit but can't answer questions of logic.That's a damn good question, since we know for a fact Trump was working hard to end it they probably never thought it would go this far.
Was Trump working behind the scenes to end the investigation?
now - what specific actions did he do to obstruct?
Yes if I am innocent I put everything out in the open I don't try and hide it.
If that's the case, why are you and all your fellow travelers soiling your underwear because Trump declassified the FISA documents?
They're too friggin lazy, and they don't want to know the truth, because the truth has destroyed every talking point they've used to defend Trump since the beginning. The report reveals these Toads as total fools.so - again - what specific actions did trump do?dunno. but if he was, was it to hide guilt or he knew he didn't do it and wanted to end the madness? if you were accused of a crime you didn't commit, would you defend yourself?so - you can't answer the question. you just lob more asinine speculation on top of your previous bullshit but can't answer questions of logic.
Was Trump working behind the scenes to end the investigation?
now - what specific actions did he do to obstruct?
Yes if I am innocent I put everything out in the open I don't try and hide it.
i never seem to get good answers here, just return rage and sideshow bobs.Have you bothered to read Mueller's report?so - again - what specific actions did trump do?
i never seem to get good answers here, just return rage and sideshow bobs.
Read the Mueller Report: Searchable Document and Index (Vol. II, P. 113)
"In late January 2018, the media reported that in June 2017 the President had ordered McGahn to have the Special Counsel fired based on purported conflicts of interest but McGahn had refused, saying he would quit instead.
"After the story broke, the President, through his personal counsel and two aides, sought to have McGahn deny that he had been directed to remove the Special Counsel.
"Each time he was approached, McGahn responded that he would not refute the press accounts because they were accurate in reporting on the President’s effort to have the Special Counsel removed.
"The President later personally met with McGahn in the Oval Office with only the Chief of Staff present and tried to get McGahn to say that the President never ordered him to fire the Special Counsel.
"McGahn refused and insisted his memory of the President’s direction to remove the Special Counsel was accurate.
"In that same meeting, the President challenged McGahn for taking notes of his discussions with the President and asked why he had told Special Counsel investigators that he had been directed to have the Special Counsel removed."
Why do you suppose the RNC doesn't want McGahn to testify under oath with all Americans watching?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9baae0d5571a
They have sighted the report. Nadler at the hearing quoted a bunch of it to the committee when McGhan didn't show up. Obstruction has been proven.It's in the Mueller report. There's at least eleven obstruction cases that have been confirmed for indictment if Mueller was allowed to do so. The fact that Trump toads are too lazy to read it is their fuck up. No one else's.How? Trump has been found guilty.No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.
The Lefts wall is crumbling around them. Just going to get worse for them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No he hasn't. Your fantasy world isn't reality. Mueller could find NO evidence of a crime. Now thinks he can just run away and avoid any tough questions. So show your link that proves Trump committed a crime and was found guilty or STFU.
There are 0 proven cases of obstruction you dufus. If there were, don't you think that Democrats like Nadler would cite the Mueller report? The Mueller report is available to the Congress........So far NO ONE can find any thing to impeach Trump with.
House Judiciary Chair Jerrold Nadler threatens to go to court to force ex-White House counsel Don McGahn to testifyso - again - what specific actions did trump do?dunno. but if he was, was it to hide guilt or he knew he didn't do it and wanted to end the madness? if you were accused of a crime you didn't commit, would you defend yourself?so - you can't answer the question. you just lob more asinine speculation on top of your previous bullshit but can't answer questions of logic.That's a damn good question, since we know for a fact Trump was working hard to end it they probably never thought it would go this far.
Was Trump working behind the scenes to end the investigation?
now - what specific actions did he do to obstruct?
Yes if I am innocent I put everything out in the open I don't try and hide it.
i never seem to get good answers here, just return rage and sideshow bobs.
House Judiciary Chair Jerrold Nadler threatens to go to court to force ex-White House counsel Don McGahn to testifyIt's in the Mueller report. There's at least eleven obstruction cases that have been confirmed for indictment if Mueller was allowed to do so. The fact that Trump toads are too lazy to read it is their fuck up. No one else's.How? Trump has been found guilty.No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.
