Mueller : Trump is guilty of obstruction. Congress should handle it. Don't bother me again.

[Redfish]

Most important thing said: MUELLER: 'If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so'

MUELLER: 'If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so'

But, the GOP are going to continue to spin, spin, spin!

except thats not what he said. what he said is: I think he must be guilty because I don't like him and he beat hillary, but I can't prove it so lets continue this bullshit and hope it helps the dems next year.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

"Trump’s days as the most corrupt, bigoted and traitorous president in US history are numbered. The most patriotic thing Trump could do at this point is resign." - Rep Waters

Sorry bub, O already sailed that most corrupt boat. You're a day late and a pena and nena behind.

 

[Redfish]

Why is this not in the Conspiracy section????
All we have now is libbies rehashing what has already been disproven.

10 cases of obstruction HAVE NOT been disprove

Where does the burden of proof lie?

With the accuser

Who must demonstrate corrupt intent.
Something Mueller could not do.

Congress The House

based on what? does congress have evidence that Mueller did not have? Do Schiff and Swalwell have the "proof" they claim to have? if so, why didn't they give it to Mueller?

 

[mudwhistle]

It does, however, require a specific motive,m which Mueller could not find.

What could possibly be Trump's motive in obstructing investigations that were trying to discover evidence that he colluded with the Russians to win the election?

Burden of proof lies with the accuser.

There are 10 examples of obstruction in Muellers report

There are 10 examples of -potential- obstruction in the report.
For -actual- obstruction to exist, corrupt intent must be proven.
Burden of proof lies with the accuser.

Hows firing Comey when he wouldn't halt russian investigation? And preventing his lawyer from testifying to tell how he was told to lie for trump? An impeachment hearing should clear that up ,,,,,,,,,,,,and give the chance for the trump ass kissers in the senate to keep him in the WH

The congressional investigation has nothing to do with the Mueller Probe.

 

[mudwhistle]

FOX NEWS Shooter
Mueller report outlines Trump 'crimes,' but no obstruction conclusion because Barr wouldn't permit indictment: Judge Nap

Wrong.

 

[edward37]

From tigerreds post
The Trump team is now daring Mueller to testify, after .....keep this in mind....after the shit for brains said, he does not want to testify.....So leave it to team Trump to now go on record and say to his American Stupid.....Mueller doesn't want to testify and say to my face and my adoring Nazi Nuts, in the senate and congressional GOP lap dogs that I'm guilty as hell.

So to Robert Mueller, please call this clown on his dare, agree to testify and put a period behind a history that will leave you and the country victorious in getting rid of a treasonous low life clown who should be behind bars having his butt hole pierced, by every minority he's bravely attacked with secret service looking on!!

 

[OKTexas]

It does, however, require a specific motive,m which Mueller could not find.

What could possibly be Trump's motive in obstructing investigations that were trying to discover evidence that he colluded with the Russians to win the election?

Burden of proof lies with the accuser.

There are 10 examples of obstruction in Muellers report

There are 10 examples of -potential- obstruction in the report.
For -actual- obstruction to exist, corrupt intent must be proven.
Burden of proof lies with the accuser.

Hows firing Comey when he wouldn't halt russian investigation? And preventing his lawyer from testifying to tell how he was told to lie for trump? An impeachment hearing should clear that up ,,,,,,,,,,,,and give the chance for the trump ass kissers in the senate to keep him in the WH

That's not why he fired Comey and you commies know it.

.

 

[edward37]

What could possibly be Trump's motive in obstructing investigations that were trying to discover evidence that he colluded with the Russians to win the election?

Burden of proof lies with the accuser.

There are 10 examples of obstruction in Muellers report

There are 10 examples of -potential- obstruction in the report.
For -actual- obstruction to exist, corrupt intent must be proven.
Burden of proof lies with the accuser.

Hows firing Comey when he wouldn't halt russian investigation? And preventing his lawyer from testifying to tell how he was told to lie for trump? An impeachment hearing should clear that up ,,,,,,,,,,,,and give the chance for the trump ass kissers in the senate to keep him in the WH

That's not why he fired Comey and you commies know it.

.

OH then it was because Comey wouldn't kiss is ass like Barr has Right?

 

[edward37]

10 cases of obstruction HAVE NOT been disprove

Where does the burden of proof lie?

With the accuser

Who must demonstrate corrupt intent.
Something Mueller could not do.

Congress The House

based on what? does congress have evidence that Mueller did not have? Do Schiff and Swalwell have the "proof" they claim to have? if so, why didn't they give it to Mueller?

Why didn't Barr tell Meuller he could accuse ? Wait till those 10 charges are brought to light Then you'll find what scum you support But knowing most of the dotards here even then they'll still support trump

 

[mudwhistle]

Apparently, since no evidence is needed anymore for impeachment, Rs should adopt this method when the next D becomes president.

Maybe we should just wait till the election is certified in 2024 and begin impeachment hearings before the next Democrat is sworn in. So they can be sworn in and forced out the same day.

