Mueller Just Proved His Entire Operation Was A Political Hit Job That Trampled The Rule Of Law

[Leo123]

No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.

The Lefts wall is crumbling around them. Just going to get worse for them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How? Trump has been found guilty.

No he hasn't. Your fantasy world isn't reality. Mueller could find NO evidence of a crime. Now thinks he can just run away and avoid any tough questions. So show your link that proves Trump committed a crime and was found guilty or STFU.

It's in the Mueller report. There's at least eleven obstruction cases that have been confirmed for indictment if Mueller was allowed to do so. The fact that Trump toads are too lazy to read it is their fuck up. No one else's.

There are 0 proven cases of obstruction you dufus. If there were, don't you think that Democrats like Nadler would cite the Mueller report? The Mueller report is available to the Congress........So far NO ONE can find any thing to impeach Trump with.

 

[Leo123]

Basically he said he knew from the start that his work could not unseat Trump.
I think his and the libs agenda may have been farther apart than thought.

Yeah, Mueller knew from the start that he would find nothing. The investigation was to provide cover for FBI and CiA corruption (at the highest political levels) and a connection to the Hillary controlled DNC.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.

The Lefts wall is crumbling around them. Just going to get worse for them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Actually it looks like iit's crumbling around Trump Humpers.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.

He could be indicted, under the auspices of impeachment...."High crimes and misdemeanors".

The Mule couldn't even find sufficient evidence of that.

Suck it, loser.

This is what you call "Trump Humper Denial".

 

[Superbadbrutha]

No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.

Muelle'rs own report STATES that no American colluded with Russians in attempting to unlawfully influence the election. Not sure we can say the same for MI-6 agents involved. Democrats are trying for obstruction charges well after the investigation started. Of Course everyone knows Mueller couldn't indict if there was no crime.
And furthermore, The FBI had surveilance of Trump tower.... so if they had something besides partisan bullshit we would know about it.

On what page does his report state that no American colluded with Russians?

He couldn't indict because DOJ POLICY said he couldn't indict.

You already know about it, you are just the usual Trump Humper who is in denial.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.

He could be indicted, under the auspices of impeachment...."High crimes and misdemeanors".

The Mule couldn't even find sufficient evidence of that.

Suck it, loser.

That's a lie. There is evidence, and it is up to Congress. You folks are so damn ignorant.

Mueller didn’t recommend any charges because there is no evidence of a crime.

In fact the only crime we know that happened was that the Hussein administration spying on the Trump campaign.

He didn't bring any charges because he couldn't, the FIX was in before his investigation even started.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.

The Lefts wall is crumbling around them. Just going to get worse for them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How? Trump has been found guilty.

No he hasn't. Your fantasy world isn't reality. Mueller could find NO evidence of a crime. Now thinks he can just run away and avoid any tough questions. So show your link that proves Trump committed a crime and was found guilty or STFU.

It's in the Mueller report. There's at least eleven obstruction cases that have been confirmed for indictment if Mueller was allowed to do so. The fact that Trump toads are too lazy to read it is their fuck up. No one else's.

There are 0 proven cases of obstruction you dufus. If there were, don't you think that Democrats like Nadler would cite the Mueller report? The Mueller report is available to the Congress........So far NO ONE can find any thing to impeach Trump with.

Denial is a bitch, it's amazing how this transparent president is doing all he can to stay in the dark.

 

[Leo123]

The Lefts wall is crumbling around them. Just going to get worse for them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How? Trump has been found guilty.

No he hasn't. Your fantasy world isn't reality. Mueller could find NO evidence of a crime. Now thinks he can just run away and avoid any tough questions. So show your link that proves Trump committed a crime and was found guilty or STFU.

It's in the Mueller report. There's at least eleven obstruction cases that have been confirmed for indictment if Mueller was allowed to do so. The fact that Trump toads are too lazy to read it is their fuck up. No one else's.

