Mueller Just Proved His Entire Operation Was A Political Hit Job That Trampled The Rule Of Law

No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.

The Lefts wall is crumbling around them. Just going to get worse for them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How? Trump has been found guilty.

No he hasn't. Your fantasy world isn't reality. Mueller could find NO evidence of a crime. Now thinks he can just run away and avoid any tough questions. So show your link that proves Trump committed a crime and was found guilty or STFU.
It's in the Mueller report. There's at least eleven obstruction cases that have been confirmed for indictment if Mueller was allowed to do so. The fact that Trump toads are too lazy to read it is their fuck up. No one else's.

Can't obstruct a non-crime.

Next.
 
No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.
He could be indicted, under the auspices of impeachment...."High crimes and misdemeanors".

The Mule couldn't even find sufficient evidence of that.

Suck it, loser.
That's a lie. There is evidence, and it is up to Congress. You folks are so damn ignorant.
If there was enough evidence, a criminal referral would and should have been made....But there wasn't...Game over.

Suck it, loser.
 
so - again - what specific actions did trump do?

i never seem to get good answers here, just return rage and sideshow bobs.
so - again - what specific actions did trump do?

i never seem to get good answers here, just return rage and sideshow bobs.
Have you bothered to read Mueller's report?

Read the Mueller Report: Searchable Document and Index (Vol. II, P. 113)

"In late January 2018, the media reported that in June 2017 the President had ordered McGahn to have the Special Counsel fired based on purported conflicts of interest but McGahn had refused, saying he would quit instead.

"After the story broke, the President, through his personal counsel and two aides, sought to have McGahn deny that he had been directed to remove the Special Counsel.

"Each time he was approached, McGahn responded that he would not refute the press accounts because they were accurate in reporting on the President’s effort to have the Special Counsel removed.

"The President later personally met with McGahn in the Oval Office with only the Chief of Staff present and tried to get McGahn to say that the President never ordered him to fire the Special Counsel.

"McGahn refused and insisted his memory of the President’s direction to remove the Special Counsel was accurate.

"In that same meeting, the President challenged McGahn for taking notes of his discussions with the President and asked why he had told Special Counsel investigators that he had been directed to have the Special Counsel removed."

Why do you suppose the RNC doesn't want McGahn to testify under oath with all Americans watching?
D7Fw0YLWwAA6-ha.jpg

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9baae0d5571a
They're too friggin lazy, and they don't want to know the truth, because the truth has destroyed every talking point they've used to defend Trump since the beginning. The report reveals these Toads as total fools.
They're too friggin lazy, and they don't want to know the truth, because the truth has destroyed every talking point they've used to defend Trump since the beginning. The report reveals these Toads as total fools.
I don't think Trump ever expected to win the White House.
He wanted to launch Trump TV, and in order to make that happen he had to lure Roger Aisles. Sean Hannity, and Bill O'Reilly away from Fox. Had he finished second in the Republican primaries he would have burnished his brand sufficiently to launch his network.

MSM never investigated his many business conflicts or his lifelong contacts with organized crime figures.

A Republican congress protected Trump during his first two years. Now that Democrats control the House, he realizes it is only a matter of time before his financials become part of a public record.

When that happens even corporate Democrats are going to have to impeach a gold plated con man who should never been allowed to set foot in the White House.
be8f28b58bf8ef572368fa2f2726dd77

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...d346f0ec94f_story.html?utm_term=.0cd215ef8050
You are so way ahead of the rest of us on this board, and you are exactly right. Kudos! And try not to forget in the beginning of this investigation about the half a trillion dollar oil deal he probably had going on with Russia in the Kara sea. Russia needed sanctions lifted in order for them to get Exxon to move that oil for them.

Follow the money from Hillary to Russia and from Russia to the Clinton Foundation.

Post the map.
 
No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.
if they couldn't do anything with the results cause they knew it wouldn't happen - why did they do it?
It's a Constitutional responsibility to hold a president accountable.


~~~~~~
Did you consider the same logic when Obama was president?

If Pres. Obama had done a 1/4 of the shit this administration has engaged in, you right wingers would have been calling for his head on a pike.
 
Let the indictments begin...
And then we will have a discussion about infrastructure that will specifically address the need for prisons to secure the criminals who attempted to overthrow our government and destroy our government for our enemies.

This is so much fun.
 
No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.

The Lefts wall is crumbling around them. Just going to get worse for them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How? Trump has been found guilty.

No he hasn't. Your fantasy world isn't reality. Mueller could find NO evidence of a crime. Now thinks he can just run away and avoid any tough questions. So show your link that proves Trump committed a crime and was found guilty or STFU.
It's in the Mueller report. There's at least eleven obstruction cases that have been confirmed for indictment if Mueller was allowed to do so. The fact that Trump toads are too lazy to read it is their fuck up. No one else's.

Can't obstruct a non-crime.

Next.

False. What do you think happened with Tricky Dick.
 
No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.
if they couldn't do anything with the results cause they knew it wouldn't happen - why did they do it?
It's a Constitutional responsibility to hold a president accountable.