 

[OKTexas]

Why is this not in the Conspiracy section????
All we have now is libbies rehashing what has already been disproven.

10 cases of obstruction HAVE NOT been disproven

The American standard is they have to be proven. They haven't been and won't be.

.

 

[edward37]

Apparently, since no evidence is needed anymore for impeachment, Rs should adopt this method when the next D becomes president.

Maybe we should just wait till the election is certified in 2024 and begin impeachment hearings before the next Democrat is sworn in. So they can be sworn in and forced out the same day.

Best to wait when we kick this vile pos trump out of the WH in 2020 so no statute of limitations for the pig

 

[mudwhistle]

Apparently, since no evidence is needed anymore for impeachment, Rs should adopt this method when the next D becomes president.

Maybe we should just wait till the election is certified in 2024 and begin impeachment hearings before the next Democrat is sworn in. So they can be sworn in and forced out the same day.

Best to wait when we kick this vile pos trump out of the WH in 2020 so no statute of limitations for the pig

Don't hold your breath.... PIG FUCKER!!

You scumbags have been saying this shit since November 2016.

 

[M14 Shooter]

well of course no one interfered; that's why Mueller documented at least TEN, yes, no less that TEN obstructive acts by Trump.

Your post is a lie.
Mueller did not determine that any of those acts were an obstruction of justice..
Not one.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Why is this not in the Conspiracy section????
All we have now is libbies rehashing what has already been disproven.

10 cases of obstruction HAVE NOT been disprove

Where does the burden of proof lie?

With the accuser

Who must demonstrate corrupt intent.
Something Mueller could not do.

Congress The House

Mueller could not concretely demonstrate corrupt intent - why do you think the house can?
Your feeelings?

 

[OKTexas]

Mueller clearly walked a fine line, implicating Trump enuff to do nothing more than to imply it is up to Congress to exercise their authority to act as a check on the abuse of power by the executive; just as The Constitution intended.

One would have to be a fool to think that Trump did not obstruct Mueller, Comey, and now congress. When Trumps fights, he uses every means at his disposal. Issues of legality, he leaves to his lawyers.

Exactly what did he do that affected Mueller doing his job?

.

obviously you did not read the report; you so funny

What's wrong commie, can't answer the question. The fact is Mueller completed his investigation, NO ONE interfered with him.

.

well of course no one interfered; that's why Mueller documented at least TEN, yes, no less that TEN obstructive acts by Trump.
See my signature? You can go & read it all, right there.

Yet he couldn't make a decision, go figure. BTW which of those potential acts were not within the presidents Article 2 powers?

.

 

[edward37]

Apparently, since no evidence is needed anymore for impeachment, Rs should adopt this method when the next D becomes president.

Maybe we should just wait till the election is certified in 2024 and begin impeachment hearings before the next Democrat is sworn in. So they can be sworn in and forced out the same day.

Best to wait when we kick this vile pos trump out of the WH in 2020 so no statute of limitations for the pig

Don't hold your breath.... PIG FUCKER!!

You scumbags have been saying this shit since November 2016.

We have been ,and it's becoming more true each and every day that you AH's put a lying crazy POS in our WH and hopefully, people like you get what you deserve

 

[caddo kid]

One would have to be a fool to think that Trump did not obstruct Mueller, Comey, and now congress. When Trumps fights, he uses every means at his disposal. Issues of legality, he leaves to his lawyers.

Exactly what did he do that affected Mueller doing his job?

.

obviously you did not read the report; you so funny

What's wrong commie, can't answer the question. The fact is Mueller completed his investigation, NO ONE interfered with him.

.

well of course no one interfered; that's why Mueller documented at least TEN, yes, no less that TEN obstructive acts by Trump.
See my signature? You can go & read it all, right there.

Yet he couldn't make a decision, go figure. BTW which of those potential acts were not within the presidents Article 2 powers?

.

each obstructive act is thoroughly analyzed within the report; you can read it in the report

 

[M14 Shooter]

each obstructive act is thoroughly analyzed within the report; you can read it in the report

And yet, Mueller did not determine that any of those acts were an obstruction of justice..
Not one.
Why do you need to lie to make a point?

 

[OKTexas]

Burden of proof lies with the accuser.

There are 10 examples of obstruction in Muellers report

There are 10 examples of -potential- obstruction in the report.
For -actual- obstruction to exist, corrupt intent must be proven.
Burden of proof lies with the accuser.

Hows firing Comey when he wouldn't halt russian investigation? And preventing his lawyer from testifying to tell how he was told to lie for trump? An impeachment hearing should clear that up ,,,,,,,,,,,,and give the chance for the trump ass kissers in the senate to keep him in the WH

That's not why he fired Comey and you commies know it.

.

OH then it was because Comey wouldn't kiss is ass like Barr has Right?

Nope, Comey refused to say in public what he was telling Trump in private about Trump not personally being a target of the investigation, even when directed by his boss to do so. Subordinates that refuse the lawful orders from their superiors tend to become unemployed.

.