Polishprince
Diamond Member
- Jun 8, 2016
- 45,802
- 35,399
Is this one of those supposed facts in the OP?Because this klutz knows there is zero evidence to prove any of the charges in the indictment to a jury who, unlike a DC grand jury, may actually be awake and paying attention.
What I know is this.
Mueller got an indictment because he said he had evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to PROVE the defendant, Concord Management, guilty of the crime of Russian Collusion beyond a reasonable doubt.
And now they are saying they don't.
That tells me this whole line of bullshit about Russian Collusion is a fraud.
And it leads to the question as to why Mueller and his cronies put on this charade, was it part of the coup against the American people for picking the "wrong" candidate in 2016?