There are 0 proven cases of obstruction you dufus. If there were, don't you think that Democrats like Nadler would cite the Mueller report? The Mueller report is available to the Congress........So far NO ONE can find any thing to impeach Trump with.

Denial is a bitch, it's amazing how this transparent president is doing all he can to stay in the dark.

Troll. ^^^^^

 

[Superbadbrutha]

How? Trump has been found guilty.

No he hasn't. Your fantasy world isn't reality. Mueller could find NO evidence of a crime. Now thinks he can just run away and avoid any tough questions. So show your link that proves Trump committed a crime and was found guilty or STFU.

It's in the Mueller report. There's at least eleven obstruction cases that have been confirmed for indictment if Mueller was allowed to do so. The fact that Trump toads are too lazy to read it is their fuck up. No one else's.

There are 0 proven cases of obstruction you dufus. If there were, don't you think that Democrats like Nadler would cite the Mueller report? The Mueller report is available to the Congress........So far NO ONE can find any thing to impeach Trump with.

Denial is a bitch, it's amazing how this transparent president is doing all he can to stay in the dark.

Troll. ^^^^^

Ass clown.

 

[2aguy]

This is a good look at mueller's last hit at Trump....

4 Key Takeaways From Robert Mueller's Farewell Address

2. Mueller’s Investigation Never Should Have Included Obstruction by Trump. Mueller then moved on to his explanation of his investigation of obstruction. Unlike the election interference investigation, which began as a counterintelligence investigation inside the FBI, the obstruction investigation began as a criminal investigation — and a criminal investigation that Mueller admits he never had the authority to conclude. Mueller stated regarding Russian interference,
------

Yet Mueller proceeded to write two hundred pages about Trump himself, and his conduct. This means that Mueller spent tens of millions of dollars and years of time investigating unindictable conduct. So what the hell was he doing? Mueller provided two separate explanations for the investigation of Trump’s conduct: first, he said, the investigation was permitted because it is “important to preserve evidence while memories are fresh and documents available.” Evidence of what, though? A crime? But Mueller refused to allege a crime. So evidence of something — something that wasn’t prosecutable right now, and that Mueller refused to suggest amounted to a crime for the future.

3. Mueller Wants Trump To Go Down, But Wouldn’t Call For Prosecution. Mueller infamously stated that there was “insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy.” So far, so good. That’s a prosecutorial statement in prosecutorial language. But then Mueller wildly exceeded his brief. In fact, he pulled a James Comey: he effectively indicted Trump for supposed non-crimes publicly, the same way Comey did Hillary Clinton. Of course, he said he would never do that: “It would be unfair to potentially — it would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge.”

That’s pretty rich, coming just paragraphs after Mueller accused Trump of a non-crime without the possibility of resolution of the actual charge:

4. Mueller Didn’t Expose Barr As A Perjurer Or Obstructor Of Justice. Barr stated in public testimony that Mueller told him “several times in a group meeting that he was not saying that but for the OLC opinion he would have found obstruction.” Here, Mueller stated that he could not prosecute, and that he would not say whether Trump had committed a crime. These two statements are not actually in conflict. Mueller may well have told Barr that he had not reached a determination on obstruction, and that he saw no reason to do so. That’s what he told the public, after all. Furthermore, Mueller explained that he didn’t question Barr’s “good faith” in his decision to “make the entire report public all at once.” So much for Barr’s supposed obstruction.

 

[DGS49]

One person's opinion: Mueller proved himself a political hack and a coward.

The main thrust of his 9-minute, self-serving speech was that everything he wanted to say was included in his lengthy but grossly incomplete "Report."

Specifically, he is trying his best NEVER to answer the questions (by Republicans) that his report DEMANDS, to wit, "When did you realize that there was no conspiracy between operatives of the Russian Federation and the Trump Campaign?"

"Why did you not announce that fact publicly, given the fact that a sitting President was being slandered constantly in Congress and in the Media for the past two plus years?"