~~~~~~
Did you consider the same logic when Obama was president?

If Pres. Obama had done a 1/4 of the shit this administration has engaged in, you right wingers would have been calling for his head on a pike.

What is it that this admin engaged in again?

"The Mueller report flatly states that Russia began interfering in American democracy in 2014. Over the next couple of years, the effort blossomed into a robust attempt to interfere in our 2016 presidential election. The Obama administration knew this was going on and yet did nothing."

Mueller's report looks bad for Obama (opinion) - CNN
 
No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.
He could be indicted, under the auspices of impeachment...."High crimes and misdemeanors".

The Mule couldn't even find sufficient evidence of that.

Suck it, loser.
That's a lie. There is evidence, and it is up to Congress. You folks are so damn ignorant.
If there was enough evidence, a criminal referral would and should have been made....But there wasn't...Game over.

Suck it, loser.

That is why he left it to the Congress, so suck on that.
 
No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.
if they couldn't do anything with the results cause they knew it wouldn't happen - why did they do it?
It's a Constitutional responsibility to hold a president accountable.


~~~~~~
Did you consider the same logic when Obama was president?

If Pres. Obama had done a 1/4 of the shit this administration has engaged in, you right wingers would have been calling for his head on a pike.

What is it that this admin engaged in again?

"The Mueller report flatly states that Russia began interfering in American democracy in 2014. Over the next couple of years, the effort blossomed into a robust attempt to interfere in our 2016 presidential election. The Obama administration knew this was going on and yet did nothing."

Mueller's report looks bad for Obama (opinion) - CNN

Unfortunately for you Mueller wasn't investigating the Obama Administration.

What does Volume II of the Mueller investigation state?
 
"Two years have been spent fomenting the idea that Russia only interfered because it had a willing, colluding partner: Trump. Now that Mueller has popped that balloon, we must ask why this collusion narrative was invented in the first place.

"Given Obama's record on Russia, one operating theory is that his people needed a smokescreen to obscure just how wrong they were."

"...the Mueller report makes it clear that the Russian interference failure was Obama's alone. He was the commander-in-chief when all of this happened. In 2010, he and Eric Holder, his Attorney General, declined to prosecute Julian Assange, who then went on to help Russia hack the Democratic National Committee's emails in 2016. He arguably chose to prioritize his relationship with Putin vis-à-vis Iran over pushing back against Russian election interference that had been going on for at least two years."

"If you consider Russian election interference a crisis for our democracy, then you cannot read the Mueller report, adding it to the available public evidence, and conclude anything other than Barack Obama spectacularly failed America. Subsequent investigations of this matter should explore how and why Obama's White House failed, and whether they invented the collusion narrative to cover up those failures."

Mueller's report looks bad for Obama (opinion) - CNN

Ouch. CNN even.
 
if they couldn't do anything with the results cause they knew it wouldn't happen - why did they do it?
It's a Constitutional responsibility to hold a president accountable.


~~~~~~
Did you consider the same logic when Obama was president?

If Pres. Obama had done a 1/4 of the shit this administration has engaged in, you right wingers would have been calling for his head on a pike.

What is it that this admin engaged in again?

"The Mueller report flatly states that Russia began interfering in American democracy in 2014. Over the next couple of years, the effort blossomed into a robust attempt to interfere in our 2016 presidential election. The Obama administration knew this was going on and yet did nothing."

Mueller's report looks bad for Obama (opinion) - CNN

Unfortunately for you Mueller wasn't investigating the Obama Administration.

What does Volume II of the Mueller investigation state?
However, the only collusion they exposed was the collusion of Obama.

If it's a crime ifTrump did it, it is also a crime when it is proven that it was Obama who did it.
Democrats are just dumb about this stuff lol.
 
Last edited:
No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.
He could be indicted, under the auspices of impeachment...."High crimes and misdemeanors".

The Mule couldn't even find sufficient evidence of that.

Suck it, loser.
That's a lie. There is evidence, and it is up to Congress. You folks are so damn ignorant.
If there was enough evidence, a criminal referral would and should have been made....But there wasn't...Game over.

Suck it, loser.

That is why he left it to the Congress, so suck on that.
I can't find any evidence that you don't suck dicks at the bus station, so we'll have to let congress decide that.
 
No he just proved that Trump and his minions knew that Mueller couldn't indict him before his investigation even started.
He could be indicted, under the auspices of impeachment...."High crimes and misdemeanors".

The Mule couldn't even find sufficient evidence of that.

Suck it, loser.
That's a lie. There is evidence, and it is up to Congress. You folks are so damn ignorant.
If there was enough evidence, a criminal referral would and should have been made....But there wasn't...Game over.

Suck it, loser.

That is why he left it to the Congress, so suck on that.
I can't find any evidence that you don't suck dicks at the bus station, so we'll have to let congress decide that.