The Lefts wall is crumbling around them. Just going to get worse for them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No he hasn't. Your fantasy world isn't reality. Mueller could find NO evidence of a crime. Now thinks he can just run away and avoid any tough questions. So show your link that proves Trump committed a crime and was found guilty or STFU.
No it is not in the report. A bunch of innuendo and conversations. Not one thing that would constitute obstruction in a court of law. Mueller lied. He told Barr 3 times with witnesses present that the DOJ guidelines did NOT enter into the decision. The fact that you don't have the brain power to understand that due to terminal TDS is your fuck up, not ours.
They're too friggin lazy, and they don't want to know the truth, because the truth has destroyed every talking point they've used to defend Trump since the beginning. The report reveals these Toads as total fools.so - again - what specific actions did trump do?dunno. but if he was, was it to hide guilt or he knew he didn't do it and wanted to end the madness? if you were accused of a crime you didn't commit, would you defend yourself?Was Trump working behind the scenes to end the investigation?
now - what specific actions did he do to obstruct?
Yes if I am innocent I put everything out in the open I don't try and hide it.
i never seem to get good answers here, just return rage and sideshow bobs.Have you bothered to read Mueller's report?so - again - what specific actions did trump do?
i never seem to get good answers here, just return rage and sideshow bobs.
Read the Mueller Report: Searchable Document and Index (Vol. II, P. 113)
"In late January 2018, the media reported that in June 2017 the President had ordered McGahn to have the Special Counsel fired based on purported conflicts of interest but McGahn had refused, saying he would quit instead.
"After the story broke, the President, through his personal counsel and two aides, sought to have McGahn deny that he had been directed to remove the Special Counsel.
"Each time he was approached, McGahn responded that he would not refute the press accounts because they were accurate in reporting on the President’s effort to have the Special Counsel removed.
"The President later personally met with McGahn in the Oval Office with only the Chief of Staff present and tried to get McGahn to say that the President never ordered him to fire the Special Counsel.
"McGahn refused and insisted his memory of the President’s direction to remove the Special Counsel was accurate.
"In that same meeting, the President challenged McGahn for taking notes of his discussions with the President and asked why he had told Special Counsel investigators that he had been directed to have the Special Counsel removed."
Why do you suppose the RNC doesn't want McGahn to testify under oath with all Americans watching?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9baae0d5571a
I don't think Trump ever expected to win the White House.They're too friggin lazy, and they don't want to know the truth, because the truth has destroyed every talking point they've used to defend Trump since the beginning. The report reveals these Toads as total fools.
You are so way ahead of the rest of us on this board, and you are exactly right. Kudos! And try not to forget in the beginning of this investigation about the half a trillion dollar oil deal he probably had going on with Russia in the Kara sea. Russia needed sanctions lifted in order for them to get Exxon to move that oil for them.They're too friggin lazy, and they don't want to know the truth, because the truth has destroyed every talking point they've used to defend Trump since the beginning. The report reveals these Toads as total fools.so - again - what specific actions did trump do?dunno. but if he was, was it to hide guilt or he knew he didn't do it and wanted to end the madness? if you were accused of a crime you didn't commit, would you defend yourself?
now - what specific actions did he do to obstruct?
Yes if I am innocent I put everything out in the open I don't try and hide it.
i never seem to get good answers here, just return rage and sideshow bobs.Have you bothered to read Mueller's report?so - again - what specific actions did trump do?
i never seem to get good answers here, just return rage and sideshow bobs.
Read the Mueller Report: Searchable Document and Index (Vol. II, P. 113)
"In late January 2018, the media reported that in June 2017 the President had ordered McGahn to have the Special Counsel fired based on purported conflicts of interest but McGahn had refused, saying he would quit instead.
"After the story broke, the President, through his personal counsel and two aides, sought to have McGahn deny that he had been directed to remove the Special Counsel.
"Each time he was approached, McGahn responded that he would not refute the press accounts because they were accurate in reporting on the President’s effort to have the Special Counsel removed.