And so on.

He said NOTHING that had not already been stated in his Report. Why are Democrats acting like "This changes everything!"?

 

[georgephillip]

Mueller Just Proved His Entire Operation Was A Political Hit Job That Trampled The Rule Of Law
At a hastily arranged Wednesday press conference, Special Counsel Robert Mueller proved that he was never interested in justice or the rule of law.​

Mueller Just Proved His Entire Operation Was A Lawless Political Hit Job
May 29, 2019 ~ By Sean Davis
If there were any doubts about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s political intentions, his unprecedented press conference on Wednesday should put them all to rest. As he made abundantly clear during his doddering reading of a prepared statement that repeatedly contradicted itself, Mueller had no interest in the equal application of the rule of law. He gave the game, and his nakedly political intentions, away repeatedly throughout his statement.
“It is important that the office’s written work speak for itself,” Mueller said, referring to his office’s 448-page report. Mueller’s report was released to the public by Attorney General William Barr nearly six weeks ago. The entire report, minus limited redactions required by law, has been publicly available, pored through, and dissected. Its contents have been discussed ad nauseum in print and on television. The report has been speaking for itself since April 18, when it was released.
There’s no longer any doubt about who Robert Mueller is or why he conducted himself the way he did. As abominable as his press conference was, we should in many ways be thankful that Mueller so willingly displayed for all to see his disdain for basic rules of prosecutorial conduct, his total lack of self-awareness, and his naked desire to stick it to Trump.

~~~~~~
Mueller's stuttering on-the-verge-of-mental-breakdown performance today would actually make one feel sorry for the gramps if it wasn't for his repeated and intentional - in the service of furthering the insane Democrat Party "Collusion" narrative - waffling about the very fundamentals of American Justice System, what he says about "exonerating" is not the standard of a prosecutor, prosecutors exist to determine whether someone committed a chargeable offense, not whether they are exonerated of charges, people are presumed innocent, and the fact that he does this proves that Dirty Robert is taking an explicitly anti-Constitutional anti-American stand,
The old hound dog faced prosecutor was nothing but the face they put on Weissman's partisan investigation. Oh yes if the PMS/DSA Dems press this, the old dog should be put before the senate Judiciary committees Republicans for intense questioning. It would be popcorn time to see Lee, and Cruz both constitutional experts cross examine this guy.
Dottering off into the sunset…not so fast Mr. Mueller we have $35 million dollars worth of questions to ask. Mueller's stuttering on-the-verge-of-mental-breakdown performance today would actually make one feel sorry for the gramps if it wasn't for his repeated and intentional - in the service of furthering the insane Democrat Party "Collusion" narrative - waffling about the very fundamentals of American Justice System, what he says about "exonerating" is not the standard of a prosecutor, prosecutors exist to determine whether someone committed a chargeable offense, not whether they are exonerated of charges, people are presumed innocent, and the fact that he does this proves that Dirty Robert is taking an explicitly anti-Constitutional anti-American stand, questions.
Innocent until proven guilty Russians, but guilty until proven guilty The President of the USA.
Mueller could not have done his investigation if Trump obstructed.

Why is Trump afraid of revealing his finances?

“Trump, Inc.” and Former FBI Deputy Chief Andrew McCabe Compare Notes — ProPublica

"Bernstein: There is a mountain of evidence suggesting a Trump-Russia thing. But so far no one — not not us, not you, not Robert Mueller — has been able to say what that thing is.

"And as you have puzzled over this relationship, does it seem possible that there in fact isn’t a thing?

"McCabe: I think that mountain of evidence that you referred to makes it strongly likely that there is a thing. Does that mean we’ll ever figure out what it is? No. But it certainly means we should keep looking.

"If you look at even just the Trumps’ history with Deutsche Bank: It’s almost impossible to look at those series of relationships and transactions and defaults and failures followed by more and more loans.

"There has to be a thing at the core of that relationship between the Trump Organization and Deutsche Bank.

"Do we know what it is just yet? No. Will we ever? I’m not sure, but we certainly should keep looking."

 

[iceberg]