The stupidity on this forum never ends.
 
He could be indicted, under the auspices of impeachment...."High crimes and misdemeanors".

The Mule couldn't even find sufficient evidence of that.

Suck it, loser.
That's a lie. There is evidence, and it is up to Congress. You folks are so damn ignorant.
If there was enough evidence, a criminal referral would and should have been made....But there wasn't...Game over.

Suck it, loser.

That is why he left it to the Congress, so suck on that.
I can't find any evidence that you don't suck dicks at the bus station, so we'll have to let congress decide that.

The stupidity on this forum never ends.
It's called demonstrating absurdity by being absurd.

In the western common law legal system of the last several centuries, you don't prove negatives, dullard.
 
Mueller Just Proved His Entire Operation Was A Political Hit Job That Trampled The Rule Of Law
At a hastily arranged Wednesday press conference, Special Counsel Robert Mueller proved that he was never interested in justice or the rule of law.



Mueller Just Proved His Entire Operation Was A Lawless Political Hit Job
May 29, 2019 ~ By Sean Davis
If there were any doubts about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s political intentions, his unprecedented press conference on Wednesday should put them all to rest. As he made abundantly clear during his doddering reading of a prepared statement that repeatedly contradicted itself, Mueller had no interest in the equal application of the rule of law. He gave the game, and his nakedly political intentions, away repeatedly throughout his statement.
“It is important that the office’s written work speak for itself,” Mueller said, referring to his office’s 448-page report. Mueller’s report was released to the public by Attorney General William Barr nearly six weeks ago. The entire report, minus limited redactions required by law, has been publicly available, pored through, and dissected. Its contents have been discussed ad nauseum in print and on television. The report has been speaking for itself since April 18, when it was released.
There’s no longer any doubt about who Robert Mueller is or why he conducted himself the way he did. As abominable as his press conference was, we should in many ways be thankful that Mueller so willingly displayed for all to see his disdain for basic rules of prosecutorial conduct, his total lack of self-awareness, and his naked desire to stick it to Trump.

~~~~~~
Mueller's stuttering on-the-verge-of-mental-breakdown performance today would actually make one feel sorry for the gramps if it wasn't for his repeated and intentional - in the service of furthering the insane Democrat Party "Collusion" narrative - waffling about the very fundamentals of American Justice System, what he says about "exonerating" is not the standard of a prosecutor, prosecutors exist to determine whether someone committed a chargeable offense, not whether they are exonerated of charges, people are presumed innocent, and the fact that he does this proves that Dirty Robert is taking an explicitly anti-Constitutional anti-American stand,
The old hound dog faced prosecutor was nothing but the face they put on Weissman's partisan investigation. Oh yes if the PMS/DSA Dems press this, the old dog should be put before the senate Judiciary committees Republicans for intense questioning. It would be popcorn time to see Lee, and Cruz both constitutional experts cross examine this guy.
Dottering off into the sunset…not so fast Mr. Mueller we have $35 million dollars worth of questions to ask. Mueller's stuttering on-the-verge-of-mental-breakdown performance today would actually make one feel sorry for the gramps if it wasn't for his repeated and intentional - in the service of furthering the insane Democrat Party "Collusion" narrative - waffling about the very fundamentals of American Justice System, what he says about "exonerating" is not the standard of a prosecutor, prosecutors exist to determine whether someone committed a chargeable offense, not whether they are exonerated of charges, people are presumed innocent, and the fact that he does this proves that Dirty Robert is taking an explicitly anti-Constitutional anti-American stand, questions.
Innocent until proven guilty Russians, but guilty until proven guilty The President of the USA.
Mueller could not have done his investigation if Trump obstructed.
Hes a fucking lowlife scumbag. He was never supposed to find Trump completely innocent, that's complete political hackery.

Whitey Bulgers last words, "Tell the Warden I want to make a full confession regarding several Prostitutes who went missing in Boston and Mueller helped me get rid of the bodies"
Your non-argument is so helpful. Thanks!
 
The Lefts wall is crumbling around them. Just going to get worse for them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How? Trump has been found guilty.

No he hasn't. Your fantasy world isn't reality. Mueller could find NO evidence of a crime. Now thinks he can just run away and avoid any tough questions. So show your link that proves Trump committed a crime and was found guilty or STFU.
It's in the Mueller report. There's at least eleven obstruction cases that have been confirmed for indictment if Mueller was allowed to do so. The fact that Trump toads are too lazy to read it is their fuck up. No one else's.

Can't obstruct a non-crime.

Next.

False. What do you think happened with Tricky Dick.

True. You can't obstruct a non-crime.

"Justice" in "obstruction of justice" means obstruction of the prosecution of a crime. If there is no crime, there is no obstruction. Look it up. "Obstruction of justice" is an intent crime. You must have intended to interfere with a criminal investigation in order for it to be true. If there is no underlying crime there can be no intent to obstruct it.

You really need to learn your laws before you spew forth your verbal garbage.
 

Forum List

Back
Top