"The President later personally met with McGahn in the Oval Office with only the Chief of Staff present and tried to get McGahn to say that the President never ordered him to fire the Special Counsel.
"McGahn refused and insisted his memory of the President’s direction to remove the Special Counsel was accurate.
"In that same meeting, the President challenged McGahn for taking notes of his discussions with the President and asked why he had told Special Counsel investigators that he had been directed to have the Special Counsel removed."
Why do you suppose the RNC doesn't want McGahn to testify under oath with all Americans watching?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9baae0d5571aI don't think Trump ever expected to win the White House.They're too friggin lazy, and they don't want to know the truth, because the truth has destroyed every talking point they've used to defend Trump since the beginning. The report reveals these Toads as total fools.
He wanted to launch Trump TV, and in order to make that happen he had to lure Roger Aisles. Sean Hannity, and Bill O'Reilly away from Fox. Had he finished second in the Republican primaries he would have burnished his brand sufficiently to launch his network.
MSM never investigated his many business conflicts or his lifelong contacts with organized crime figures.
A Republican congress protected Trump during his first two years. Now that Democrats control the House, he realizes it is only a matter of time before his financials become part of a public record.
When that happens even corporate Democrats are going to have to impeach a gold plated con man who should never been allowed to set foot in the White House.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...d346f0ec94f_story.html?utm_term=.0cd215ef8050
Keep following that yellow brick road to nowhere boss. In the mean time, the Democrats will be fighting for us over the criminality already established.
No crime, no collusion, no conspiracy. 'insufficient evidence' is not grounds to impeach or go on another fishing expedition.
I suspect Nadler is a corrupt politician and since there is 'insufficient evidence' to indict him we still need to keep looking until we find something. Because we know he is guilty.
You are so way ahead of the rest of us on this board, and you are exactly right. Kudos! And try not to forget in the beginning of this investigation about the half a trillion dollar oil deal he probably had going on with Russia in the Kara sea. Russia needed sanctions lifted in order for them to get Exxon to move that oil for them.They're too friggin lazy, and they don't want to know the truth, because the truth has destroyed every talking point they've used to defend Trump since the beginning. The report reveals these Toads as total fools.so - again - what specific actions did trump do?Yes if I am innocent I put everything out in the open I don't try and hide it.
i never seem to get good answers here, just return rage and sideshow bobs.Have you bothered to read Mueller's report?so - again - what specific actions did trump do?
i never seem to get good answers here, just return rage and sideshow bobs.
Read the Mueller Report: Searchable Document and Index (Vol. II, P. 113)
"In late January 2018, the media reported that in June 2017 the President had ordered McGahn to have the Special Counsel fired based on purported conflicts of interest but McGahn had refused, saying he would quit instead.
"After the story broke, the President, through his personal counsel and two aides, sought to have McGahn deny that he had been directed to remove the Special Counsel.
"Each time he was approached, McGahn responded that he would not refute the press accounts because they were accurate in reporting on the President’s effort to have the Special Counsel removed.
"The President later personally met with McGahn in the Oval Office with only the Chief of Staff present and tried to get McGahn to say that the President never ordered him to fire the Special Counsel.
"McGahn refused and insisted his memory of the President’s direction to remove the Special Counsel was accurate.
"In that same meeting, the President challenged McGahn for taking notes of his discussions with the President and asked why he had told Special Counsel investigators that he had been directed to have the Special Counsel removed."
Why do you suppose the RNC doesn't want McGahn to testify under oath with all Americans watching?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9baae0d5571aI don't think Trump ever expected to win the White House.They're too friggin lazy, and they don't want to know the truth, because the truth has destroyed every talking point they've used to defend Trump since the beginning. The report reveals these Toads as total fools.
He wanted to launch Trump TV, and in order to make that happen he had to lure Roger Aisles. Sean Hannity, and Bill O'Reilly away from Fox. Had he finished second in the Republican primaries he would have burnished his brand sufficiently to launch his network.
MSM never investigated his many business conflicts or his lifelong contacts with organized crime figures.
A Republican congress protected Trump during his first two years. Now that Democrats control the House, he realizes it is only a matter of time before his financials become part of a public record.