No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.

if they couldn't do anything with the results cause they knew it wouldn't happen - why did they do it?

 

[Superbadbrutha]

No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.

if they couldn't do anything with the results cause they knew it wouldn't happen - why did they do it?

That's a damn good question, since we know for a fact Trump was working hard to end it they probably never thought it would go this far.

 

[iceberg]

No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.

if they couldn't do anything with the results cause they knew it wouldn't happen - why did they do it?

That's a damn good question, since we know for a fact Trump was working hard to end it they probably never thought it would go this far.

so - you can't answer the question. you just lob more asinine speculation on top of your previous bullshit but can't answer questions of logic.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.

if they couldn't do anything with the results cause they knew it wouldn't happen - why did they do it?

That's a damn good question, since we know for a fact Trump was working hard to end it they probably never thought it would go this far.

so - you can't answer the question. you just lob more asinine speculation on top of your previous bullshit but can't answer questions of logic.

Was Trump working behind the scenes to end the investigation?

 

[iceberg]

No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.

if they couldn't do anything with the results cause they knew it wouldn't happen - why did they do it?

That's a damn good question, since we know for a fact Trump was working hard to end it they probably never thought it would go this far.

so - you can't answer the question. you just lob more asinine speculation on top of your previous bullshit but can't answer questions of logic.

Was Trump working behind the scenes to end the investigation?

dunno. but if he was, was it to hide guilt or he knew he didn't do it and wanted to end the madness? if you were accused of a crime you didn't commit, would you defend yourself?

now - what specific actions did he do to obstruct?

 

[Superbadbrutha]

No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.

if they couldn't do anything with the results cause they knew it wouldn't happen - why did they do it?

That's a damn good question, since we know for a fact Trump was working hard to end it they probably never thought it would go this far.

so - you can't answer the question. you just lob more asinine speculation on top of your previous bullshit but can't answer questions of logic.

Was Trump working behind the scenes to end the investigation?

dunno. but if he was, was it to hide guilt or he knew he didn't do it and wanted to end the madness? if you were accused of a crime you didn't commit, would you defend yourself?

now - what specific actions did he do to obstruct?

Yes if I am innocent I put everything out in the open I don't try and hide it.

 

[iceberg]

if they couldn't do anything with the results cause they knew it wouldn't happen - why did they do it?

That's a damn good question, since we know for a fact Trump was working hard to end it they probably never thought it would go this far.

so - you can't answer the question. you just lob more asinine speculation on top of your previous bullshit but can't answer questions of logic.

Was Trump working behind the scenes to end the investigation?

dunno. but if he was, was it to hide guilt or he knew he didn't do it and wanted to end the madness? if you were accused of a crime you didn't commit, would you defend yourself?

now - what specific actions did he do to obstruct?

Yes if I am innocent I put everything out in the open I don't try and hide it.

so - again - what specific actions did trump do?

i never seem to get good answers here, just return rage and sideshow bobs.

 

[Doc7505]

if they couldn't do anything with the results cause they knew it wouldn't happen - why did they do it?

That's a damn good question, since we know for a fact Trump was working hard to end it they probably never thought it would go this far.

so - you can't answer the question. you just lob more asinine speculation on top of your previous bullshit but can't answer questions of logic.

Was Trump working behind the scenes to end the investigation?

dunno. but if he was, was it to hide guilt or he knew he didn't do it and wanted to end the madness? if you were accused of a crime you didn't commit, would you defend yourself?

now - what specific actions did he do to obstruct?

Yes if I am innocent I put everything out in the open I don't try and hide it.

If that's the case, why are you and all your fellow travelers soiling your underwear because Trump declassified the FISA documents?