When that happens even corporate Democrats are going to have to impeach a gold plated con man who should never been allowed to set foot in the White House.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...d346f0ec94f_story.html?utm_term=.0cd215ef8050
Keep following that yellow brick road to nowhere boss. In the mean time, the Democrats will be fighting for us over the criminality already established.
No crime, no collusion, no conspiracy. 'insufficient evidence' is not grounds to impeach or go on another fishing expedition.
I suspect Nadler is a corrupt politician and since there is 'insufficient evidence' to indict him we still need to keep looking until we find something. Because we know he is guilty.
It's a Constitutional responsibility to hold a president accountable.if they couldn't do anything with the results cause they knew it wouldn't happen - why did they do it?No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.
It's a Constitutional responsibility to hold a president accountable.if they couldn't do anything with the results cause they knew it wouldn't happen - why did they do it?No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.
~~~~~~
Did you consider the same logic when Obama was president?
Mueller Just Proved His Entire Operation Was A Political Hit Job That Trampled The Rule Of Law
At a hastily arranged Wednesday press conference, Special Counsel Robert Mueller proved that he was never interested in justice or the rule of law.
Mueller Just Proved His Entire Operation Was A Lawless Political Hit Job
May 29, 2019 ~ By Sean Davis
If there were any doubts about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s political intentions, his unprecedented press conference on Wednesday should put them all to rest. As he made abundantly clear during his doddering reading of a prepared statement that repeatedly contradicted itself, Mueller had no interest in the equal application of the rule of law. He gave the game, and his nakedly political intentions, away repeatedly throughout his statement.
“It is important that the office’s written work speak for itself,” Mueller said, referring to his office’s 448-page report. Mueller’s report was released to the public by Attorney General William Barr nearly six weeks ago. The entire report, minus limited redactions required by law, has been publicly available, pored through, and dissected. Its contents have been discussed ad nauseum in print and on television. The report has been speaking for itself since April 18, when it was released.
There’s no longer any doubt about who Robert Mueller is or why he conducted himself the way he did. As abominable as his press conference was, we should in many ways be thankful that Mueller so willingly displayed for all to see his disdain for basic rules of prosecutorial conduct, his total lack of self-awareness, and his naked desire to stick it to Trump.
~~~~~~
Mueller's stuttering on-the-verge-of-mental-breakdown performance today would actually make one feel sorry for the gramps if it wasn't for his repeated and intentional - in the service of furthering the insane Democrat Party "Collusion" narrative - waffling about the very fundamentals of American Justice System, what he says about "exonerating" is not the standard of a prosecutor, prosecutors exist to determine whether someone committed a chargeable offense, not whether they are exonerated of charges, people are presumed innocent, and the fact that he does this proves that Dirty Robert is taking an explicitly anti-Constitutional anti-American stand,
The old hound dog faced prosecutor was nothing but the face they put on Weissman's partisan investigation. Oh yes if the PMS/DSA Dems press this, the old dog should be put before the senate Judiciary committees Republicans for intense questioning. It would be popcorn time to see Lee, and Cruz both constitutional experts cross examine this guy.
Dottering off into the sunset…not so fast Mr. Mueller we have $35 million dollars worth of questions to ask. Mueller's stuttering on-the-verge-of-mental-breakdown performance today would actually make one feel sorry for the gramps if it wasn't for his repeated and intentional - in the service of furthering the insane Democrat Party "Collusion" narrative - waffling about the very fundamentals of American Justice System, what he says about "exonerating" is not the standard of a prosecutor, prosecutors exist to determine whether someone committed a chargeable offense, not whether they are exonerated of charges, people are presumed innocent, and the fact that he does this proves that Dirty Robert is taking an explicitly anti-Constitutional anti-American stand, questions.
Innocent until proven guilty Russians, but guilty until proven guilty The President of the USA.
Mueller could not have done his investigation if Trump obstructed.
It's a Constitutional responsibility to hold a president accountable.if they couldn't do anything with the results cause they knew it wouldn't happen - why did they do it?No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.
~~~~~~
Did you consider the same logic when Obama was president?
